Technical aspects of the recipient operation in hand transplantation.

The goal of hand allotransplantation is to achieve graft survival and useful long-term function. To achieve these goals, precise surgical technique is of critical importance. The key surgical steps and sequence of events in hand allotransplantation are similar to major upper extremity replantations, but are modified to accommodate major conceptual differences that exist between the two procedures.

The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation was founded in May 2002, and the analysis of all cases with follow-up information up to July 2010 is presented here. METHODS: From September 1998 to July 2010, 49 hands (17 unilateral and 16 bilateral hand transplantations, including 1 case of bilateral arm transplantation) have been reported, for a total of 33 patients. They were 31 men and 2 women (median age 32 years). Time since hand loss ranged from 2 months to 34 years, and in 46% of cases, the level of amputation was at wrist. Immunosuppressive therapy included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and steroids; polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were used for induction. Topical immunosuppression was also used in several cases. Follow-up ranges from 1 month to 11 years. RESULTS: One patient died on day 65. Three patients transplanted in the Western countries have lost their graft, whereas until September 2009, seven hand grafts were removed for noncompliance to the immunosuppressive therapy in China. Eighty-five percent of recipients experienced at least one episode of acute rejection within the first year, and they were reversible when promptly treated. Side effects included opportunistic infections, metabolic complications, and malignancies. All patients developed protective sensibility, 90% of them developed tactile sensibility, and 82.3% also developed a discriminative sensibility. Motor recovery enabled patients to perform most daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: Hand transplantation is a complex procedure, and its success is based on patient's compliance and his or her careful evaluation before and after transplantation.

Second report (1998-2006) of the International Registry of Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation.

Since May 2002 all groups performing hand transplantations have supplied detailed information to the International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation. This report provides a review of all hand transplants performed to date. From September 1998 to February 2006 eighteen male patients underwent 24 hand/forearm/digit transplantations (eleven unilateral and four bilateral hand transplantations, two bilateral forearm transplantations, one thumb transplantation). The level of amputation was mostly at the distal forearm or wrist. Patient average age was 32. Time since hand loss ranged from 2 months to 22 years. Immunosuppressive therapy included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, rapamycin and steroids; polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were used for induction. Topical immunosuppression was administered in some patients. Follow-up period ranged from 34 to 85 months. Patient survival was 100%. Graft survival was 100% at 1 and 2 years. Two cases of graft failure at a later date occurred and were caused by severe inflammation and progressive rejection in a non-compliant patient. In addition, 6 hands were lost due to a rejection process as the Chinese recipients did not take their immunosuppressive treatment. These failures were communicated in January 2006. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 12 patients within the first year. Rejection was completely reversible in all compliant patients. Side-effects included opportunistic infections and metabolic complications. No life-threatening complications or malignancies were reported. As it would have been very difficult to analyse transplantation functional results in a standardized way, the Registry has performed a functional score system. All patients had achieved protective sensation and in 17 of them also discriminative sensation. Extrinsic and intrinsic muscle recovery enabled patients to perform most daily activities and 90% of the recipients returned to work, and improved manual skills allowed them not only to resume their previous jobs but also, in some cases, to find more suitable employment. Fifteen recipients reported an improvement of their quality of life and we evaluated as a very important point as patient satisfaction and well-being are mandatory goals of hand transplantation.

Overexpression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule antigen in gallbladder carcinoma is an independent marker for poor survival.

PURPOSE: Gallbladder carcinoma is an aggressive type of cancer that is difficult to cure by conventional procedures. There thus is a need to identify novel molecular markers for the assessment of prognosis and as potential therapeutic targets. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the prognostic significance of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM) overexpression in human gallbladder carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ep-CAM expression was examined immunohistochemically on paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from 99 patients who underwent surgical treatment for gallbladder carcinoma in the period between August 1988 and May 1999. RESULTS: Ep-CAM overexpression was found in 63 (63.6%) of the tumor samples. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that Ep-CAM overexpression was significantly related to decreased overall survival (P < 0.01). Overall survival gradually worsened with increasing Ep-CAM scores. Notably, in the subgroup of pT1 tumors (n = 17), patients without Ep-CAM overexpression had a 5-year overall survival rate of 100% compared with 38% (P = 0.01) for patients with Ep-CAM-overexpressing tumors. By univariate analysis, no correlation was found with conventional clinicopathological parameters. Multivariate analysis, including Ep-CAM expression, pT stage, tumor grade, and resection margin involvement, showed that Ep-CAM overexpression was an independent prognostic marker in gallbladder carcinoma (P = 0.03; relative risk, 1.8). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate for the first time that Ep-CAM overexpression is an independent prognostic marker in gallbladder carcinoma and that its prognostic impact should be validated prospectively. Furthermore, the Ep-CAM antigen represents an attractive target for specific therapies with monoclonal antibodies or specific vaccines in patients with Ep-CAM-overexpressing gallbladder carcinoma.