Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transl Sci ; 10(6): 509-519, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28749581

RESUMEN

Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor, undergoes active renal tubular secretion. Baricitinib was not predicted to inhibit hepatic and renal uptake and efflux drug transporters, based on the ratio of the unbound maximum eliminating-organ inlet concentration and the in vitro half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50 ). In vitro, baricitinib was a substrate for organic anion transporter (OAT)3, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein (MATE)2-K, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). Probenecid, a strong OAT3 inhibitor, increased the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC[0-∞] ) of baricitinib by twofold and decreased renal clearance to 69% of control in healthy subjects. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling reproduced the renal clearance of baricitinib and the inhibitory effect of probenecid using the in vitro IC50 value of 4.4 µM. Using ibuprofen and diclofenac in vitro IC50 values of 4.4 and 3.8 µM toward OAT3, 1.2 and 1.0 AUC(0-∞) ratios of baricitinib were predicted. These predictions suggest clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with ibuprofen and diclofenac are unlikely.


Asunto(s)
Azetidinas/farmacología , Proteínas de Transporte de Membrana/metabolismo , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Azetidinas/sangre , Azetidinas/farmacocinética , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Purinas , Pirazoles , Sulfonamidas/sangre , Sulfonamidas/farmacocinética , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
2.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 54(3): 1750-7, 2013 Mar 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23404115

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of ruboxistaurin (RBX) on vision loss through a prospectively defined combined analysis of two phase 3 trials (MBDL and MBCU). METHODS: Patients in both of these 3-year randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trials had best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) ≥ 75 letters (∼20/32 Snellen), ETDRS retinopathy level 20 to 47D (MBDL) or 35B to 53E (MBCU), and no prior panretinal or focal photocoagulation in at least one eye at baseline. Patients received oral placebo (N = 508 total from both studies) or RBX 32 mg/d (N = 520 total). Best-corrected ETDRS VA was measured at 6-month intervals for 3 years (MBDL) or for 18 to 48 months (MBCU). Sustained moderate visual loss (SMVL) was defined as a 15-letter or more reduction from baseline in VA sustained for a patient's last 6 months of study participation. RESULTS: In the combined studies (N = 1028 total), SMVL occurred in 4.4% of placebo- versus 2.3% of RBX-treated patients (P = 0.069). In patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up (N = 825 total), there was less SMVL in the RBX group (4.4% placebo versus 2.1% RBX, P = 0.045). Other VA-related measures (mean VA, contrast sensitivity, Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 [VFQ-25]) either trended toward a benefit for RBX or were also statistically significant in favor of RBX. In contrast, diabetic macular edema (DME) morphology-related measures (occurrence of significant center of macula involvement, optical coherence tomography [OCT]-determined center of macula thickness, application of focal photocoagulation) did not show a consistent trend in favor of or against RBX. CONCLUSIONS: SMVL data in a prospectively defined combined analysis from these two phase 3 trials suggest a magnitude of effect of RBX on vision loss similar to that seen in two prior studies (approximately 50% reduction above standard care). However, event rates were low and statistical significance was not achieved. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00133952, NCT00090519.).


Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Maleimidas/uso terapéutico , Proteína Quinasa C/antagonistas & inhibidores , Trastornos de la Visión/tratamiento farmacológico , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Administración Oral , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/fisiopatología , Método Doble Ciego , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/fisiopatología , Masculino , Maleimidas/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteína Quinasa C beta , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Visión/fisiopatología
3.
Retina ; 31(10): 2084-94, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21862954

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and causes of vision loss among 813 patients (1,392 eyes) with moderately severe to very severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy from the Protein Kinase C ß Inhibitor-Diabetic Retinopathy Study and Protein Kinase C ß Inhibitor-Diabetic Retinopathy Study 2 ruboxistaurin (RBX) protein kinase C ß inhibitor trials. METHODS: Patients in these 3-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, Phase 3 trials had best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity ≥45 letters (∼20/125 Snellen), Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study retinopathy level 47A/B-53E, and no previous panretinal photocoagulation in ≥1 eye. Patients received placebo (N = 401) or RBX 32 mg/day (N = 412). Data from the 2 studies were combined and masked evaluation of retinal photographs was performed for cause of visual decline in all patients experiencing sustained moderate visual loss (≥15-letter loss sustained for the last 6 months of study). RESULTS: In the studies combined, sustained moderate visual loss occurred in 10.2% of placebo-treated patients versus 6.1% of RBX-treated patients (P = 0.011). A ≥15-letter gain occurred in 2.4% of placebo versus 4.7% of RBX eyes (P = 0.021) and a ≥15-letter loss occurred in 11.4% versus 7.4%, respectively (P = 0.012). Diabetic macular edema was the probable primary cause of vision loss. Among eyes without focal/grid photocoagulation at baseline, fewer RBX group eyes (26.7%) required initial focal/grid photocoagulation versus placebo (35.6%; P = 0.008). No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: Analysis of data combined from two similar studies adds further statistical significance to RBX's beneficial effects on visual loss, need for focal laser, and vision gain, most likely through effects on macular edema.


Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Edema Macular/complicaciones , Maleimidas/uso terapéutico , Proteína Quinasa C/antagonistas & inhibidores , Trastornos de la Visión/fisiopatología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Retinopatía Diabética/fisiopatología , Método Doble Ciego , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Maleimidas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína Quinasa C beta , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastornos de la Visión/etiología , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA