Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Ultraschall Med ; 35(3): 259-66, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24563420

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for differentiating malignant from benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) and for diagnosing different FLL types. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CEUS performed in 14 Romanian centers was prospectively collected between February 2011 and June 2012. The inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years; patients diagnosed with 1 - 3 de novo FLLs on B-mode ultrasound; reference method (computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or biopsy) available; patient's informed consent. FLL lesions were characterized during CEUS according to the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology guidelines. For statistical analysis, indeterminate FLLs at CEUS were rated as false classifications. RESULTS: A total number of 536 cases were included in the final analysis, 344 malignant lesions (64.2 %) and 192 benign lesions (35.8 %). The reference method was: CT/MRI - 379 cases (70.7 %), pathological exam - 150 cases (27.9 %) and aspiration of liver abscesses - 7 cases (1.4 %). CEUS was conclusive in 89.3 % and inconclusive in 10.7 % of cases. To differentiate between malignant and benign FLLs, CEUS had 85.7 % sensitivity, 85.9 % specificity, 91.6 % positive predictive value, 77.1 % negative predictive value and 85.8 % accuracy. The CEUS accuracy for differentiation between malignant and benign liver lesions was similar in tumors with diameter ≤ 2 cm and those with diameter > 2 cm. CONCLUSION: CEUS represents a useful method in clinical practice for differentiating between malignant and benign FLLs detected on standard ultrasonography, and the results of this study are in concordance with previous multicenter studies: DEGUM (Germany) and STIC (France).


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Hepatopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/patología , Absceso Hepático/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso Hepático/patología , Hepatopatías/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Valores de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
2.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 108(1): 86-90, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23464775

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The aim of the paper was to evaluate the national availability of colonoscopy and the quality parameters of this procedure in our country. MATERIAL AND METHOD: During a 6 months period (01.07- 31.12.2009), we performed a prospective multicenter study in which 76 centers were invited to respond to a questionnaire regarding colonoscopy, 39 centers agreeing to participate. We assessed: the number of colonoscopies, the number of total colonoscopies and the causes of incomplete colonoscopies. RESULTS: During the study period, 16,083 colonoscopies were performed, 12,294 (76.4%) of them total colonoscopies. In 1,191 cases, stenosis was the cause of incomplete colonoscopy. If we consider this an objective reason for an incomplete colonoscopy, there were 12,294 total colonoscopies (82.4%). Comparing university centers with non-university ones, the proportion of total colonoscopies was 10,400/12,475 (83.4%) vs. 1,894/2,417 (78.4%) (p less then 0.0001). However, comparing the present study with previous ones, performed in 2003 and 2007, the proportion of total colonoscopies increased from 70.5% to 76.9% and 82.4% respectively (2003 vs. 2007 p less then 0.0001; 2007 vs. 2009 p less then 0.0001), while the quality difference between university and non-university hospitals persisted. CONCLUSIONS: the quality of colonoscopy in Romania increased in the last 5 years, while the quality difference between university and non-university hospitals persisted.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía/normas , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Comunitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Rumanía/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Ultraschall Med ; 33(6): 550-8, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22833202

RESUMEN

Liver Biopsy was considered the "gold standard" for severity assessment in chronic hepatitis for a very long time. In recent years, non invasive methods were developed in order to replace it. Among them ultrasound based elastographic methods: Transient Elastography (already validated and replacing liver biopsy in some countries), Real Time Tissue Elastography and Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography (currently under evaluation) and Shear Wave Elastography (the newest one). As an alternative to liver biopsy, the development of all these non invasive methods for dynamic evaluation of liver fibrosis will decrease the need for LB, making clinical care safer and more convenient for patients with liver diseases.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/tendencias , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Hepatopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/patología , Biopsia/instrumentación , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia/tendencias , Enfermedad Crónica , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Predicción , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Hepatitis C Crónica/patología , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/patología , Hepatopatías/patología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
4.
Ultraschall Med ; 32(3): 281-5, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21321841

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the values of thyroid tissue elasticity in subjects without known thyroid pathology, in patients with Graves' disease and with chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (CAT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study that included 74 subjects, 23 without thyroid pathology, 29 with Graves' disease and 22 with CAT (diagnosed by specific tests). In all patients, 10 elastographic measurements were performed in the right thyroid lobe (RTL) and 10 in the left thyroid lobe (LTL) using a 2-6 MHz convex probe. Median values were calculated for each thyroid lobe, measured in meters/second (m/sec). We calculated a mean ARFI value from measurements made in the RTL and LTL. RESULTS: Thyroid stiffness was statistically significant lower in normal subjects vs. those with Graves' disease (2.07±0.44 m/sec vs. 2.82±0.47 m/sec, p<0.001) and with CAT (2.07±0.44 m/sec vs. 2.49±0.48 m/sec, p=0.004). We also found a statistically significant difference between subjects without thyroid pathology and those with autoimmune thyroid pathology (Graves' disease and CAT) (2.07±0.44 m/sec vs. 2.68±0.50 m/sec, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: ARFI seems to be a useful method for the evaluation of diffuse thyroid gland pathology and is able to predict with sufficient accuracy the presence of thyroid diffuse diseases (AUROC=0.80).


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad , Enfermedad de Graves/diagnóstico por imagen , Glándula Tiroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Tiroiditis Autoinmune/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Femenino , Enfermedad de Graves/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Glándula Tiroides/patología , Tiroiditis Autoinmune/patología
5.
Ultraschall Med ; 32 Suppl 1: S46-52, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20603783

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare two methods of noninvasive assessment: transient elastography (TE) and acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study included 114 subjects: 38 healthy volunteers, (considered to have no fibrosis - F 0) and 76 patients with chronic liver disease: 53 who had undergone liver biopsy (LB) (7 with F 1, 24 with F 2, 22 with F 3 Metavir) and 23 previously diagnosed with cirrhosis (F4 Metavir). In each patient we performed a liver stiffness measurement by means of TE and ARFI. ARFI (shear wave velocity quantification) was performed at 3 points: at 0 - 1 cm, at 1 - 2 cm and at 2 - 3 cm under the capsule. For each depth, 5 valid measurements were made, and a median value was calculated, measured in m/sec. RESULTS: A direct, strong, linear correlation (Spearman rho = 0.848) was found between TE and the stage of fibrosis (p < 0.001). A significant, direct correlation was found between ARFI measurements made 1 - 2 cm and 2 - 3 cm below the liver capsule and the severity of fibrosis (rho = 0.675 and 0.714 respectively). The subcapsularly measured ARFI values showed a poor correlation with fibrosis (rho = 0.469). The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was TE, with the area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.908, significantly larger than the AUROCs for ARFI. If only ARFI is considered, measurements made 1 - 2 and 2 - 3 cm below the capsule have the best predictive value, with AUROCs not significantly different from each other (0.767 and 0.731, respectively). For predicting fibrosis (F > 0), TE had the best predictive value: optimized cut-off 5.65 kPa (AUROC -0.898). For ARFI, the cut-offs were: 1.4 m/sec, AUROC -0.747 (1 - 2 cm), and 1.26 m/sec AUROC -0.721 (2 - 3 cm). For predicting cirrhosis (F = 4 Metavir), the optimized cut-offs were: TE -12.9 kPa (AUROC -0.994); ARFI - 1.78 m/sec for measurements made 2 - 3 cm below the capsule, AUROC - 0.951. CONCLUSION: At present, liver elasticity evaluation by means of ARFI is not superior to TE for the assessment of liver fibrosis. For ARFI, the most reliable results are obtained if measurements are made 1 - 2 and 2 - 3 cm below the liver capsule. ARFI is an accurate test for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Hepatitis Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Biopsia , Femenino , Hepatitis B Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Hepatitis B Crónica/patología , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico por imagen , Hepatitis C Crónica/patología , Hepatitis Alcohólica/diagnóstico por imagen , Hepatitis Alcohólica/patología , Hepatitis Crónica/patología , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/patología , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Valores de Referencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA