Accuracy Verification of Respiratory-gated Radiotherapy that Combines the Respiration-Monitoring Device and Respiratory-gated System.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mechanical accuracy of a respiratory-gated radiation system that combines the Linear Indicator-equipped Abches respiration-monitoring device and the Varian Real-time Position Management system (LI-RPM system). This combined configuration, implemented for the first time in Japan, was compared with the stand-alone Varian RPM system (RPM system). The delay times, dose profiles, and output waveforms of the LI-RPM and RPM systems were evaluated using a self-produced dynamic phantom. The delay times for the LI-RPM and RPM systems were both 0.1 s for 4 s and 8 s test periods. The corresponding output waveform correlation factors (R2) for the 4 s and 8 s test periods were 0.9981 and 0.9975, respectively. No difference was observed in the dose profiles of the two systems. Thus, the present results indicate that the proposed LI-RPM combined respiratory-gated radiation system has similar properties to the RPM system. However, it offers several advantages in terms of its versatility, including its alignment assistance capabilities for non-coplanar treatments.

Dosimetric properties and clinical application of an a-Si EPID for dynamic IMRT quality assurance.

Dosimetric properties of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were investigated as a replacement for conventional verification tools. The portal dosimetry system of Varian's EPID (aS1000) has an integrated image mode for portal dosimetry (PD). The source-to-imager distance was 105 cm, and there were no extra buildup materials on the surface of the EPID in this study. Several dosimetric properties were examined. For clinical dosimetry, the dose distributions of dynamic IMRT beams for prostate cancer (19 patients, 97 beams) were measured by EPID and compared with the results of ionization chamber (IC) measurements. In addition, pretreatment measurements for prostate IMRT (50 patients, 309 beams) were performed by EPID and were evaluated by the gamma method (criterion: 3 mm/3 %). The signal-to-monitor unit ratio of PD showed dose dependence, indicating ghosting effects. Tongue-and-groove effects were observed as a result of the dose difference in the measured EPID images. The results of PD for clinical IMRT beams were in good agreement with the predicted dose image with average values of 1.37 and 0.25 for γ (max) and γ (ave), respectively. The point doses of PD were slightly, but significantly, higher than the results of IC measurements (p < 0.05 paired t test). However, this small difference seems clinically acceptable. This portal dosimetry system is useful as a rapid and convenient verification tool for dynamic IMRT.

Dosimetric properties of radiophotoluminescent glass detector in low-energy photon beams.

PURPOSE: A radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter (RGD) has recently become commercially available. It is being increasingly used for dosimetry in radiotherapy to measure the absorbed dose including scattered low-energy photons on the body surface of a patient and for postal dosimetry audit. In this article, the dosimetric properties of the RGD, including energy dependence of the dose response, reproducibly, variation in data obtained by the RGD for each energy, and angular dependence in low-energy photons, are discussed. METHODS: An RGD (GD-301, Asahi Techno Glass Corporation, Shizuoka, Japan) was irradiated with monochromatic low-energy photon beams generated by synchrotron radiation at Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK). The size of GD-301 was 1.5 mm in diameter and 8.5 mm in length and the active dose readout volume being 1 mm diameter and 0.6 mm depth located 0.7 mm from the end of the detector. The energy dependence of the dose response and reproducibility and variation were investigated for RGDs irradiated with a plastic holder and those irradiated without the plastic holder. Response of the RGD was obtained by not only conventional single field irradiation but also bilateral irradiation. Angular dependence of the RGD was measured in the range of 0°-90° for 13, 17, 40, and 80 keV photon beams by conventional single field irradiation. RESULTS: The dose responses had a peak at around 40 keV. For the energy range of less than 25 keV, all dose response curves steeply decreased in comparison with the ratio of mass energy absorption coefficient of the RGD to that of air. As for the reproducibility and variation in data obtained by the RGD, the coefficient of variance increased with decrease in photon energy. Furthermore, the variation for bilateral irradiation was less than that for single field irradiation. Regarding angular dependence of the RGD, for energies of 13 and 17 keV, the response decreased with increase in the irradiation angle, and the minimum values were 93.5% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed the dosimetric properties of the RGD, including the energy dependence of the dose response, reproducibly, variation, and angular dependence in low-energy photons and suggest that the accuracy of the absorbed dose in low-energy photons is affected by the readout method and the distribution of radiophotoluminescence centers in the RGD.

Visual comparisons between Cherenkov radiation from water and fluorescence from a scintillator.

A system for observing blue light of Cherenkov radiation was constructed using a Co-60 gamma-ray irradiation unit. However, there was some doubt that the observed light was not Cherenkov light, but scintillation. Therefore, the radiation from water was compared with that from a scintillator. The difference between both luminosities was examined using photographs taken in a dark irradiation room with mirrors and a camera. The radiation from the scintillator was much stronger than that from water. The differences between luminosities of the light radiated in the beam direction, at right angles to the beam and in the reverse beam direction were examined for both radiations. The luminosity from water showed very definite anisotropy, while that from the scintillator was almost isotropic. Furthermore, the light radiated in the beam direction from water was the strongest, and the strengths of the light radiated in the three directions from the scintillator were almost equivalent to each other. It was confirmed that the radiation from water irradiated by Co-60 gamma-rays was indeed Cherenkov light. The anisotropy of the radiated Cherenkov light and the isotropy of the scintillation were clearly observed in the photographs.