RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few effective therapeutic options exist for patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). YM155 is a survivin suppressant with activity against DLBCL in a phase I trial. This phase II study was conducted to better characterize the toxicity and efficacy of this small molecule in patients with refractory DLBCL. METHODS: Forty-one patients with a median age of 66 years and 3 prior regimens were enrolled and treated with a YM155 dose of 5 mg/m(2)/d by continuous infusion for 168 hours every 21 days for up to 15 cycles of treatment. The median number of completed cycles was 3. RESULTS: One patient had a complete remission (CR) (2.4%) with an additional 2 patients (5.9%) responding, with a median progression-free survival of 58 days. CONCLUSIONS: YM155 was well tolerated with major toxicities including anemia and fatigue. Whereas YM155 had limited single-agent activity, preclinical data suggest its role in combination with other agents, including rituximab, and a study of that combination in ongoing.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Inhibidoras de la Apoptosis/antagonistas & inhibidores , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Naftoquinonas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Terminación Anticipada de los Ensayos Clínicos , Femenino , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naftoquinonas/administración & dosificación , Naftoquinonas/efectos adversos , Survivin , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and safety of YM155, a novel, small-molecule suppressor of survivin, as single-agent therapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC who had experienced treatment failure during one or two prior chemotherapy regimens (at least one of which was platinum based) received YM155 as a continuous intravenous infusion (4.8 mg/m(2)/d) over 168 hours followed by observation for 14 days in 21-day treatment cycles. The primary end point was objective tumor response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of stable disease (SD), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and pharmacokinetic profiles, and pharmacodynamic evaluations. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received YM155. Two patients achieved a confirmed partial response, with an ORR of 5.4% (95% CI, 0.7% to 18.2%). An additional 14 patients (37.8%) achieved SD resulting in a disease control rate of 43.2% (95% CI, 27.1% to 60.5%). Median duration of PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.8 months). Median duration of OS was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4 to 12.2 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 35.1%. Treatment with YM155 was well tolerated with the majority of treatment discontinuations not treatment related. CONCLUSION: YM155 exhibited modest single-agent activity in patients with refractory, advanced NSCLC. A favorable safety/tolerability profile was reported. Further evaluation of YM155 in combination with chemotherapy and other targeted agents may be warranted.