Button battery and magnet ingestions in the pediatric patient.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric foreign body ingestion is a common occurrence that presents a challenge both to pediatric gastroenterologists and primary care providers. Increasing prevalence of smaller, more technologically advanced toys in the household has resulted in an increased exposure to higher voltage batteries and powerful magnets that carry a high incidence of morbidity and mortality. This review highlights the latest findings regarding the patients at risk for button battery and magnet ingestions, the symptoms of presentation, and complications of these objects in contributing to long-standing gastrointestinal injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Button batteries may lead to esophageal injury within a few hours. Batteries retained in the esophagus are larger in diameter on average and size is associated with esophageal impaction as well as higher grade esophageal injury. Magnet ingestions, when multiple or with another metallic object, are often initially asymptomatic but may have acute worsening, and therefore warrant close monitoring. SUMMARY: Button battery and magnet ingestions have increased in incidence over the past two decades. Recent literature demonstrates that higher voltage, larger lithium button batteries, and prevalence of high-powered magnets can lead to significant morbidity. High suspicion, early referral, and removal may lead to improved outcomes.

Simultaneous surgical and interventional radiological approach to treat complicated biliary strictures after pediatric liver transplantation.

Post-transplantation biliary strictures occur in 5-15% of the pediatric liver transplant patients and are conventionally managed by interventional radiological techniques. Failure of this treatment leads to reoperation and sometimes to retransplantation. Herein, we describe a surgical approach and interventional radiologic approach to manage biliary strictures that failed the conventional radiologic treatment, in order to avoid retransplantation. Included in the study were eight children who underwent liver transplantation at our center or referred to our institution for evaluation of the biliary strictures that failed radiological treatment. Biliary strictures were confirmed by a narrowing of the biliary anastomosis on the percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram. At surgery, a guide wire was introduced into the distal bile system through the use of an enterotomy in Roux limb. Over the guide wire, the stricture was ballooned and the diameter of the biliary tree was determined. A pigtail catheter was introduced on the biliary tree across the abdominal wall, the liver, the stricture and the anastomosis into the enterotomy. A final cholangiogram confirmed the positioning of the catheter. Mean follow-up was 39.8 +/- 20.8 months. All patients had their strictures successfully treated and survived the procedure. Three patients were readmitted to the hospital with fever. It was necessary to revise the hepaticojejunostomy in three patients because of cholangitis and/or recurrence of biliary stricture. Of the eight patients of this study, two required retransplantation and one died. We conclude that an aggressive combined surgical and radiologic approach can avoid retransplantation in patients with complicated post-transplant biliary strictures.