Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660816

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is currently the gold standard for restoration of gastrointestinal continuity after colectomy for ulcerative colitis in the UK. However, with further experience of the risks relating to IPAA, the use of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is being revisited. Decisions regarding restorative surgery after colectomy are individual to every patient's circumstances, and this paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the literature to guide a full discussion of the risks and benefits of IRA. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted of papers published from 2000 onwards relating to IRA and ulcerative colitis, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The papers were reviewed by two independent surgeons for information it was felt that patients and surgeons would want to know about the operation (cancer risk, bowel function, sexual and urinary function, fecundity/fertility and postoperative complications). RESULTS: Seventeen papers were identified for inclusion as they reported original data on one or more of the categories identified for discussion. The median ten-year cancer risk after IRA was 2.8% and the median failure rate at ten years was 21%. IRA was generally found to have lower postoperative complication rates and better bowel function than IPAA, with sexual function similar and fecundity not commented on in any paper. CONCLUSIONS: For some patients, IRA can offer restorative surgery in the short or long term, with acceptable cancer risk, failure rate and postoperative complications, while avoiding the higher risks associated with IPAA.

2.
J Hosp Infect ; 122: 162-167, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35151765

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are responsible for a significant economic burden as well as intangible costs suffered by the patient, with up to 60% deemed preventable. Colorectal patients are disproportionally affected by SSI due the risk of wound contamination with bowel content. We aimed to reduce the rate of superficial SSI after elective colorectal surgery using a bundle of evidence-based interventions. METHODS: An SSI prevention bundle was implemented in elective colorectal surgery, comprised of triclosan-coated sutures, 2% chlorhexidine skin preparation and use of warmed carbon dioxide (CO2) during laparoscopic procedures. The SSI reduction strategy was prospectively implemented and compared with historical controls. Our primary outcome measure was the overall rate of superficial SSI. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, which use microbiological evidence in conjunction with clinical features were used as the definition of SSI. RESULTS: The overall SSI rate was 27.4% in the pre-bundle group (N = 208) and 12.5% in the patients who received the SSI prevention bundle (N = 184) (adjusted odds ratio 0.38; confidence interval 0.21-0.67; P<0.001). The median time to SSI diagnosis was postoperative day 8. Overall patient length of stay (LOS) was unchanged from six days at baseline following implementation of the bundle. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown successful implementation of an SSI prevention bundle which has reduced superficial SSI rate. We recommend this SSI prevention bundle becomes standard practice in elective colorectal surgery and plan to extend the bundle to emergency general surgery.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Triclosán , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
3.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 103(9): 661-665, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34414781

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer, accounting for approximately 10% of all cancer deaths. The incidence of CRC in young adults and the adolescent population is increasing. This study aims to highlight short-term outcomes for young patients with CRC. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for all patients aged less than 50 years diagnosed with CRC at a university teaching hospital between October 2012 and June 2018. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (65 males, 55 females) with CRC aged under 50 years were initially included; 20 did not receive surgical treatment (12 metastatic adenocarcinoma, 5 metastatic squamous cell cancer (SCC), 3 neuroendocrine tumours (NET)), and 13 patients had insufficient data for analysis and were excluded. A total of 87 patients underwent surgical intervention and 66 with diagnosis of adenocarcinoma were included in survival analysis. Median age of patients was 42 years (19-49 years). Cancer recurrence was seen in 14 patients, 10 showing local, 3 liver and 1 lung metastasis. The median OS was 28 months (3-156 months). The median DFS was 13 months (3-85 months). Overall 5-year survival and DFS were 72% and 59%, respectively. Median survival in the group who did not undergo surgery was 4.5 months (1-15 months). CONCLUSIONS: CRC is often more advanced and aggressive in younger patients. Current guidelines can result in young patients being investigated/treated for other gastrointestinal conditions before referral for CRC investigation.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 102(9): 654-662, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32777932

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the current literature on the use of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC) as an alternative to major surgery and endoscopic decompression alone for treating sigmoid volvulus in frail, comorbid patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search of literature published between April 2000 and January 2017 was carried out using the MEDLINE®, Embase™ and CINAHL® (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases. The search terms were "percutaneous endoscopic colostomy", "PEC", "sigmoidopexy", "sigmoidostomy" and "sigmoid volvulus". The studies identified were screened and those that did not fulfil the inclusion criteria were excluded. FINDINGS: Seven observational studies and seven case reports (comprising eighty-one patients) were found to match our inclusion criteria. All patients had recurrent sigmoid volvulus and were treated with PEC either with a single PEC tube or with two PEC tubes inserted. Sigmoid volvulus recurred in 10 of the 81 patients; 3 of these individuals developed recurrence with PEC tubes in situ and 7 following tube removal. There were seven deaths after the procedure. The most frequent morbidity associated with PEC tube insertion was site infection (n=6). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review highlights the use of PEC as an alternative in managing recurrent sigmoid volvulus in frail, comorbid patients unfit for or refusing surgery, with the best outcomes seen in those patients where two PEC tubes were inserted and remained in situ indefinitely. Further studies are needed to improve the safety and efficacy of the procedure as well as post-procedure care.


Asunto(s)
Colostomía , Vólvulo Intestinal/cirugía , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Sigmoidoscopía , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Colostomía/métodos , Humanos , Sigmoidoscopía/métodos
5.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 100(7): 570-579, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29909672

RESUMEN

Introduction Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is associated with reduced length of stay (LOS) and improved outcomes in colorectal surgery. It is unclear whether ERAS can be safely implemented in elderly patients undergoing complex colorectal resections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ERAS in patients of all ages undergoing colorectal surgery. Methods A prospective database of a consecutive series of patients undergoing colorectal resections with ERAS between August 2012 and December 2014 was evaluated. Patients were divided into four age groups. Outcomes studied were compliance with ERAS elements, LOS, morbidity and mortality. Results Of the 294 patients in the study cohort, 79 were <60 years, 81 were 60-69 years, 86 were 70-79 years and 48 were ≥80 years of age. There was no significant difference between age groups in compliance with ERAS elements. Age was not predictive of delayed discharge (LOS >6 days) or morbidity. Factors that were predictive of delayed discharge on multivariate analysis were open surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 2.23, p=0.003), conversion to open surgery (OR: 3.23, p=0.017), stoma formation (OR: 2.10, p=0.019) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 4.12, p=0.038). Factors predictive of morbidity on multivariate analysis comprised conversion to open surgery (OR: 7.72, p=0.004), high creatinine (OR: 1.03 per unit increase in creatinine, p=0.008) and stoma education (OR: 0.31, p=0.030). Conclusions ERAS can be successfully implemented in older patients. There was equal compliance with the ERAS programme across the four age groups and no significant effect of age on LOS or morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuperación de la Función , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Cirugía Colorrectal , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/normas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
6.
Colorectal Dis ; 14(6): 727-30, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21801295

RESUMEN

AIM: The 30-day outcome after laparoscopic resection for cancer in patients over the age of 80 years was studied. METHOD: An electronic database was used to identify patients over 80 years who underwent laparoscopic bowel resection between December 2000 and October 2009 at three UK laparoscopic colorectal training units. Patients who required abdominoperineal excision of the rectum were excluded. RESULTS: In all, 173 patients (80 men) of median age 84 (80-93) years were identified. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades were ASA 1, 14; ASA 2, 87; ASA 3, 68; and ASA 4, 4. Median body mass index was 26 (14-45) kg/m(2). Thirteen (7.5%) patients were converted to open surgery. The major causes for conversion were bleeding and adhesions. Thirty-three major complications occurred in 21 (12%) patients. Ten (5.8%) required readmission after discharge for complications giving a total of 17.8% of patients with complications. The median hospital stay was 5 (1-37) days. Three (1.7%) patients died within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that laparoscopic large bowel resection is safe and beneficial in a population over 80 years. It has low morbidity and mortality and a shortened hospital stay. Octogenarians should not be denied major laparoscopic bowel surgery based on age alone.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Readmisión del Paciente , Factores de Tiempo , Adherencias Tisulares/cirugía
8.
Colorectal Dis ; 12(10): 958-64, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19604288

RESUMEN

Stoma formation is a commonly performed procedure in colorectal surgery as a part of operations performed for malignant- and inflammatory bowel disease. Stoma formation is a simple, but not trivial, undertaking. When performed badly, it can leave the patients with a legacy of complications such as leakage, prolapse, parastomal hernia and retraction. Various studies have reported a complication rate of 21-70%. We performed a literature search using the Medline, Ovid and Google scholar database for all the articles published between January 1980 and December 2008. The search terms used were colostomy, ileostomy, stoma, parastomal hernia, stenosis, prolapse, necrosis and complications. The following article summarizes the common complications associated with stomas.


Asunto(s)
Enterostomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Dermatitis/etiología , Hernia/etiología , Humanos , Necrosis , Prolapso , Piodermia Gangrenosa/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico
9.
Surgeon ; 7(5): 276-81, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19848060

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The TWR system was introduced in July 2000. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patients below the age of 50 years with colorectal cancer (CRC) are experiencing delays in treatment. METHODS: The CRC database was searched for all newly diagnosed colorectal cancers between January 2001 and December 2005 in patients who were aged less than 50 years. RESULTS: There were 911 patients with CRC during the study period. Of these, 41 patients (4.5%) were aged under 50. Thirty-eight case notes were retrieved and reviewed; the median age was 47 years. Fourteen (37%) presented as an emergency, 9 (24%) via the TWR, 8 (21%) were non-TWR referrals to outpatients and the remainder were referred via miscellaneous routes. The median time from referral to initial consultation was 11 days (range 8-14 days) in the TWR group, 24 days (range 14-135 days) in the surgical outpatients group and 44 days (range 11-93 days) in the miscellaneous (direct endoscopy, in-hospital physician's referral) group. The median time from referral to initiation of treatment was 51 days (range 15-116 days) in the TWR group, 103 days (range 43-174 days) in the outpatient group and 96 days (range 27-270 days) in the miscellaneous group. Excluding age as a factor, 73% of the non-TWR referrals met the TWR criteria. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptoms of CRC below the age of 50 years may face referral and diagnostic delay if not referred via the TWR system; many of these would be eligible if age was not a deciding factor.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Listas de Espera , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Medicina Estatal , Factores de Tiempo
10.
Breast J ; 14(4): 369-71, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18540958

RESUMEN

This study was performed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for axillary staging in invasive breast cancer. Data were collected prospectively from June 2005 to June 2006. In all, 197 patients with invasive breast cancer and clinically nonsuspicious axillary lymph nodes were included. Patients with suspicious nodes on ultrasound had fine needle aspiration biopsy. Those with fine needle aspiration biopsy positive for malignancy were planned for axillary nodes clearance otherwise they had sentinel node biopsy. Patients (41) had ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. Three cases were excluded for being nonconclusive. Postoperative histology showed 18/38 cases (47.4%) axillary lymph nodes positive and 20/38 cases (52.6%) axillary nodes negative. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy was positive in 8/38 cases (21.1%), negative in 30/38 cases (78.9%). The sensitivity of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy was found to be 47.1%, specificity 100%, positive predictability 100%, negative predictability 70%, and overall accuracy 76.3%. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy was found to be more accurate and sensitive when two or more nodes were involved, raising the sensitivity to 80% and negative predictability to 93.3%. Preoperative axillary staging with ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in invasive breast cancer patients is very beneficial in diagnosing nodes positive cases. These cases can be planned for axillary lymph nodes clearance straightaway therefore saving patients from undergoing further surgery as well as time and resources.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Fina/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Adulto , Anciano , Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
11.
BJU Int ; 101(12): 1536-41, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18218057

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effect of prostate size on the outcome of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP, an established procedure for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy, BPH), in the initial 354 patients at 1 year of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 354 patients who had HoLEP at our institution from April 2003 to March 2007. In 235 patients the prostate weighed <60 g (group 1), in 77 it weighed 60-100 g (group 2) and in 42 >100 g (group 3). Demographic data and perioperative variables were recorded and compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The mean prostate size was 38.1, 76.4 and 133.5 g for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P < 0.001), and the respective mean weight of resected prostate was 18.47, 40.8 and 82.76 g, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean procedure efficiency increased from 0.36 g/min in group 1 to 0.49 g/min in group 2 and 0.58 g/min in group 3 (P < 0.001). The decrease in haemoglobin level after HoLEP was greater in group 3 than in the other groups. Overall, HoLEP resulted in a 75% reduction in American Urologic Association symptom score, a 225% increase in peak urinary flow rate and an 86% decrease in postvoid residual urine volume at 1 year of follow-up. Perioperative complications were evenly distributed among the three groups, except for a higher incidence of superficial bladder mucosal injury and stenotic complications in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP is a safe and effective procedure for treating symptomatic BPH, independent of prostate size, and is associated with low morbidity. The efficiency of HoLEP increases with increasing prostate size.


Asunto(s)
Holmio , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Próstata/patología , Prostatectomía/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 88(2): 174-5, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16551413

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Surgery has been the gold standard in the treatment of adult pyloric stenosis (APS). The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in 1989 revolutionised the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of PPIs as an alternative to surgery for treatment of APS. Six consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of adult peptic pyloric stenosis between November 1999 and August 2002 were studied. The diagnosis was confirmed with endoscopy. All patients were commenced on a twice-daily dose of intravenous PPI. This was changed to oral treatment after 2 days. Main outcome measures evaluated were resolution of symptoms on PPIs and failure of medical therapy. RESULTS: There were five females and one male. Median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range, 30-90 years). Median duration of symptoms was 2 weeks (range, 1-5 weeks). Of the patients, five had a history of peptic ulcer disease. Complete resolution was achieved in 5 patients (83%). Median duration for resolution of symptoms was 9 days (range, 5-14 days). All patients were changed to oral PPIs after 2 days. One patient did not respond to oral therapy and required surgical intervention (pyloroplasty). Median follow-up was 26 months (range, 6-48 months). There was no recurrence of symptoms. All patients were discharged on low-dose PPI. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the view that proton pump inhibitors are a safe and feasible alternative to surgery in adult pyloric stenosis secondary to peptic ulcer disease.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Estenosis Pilórica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 31(3): 325-31, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16236532

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To observe the effect of local anaesthetic flush through the great saphenous vein (GSV) tunnel on postoperative pain and haematoma formation following saphenous vein stripping operations. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomised, control trial. METHODS: One hundred patients were randomized to receive 20 ml of local anaesthetic (bupivacaine 0.25% + adrenaline) or saline control flush through the GSV tunnel after stripping in a double-blind study. Visual analogue pain scores were used to measure postoperative pain daily for the 1st week, then at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. Patients were examined during the 1st, 3rd and 6th week for haematoma formation. RESULTS: In the control group the median postoperative pain score was 4 (range 0-7) in the immediate postoperative period compared to a median of 1 (range 0-4) in the LA group (p<0.001). The median pain score on day-4 was 4 (range 1-6) (control) vs. 1 (range 0-3) (LA group) (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney Utest) and on day-6 it was 1 (range 0-5) (control) vs. 0 (range 0-5) (LA group) (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney). Twelve patients (24%) developed a haematoma in the GSV tunnel in the control group compared to three patients (6%) in the LA group (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Flushing of the GSV tunnel with bupivacaine plus adrenaline significantly reduces postoperative pain and haematoma formation in patients undergoing GSV stripping for varicose veins.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Hematoma/prevención & control , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Vena Safena/cirugía , Várices/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Ir J Med Sci ; 175(4): 26-9, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17312825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in day case/short-stay surgery is unknown. AIM: To characterise the current national use of LMWH prophylaxis in specific day and short stay surgeries. METHODS: A standardised anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to all consultant general surgeons in Ireland. The operations selected were herniorraphy, anorectal, varicose vein and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Questionnaires were sent to 82 surgeons in 2003. There was a response rate of 68.3% (56). Fifty-four per cent of respondents said there was a protocol in place for administration of LMWH in day case surgery. Of these 41% were not confident that their protocols were being adhered. Fifty-nine per cent of all respondents said they stratified patients according to individual risk. Thirteen per cent reported occurrence of VTE post day case surgery CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a heterogeneous pattern of administration of LMWH. In the absence of published validated protocols, the authors suggest a consensus day case protocol.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Cirugía General , Humanos , Irlanda , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Surgeon ; 3(1): 32-5, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15789791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hickman catheters have been shown to provide safe long-term venous access for patients with malignant diseases. In many centres, catheters are placed using fluoroscopic guidance. We hypothesised that ultrasound-assisted catheter placement by surgeons in the operating theatre would be a simple, safe and effective alternative technique with reduced infective complication rates. METHODS: Hickman catheter insertions between May 1998 and March 2002 were studied. The data were collected from the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry database and the case notes of all patients were reviewed. Percutaneous catheter placement with tunnelling was performed in the operating theatre after scanning the internal jugular vein (IJV) for position, size and patency, using a Pie 100LC Scanner (Pie Medical, Maastricht). A standard chest radiograph confirmed catheter position at the end of the procedure. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (30 males and 28 females) had 65 Hickman catheters inserted. The median age was 60 years (range 32-82 years). Catheter placement was achieved in all patients, 59 in the right IJV and six in the left. Ultrasound scanning demonstrated that the right IJV was thrombosed in six patients (10%), thus avoiding unnecessary attempts at cannulation. The Hickman catheters remained in situ for a combined total of 5857 days (median, 89 days, range 4-485 days). Immediate complications occurred in two patients (pneumothorax in both). One patient required a chest drain. The overall sepsis rate was 3.92 per 1000 catheter days. Systemic sepsis was slightly higher (2.21 per 1000 catheter days) than superficial sepsis (1.71 per 1000 catheter days). In all the patients who developed systemic sepsis the catheter had to be removed (n = 13). All the superficial infections were treated successfully with antibiotics (n = 10 patients). Two catheters developed thrombosis. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ultrasound-assisted percutaneous placement of Hickman catheters in the operating suite is a simple, safe and effective technique and may help to reduce infective complications.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA