Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 50(18): 3125-35, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25446376

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since sorafenib has shown activity in different tumour types and gemcitabine regimens improved the outcome for biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients, we evaluated first-line gemcitabine plus sorafenib in a double-blind phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 102 unresectable or metastatic BTC patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of gallbladder or intrahepatic bile ducts, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2 were randomised to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly, first 7-weeks+1-week rest followed by once 3-weeks+1-week rest) plus sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumour samples were prospectively stained for sorafenib targets and potential biomarkers. Serum samples (first two cycles) were measured for vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1)α by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Gemcitabine plus sorafenib was generally well tolerated. Four and three patients achieved partial responses in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively. There was no difference in the primary end-point, median progression-free survival (PFS) for gemcitabine plus sorafenib versus gemcitabine plus placebo (3.0 versus 4.9 months, P=0.859), and no difference for median overall survival (OS) (8.4 versus 11.2 months, P=0.775). Patients with liver metastasis after resection of primary BTC survived longer with sorafenib (P=0.019) compared to placebo. Patients who developed hand-foot syndrome (HFS) showed longer PFS and OS than patients without HFS. Two sorafenib targets, VEGFR-2 and c-kit, were not expressed in BTC samples. VEGFR-3 and Hif1α were associated with lymph node metastases and T stage. Absence of PDGFRß expression correlated with longer PFS. CONCLUSION: The addition of sorafenib to gemcitabine did not demonstrate improved efficacy in advanced BTC patients. Biomarker subgroup analysis suggested that some patients might benefit from combined treatment.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/metabolismo , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/patología , Quimiocina CXCL12/metabolismo , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Síndrome Mano-Pie/etiología , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/efectos adversos , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Sorafenib , Resultado del Tratamiento , Receptor 2 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Gemcitabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA