Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
BMC Pediatr ; 14: 309, 2014 Dec 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25514973

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New standardised parenteral nutrition (SPN) formulations were implemented in July 2011 in many neonatal intensive care units in New South Wales following consensus group recommendations. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of new consensus formulations in preterm infants born less than 32 weeks. METHODS: A before-after intervention study conducted at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Data from the post-consensus cohort (2011 to 2012) were prospectively collected and compared retrospectively with a pre-consensus cohort of neonates (2010). RESULTS: Post-consensus group commenced parenteral nutrition (PN) significantly earlier (6 v 11 hours of age, p 0.005). In comparison to the pre-consensus cohort, there was a higher protein intake from day 1 (1.34 v 0.49 g/kg, p 0.000) to day 7 (3.55 v 2.35 g/kg, p 0.000), higher caloric intake from day 1 (30 v 26 kcal/kg, p 0.004) to day 3 (64 v 62 kcal/kg, p 0.026), and less daily fluid intake from day 3 (105.8 v 113.8 mL/kg, p 0.011) to day 7 (148.8 v 156.2 mL/kg, p 0.025), and reduced duration of lipid therapy (253 v 475 hr, p 0.011). This group also had a significantly greater weight gain in the first 4 weeks (285 v 220 g, p 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: New consensus SPN solutions provided better protein intake in the first 7 days and were associated with greater weight gain in the first 4 weeks. However, protein intake on day 1 was below the consensus goal of 2 g/kg/day.


Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Nutrición Parenteral , Aumento de Peso , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Ingestión de Energía , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Nueva Gales del Sur , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (8): CD007448, 2012 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22895960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the exact aetiology of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) remains unknown, research suggests that it is multifactorial; suspected pathophysiological mechanisms include immaturity, intestinal ischaemia, disruption of intestinal mucosal integrity, formula feeding, hyperosmolar load to the intestine, infection and bacterial translocation. Various antibiotic regimens have been widely used in the treatment of NEC. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of different antibiotic regimens on mortality and the need for surgery in neonates with NEC. SEARCH METHODS: Searches were made of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2012), Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE (1966 to February 2012), EMBASE (1980 to February 2012) and CINAHL (1982 to February 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials where antibiotic regimens were used for treatment of NEC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility of studies for inclusion was assessed independently by each review author. The criteria and standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used to assess the methodological quality of the included trials. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials met the inclusion criteria. Faix 1988 randomised 42 premature infants with radiological diagnosis of NEC. Infants were randomised to receive either intravenous ampicillin and gentamicin or ampicillin, gentamicin and clindamycin. Hansen 1980 randomised 20 infants with NEC to receive intravenous ampicillin and gentamicin with or without enteral gentamicin.In the study by Faix 1988, there were no statistical differences in mortality (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.32 to 3.83) or bowel perforation (RR 2.20; 95% CI 0.45 to 10.74) between the two groups although there was a trend towards higher rate of strictures in the group that received clindamycin (RR 7.20; 95% CI 0.97 to 53.36).The Hansen 1980 study showed no statistically significant difference in death, bowel perforation or development of strictures. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to recommend a particular antibiotic regimen for the treatment of NEC. There were concerns about adverse effects following the usage of clindamycin, related to the development of strictures. To address this issue a large randomised controlled trial needs to be performed.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/mortalidad , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Enfermedades del Prematuro/mortalidad , Perforación Intestinal/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
5.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 46(6): 354-6, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20163531

RESUMEN

Respiratory distress in the neonate with collapse/hyperinflation of the lung can be because of a number of causes, which includes extraluminal, parenchymal and endobronchial lesions. Endobronchial tumour and polyps as the cause of collapse/hyperinflation in newborns are quite rare. We report a case of preterm newborn with respiratory distress secondary to endobronchial inflammatory granuloma and discuss the relevant issues in diagnosis and management.


Asunto(s)
Bronquios/inmunología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/inmunología , Pólipos/inmunología , Bronquios/fisiopatología , Broncoscopía , Granuloma/complicaciones , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades Pulmonares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Pólipos/complicaciones , Pólipos/diagnóstico , Nacimiento Prematuro , Respiración Artificial , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA