A multicenter study of emergency endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta: Indications and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular techniques have become an essential tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease (thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR]). The aim is to analyze the indications and outcomes of emergency TEVAR at national level in relation to elective surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND SCOPE: A retrospective multicenter registry of patients with descending thoracic aortic disease treated on an emergency basis using endovascular techniques between 2012-2016, in 11 clinical units. PATIENTS, INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1) Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (RTAA); 2) Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TAI); and 3) Complicated acute type B aortic dissections (TBADc). PRIMARY VARIABLES: Patient mortality, survival and reoperation rate. SECONDARY VARIABLES: Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, specific data by indication, technical resources and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 135 urgent TEVARs were included (111 men, mean age 60.4 ±â€¯16.3 years): 43 ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (31.9%), 54 type B dissections (40%) and 32 traumatic aortic injuries (23.7%), and other etiologies 4.4%. The overall mortality rate at 30 days was 18.5%, and proved higher in the RTAA group (27.9%). The mean actuarial survival rate was 67 ±â€¯6% at 5 years. The postoperative stroke rate was 5.2%, and the paraplegia rate was 5.9%. Aortic reoperations proved necessary in 12 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency descending thoracic aortic diseases can be treated by endovascular techniques with optimal results and low morbidity and mortality - though the figures are slightly higher than in elective cases. This registry provides, for the first time, real information on the daily clinical practice of emergency TEVAR in Spain.

A multicenter study of emergency endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta: indications and outcomes. / Estudio multicéntrico de la reparación endovascular urgente de la aorta torácica: indicaciones y resultados.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular techniques have become an essential tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease (thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR]). The aim is to analyze the indications and outcomes of emergency TEVAR at national level in relation to elective surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND SCOPE: A retrospective multicenter registry of patients with descending thoracic aortic disease treated on an emergency basis using endovascular techniques between 2012-2016, in 11 clinical units. PATIENTS, INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1) Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms; 2) Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury; and 3) Complicated acute type B aortic dissections (TBADc). PRIMARY VARIABLES: Patient mortality, survival and reoperation rate. SECONDARY VARIABLES: Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, specific data by indication, technical resources and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 135 urgent TEVARs were included (111 men, mean age 60.4 ± 16.3 years): 43 ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (31.9%), 54 type B dissections (40%) and 32 traumatic aortic injuries (23.7%), and other etiologies 4.4%. The overall mortality rate at 30 days was 18.5%, and proved higher in the ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms group (27.9%). The mean actuarial survival rate was 67± 6% at 5 years. The postoperative stroke rate was 5.2%, and the paraplegia rate was 5.9%. Aortic reoperations proved necessary in 12 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency descending thoracic aortic diseases can be treated by endovascular techniques with optimal results and low morbidity and mortality - though the figures are slightly higher than in elective cases. This registry provides, for the first time, real information on the daily clinical practice of emergency TEVAR in Spain.

[Diagnostic and therapeutic management of pseudo-occlusions of the carotid artery]. / Manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico de la pseudooclusién carotídea.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic attitude and the results obtained after surgery in cases of pseudo occlusions of the carotid artery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 2000, 13 cases of pseudo occlusion of the internal carotid artery were performed (3.06% of carotid surgery carried out). Diagnostic criteria were as follows. Echo Doppler: complete occlusion with its origin in the internal carotid artery, damped distal signal; arteriography: occlusion with its origin in the internal carotid artery, filiform distal part, string sign. Clinical presentation was: 53.84% cerebral infarction, 23.07% TIA and 23.07% were asymptomatic. The 13 patients were submitted to echo Doppler and nine were examined using arteriography. Two patients were operated on without arteriography because of unstable neurological clinical features. A surgical exploration was performed in 100% of the cases. RESULTS: In seven cases, revascularisation of the internal carotid artery was carried out (53.84%) and in six cases it was ligated (46.16%). Echographic monitoring (from 1 4 years, average 2 years) showed permeability in the seven revascularised cases; in one case restenosis was detected between 31 50% at 2 years follow up. In the clinical controls (from 2 months to 4 years, average 30 months), one patient who was not revascularised was seen to have symptoms of TIA at one year and two months. DISCUSSION: Since neither arteriography nor echo Doppler can predict when it will be possible to revascularise the internal carotid artery, and because we did not observe an increase in surgical morbidity mortality, we believe surgical exploration is useful. In our study 53.84% of the series were successfully revascularised.