The Seventh Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST VII)-A randomized clinical trial of atomoxetine for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: Rationale and study design.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is common, recurs, and is associated with markedly reduced quality of life, anxiety, and frequent injuries. The few pharmacological therapies for VVS proven to have a moderate benefit in reducing recurrences are limited to patients without coexisting conditions such as hypertension or heart failure. Although there is some data to suggest Atomoxetine, a norepinephrine reuptake transport inhibitor (NET), may be a promising treatment option, an adequately powered randomized placebo-controlled trial is needed. STUDY DESIGN: POST VII is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study that will randomize 180 patients with VVS and at least 2 syncopal spells in the preceding year to a target daily dose of atomoxetine 80 mg daily or to a matching placebo, with an observation period of 6 months in each phase and with a 1-week washout period between phases. The primary end point will be the proportion of patients with at least one syncope recurrence in each arm analyzed with an intention-to-treat approach. The secondary end points include total syncope burden, quality of life, cost, and cost-effectiveness. POWER CALCULATIONS: Assuming a 33% relative risk reduction in syncope recurrence with atomoxetine, and a dropout rate of 16%, the enrollment of 180 patients will give an 85% power of reaching a positive conclusion about atomoxetine, with P = .05. CONCLUSIONS: This will be the first adequately powered trial to determine whether atomoxetine is effective in preventing VVS. If proven effective, atomoxetine might become the first-line pharmacological treatment for recurrent VVS.

Atomoxetine for suppression of vasovagal syncope.

OBJECTIVE: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a common clinical condition with few effective medical therapies. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of atomoxetine in suppressing syncope in patients with recurrent VVS. METHODS: This was a retrospective, open-label, observational case series of 12 patients taking atomoxetine for suppression of recurrent vasovagal syncope. We compared syncope frequency in the 1 year before atomoxetine and while subjects were taking atomoxetine. We used novel applications of the Poisson distribution to describe the results as a collection of n = 1 studies. RESULTS: There were 12 subjects, eight female, with a mean age 47 ± 22 years and a mean Calgary Syncope Symptom Score of 2 (diagnostic of vasovagal syncope). The patients received a mean dose of atomoxetine of 66 ± 16 mg (1.06 ± 0.21 mg/kg). The mean follow-up period was 1.21 ± 1.01 years. While taking atomoxetine, 11/12 patients appeared to improve and 7/12 had no syncope in follow-up (p = 0.0046). The annualized syncope frequency decreased from a median 5.5 (IQR 4, 6.75) syncope per year to 0 (IQR 0, 0.88) syncope per year (p = 0.002, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). According to the Poisson distribution, 7/12 subjects significantly improved with p values of < 0.0001 to 0.0235, 3/12 did not faint but had too brief follow-up times to detect significance, and 2/12 did not improve significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, atomoxetine was a promising oral agent for the prevention of vasovagal syncope. The Poisson distribution permits individual patient-level assessment of improvement and detects insufficient follow-up despite apparent improvement.

Cardioneuroablation for vasovagal syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardioneuroablation (CNA) has emerged as promising therapy for patients with refractory vasovagal syncope (VVS). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide a freedom from syncope estimate for CNA, including subgroup analysis by method and target of ablation. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE according to the PRISMA guidelines until February 14, 2022. Observational studies and clinical trials reporting freedom from syncope were included. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 465 patients were included across 14 studies (mean age 39.8 ± 4.0 year; 53.5% female). Different techniques were used to guide CNA: 50 patients (10.8%) by mapping fractionated electrograms, 73 (15.7%) with the spectral method, 210 (45.2%) with high-frequency stimulation, 73 (15.7%) with a purely anatomically guided method, and 59 (12.6%) with a combination. The target was biatrial in 168 patients (36.1%), left atrium only in 259 (55.7%), and right atrium only in 38 (8.2%). The freedom from syncope was 91.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1%-94.6%; I2 = 6.9%; P = .376). CNA limited to right atrial ablation was associated with a significant lower freedom from syncope (81.5%; 95% CI 51.9%-94.7%; P <.0001) vs left atrial ablation only (94.0%; 95% CI 88.6%--6.9%) and biatrial ablation (92.7%; 95% CI 86.8%-96.1%). Subgroup analysis according to the technique used to identify ganglionated plexi did not show any significant difference in freedom from syncope (P = .206). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests a high freedom from syncope after CNA in VVS. Well-designed, double-blind, multicenter, sham-controlled randomized clinical trials are needed to provide evidence for future guidelines.

Midodrine for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a common clinical condition that lacks effective medical therapies despite being associated with significant morbidity. Current guidelines suggest that midodrine, a prodrug for an α1-adrenergic receptor agonist, might suppress VVS but supporting studies have utilized heterogeneous methods and yielded inconsistent results. To evaluate the efficacy of midodrine to prevent syncope in patients with recurrent VVS by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases without language restriction from inception to June 2021. All studies were conducted in clinical syncope populations and compared the benefit of midodrine vs. placebo or non-pharmacological standard care. Weighted relative risks (RRs) were estimated using random effects meta-analysis techniques. Seven studies (n = 315) met inclusion criteria. Patients were 33 ± 17 years of age and 31% male. Midodrine was found to substantially reduce the likelihood of positive head-up-tilt (HUT) test outcomes [RR = 0.37 (0.23-0.59), P < 0.001]. In contrast, the pooled results of single- and double-blind clinical trials (I2 = 54%) suggested a more modest benefit from midodrine for the prevention of clinical syncope [RR = 0.51 (0.33-0.79), P = 0.003]. The two rigorous double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials included 179 VVS patients with minimal between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) and reported a risk reduction with midodrine [RR = 0.71 (0.53-0.95), P = 0.02]. CONCLUSIONS: Midodrine is effective in preventing syncope induced by HUT testing and less, but still significant, RR reduction in randomized, double-blinded clinical trials.

Syncope and the aging patient: Navigating the challenges.

Syncope in the elderly patient is a common presentation and the most common causes are usually non-cardiac. Older adults however are more challenging dilemmas as their presentation is complicated by co-morbidities, mainly cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders. Frailty and cognitive impairment add to the ambiguity of the presentation, and polypharmacy is often a major modifiable contributing factor. Vasovagal syncope is a common presentation throughout life even as we age. It has a favorable prognosis and conservative management usually suffices. Vasovagal syncope in this population may be misdiagnosed as accidental falls and is frequently associated with injury, as is carotid sinus syndrome. The initial approach to these patients entails a detailed history and physical examination including a comprehensive medication history, orthostatic vital signs, and a 12-lead electrocardiogram. Further cardiac and neuroimaging rarely helps, unless directed by specific clinical findings. Head-up tilt testing and carotid sinus massage retain their diagnostic accuracy and safety in the elderly, and implantable loop recorders provide important information in many elderly patients with unexplained falls and syncope. The starting point in management of this population with non-cardiac syncope is attempting to withdraw unnecessary vasoactive and psychotropic medications. Non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy for syncope in the elderly has limited efficacy and safety concerns. In selected patients, pacemaker therapy might offer symptomatic relief despite lack of efficacy when vasodepression is prominent. An approach focused on primary care with targeted specialist referral seems a safe and effective strategy.

Genetic markers of vasovagal syncope.

Vasovagal syncope may have a genetic predisposition. It has a high prevalence in some families, and children of a fainting parent are more likely to faint than those without a parent who faints. Having two fainting parents or a fainting twin increases the likelihood even further. Several genotypes appear to associate with the phenotype of positive tilt tests, but the control subjects are usually those who faint and have negative tilt tests. Twin studies, highly focused genome-wide association studies, and copy number variation studies all suggest there are loci in the genome that associate with vasovagal syncope, although the specific genes, pathways, and proteins are unknown. A recent multigenerational kindred candidate gene study identified 3 genes that associate with vasovagal syncope. The best evidence to date is for central signaling genes involving serotonin and dopamine. Genome-wide association studies to date have not yet been helpful. Our understanding of the genetic correlates of vasovagal syncope leaves ample opportunity for future work.

Clinician needs and perceptions about cardioneuroablation for recurrent vasovagal syncope: An international clinician survey.

BACKGROUND: Cardioneuroablation (CNA) targets the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system ganglionated plexi located in the peri-atrial epicardial fat. There is increasing interest in CNA as a treatment of vasovagal syncope (VVS), despite no randomized clinical trial (RCT) data. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to poll the opinion on CNA) for VVS. METHODS: A REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) survey was administered to international physicians treating patients with VVS on their opinion about patient selection criteria, ablation approach, RCT design, and most appropriate end points for CNA procedures. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 118 physicians; 86% were cardiac electrophysiologists. The majority of respondents (79%) would consider referring a patient with refractory VVS for CNA, and 27% have performed CNA for VVS themselves. Most felt patient selection should require a head-up tilt test with a cardioinhibitory response (67%) and suggest a minimum age of 18 years with a median of 3 (interquartile range 2-5) episodes in the past year. There were differences in patient selection between physicians who have performed CNA themselves and those who have not. The majority felt that the ablation strategy should include both atria (70%) with an anatomical approach in combination with autonomic stimulation (85%). Performing a sham procedure in the control arm was supported by 56% of respondents, providing equipoise in RCT design. The preferred primary outcome was freedom from syncope within 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: There is widespread support for well-designed RCTs to confirm the hypothesized clinical benefit of CNA, provide data to guide the risk-benefit equations during patient selection, and appropriately estimate the placebo effect.

Likelihood of injury due to vasovagal syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common type of syncope and is usually considered a benign disorder. The potential for injury is worrisome but the likelihood is unknown. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients injured due to VVS. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search of studies published until August 2020 was performed in multiple medical and nursing databases. Included studies had data on the proportion of patients with injury due to VVS prior to study enrolment. Random effects methods were used. Twenty-three studies having 3593 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were diagnosed clinically with VVS, and 82% had >2 syncopal episodes before enrolment. Tilt test was positive in 60% and 14 studies reported comorbidities (32.6% hypertensive). The weighted mean injury rate was 33.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 27.3-40.5%]. The likelihood of injury correlated with population age (r = 0.4, P = 0.05), but not with sex, positive tilt test, or hypertension. The injury rates were 25.7% (95% CI: 19.1-32.8%) in studies with younger patients (mean age ≤50 years, n = 1803) and 43.4% (95% CI: 34.9-52.3%) in studies with older patients (P = 0.002). Nine studies reported major injuries; with a weighted mean rate of major injuries of 13.9% (95% CI: 9.5-19.8%). CONCLUSION: Injuries due to syncope are frequent, occurring in 33% of patients with VVS. The risk of major injuries is substantial. Older patients are at higher risk. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of injuries when providing care and advice to patients with VVS.

A comparison of health-related quality of life in autonomic disorders: postural tachycardia syndrome versus vasovagal syncope.

PURPOSE: Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and vasovagal syncope (VVS) are two disorders of orthostatic intolerance which are often misdiagnosed as the other. In each case, patients experience a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to healthy populations. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that HRQoL is worse in POTS. METHODS: POTS patients were recruited from the Dysautonomia International Annual Patient and Caregiver Conference. VVS patient data came from those enrolled in the Second Prevention of Syncope Trial. Participants aged ≥ 18 years (177 POTS and 72 VVS) completed the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, a generic and coherent health-related quality of life survey. RESULTS: POTS patients reported reduced HRQoL compared to VVS patients in physical functioning (42.5 ± 1.7 vs. 76.5 ± 2.9, p < 0.001), role limitations due to physical health (11.4 ± 1.9 vs. 33.0 ± 5.0, p < 0.001), energy and fatigue (27.2 ± 1.3 vs. 50.7 ± 2.6, p < 0.001), social functioning (45.2 ± 1.8 vs. 71.2 ± 2.9, p < 0.001), pain (48.8 ± 1.9 vs. 67.7 ± 2.9, p < 0.001), and general health (31.2 ± 1.5 vs. 60.5 ± 2.6, p < 0.001) domains. Scores did not differ significantly in the role limitations due to emotional health (p = 0.052) and emotional well-being (p = 0.271) domains. Physical and general health composite scores were lower in the POTS population, while mental health composite scores were not different. CONCLUSION: Differences in HRQoL exist between these patient populations. POTS patients report lower scores in physical and general health domains than VVS patients, but emotional health domains do not differ significantly. Targeting physical functioning in these patients may help improve quality of life.

Lack of benefit from hospitalization in patients with syncope: A propensity analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Patients with syncope are frequently admitted to the hospital, but whether this improves outcome is unknown. We tested whether hospitalization reduced mortality in patients who presented to emergency departments (EDs) with syncope. METHODS: We conducted a propensity analysis of the outcomes of patients ≥18 years old presenting to EDs with a primary diagnosis of syncope in April 2004-March 2013. The model used 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching to predicted admission using age, sex, urban residence, household income, and 14 significant comorbidities from 4 administrative databases of the province of Alberta. The primary outcome was death. RESULTS: There were 57,417 ED patients with a primary diagnosis of syncope; 8864 were admitted, and 48,553 were discharged in <24 hours. Admitted patients were older (median 76 vs 49 years), male (53% vs 45%), rural (23% vs 18%), and had lower income (median $58,599 vs $61,422); all P < 0.001. All comorbidities were higher in admitted patients (mean Charlson scores, 1.9 vs 0.7; P < 0.001). The propensity-matched hospitalized patients had higher 30-day mortality (3.5% vs 1.0%) and 1-year mortality (14.1% vs 8.6%); both P < 0.001. Mortality in all propensity quintiles was higher in the hospitalized group (all P < 0.001). The most common causes of death in 2719 patients included chronic ischemic heart disease, 14%; lung cancer, 7.1%; acute myocardial infarction, 6.9%; stroke, 3.7%; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 3.6%; dementia, 2.6%; and heart failure, 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital admission did not reduce early or late mortality in patients who presented to the ED with syncope. Mortality is associated with comorbidities.

Frequency of injuries associated with syncope in the prevention of syncope trials.

AIMS: Syncope can lead to injuries. We determined the frequency, severity, and predictors of injuries due to syncope in cohorts of syncope patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants were enrolled in the POST2 (fludrocortisone) and POST4 (midodrine) vasovagal syncope (VVS) randomized trials, and POST3 enrolled patients with bifascicular block and syncope. Injury was defined as minor (bruising, abrasions), moderate (lacerations), and severe (fractures, burns, joint pain), and recorded up to 1 year after enrolment. A total of 459 patients (median 39 years) were analysed. There were 710 faints occurred in 186 patients during a 1-year follow-up. Fully 56/186 (30%) of patients were injured with syncope (12% of overall group). There were 102 injuries associated with the 710 faints (14%), of which 19% were moderate or severe injuries. Neither patient age, sex, nor the presence of prodromal symptoms associated with injury-free survival. Patients with bifascicular block were more prone to injury (relative risk 1.98, P = 0.018). Patients with ≥4 faints in the prior year had more injuries than those with fewer faints (relative risk 2.97, P < 0.0001), but this was due to more frequent syncope, and not more injuries per faint. In VVS patients, pharmacological therapy significantly reduced the likelihood of an injury due to a syncopal spell (relative risk 0.64, P = 0.015). Injury severity did not associate with age, sex, or prior-year syncope frequency. CONCLUSION: Injuries are frequent in syncope patients, but only 4% of injuries were severe. None of age, sex, and prodromal symptoms associate with injury.

Pharmacological norepinephrine transporter inhibition for the prevention of vasovagal syncope in young and adult subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) significantly reduces quality of life, yet lacks effective medical therapies. Pharmacological norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibition increases synaptic norepinephrine reuptake, which may be able to prevent hypotension, bradycardia, and syncope. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the ability of 3 NET inhibitors-reboxetine, sibutramine, and atomoxetine-to prevent head-up tilt-induced vasovagal outcomes in healthy participants and patients with VVS. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature without language restriction from database inception to August 2019. All randomized controlled trials comparing the benefit of a NET inhibitor vs placebo in adult populations were selected for review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four studies (101 participants) met inclusion criteria. The mean study size was 25 (range 11-56) participants. NET inhibition reduced the likelihood of vasovagal reactions marked by hypotension and bradycardia in healthy participants during head-up tilt testing (relative risk 0.15; 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.52; P = .003). This relative risk reduction also occurred in patients with VVS during head-up tilt when given atomoxetine (relative risk 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.86; P = .01). This was achieved through heart rate compensation with NET inhibition toward the end of tilt testing (106 ± 32 beats/min vs 60 ± 22 beats/min; P < .001), which in turn preserved cardiac output and mean arterial pressure (71 ± 20 mm Hg vs 43 ± 13 mm Hg; P < .001) in the absence of significantly increased systemic vascular resistance. CONCLUSION: NET inhibition prevents severe vasovagal reactions and syncope induced by head-up tilt testing in both healthy participants and patients with VVS. Pharmacological NET inhibition is a promising potential treatment of recurrent syncope.

A proof of principle study of atomoxetine for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: the Prevention of Syncope Trial VI.

AIMS: There are few effective therapies for vasovagal syncope (VVS). Pharmacological norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibition increases sympathetic tone and decreases tilt-induced syncope in healthy subjects. Atomoxetine is a potent and highly selective NET inhibitor. We tested the hypothesis that atomoxetine prevents tilt-induced syncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: Vasovagal syncope patients were given two doses of study drug [randomized to atomoxetine 40 mg (n = 27) or matched placebo (n = 29)] 12 h apart, followed by a 60-min drug-free head-up tilt table test. Beat-to-beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and cardiac haemodynamics were recorded using non-invasive techniques and stroke volume modelling. Patients were 35 ± 14 years (73% female) with medians of 12 lifetime and 3 prior year faints. Fewer subjects fainted with atomoxetine than with placebo [10/29 vs. 19/27; P = 0.003; risk ratio 0.49 (confidence interval 0.28-0.86)], but equal numbers of patients developed presyncope or syncope (23/29 vs. 21/27). Of patients who developed only presyncope, 87% (13/15) had received atomoxetine. Patients with syncope had lower nadir mean arterial pressure than subjects with only presyncope (39 ± 18 vs. 69 ± 18 mmHg, P < 0.0001), and this was due to lower trough HRs in subjects with syncope (67 ± 30 vs. 103 ± 32 b.p.m., P = 0.006) and insignificantly lower cardiac index (2.20 ± 1.36 vs. 2.84 ± 1.05 L/min/m2, P = 0.075). There were no significant differences in stroke volume index (32 ± 6 vs. 35 ± 5 mL/m2, P = 0.29) or systemic vascular resistance index (2156 ± 602 vs. 1790 ± 793 dynes*s/cm5*m2, P = 0.72). CONCLUSION: Norepinephrine transporter inhibition significantly decreased the risk of tilt-induced syncope in VVS subjects, mainly by blunting reflex bradycardia, thereby preventing final falls in cardiac index and BP.

Quality of life improves in vasovagal syncope patients after clinical trial enrollment regardless of fainting in follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Frequent syncope is linked to poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recurrent syncope has been observed to reduce in all groups after seeing a syncope expert and enrolling in a clinical trial. It is unknown if HRQoL improves with this reduction in syncope recurrence. OBJECTIVES: We examined the change in HRQoL over time in vasovagal syncope (VVS) patients seen by a syncope expert and enrolled in a trial. We also explored whether change differed with treatment or the frequency of fainting during follow up. METHODS: The Short Form Health Survey (SF36) was completed at baseline (BL), 6 m, and 12 m post-enrollment by VVS patients in the 1st and 2nd Prevention of Syncope Trials, which were multi-centered, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of metoprolol (POST) and fludrocortisone (POST2). Differences in HRQoL at BL, 6 m, and 12 m were analyzed and compared by faints in follow-up and randomization group. RESULTS: Complete study data were available for 143 VVS patients (40 ±â€¯17 years, 62% F). Over 12 months, patients reported improvement in all SF36 dimensions except for bodily pain. Post hoc analyses indicated that differences first occurred between BL and 6 m for all but general health. Fainting in follow-up or drug randomization group did not diminish the improvements. The baseline syncope burden was not different whether patients' HRQoL improved or not. CONCLUSION: HRQoL of VVS patients improves over time after enrolling in a clinical trial, even with recurrent faints or randomization to placebo. Improvements may result from alternative factors, such as interaction with experts or patient adjustment.

Reduced quality of life and greater psychological distress in vasovagal syncope patients compared to healthy individuals.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) patients have a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There are limited data comparing HRQoL and psychological profile in VVS patients and healthy individuals. We tested the hypothesis that VVS patients have greater impairment in both HRQoL and psychological profile compared to healthy nonfainting individuals, and that both outcome measures are negatively correlated for VVS patients. METHODS: The RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND36), global health visual analogue scale (VAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form were completed by healthy individuals and at baseline by VVS patients enrolled in the Second Prevention of Syncope Trial, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fludrocortisone for VVS. RESULTS: Data were available on 76 VVS patients (34 ± 14 years; 68% F) and 85 healthy participants (35 ± 11 years; 80% F). Compared to healthy participants, VVS patients reported poorer HRQoL on all scales of the RAND36 and the VAS. VVS patients had significantly greater anxiety, depression, and anxiety sensitivity (each P < 0.001). VVS patients had more negative affect (P < 0.001) and less positive affect (P = 0.003) compared to healthy participants. Anxiety, depression, and anxiety sensitivity were negatively correlated with HRQoL for VVS patients, but not for healthy participants. CONCLUSION: In this first direct comparison, VVS patients have a significantly reduced HRQoL and more anxiety and depression compared to healthy nonfainting individuals. For VVS patients, there is a relationship between psychological distress and HRQoL, suggesting a potential benefit from more comprehensive assessment and treatment.