Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to show that one can safely remove all sonographic evidence of masses in the breast less than or equal to 1.5 cm in greatest dimension using the 11-gauge handheld Mammotome, thereby reducing the possibility of a false-negative diagnosis and other shortcomings of the automated core biopsy device. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Over a 12-week period (May 3--July 31, 2000), 124 sonographically guided breast biopsies were performed in 113 patients, using a new handheld directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device. All lesions that were less than or equal to 1.5 cm were biopsied using a handheld Mammotome; an attempt was made to continue the biopsy until no sonographic evidence of the lesion remained. RESULTS: Of these 124 lesions, 14 had infiltrating ductal carcinomas, four had infiltrating ductal carcinomas with associated ductal carcinoma in situ, one had infiltrating lobular carcinoma, one had ductal carcinoma in situ, three had atypical ductal hyperplasias, one had atypical lobular hyperplasia, and one had phyllodes tumor. Only one infiltrating ductal carcinoma was entirely removed histologically at Mammotome biopsy. There were no underestimates of disease. No cases of epithelial displacement were observed in any of the surgical excisions of malignancies. The remaining 99 lesions were benign. CONCLUSION: The handheld Mammotome diminishes the shortcomings of the automated core biopsy device. It reduces the possibility of false-negatives and underestimation of disease. It eliminates the need for multiple insertions and reduces the likelihood of epithelial displacement. As a result, we now use this device for all sonographically guided biopsies of breast masses smaller than 1.5 cm and recommend that others consider it for such use.

Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates.

PURPOSE: To measure the effect of biopsy device, probe size, mammographic lesion type, lesion size, and number of samples obtained per lesion on the ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) underestimation rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonpalpable breast lesions at 16 institutions received a histologic diagnosis of DCIS after 14-gauge automated large-core biopsy in 373 lesions and after 14- or 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy in 953 lesions. The presence of histopathologic invasive carcinoma was noted at subsequent surgical biopsy. RESULTS: By performing the chi(2) test, independent significant DCIS underestimation rates by biopsy device were 20.4% (76 of 373) of lesions diagnosed at large-core biopsy and 11.2% (107 of 953) of lesions diagnosed at vacuum-assisted biopsy (P <.001); by lesion type, 24.3% (35 of 144) of masses and 12.5% (148 of 1,182) of microcalcifications (P <.001); and by number of specimens per lesion, 17.5% (88 of 502) with 10 or fewer specimens and 11.5% (92 of 799) with greater than 10 (P <.02). DCIS underestimations increased with lesion size. CONCLUSION: DCIS underestimations were 1.9 times more frequent with masses than with calcifications, 1.8 times more frequent with large-core biopsy than with vacuum-assisted biopsy, and 1.5 times more frequent with 10 or fewer specimens per lesion than with more than 10 specimens per lesion.