Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 54
Filtrar
1.
Lancet ; 403(10423): 261-270, 2024 Jan 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065194

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant breast radiotherapy as a standard component of breast-conserving treatment for early cancer can overtreat many women. Breast MRI is the most sensitive modality to assess local tumour burden. The aim of this study was to determine whether a combination of MRI and pathology findings can identify women with truly localised breast cancer who can safely avoid radiotherapy. METHODS: PROSPECT is a prospective, multicentre, two-arm, non-randomised trial of radiotherapy omission in patients selected using preoperative MRI and postoperative tumour pathology. It is being conducted at four academic hospitals in Australia. Women aged 50 years or older with cT1N0 non-triple-negative breast cancer were eligible. Those with apparently unifocal cancer had breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and, if pT1N0 or N1mi, had radiotherapy omitted (group 1). Standard treatment including excision of MRI-detected additional cancers was offered to the others (group 2). All were recommended systemic therapy. The primary outcome was ipsilateral invasive recurrence rate (IIRR) at 5 years in group 1. Primary analysis occurred after the 100th group 1 patient reached 5 years follow-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness of the PROSPECT pathway were analysed. This study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12610000810011). FINDINGS: Between May 17, 2011, and May 6, 2019, 443 patients with breast cancer underwent MRI. Median age was 63·0 years. MRI detected 61 malignant occult lesions separate from the index cancer in 48 patients (11%). Of 201 group 1 patients who had BCS without radiotherapy, the IIRR at 5 years was 1·0% (upper 95% CI 5·4%). In group 1, one local recurrence occurred at 4·5 years and a second at 7·5 years. In group 2, nine patients had mastectomy (2% of total cohort), and the 5-year IIRR was 1·7% (upper 95% CI 6·1%). The only distant metastasis in the entire cohort was genetically distinct from the index cancer. The PROSPECT pathway increased QALYs by 0·019 (95% CI 0·008-0·029) and saved AU$1980 (95% CI 1396-2528) or £953 (672-1216) per patient. INTERPRETATION: PROSPECT suggests that women with unifocal breast cancer on MRI and favourable pathology can safely omit radiotherapy. FUNDING: Breast Cancer Trials, National Breast Cancer Foundation, Cancer Council Victoria, the Royal Melbourne Hospital Foundation, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Mastectomía , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Victoria , Anciano
2.
Med J Aust ; 218(8): 368-373, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37005005

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of universal genetic testing of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, to estimate the incidence of pathogenic gene variants and their impact on patient management, and to evaluate patient and clinician acceptance of universal testing. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study of women with invasive or high grade in situ breast cancer and unknown germline status discussed at the Parkville Breast Service (Melbourne) multidisciplinary team meeting. Women were recruited to the pilot (12 June 2020 - 22 March 2021) and expansion phases (17 October 2021 - 8 November 2022) of the Mutational Assessment of newly diagnosed breast cancer using Germline and tumour genomICs (MAGIC) study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Germline testing by DNA sequencing, filtered for nineteen hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes that could be classified as actionable; only pathogenic variants were reported. Surveys before and after genetic testing assessed pilot phase participants' perceptions of genetic testing, and psychological distress and cancer-specific worry. A separate survey assessed clinicians' views on universal testing. RESULTS: Pathogenic germline variants were identified in 31 of 474 expanded study phase participants (6.5%), including 28 of 429 women with invasive breast cancer (6.5%). Eighteen of the 31 did not meet current genetic testing eligibility guidelines (probability of a germline pathogenic variant ≥ 10%, based on CanRisk, or Manchester score ≥ 15). Clinical management was changed for 24 of 31 women after identification of a pathogenic variant. Including 68 further women who underwent genetic testing outside the study, 44 of 542 women carried pathogenic variants (8.1%). Acceptance of universal testing was high among both patients (90 of 103, 87%) and clinicians; no decision regret or adverse impact on psychological distress or cancer-specific worry were reported. CONCLUSION: Universal genetic testing following the diagnosis of breast cancer detects clinically significant germline pathogenic variants that might otherwise be missed because of testing guidelines. Routine testing and reporting of pathogenic variants is feasible and acceptable for both patients and clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente
3.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(6): 1638-1645, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36797227

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This retrospective cohort study reports on overall survival and short-term complications, comparing laparoscopic to open resection for right-sided colon cancers. It is one of the largest studies in the field with generalizable population-level results. METHOD: This study on right sided colon cancers used prospectively collected administrative data linked to a death registry over 5 years from 2014 to 2018. Exclusion criteria were private patients, patients aged less than 10 years, synchronous and metachronous cancers. Propensity score weighting was used to balance cohorts and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the hazard of death. In addition, logistic regression analysis was used to assess secondary outcomes. For completeness, unweighted data was similarly analysed. RESULTS: There were 3603 patients identified for the analysis: 1729 open patients and 1874 laparoscopic patients. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the weighted data showed no evidence of a statistically significant effect of laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery on overall survival for right-sided colon cancers (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.04, P = 0.112). The weighted data showed lower odds of prolonged length of stay, return to theatre and discharge destination other than home in the laparoscopic cohort compared to the open cohort. There was no difference in inpatient mortality. Unweighted results were similar. CONCLUSION: This study validates the use of laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer, showing similar long-term overall survival and inpatient mortality compared to open surgery. It is superior to open surgery for the short-term outcomes of LOS, return to theatre and discharge destination other than home.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Colectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(1-2): 251-256, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36692298

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients with high breast cancer risk undergoing elective risk reduction mastectomy and reconstruction. These patients incur operative risk in the absence of active cancer, which renders their treatment experience unique. This study aimed to identify longer-term quality of life (QoL) issues that persist in this patient cohort. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study assessed PROs in 48 women with high breast cancer risk who attended the Royal Melbourne Hospital Risk Management Clinic, at least 12 months post-mastectomy and reconstruction, with surgery between 2011 and 2020, using the BREAST-Q© Likert surveys. The BREAST-Q© internationally validated QoL instrument scales survey data from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) in 14 domains addressing satisfaction and psychosocial issues. RESULTS: There was higher overall breast and psychosocial satisfaction, with scores of 11 and four, respectively, yet lower chest, abdomen and sexual well-being scores with 14, three and four, respectively, in contrast to normative BREAST-Q© data from >1000 women without prior breast cancer or breast operations. High average scores >90 were found for patient satisfaction with surgical, medical and office staff. Twenty-one patients had an average score of 63 for satisfaction with breast implants, while 27 patients post-DIEP had average scores >72 for abdominal well-being, appearance and overall outcomes. Higher mean QoL outcomes were found with DIEP flap in all domains, compared with breast implant reconstruction. CONCLUSION: QoL assessment with PROs 12 months post-risk reduction mastectomy and reconstruction demonstrated higher psychosocial well-being, yet highlights physical implications, with patients experiencing reduced chest, abdomen and sexual well-being, compared with normative BREAST-Q© control data. Higher mean QoL outcomes were found with DIEP flap compared with breast implant reconstruction. PROs studies can identify unmet needs and facilitate change in service provision.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Transversales , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción Personal
5.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 63(1): 86-92, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35815382

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy and caesarean section are known to predispose to the development of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), a rare form of functional ileus of the distal large bowel. Pathogenesis of ACPO is likely influenced by pregnancy and childbirth and subsequent changes to hormonal, autonomic and metabolic physiology. Identifying pregnancy risk factors will assist with early identification, as the insidious onset postpartum often leads to delayed diagnosis and bowel ischaemia, perforation and sepsis. AIMS: To establish pregnancy risk factors associated with the development of ACPO after caesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study included 19 121 women undergoing caesarean between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2016 at a tertiary referral hospital. Twenty-three cases of computerised tomography (CT)-diagnosed ACPO post-caesarean were identified from hospital medical records and imaging databases. Controls were matched for gestational and maternal age within one week of delivery with a ratio of 1:3. RESULTS: The incidence of ACPO was one in 800 caesarean sections. ACPO was significantly more likely to occur in women who had been administered opioid analgesia in labour (odds ratio (OR) 4.67, P = 0.04), and a trend for increased estimated blood loss (OR 1.01, P = 0.01). There was no increased risk associated with emergency or elective caesarean classification, previous abdominal surgery, type of anaesthesia, duration of labour, oxytocin augmentation, intrapartum fever, hypertensive disorders, diabetes in pregnancy, antepartum haemorrhage, multiple gestation, fetal presentation or birthweight. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for developing ACPO post-caesarean include opioid analgesia in labour and a trend for increased blood loss.


Asunto(s)
Seudoobstrucción Colónica , Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Seudoobstrucción Colónica/epidemiología , Seudoobstrucción Colónica/etiología , Analgésicos Opioides , Factores de Riesgo
6.
ANZ J Surg ; 92(11): 2808-2815, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36189982

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Social disparities in cancer survival have been demonstrated in Australia despite a universal healthcare insurance system. Colorectal cancer is common, and reasons for survival disparities related to socioeconomic status need to be investigated and addressed. The aim is to evaluate the current Australian literature concerning the impact of socioeconomic status on colorectal cancer survival and stage at presentation. METHODS: A systematic search of PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Clarivate Web of Science databases from January 2010 to March 2022 was performed. Studies investigating the impact of socioeconomic status on colorectal stage at presentation or survival in Australia were included. Data were extracted on author, year of publication, state or territory of origin, patient population, other exposure variables, outcomes and findings and adjustments made. RESULTS: Of the 14 articles included, the patient populations examined varied in size from 207 to 100 000+ cases. Evidence that socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with poorer survival was demonstrated in eight of 12 studies. Evidence of effect on late stage at presentation was demonstrated in two of seven studies. Area-level measures were commonly used to assess socioeconomic status, with varying indices utilized. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence that socioeconomic status is associated with late-stage at presentation. More studies provide evidence of an association between socioeconomic disadvantage and poorer survival, especially larger studies utilizing less clinically-detailed cancer registry data. Further investigation is required to analyse why socioeconomic disadvantage may be associated with poorer survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Australia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Clase Social , Sistema de Registros , Bases de Datos Factuales
7.
World J Surg ; 46(6): 1249-1258, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35384475

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital acquired infections are common, costly, and potentially preventable adverse events. This study aimed to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic-related escalation in infection prevention and control measures on the incidence of hospital acquired infection in surgical patients in a low COVID-19 environment in Australia. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary institution. All patients undergoing a surgical procedure from 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020 (COVID-19 pandemic period) were compared to patients pre-pandemic (1 April 2019-30 June 2019). The primary outcome investigated was odds of overall hospital acquired infection. The secondary outcome was patterns of involved microorganisms. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess odds of hospital acquired infection. RESULTS: There were 5945 admission episodes included in this study, 224 (6.6%) episodes had hospital acquired infections in 2019 and 179 (7.1%) in 2020. Univariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated no evidence of change in odds of having a hospital acquired infection between cohorts (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.88-1.33, P = 0.434). The multivariable regression analysis adjusting for potentially confounding co-variables also demonstrated no evidence of change in odds of hospital acquired infection (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.74-1.16, P = 0.530). CONCLUSION: Increased infection prevention and control measures did not affect the incidence of hospital acquired infection in surgical patients in our institution, suggesting that there may be a plateau effect with these measures in a system with a pre-existing high baseline of practice.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , COVID-19/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Hospitales , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
8.
ANZ J Surg ; 92(1-2): 27-33, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34569698

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are multiple data sources relating to colorectal cancer (CRC) nationwide. Prospective clinical cancer databases, population-based registries and linked administrative data are powerful tools in clinical outcomes research and provide real-world perspective on cancer treatments. This study aims to review the different Australian data sources for CRC from the perspective of conducting comparative research studies using a PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) framework. METHODS: Data dictionaries from the different data sources were evaluated for the types of exposure and outcome variables contained to highlight their differing research utility. RESULTS: State or territory-based cancer registries contain limited histology, cancer staging and treatment detail. They enable investigation of population-level patterns in overall survival (OS) of cancer patients with different demographics. Prospective clinical cancer databases contain more detail, especially surgical. Their strength is in auditing short-term surgical outcomes. They vary in the amount of data collected for other cancer treatments and completion of follow up data. Linked administrative databases have broad population coverage but less surgical detail. They provide population-level data on treatment patterns, short-term outcome measures and OS, as well as long-term surgical outcomes such as identifying patients who did not undergo stoma reversal. These databases cannot assess disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: Of the various CRC data sources within Australia, linked administrative databases have the potential to provide the widest population coverage combined with the broadest range of exposures and outcomes, and arguably the most research utility.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Australia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros
10.
ANZ J Surg ; 91(6): 1083-1090, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33480177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aim: to review outcomes of the 'no zone' approach to penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) with the advent of high-fidelity computed tomography-angiography (CT-A) in order to determine the most appropriate management for stable PNIs. DESIGN: Systematic review. POPULATION: Retrospective and prospective cohort studies of patients who sustained penetrating neck trauma, as defined by an injury which penetrates the platysma, and whose initial management involved CT-A evaluation. METHODS: An extensive literature search was performed in July 2019 using the following databases: Pubmed Central, EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane CENTRAL. Only studies published in English from the last 15 years were included. RESULTS: Nine cohort studies met inclusion criteria. There has been an increase in CT-A focussed evaluation of PNIs in recent years. CT-A is a highly sensitive and specific imaging choice and reduces negative neck exploration rates. A new management algorithm for stable patients involving initial radiological assessment using CT-A, and subsequent selective surgical exploration, is safe and effective. CONCLUSION: The results of this review provide level 2A evidence that the 'no zone' approach to PNIs, complemented by CT-A and thorough clinical assessment, is a safe management strategy which reduces negative neck exploration rates.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Cuello , Heridas Penetrantes , Angiografía , Humanos , Traumatismos del Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos del Cuello/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía
11.
Qual Life Res ; 30(2): 385-394, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997334

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The burden of treatment toxicities in breast cancer requires longitudinal assessment of patient-centered outcomes. The current study aimed to assess the feasibility of collecting general and breast cancer-specific quality of life (QoL), ongoing symptoms and unmet needs, in patients identified from a population-based cancer registry, and to assess the contribution of demographic, disease, and care-related factors. METHODS: Eligible patients were identified from the Victorian Cancer Registry (Victoria, Australia) using the ICD-10 code C50, diagnosed during 2013, 2011, and 2009. Data included age, area of residence, cancer diagnosis, date of diagnosis, treatment modality, and staging. Patients completed a number of validated tools including the EQ-5D-5L and FACT-B, symptom items, and unmet needs. RESULTS: Of 1006 eligible patients, the overall response rate was 45.6%. Survivors 1 year post-diagnosis had significantly greater problems with pain or discomfort (59.2%) and with anxiety or depression (51.3%) compared with survivors 5 years post-diagnosis (45.1% with pain or discomfort, p < 0.05, and 32.7% with anxiety or depression, p < 0.01). For the 5 years group, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression were significantly higher than for the general population (32.2% and 21.6%, respectively). Improved quality of life was found in those who did not receive chemotherapy (coefficient = 0.2269, p = 0.0409) and those who did not have a longstanding health condition (coefficient = 0.6342, p < 0.001). Poorer quality of life was associated with those who were not certain what was happening with their breast cancer (coefficient = - 0.3674, p = 0.0094) and those whose cancer had not been treated, had been treated but was still present, or had returned after treatment (coefficient = - 0.5314, p = 0.0136). Across the total cohort, women were bothered by changes in weight (21.3%) and concerned about the effects of stress on their cancer (19.6%). Fear of cancer recurrence was commonly reported and did not diminish over time (60.7%, 52.2%, and 56.9% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: Collecting patient-reported outcomes from a population-based sample of breast cancer survivors was feasible. Physical symptoms and psychosocial issues are common and are persistent. Use of chemotherapy was the only treatment modality that significantly impacted on QoL.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol ; 16(6): 363-371, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32894009

RESUMEN

AIMS: Survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adulthood malignancies have an increased risk of subsequent primary malignancies, particularly after exposure to therapeutic radiation. This study aims to evaluate the mode of surveillance and surveillance compliance, incidence and mode of detection of breast cancer, breast cancer phenotype, and outcomes after radiation-associated breast cancer (RBC) in a late-effects cohort. METHODS: Women exposed to therapeutic radiation attending the late effects service from 1st January 2000 to 20th February 2013. All invasive and in-situ cancers, benign tumors, and deaths were evaluated. The incidence of breast cancer was compared to the Australian general population. Compliance with breast surveillance recommendations, clinicopathological features, and management of breast cancers were examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of RBC was 17.1%. Twenty-eight cases of RBC occurred in 24 women, out of 140 women exposed to chest radiation. Patients whose first attendance was ≥15 years after radiation exposure experienced the highest incidence of RBC at 23%. The incidence of breast cancer was 11.2 times the general population (P < .001). Compliance with surveillance mammography was observed in 18.4%. Breast cancers diagnosed after the first attendance to the service were more likely screen-detected (P = .002). Most were hormone receptor positive (84.0%), invasive ductal carcinomas (82.1%), and managed with mastectomy (89.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients attending a dedicated late effects service have a high burden of subsequent malignancies generally occurring after long latency. Judicious management with adherence to long-term surveillance guidelines is advocated.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia
13.
ANZ J Surg ; 90(7-8): 1321-1327, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32496014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to use administrative data (AD) linked to the Victorian death index (VDI) to report on overall long-term survival following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, comparing regional to metropolitan hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively gathered AD linked to VDI. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders via multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: Total of 17 533 patients: 12 879 metropolitan patients, 3835 inner regional patients and 719 outer regional patients. Multivariable Cox regression, adjusted for the effects of age, ASA score, Charlson score, position of tumour, mode of access, admission type, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, return to theatre, length of stay, HDU admission and discharge destination showed no difference in OS comparing CRC resection patients from inner or outer regional hospitals to metropolitan ((HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95-1.09, P = 0.59) and (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85-1.11, P = 0.68) respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the largest and most detailed study concerning OS after CRC resection involving Victorian public hospitals. There was no difference in OS following CRC resection when inner or outer regional hospitals were compared to metropolitan hospitals in Victoria. The study demonstrated the utility of AD with validated algorithms, linked to death data for reporting CRC survival outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hospitales , Humanos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
World J Surg ; 44(9): 3028-3035, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32372144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Compared to the general population, the incidence of thyroid cancer in childhood and adolescent and young adult malignancy survivors is increased 14.0-18.0 times (CI 11.7-23.8). The cumulative incidence is variably reported as 0.5% by age 45 with 30-year incidence of 1.3% in women and 0.6% in men. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of radiation-associated thyroid cancer amongst patients treated with prior radiation to the thyroid followed up in a late effects service. A secondary aim was to assess screening compliance in this cohort. METHODS: The medical records of all patients attending the late effects service from 1 January 2000 to 20 February 2013 were interrogated to identify patients exposed to thyroid irradiation. The screening compliance and incidence of thyroid cancer were assessed for the duration whilst under the guidance of the late effect service. Mode of diagnosis, all imaging and cytology were retrieved from the institutional electronic record. Cytology was categorized according to Bethesda. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-five patients were exposed to direct or scatter neck irradiation. Compliance with thyroid surveillance was observed in 76.9%. Ultrasound features of microcalcification and increased internal vascularity had a low sensitivity (62.5%) for predicting a malignant nodule, which improved when used in conjunction with a Bethesda IV-VI result (91.7%). However, cytological assessment was not performed in 45.6% of operative cases. Thirty-three patients had thyroid carcinoma of which 45.4% (n = 15) were incidental. The majority were papillary thyroid cancers (88.9%); of which 12.5% were node positive and 34.4% were multifocal. The incidence of thyroid cancer was elevated 57.6 times compared to the Australian general population (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Due to the high incidence of thyroid cancer, this study supports screening in this cohort. However, due to the risk of overtreatment, we endorse further investigation of thyroid nodules with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology based on sonographic criteria as for the general population and American Thyroid Association guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Australia , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/patología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/terapia , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/terapia , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto Joven
15.
ANZ J Surg ; 90(7-8): 1328-1334, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32455508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to use validated coding algorithms, applied to a central repository of administrative data (AD), to report on short-term outcomes following resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) comparing regional to metropolitan Victorian hospitals. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using prospectively gathered AD. The primary outcome was prolonged length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were: inpatient mortality, return to theatre, discharge destination and need for mechanical ventilation/intensive care unit support. Outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders via multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: This study of 18 470 patients found strong evidence for lower odds of prolonged LOS (odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.58, P ≤ 0.001) and inpatient mortality (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.91, P = 0.01) in inner regional hospital compared with metropolitan hospitals. For outer regional hospitals, there was strong evidence of decreased odds of prolonged LOS (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.77, P = <0.001) and return to theatre (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.95, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This is the largest and most detailed study concerning short-term outcomes following CRC resection in Victorian public hospitals. Inner and outer regional centres had similar or better short-term outcomes than metropolitan hospitals after CRC resection. AD with validated algorithms serves as a large accurate database to report on CRC outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Alta del Paciente , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
ANZ J Surg ; 90(3): 308-313, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32039566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Administrative data provide a unique opportunity to examine whole-of-state colorectal cancer (CRC) data. The purpose of this study was to compare types of CRC resection across Victorian geographical zones, using hospital volume and accredited training-post status. METHODS: All CRC resections in Victorian public hospitals between 2008 and 2013 were analysed using validated algorithms of administrative data from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset. Hospitals were grouped according to Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) training-post status, case-volume (high >200 in 5 years) and remoteness of location. Resection frequency and type were compared. RESULTS: In 44 public hospitals over 6 years, 7596 CRC resections were performed. Patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score and tumour stage were similar among groups. CSSANZ accounted for nearly 50% of cases but the lowest percentage of emergencies (16.8%). The ratio of right-sided to left-sided plus rectal resections was greater for low-volume than high-volume centres (56.8% versus 40.4%), while left colon and rectal resections comprised a larger proportion of high-volume workload. High- compared with low-volume favoured ultra-low anterior resections (62% versus 33%) over abdominoperineal resections (38% versus 67%). Work patterns among high-volume hospitals were similar regardless of remoteness or CSSANZ status. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that administrative data can provide granular, clinically relevant information with population-wide coverage. Most public CRC resections in Victoria were performed in metropolitan hospitals. The majority of rectal cancer resections were performed in high-volume metropolitan centres but 15% were performed by low-volume regional hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Victoria
18.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 63(1): 101-112, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31804272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia and adhesional intestinal obstruction are important complications of laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer. This is the largest systematic review of comparative studies on this topic. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether laparoscopic surgery decreases the incidence of incisional hernia and adhesional intestinal obstruction compared to open surgery for colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: Online databases PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Abstracts from the annual meetings of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the European Society of Coloproctology were performed to cover gray literature. STUDY SELECTION: We included both randomized and nonrandomized comparative studies. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic resection was compared to open resection for patients with colorectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were incisional hernia and adhesional intestinal obstruction. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria (6 randomized comparative studies/9 nonrandomized comparative studies); 84,172 patients. Meta-analysis showed decreased odds of developing incisional hernia in the laparoscopic cohort (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95; p = 0.01) but no difference in requirement for surgery (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.79; p = 0.79). Similarly, there were decreased odds of developing adhesional intestinal obstruction in the laparoscopic cohort (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92, p = 0.001), but no difference in requirement for surgery (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.53-1.35; p = 0.48). LIMITATIONS: Incisional hernia and adhesional intestinal obstruction were poorly defined in many studies. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with decreased odds of incisional hernias and adhesional intestinal obstructions compared with open surgery for colorectal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adherencias Tisulares/epidemiología , Salud Global , Humanos , Incidencia , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Adherencias Tisulares/etiología
20.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol ; 16(2): e27-e37, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31657879

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The value of a high-risk surveillance program for mutation carriers and women at high familial breast cancer risk has not been extensively studied. A Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Management Clinic (BOCRMC) was established at the Royal Melbourne Hospital in 2010 to provide multimodality screening and risk management strategies for this group of women. The aims of this study were to evaluate the program and describe breast cancer diagnoses for BRCA1, BRCA2, and other germline mutation carriers as well as high-risk noncarriers attending the BOCRMC. METHODS: Clinical data from mutation carriers and noncarriers with a ≥25% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer who attended between 2010 and 2018 were extracted from clinic records and compared. The pattern and mode of detection of cancer were determined. RESULTS: A total of 206 mutation carriers and 305 noncarriers attended the BOCRMC and underwent screening on at least one occasion. Median age was 37 years. After a median follow-up of 34 months, 15 (seven invasive) breast cancers were identified in mutation carriers, with seven (six invasive) breast cancers identified in noncarriers. Of these, 20 (90.9%) were detected by annual screening, whereas two (9.1%) were detected as interval cancers (both in BRCA1 mutation carriers). Median size of the invasive breast cancers was 11 mm (range: 1.5-30 mm). The majority (76.9%) were axillary node negative. In women aged 25-49 years, the annualized cancer incidence was 1.6% in BRCA1, 1.4% in BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 0.5% in noncarriers. This compares to 0.06% annualized cancer incidence in the general Australian population. CONCLUSIONS: Screening was effective at detecting early-stage cancers. The incidence of events in young noncarriers was substantially higher than in the general population. This potentially justifies ongoing management through a specialty clinic, although further research to better personalize risk assessment in noncarriers is required.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA