Probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease: review of mechanisms and effectiveness.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and has been linked with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this article is to critically review the emerging evidence for the mechanisms and effectiveness of probiotics in the management of these conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: The GI microbiome is strongly influenced by ageing, diet and disease. Probiotics may confer health effects to the host by modulating the metabolic activities of the microbiome to propagate anti-inflammatory effects and reinforce the intestinal barrier, and are considered to be safe to use. Many short-term studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of probiotics overall in IBS, with meta-analyses demonstrating efficacy across specific strains albeit with relatively small effect sizes. Within IBD, some probiotics appear to offer clinical benefit in ulcerative colitis but strain-specific effects are unclear. Evidence for the use of probiotics in Crohn's disease remains limited. SUMMARY: Probiotics offer considerable potential for the management of IBS and possibly in IBD, however, any benefits conferred appear to be strain-specific. High quality trials of specific probiotics in IBS and IBD, as well as laboratory investigations of their mechanism of action, are required in order to fully understand their potential therapeutic value.

Comparison of gastrointestinal landmarks using the gas-sensing capsule and wireless motility capsule.

BACKGROUND: Accurate definition of the gastroduodenal and ileocaecal junctions (GDJ, ICJ) is essential for the measurement of regional transit times. AIMS: To compare the assessment of these landmarks using the novel gas-sensing capsule and validated wireless motility capsule (WMC), and to evaluate intra-subject variance in transit times METHODS: Healthy subjects ingested the gas-sensing capsule and WMC tandemly in random order. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement between the paired devices' transit times was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis; coefficient of variation was performed to express intra-individual variance in transit times. Similar analyses were completed with tandemly ingested gas-sensing capsules. RESULTS: The inter-observer agreement for landmarks for both capsules was excellent (mean ICC ≥0.97) in 50 studies. The GDJ was identifiable in 92% of the gas-sensing capsule studies versus 82% of the WMC studies (p = 0.27); the ICJ in 96% versus 84%, respectively (p = 0.11). In the primary cohort (n = 26), median regional transit times differed by less than 6 min between paired capsules. Bland-Altman revealed a bias of -0.12 (95% limits of agreement, -0.94 to 0.70) hours for GDJ and - 0.446 (-2.86 to 2.0) hours for ICJ. Similar results were found in a demographically distinct validation cohort (n = 24). For tandemly ingested gas-sensing capsules, coefficients of variation of transit times were 11%-35%, which were similar to variance between the paired gas-sensing capsule and WMC, as were the biases. The capsules were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Key anatomical landmarks are accurately identified with the gas-sensing capsule in healthy individuals. Intra-individual differences in transit times between capsules are probably due to physiological factors. Studies in populations with gastrointestinal diseases are now required.