Parvovirus B19-triggered hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in a patient with Crohn's disease.

Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life threatening condition caused by inappropriate immune activity. Infection is often the trigger, both in genetically predisposed and in sporadic cases. Although more commonly seen in the paediatric population, patients of all ages can be affected. Case presentation: A 26-year-old male patient with Crohn's disease, treated with ustekinumab, presented with high fever, epistaxis and anorexia. Laboratory results showed pancytopenia, and a high serum levels of ferritin and LDH. Colonoscopy revealed only mild signs of disease activity. CT-scan showed splenomegaly and multiple lymphadenopathies. Bone marrow aspirate was suggestive for hemophagocytosis. PCR & serology for parvovirus B19 came back positive. Treatment with ustekinumab was temporarily put on hold and supportive care was given. Viral replication decreased and he recovered completely. Conclusion: There is a known association between HLH and Crohn's disease. This is probably because they are more susceptible to infections with CMV, EBV and parvovirus B19, all known as triggers for HLH. The role of ustekinumab is unclear: did it play a role in the pathophysiological evolution of this primo-infection with parvovirus B19? On the other hand, did it contribute to the rather mild course of the disease, acting as a immunomodulator that works on interleukin-12, a cytokine that plays a role in HLH? Further study is warranted to answer these questions.

Azacitidine access program for Belgian patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukemia or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: Azacitidine (Vidaza *) is approved in Europe for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20-30% bone marrow (BM) blasts, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) with 10-29% BM blasts and no myeloproliferative syndrome (i.e. <13.000/µL white blood cells). In Belgium, the azacitidine reimbursement process can take several months, and is often delayed at submission for medical assessment by the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance of incomplete patient dossiers, due to disease complexity and classification, and administrative burden. We describe the Vidaza Access Program and its application to an initial 175 patients. Individual medical dossiers were reviewed for completeness to facilitate patient access to treatment in Belgium. METHODS: A standardized anonymized patient information form is completed by the physician and sent for review to the Belgian Celgene Medical Department. The form is reviewed within three working days and, for complete dossiers, Celgene grants a financial guarantee for treatment with azacitidine. The patient can then be treated without the hospital being subjected to financial risk. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and June 2014, 63 physicians (53 Belgian hospitals) recruited 175 patients. In total, 163 patient dossiers were approved by Celgene (120 MDS, 36 AML, and 7 CMML), of which 104 dossiers were also approved by the review committee and 49 have been waiting for a final decision for a median of 6 months; no information is currently available for the remaining 10. No dossiers approved by Celgene have been rejected by the review committee. CONCLUSIONS: The Celgene Vidaza Access Program offers support to healthcare professionals in the appropriate use of azacitidine. By facilitating the assessment of patient dossiers and providing a financial guarantee for prescribers and hospitals, treatment can be initiated more rapidly and patients may better benefit from azacitidine treatment.

Plerixafor prescription modalities in autologous haematopoietic stem cell mobilization in Belgium.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and safety of plerixafor, an antagonist of the CXCR4 receptor, in combination with G-CSF has been demonstrated in patients suffering from Iymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM) eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem cell collection. However, different reimbursement criteria have been applied in different countries to select patients eligible for treatment with plerixafor. The objective of this observational study was to describe the plerixafor prescription modalities in daily practice in Belgium. METHODS: This open-label, prospective, observational study was conducted in 11 Belgian centres in 114 patients with lymphoma (Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) or MM who were treated with plerixafor according to the SmPC between April 2011 and October 2012. Patients included in another clinical trial with plerixafor were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The use of plerixafor in patients with MM or lymphoma was effective, with a success rate (defined as a total yield >2×10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) of 77%, and well tolerated (one SAE reported). Optimal collection (defined as a total yield >4×10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) was obtained for 43% of the study population (31% in lymphoma patients, compared to 61% in patients with MM). The use of plerixafor was in line with the SmPC and the Belgian reimbursement criteria for all patients. CONCLUSION: This study is showing that the use of plerixafor according to Belgian reimbursement criteria results in similar efficacy and safety as in other centres and countries worldwide.

Safety and efficacy of azacitidine in Belgian patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukaemia, or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: results of a real-life, non-interventional post-marketing survey.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated azacitidine (Vidaza(®)) safety and efficacy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML), in a real-life setting. Treatment response, dose, and schedule were assessed. METHODS: This non-interventional, post-marketing survey included 49/50 patients receiving azacitidine at 14 Belgian haematology centres from 2010-2012. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including treatment-related TEAEs, and serious TEAEs (TESAEs) were recorded throughout the study. Treatment response [complete response (CR), partial response (PR), haematological improvement (HI), stable disease (SD), treatment failure (TF)) and transfusion-independence (TI) were evaluated at completion of a 1-year observation period (1YOP) or at treatment discontinuation, and overall survival (OS), at study conclusion. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 74·7 (range: 43·9-87·8) years; 69·4% had MDS, 26·5% had primary or secondary AML, and 4·1% had CMML. Treatment-related TEAEs, grade 3-4 TEAEs, and TESAEs were reported in 67·3%, 28·6%, and 18·4% of patients, respectively. During 1YOP, patients received a median of 7 (1-12) treatment cycles. Treatment response was assessed for 38/49 patients. Among MDS and CMML patients (n = 29), 41·4% had CR, PR, or HI, 41·4% had SD, and 17·2% had TF. Among AML patients (n = 9), 44·4% had CR or PR, 33·3% had SD, and 22·2% had TF. TI was observed in 14/32 (43·8%) patients who were transfusion-dependent at baseline. Median (95% confidence interval) OS was 490 (326-555) days; 1-year OS estimate was 0·571 (0·422-0·696). CONCLUSIONS: Our data support previous findings that azacitidine has a clinically acceptable safety profile and shows efficacy.

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients: a position statement from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Autologous haematopoietic SCT with PBSCs is regularly used to restore BM function in patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma after myeloablative chemotherapy. Twenty-eight experts from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation developed a position statement on the best approaches to mobilising PBSCs and on possibilities of optimising graft yields in patients who mobilise poorly. Choosing the appropriate mobilisation regimen, based on patients' disease stage and condition, and optimising the apheresis protocol can improve mobilisation outcomes. Several factors may influence mobilisation outcomes, including older age, a more advanced disease stage, the type of prior chemotherapy (e.g., fludarabine or melphalan), prior irradiation or a higher number of prior treatment lines. The most robust predictive factor for poor PBSC collection is the CD34(+) cell count in PB before apheresis. Determination of the CD34(+) cell count in PB before apheresis helps to identify patients at risk of poor PBSC collection and allows pre-emptive intervention to rescue mobilisation in these patients. Such a proactive approach might help to overcome deficiencies in stem cell mobilisation and offers a rationale for the use of novel mobilisation agents.

Preference for involvement in treatment decisions and request for prognostic information in newly diagnosed patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to assess preferences for involvement in treatment decisions and requests for prognostic information in newly diagnosed higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. PATIENT AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort observational study that consecutively enrolled MDS patients with an international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) risk category of intermediate-2 or high risk (summarized as 'higher risk'). The control preference scale was used to assess patient preferences for involvement in treatment decisions, and whether a request by patients for prognostic information during consultation was made, was also recorded. All of the patients were surveyed at the time of diagnosis before receiving treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to assess how sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory data related to decision-making preferences and requests for prognostic information. Relationship with the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) profile was also examined. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients were enrolled, 74% with intermediate-2 and 26% with high-risk IPSS. The mean age of patients was 70-year old (range: 32-89 years). One hundred thirty-two patients (47%) favored a passive role in treatment decision-making, whereas only 14% favored an active role. The remaining 39% of patients favored a shared decision-making approach. Patients with lower hemoglobin levels were more likely to prefer a passive role (P=0.037). HRQOL was generally better in patients preferring an active role versus those preferring a passive one. Overall, 61% (N=171) of patients requested prognostic information on survival during consultation. The likelihood of not requesting prognostic information was higher for older patients (P = 0.003) and for those with lower education (P=0.010). CONCLUSION: Decision-making preferences vary among patients with newly diagnosed higher-risk MDS. Current findings suggest that patients with worse underlying health conditions are more likely to prefer less involvement in treatment decisions.

Management of myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: guidelines from the Belgian Haematological Society.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of haematological disorders characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis and an increased risk for leukemic transformation. In recent years several new therapeutics have emerged that have demonstrated to alter the natural course of the disease. This document summarizes the state of the art in diagnosis and treatment of this heterogeneous disease, as proposed by a group of expert haematologists in the field of MDS from the Belgian Haematological Society. Its main purpose is to guide clinicians in daily practice to treat patients with this disease, within the limitations of current reimbursement modalities in Belgium.

European data on stem cell mobilization with plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients. A subgroup analysis of the European Consortium of stem cell mobilization.

The effectiveness of the novel hematopoietic stem cell mobilizing agent plerixafor was evaluated in nationwide compassionate use programs in 13 European countries. A total of 580 poor mobilizers with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and multiple myeloma (MM) were enrolled. All patients received plerixafor plus granulocyte CSF with or without chemotherapy. Overall, the collection yield was significantly higher in MM patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 81.6%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 32.0%) than in NHL patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 64.8%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 12.6%; P<0.0001) and also significantly higher in HL patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 81.5%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 22.2%) than in NHL patients (P=0.013). In a subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in mobilization success comparing patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Our data emphasize the role of plerixafor in poor mobilizers, but further strategies to improve the apheresis yield especially in patients with NHL are required.

Plerixafor in poor stem cell mobilizers: the Belgian Compassionate Use Program.

INTRODUCTION: Currently available stem cell mobilizing regimens (G-CSF +/- chemotherapy) show high failure rates, especially in heavily pretreated patients. Plerixafor, a new stem cell mobilizing agent blocking the CXCR4-SDF-1 interaction, offers a new strategy for stem cell mobilization, especially in poor mobilizers.This study reports on the outcome of the Belgian compassionate use program (CUP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2008 and July 2009, 14 Belgian transplant centres participated in plerixafor CUP. In total, 22 poor stem cell mobilizers were included. Patients who previously failed stem cell mobilization received a combination of G-CSF (morning of Day 1-5) and plerixafor (evening of Day 4). Apheresis was performed on Day 5. G-CSF, plerixafor and apheresis were continued until at least 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells were obtained in a maximum of 3 collections. RESULTS: A mean of 2 plerixafor administrations was needed to reach > or = 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells. The overall cumulative success rate (defined as the proportion of patients achieving a successful collection after a maximum of 3 apheresis days) was 64%. Half of the heavily pretreated patients ( 3 prior chemotherapy regimens) could be mobilized successfully. Patients who received < or = 2 prior chemotherapy regimens mobilized successfully in 75% of the cases. Thirteen patients (59.1%) underwent autologous stem cell transplantation with normal neutrophil and platelet recovery times. CONCLUSION: For patients failing previous mobilization attempts, the combination of plerixafor and G-CSF is a successful mobilizing strategy, even in poor mobilizers who received > or = 3 prior chemotherapy regimens.

Dual infection with polyomavirus BK and acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus successfully treated with cidofovir in a bone marrow transplant recipient.

A hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient developed a mucosal herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection while under acyclovir (ACV) treatment (HSV was later shown to be resistant to ACV). Concomitantly, the patient presented a hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) due to polyomavirus BK, for which intravenous cidofovir (CDV) was prescribed. The patient benefited from the broad-spectrum anti-DNA virus activity of CDV, and not only the HC resolved without signs of nephrotoxicity but also the HSV-1 lesions disappeared. This is the first report describing the effect of CDV on 2 simultaneous and unrelated DNA viral infections in an immunosuppressed transplant recipient. In addition, we describe here that this HSV-1 isolate possesses a unique phenotype and genotype.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) as single-agent treatment for frail patients 61 years of age and older with acute myeloid leukemia: final results of AML-15B, a phase 2 study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto Leukemia Groups.

The therapeutic activity and toxicity profile of gemtuzumab ozogamicin were assessed in 40 patients >60 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were not considered eligible for conventional chemotherapy because of advanced age or poor performance status. The drug was administered at the dose of 9 mg/m2 as a single 2-h i.v. infusion on days 1 and 15. Patients who achieved a complete remission (CR/CRp) were to receive a consolidation with two additional injections of the immunotoxin at the same dose. The overall CR/CRp rate was 17% (95% CI, 8-32%). The CR/CRp rate in patients 61-75 years old was 33% (6/18), and 5% (1/22) in patients older than 75 years. Induction death occurred in seven patients (17%), all aged above 75 years. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients aged 61-75 years than in older individuals (P=0.05), and in CD33+ cases than in CD33- cases (P=0.05). We conclude that the dose/schedule of gemtuzumab ozogamicin used in this trial is too toxic in the age group over 75 years. For these patients, additional studies with reduced doses of the immunotoxin are warranted.

Management of therapy-resistant systemic lupus erythematosus with rituximab: report of a case and review of the literature.

Therapy of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with major organ involvement consists of aggressive immunosuppression with glucocorticoids and cytotoxic agents. When remission is achieved, maintenance therapy is begun to reduce the risk of relapse while minimizing toxicity. Remission with standard therapy is, however, not always achieved. We discribe a women with SLE and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia, pneumonitis and nephritis refractory to high-dose steroids, pulse cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab was administered, resulting in major clinical and biochemical improvement. Therapy-resistant SLE generally has an ominous prognosis. A few anecdotal reports and small open studies describe beneficial effects of rituximab in these cases. Rituximab may be a promising new approach to improve the dismal outcome of therapy-resistant SLE.

A new recurrent inversion, inv(7)(p15q34), leads to transcriptional activation of HOXA10 and HOXA11 in a subset of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias.

Chromosomal translocations with breakpoints in T-cell receptor (TCR) genes are recurrent in T-cell malignancies. These translocations involve the TCRalphadelta gene (14q11), the TCRbeta gene (7q34) and to a lesser extent the TCRgamma gene at chromosomal band 7p14 and juxtapose T-cell oncogenes next to TCR regulatory sequences leading to deregulated expression of those oncogenes. Here, we describe a new recurrent chromosomal inversion of chromosome 7, inv(7)(p15q34), in a subset of patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia characterized by CD2 negative and CD4 positive, CD8 negative blasts. This rearrangement juxtaposes the distal part of the HOXA gene cluster on 7p15 to the TCRbeta locus on 7q34. Real time quantitative PCR analysis for all HOXA genes revealed high levels of HOXA10 and HOXA11 expression in all inv(7) positive cases. This is the first report of a recurrent chromosome rearrangement targeting the HOXA gene cluster in T-cell malignancies resulting in deregulated HOXA gene expression (particularly HOXA10 and HOXA11) and is in keeping with a previous report suggesting HOXA deregulation in MLL-rearranged T- and B cell lymphoblastic leukemia as the key factor in leukaemic transformation. Finally, our observation also supports the previous suggested role of HOXA10 and HOXA11 in normal thymocyte development.

Clinical and molecular features of FIP1L1-PDFGRA (+) chronic eosinophilic leukemias.

Detection of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene or the corresponding cryptic 4q12 deletion supports the diagnosis of chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) in patients with chronic hypereosinophilia. We retrospectively characterized 17 patients fulfilling WHO criteria for idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES) or CEL, using nested RT-PCR and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Eight had FIP1L1-PDGFRA (+) CEL, three had FIP1L1-PDGFRA (-) CEL and six had IHES. FIP1L1-PDGFRA (+) CEL responded poorly to steroids, hydroxyurea or interferon-alpha, and had a high probability of eosinophilic endomyocarditis (n=4) and disease-related death (n=4). In FIP1L1-PDGFRA (+) CEL, palpable splenomegaly was present in 5/8 cases, serum vitamin B(12) was always markedly increased, and marrow biopsies revealed a distinctively myeloproliferative aspect. Imatinib induced rapid complete hematological responses in 4/4 treated FIP1L1-PDGFRA (+) cases, including one female, and complete molecular remission in 2/3 evaluable cases. In the female patient, 1 log reduction of FIP1L1-PDGFRA copy number was reached as by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). Thus, correlating IHES/CEL genotype with phenotype, FIP1L1-PDGFRA (+) CEL emerges as a homogeneous clinicobiological entity, where imatinib can induce molecular remission. While RT-PCR and interphase FISH are equally valid diagnostic tools, the role of marrow biopsy in diagnosis and of RQ-PCR in disease and therapy monitoring needs further evaluation.

The presence of an HLA-identical sibling donor has no impact on outcome of patients with high-risk MDS or secondary AML (sAML) treated with intensive chemotherapy followed by transplantation: results of a prospective study of the EORTC, EBMT, SAKK and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups (EORTC study 06921).

This report used the framework of a large European study to investigate the outcome of patients with and without an HLA-identical sibling donor on an intention-to-treat basis. After a common remission-induction and consolidation course, patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor were scheduled for allogeneic transplantation and patients lacking a donor for autologous transplantation. In all, 159 patients alive at 8 weeks from the start of treatment were included in the present analysis. In total, 52 patients had a donor, 65 patients did not have a donor and in 42 patients the availability of a donor was not assessed. Out of 52 patients, 36 (69%) with a donor underwent allogeneic transplantation (28 in CR1). Out of 65 patients, 33 (49%) received an autograft (27 in CR1). The actuarial survival rates at 4 years were 33.3% (s.e. = 6.7%) for patients with a donor and 39.0% (s.e. = 6.5%) for patients without a donor (P = 0.18). Event-free survival rates were 23.1% (s.e. = 6.2%) and 21.5% (s.e. = 5.3%), respectively (P = 0.66). Correction for alternative donor transplants did not substantially alter the survival of the group without a donor. Also, the survival in the various cytogenetic risk groups was not significantly different when comparing the donor vs the no-donor group. This analysis shows that patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia may benefit from both allogeneic and autologous transplantation. We were unable to demonstrate a survival advantage for patients with a donor compared to patients without a donor.

Donor lymphocyte infusions in adult haploidentical transplant: a dose finding study.

Haploidentical transplantation has become a clinical option for patients lacking a compatible donor. However, patients are still referred at advanced stages and are usually heavily pretreated. This results in a high risk of toxicity, relapses and infections. We therefore started a donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) dose-finding protocol, to try to improve both relapse rate and immunity reconstitution. In all, 12 consecutive patients were investigated. All had a refractory, some progressive, disease. Conditioning consisted of TBI, melphalan, ATG, fludarabine and CSA pretransplant. In four rapidly progressive patients, Ara-C had to be given 1 week preconditioning. The graft was T- and B-cell depleted with a fixed reinfused CD3 dose of 5 x 10(4)/kg. All patients engrafted before day 20. G-CSF was given from day 5 post-transplant and replaced with GM-CSF in the last three patients. Nonrelapse related mortality was 0/12 at 1 year. DLI were started at day 28 (3 x 10(4) CD3/kg) in the two first patients. This resulted in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in both, but they did not relapse. The next dose was 1 x 10(4)/kg monthly for 3 months. This was well tolerated with only one grade I GVHD. Given the high relapse rate, we escalated doses (1, 3 and 10 x 10(4)/kg). This produced GVHD in all. We next moved, to GM-CSF and 1 x 10(4) CD3/kg monthly. Overall, 6/12 patients relapsed and received therapeutic DLI, starting at 1 x 10(5) CD3/kg with escalation every 2 weeks. We conclude that prophylactic DLI are feasible in adult haploidentical transplantation, without GVHD at a monthly dose of 1 x 10(4) CD3/kg. They result in faster CD4 recovery and a low rate of infections. The impact of GM-CSF remains to be further investigated. This scheme seems ideal for patients transplanted early in the course of their disease. In very bad prognosis patients, it remains insufficient to rapidly induce a GVL effect. Escalated doses are feasible but the price is aGVHD. Therapeutic DLI can be given at higher doses, depending on the time post-transplant. Haploidentical transplantation with low-dose DLI is a safe procedure that should be considered in all patients needing a transplant, but lacking a matched donor, early in the course of the disease.

Chemotherapy only compared to chemotherapy followed by transplantation in high risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia; two parallel studies adjusted for various prognostic factors.

Comparisons of the effectiveness of chemotherapy and transplantation in AML in first complete remission (CR) have focused almost exclusively on patients with de novo disease. Here we used Cox modelling to compare these strategies in patients with MDS and s-AML treated by the Leukemia Group of the EORTC or at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. All patients were aged 15-60. The 184 EORTC patients received conventional dose ara-C + idarubicin + etoposide for remission induction, and after one consolidation course, were scheduled to receive an allograft, or an autograft if a sibling donor was unavailable. The 215 MDA patients received various high-dose ara-C containing induction regimens, and in CR, continued to receive these regimens at reduced dose for 6-12 months. CR rates were 54% EORTC and 63% MDA (P = 0.09). Sixty-five of the 100 EORTC patients who entered CR received a transplant in first CR. Disease-free survival in patients achieving CR was superior in the EORTC cohort, the 4-years DFS rates were 28.9% (s.e. = 4.8%) EORTC vs 17.3% (s.e. = 3.7%) MDA (P = 0.017). Survival from CR was not significantly different in the EORTC and MDA groups, as was survival from start of treatment. After accounting for prognostic factors the conclusions were unchanged. Despite various problems with the analysis discussed below, the data suggest that neither transplantation nor chemotherapy, as currently practised, can be unequivocally recommended for these patients in first CR and that questions as to the superior modality may be less important than the need to improve results with both.

Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus.

During the past several decades, there has been a steady increase in the frequency of opportunistic invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in immunocompromised patients. However, there is substantial controversy concerning optimal diagnostic criteria for these IFIs. Therefore, members of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group formed a consensus committee to develop standard definitions for IFIs for clinical research. On the basis of a review of literature and an international consensus, a set of research-oriented definitions for the IFIs most often seen and studied in immunocompromised patients with cancer is proposed. Three levels of probability are proposed: "proven," "probable," and "possible." The definitions are intended for use in the context of clinical and/or epidemiological research, not for clinical decision making.