[2019 Catheter Ablation Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing]. / Registro Italiano Ablazioni 2019. Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione.

BACKGROUND: This report describes the findings of the 2019 Italian Catheter Ablation Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC). METHODS: Data collection was retrospective. A standardized questionnaire was completed by each of the participating centers. RESULTS: A total of 15 201 ablation procedures were performed by 91 institutions. Most (78%) of the centers has one electrophysiology laboratory, and 17% of them has a hybrid cardiac surgery laboratory. Almost all (98%) centers have a 3D mapping system. The median number of electrophysiologists and nurses involved in the electrophysiology laboratory was 3 and an electrophysiology technician was involved in 30% of all centers. In 88.4% of cases, ablations were performed for supraventricular arrhythmias, and among these the most frequently treated arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation (32.9%), followed by atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (23.9%), and common atrial flutter (11.7%). In 10 256 (67.4%) patients catheter ablation was performed by means of a 3D mapping system, with a "near-zero" fluoroscopic approach in 4626 (30.4%) of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 Italian Catheter Ablation Registry confirmed that atrial fibrillation is the most commonly treated arrhythmia in the ablation centers with an increasing number of procedures performed with a 3D mapping system and a "near-zero" approach.

Organization and procedures in contemporary catheter ablation centres: data from the 2018 Italian Catheter Ablation Registry.

AIMS: This report describes the findings of the 2018 Italian Catheter Ablation Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC). METHODS: The Italian Catheter Ablation Registry systematically collects data on the ablation procedures performed in Italy. Data collection was retrospective. A standardized questionnaire was completed by participating centres. RESULTS: We collected data on 15 714 catheter ablation procedures performed in Italy during 2018 in 94 electrophysiology centres. In most centres (75/94, 80%), a single electrophysiology laboratory was available, and a hybrid electrophysiology laboratory was available in 15% (14/94) of centres. In most (93%) centres, at least two electrophysiologists were involved in the catheter ablation procedures. In only 13 out of 94 (14%) electrophysiology laboratories, an anaesthesiologist assists every electrophysiology procedure; in most cases (74/94, 79%), an on-demand anaesthesiology service was available. On-site cardiothoracic surgery was reported in 43 out of 94 (46%) centres.Nonfluoroscopic navigation systems were available in most centres (88/94, 93%). Intracardiac echocardiography was used in 59 out of 94 (63%) electrophysiology laboratories. Atrial fibrillation (31%) was the most frequently treated ablation target, followed by atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (20%) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus (15%). In 61.7% of all procedures, a 3D mapping system was used. In about one-third of procedures, a near-zero approach was performed. CONCLUSION: In most Italian electrophysiology centres, a single electrophysiology laboratory was available and at least two electrophysiologists were involved in the ablation procedures. An increasing number of procedures were performed by means of a nonfluoroscopic mapping system with a near-zero approach.

Role of pre-procedural CT imaging on catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: procedural outcomes and radiological exposure.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to study left atrial (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs) anatomy before atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of pre-procedural cardiac CT with 3D reconstruction on procedural outcomes and radiological exposure in patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of AF. METHODS: In this registry, 493 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 8 years, 70% male) with paroxysmal (316) or persistent (177) AF who underwent first procedure of RFA were included. A pre-procedural CT scan was obtained in 324 patients (CT group). Antral pulmonary vein isolation was performed in all patients using an open-irrigation-tip catheter with a 3D electroanatomical navigation system. Procedural outcome, including radiological exposure, and clinical outcomes were compared among patients who underwent RFA with (CT group) and without (no CT group) pre-procedural cardiac CT. RESULTS: Acute PV isolation was obtained in all patients, with a comparable overall complication rate between CT and no CT group (4.3% vs 3%, p = 0.7). No differences were observed about mean duration of the procedure (231 ± 60 vs 233 ± 58 min, p = 0.7) and fluoroscopy time (13 ± 10 vs 13 ± 8 min, p = 0.6) among groups. Cumulative radiation dose resulted significantly higher in the CT group compared with no CT group (8.9 ± 24 vs 4.8 ± 15 mSv, P = 0.02). At 1 year, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia were comparable among groups (CT group, 227/324 (70%), vs no CT group,119/169 (70%), p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-procedural CT does not improve safety and efficacy of AF ablation, increasing significantly the cumulative radiological exposure.

Predictors of zero X ray procedures in supraventricular arrhythmias ablation.

To evaluate predictors of zero-X ray procedures for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVT) using minimally fluoroscopic approach (MFA). Patients referred for RF catheter ablation of SVT were admitted for a MFA with an electro-anatomical navigation system or a conventional fluoroscopic approach (ConvA). Exclusion criterion was the need to perform a transseptal puncture. 206 patients (98 men, age 53 ± 19 years) underwent an EP study, 93 (45%) with an MFA and 113 (55%) with a ConvA. Fifty-five had no inducible arrhythmias (EPS). Fifty-four had AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 49 patients had typical atrial flutter (AFL), 37 had AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT/WPW), 11 had focal atrial tachycardia (AT), and underwent a RF ablation. X-ray was not used at all in 51/93 (58%) procedures (zero X ray). MFA was associated with a significant reduction in total fluoroscopy time (5.5 ± 10 vs 13 ± 18 min, P = 0.01) and operator radiation dose (0.8 ± 2.5 vs 3 ± 8.2 mSV, P < 0.05). The greatest absolute dose reduction was observed in AVNRT (0.1 ± 0.3 vs 5.1 ± 10 mSV, P = 0.01, 98% relative dose reduction) and in AFL (1.3 ± 3.6 vs 11 ± 16 mSV, P = 0.003, 88% relative dose reduction) groups. Both AVNRT or AFL resulted the only statistically significant predictors of zero x ray at multivariate analysis (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.5-13 and OR 5, 95% CI 1.7-15, P < 0.001, respectively). Success and complication rate was comparable between groups (P = NS). Using MFA for SVT ablation, radiological exposure is significantly reduced. Type of arrhythmia is the strongest predictor of zero X ray procedure.

[2017 Catheter Ablation Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing]. / Registro Italiano Ablazioni 2017. Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione.

BACKGROUND: This report describes the findings of the 2017 Catheter Ablation Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC). METHODS: Data collection was retrospective. A standardized questionnaire was completed by each of the participating centers. RESULTS: A total of 15 601 ablation procedures were performed by 91 institutions, with a mean of 184 ± 213 procedures per center. The most frequently treated arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation (34%), followed by atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (25%) and common atrial flutter (14%). About 10% of overall ablation procedures were performed in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. On-site cardiothoracic surgery was available in 42% of the centers performing ablation and in 49% of the centers performing atrial fibrillation ablation. In most patients, the ablation procedure was guided by a three-dimensional mapping system, and in 15% of patients a near-zero X-ray strategy was used. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian Catheter Ablation Registry systematically collected 1-year data on ablation procedures performed in Italy, revealing that atrial fibrillation is the most commonly treated arrhythmia in the ablation centers with an increasing number of patients treated for ventricular tachycardia.

Micra pacemaker implant after cardiac implantable electronic device extraction: feasibility and long-term outcomes.

AIMS: We aimed at investigating the feasibility and outcome of Micra implant in patients who have previously undergone transvenous lead extraction (TLE), in comparison to naïve patients implanted with the same device. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (65 males, 78.31%; 77.27 ± 9.96 years) underwent Micra implant at our centre. The entire cohort was divided between 'post-extraction' (Group 1) and naïve patients (Group 2). In 23 of 83 patients (20 males, 86.96%; 73.83 ± 10.29 years), Micra was implanted after TLE. Indication to TLE was an infection in 15 patients (65.21%), leads malfunction in four (17.39%), superior vena cava syndrome in three (13.05%), and severe tricuspid regurgitation in one case (4.35%). The implant procedure was successful in all patients and no device-related events occurred at follow-up (median: 18 months; interquartile range: 1-24). No differences were observed between groups in fluoroscopy time (13.88 ± 10.98 min vs. 13.15 ± 6.64 min, P = 0.45), single device delivery (Group 1 vs. Group 2: 69.56% vs. 55%, P = 0.22), electrical performance at implant and at 12-month follow-up (Group 1 vs. Group 2: pacing threshold 0.48 ± 0.05 V/0.24 ms vs. 0.56 ± 0.25 V/0.24 ms, P = 0.70; impedance 640 ± 148.83 Ohm vs. 583.43 ± 99.7 Ohm, P = 0.27; and R wave amplitude 10.33 ± 2.88 mV vs. 12.62 ± 5.31 mV, P = 0.40). A non-apical site of implant was achievable in the majority of cases (72.3%) without differences among groups (78.26% vs. 70%; P = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Micra implant is an effective and safe procedure in patients still requiring a ventricular pacing after TLE, with similar electrical performance and outcome compared with naïve patients at long-term follow-up.

Effect of left atrial volume and pulmonary vein anatomy on outcome of nMARQ™ catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: Left atrial volume (LA) and pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy may potentially relate to technical challenges in achieving stable and effective catheter position in case of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation by means of "one-shot" catheters. The aim of this study was to investigate whether LA volume and PV anatomy, evaluated by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) prior to ablation, predict acute and midterm outcome of AF ablation by nMARQ™. METHODS: We included 75 patients (mean age 58 ± 11 years, 67 % male) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF. All patients underwent CT/MR scanning prior to catheter ablation to evaluate LA volume and PV anatomy. All the patients underwent PV isolation by nMARQ™, an open-irrigated mapping and radiofrequency (RF) decapolar ablation catheter. Ablation was guided by electroanatomic mapping allowing RF energy delivery in the antral region of PVs from ten irrigated electrodes simultaneously. RESULTS: Mean LA volume was 75 ± 40 ml. A normal anatomy (4 PVs) was documented in 40 (53 %) patients and abnormal anatomy (common truncus or accessory PVs) in 35 patients. Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 94 ± 55 and 8 ± 5 min, respectively, without significant differences among patients with normal or abnormal anatomy (92 ± 45 vs 95 ± 64 min, p = 0.85 and 6 ± 3 vs 8 ± 4 min, p = 0.65, respectively). Mean ablation time was 14 ± 3 min, and 99 % of the targeted veins were isolated with a mean of 23 ± 5 RF pulses per patient. After a mean follow-up of 17 ± 8 months, 23 (31 %) patients had an atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Neither LA volume nor PV anatomy was a predictor of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: LA volume and PV anatomy did not affect procedural data and outcome in patients who underwent PV isolation by an open-irrigated mapping and RF decapolar ablation catheter.

Relationships between cardiac innervation/perfusion imbalance and ventricular arrhythmias: impact on invasive electrophysiological parameters and ablation procedures.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between regional myocardial perfusion and sympathetic innervation parameters at myocardial scintigraphy and intra-cavitary electrophysiological data in patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) submitted to invasive electrophysiological study and ablation procedure. METHODS: Sixteen subjects underwent invasive electrophysiological study with electroanatomical mapping (EAM) followed by trans-catheter ablations of VA. Before ablation all patients were studied with a combined evaluation of regional myocardial perfusion and sympathetic innervation by means of tomographic 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 123I- metaiodobenzylguanidine cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) scintigraphies, respectively. Off-line spatial co-registration of CZT perfusion and innervation data with the three-dimensional EAM reconstruction was performed in every patient. RESULTS: CZT revealed the presence of myocardial scar in 55 (20 %) segments. Of the viable myocardial segments, 131 (60 %) presented a preserved adrenergic innervation, while 86 (40 %) showed a significantly depressed innervation (i.e. innervation/perfusion mismatch). On EAM, the invasively measured intra-cavitary voltage was significantly lower in scarred segments than in viable ones (1.7 ± 1.5 mV vs. 4.0 ± 2.2 mV, P < 0.001). Interestingly, among the viable segments, those showing an innervation/perfusion mismatch presented a significantly lower intra-cavitary voltage than those with preserved innervation (1.9 ± 2.5 mV vs. 4.7 ± 2.3 mV, P < 0.001). Intra-cardiac ablation was performed in 63 (23 %) segments. On multivariate analysis, after correction for scar burden, the segments showing an innervation/perfusion mismatch remained the most frequent ablation targets (OR 5.6, 95 % CI 1.5-20.8; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with VA, intra-cavitary electrical abnormalities frequently originate at the level of viable myocardial segments with depressed sympathetic innervation that frequently represents the ultimate ablation target.

Near zerO fluoroscopic exPosure during catheter ablAtion of supRavenTricular arrhYthmias: the NO-PARTY multicentre randomized trial.

AIMS: Aim of this study was to compare a minimally fluoroscopic radiofrequency catheter ablation with conventional fluoroscopy-guided ablation for supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) in terms of ionizing radiation exposure for patient and operator and to estimate patients' lifetime attributable risks associated with such exposure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial in six electrophysiology (EP) laboratories in Italy. A total of 262 patients undergoing EP studies for SVT were randomized to perform a minimally fluoroscopic approach (MFA) procedure with the EnSiteTMNavXTM navigation system or a conventional approach (ConvA) procedure. The MFA was associated with a significant reduction in patients' radiation dose (0 mSv, iqr 0-0.08 vs. 8.87 mSv, iqr 3.67-22.01; P < 0.00001), total fluoroscopy time (0 s, iqr 0-12 vs. 859 s, iqr 545-1346; P < 0.00001), and operator radiation dose (1.55 vs. 25.33 µS per procedure; P < 0.001). In the MFA group, X-ray was not used at all in 72% (96/134) of cases. The acute success and complication rates were not different between the two groups (P = ns). The reduction in patients' exposure shows a 96% reduction in the estimated risks of cancer incidence and mortality and an important reduction in estimated years of life lost and years of life affected. Based on economic considerations, the benefits of MFA for patients and professionals are likely to justify its additional costs. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicentre randomized trial showing that a MFA in the ablation of SVTs dramatically reduces patients' exposure, risks of cancer incidence and mortality, and years of life affected and lost, keeping safety and efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01132274.

Major predictors of fibrous adherences in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous removal of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads is a difficult procedure because of the consequence of massive fibrous tissue growth along the lead. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the occurrence and location of fibrous adherences in ICD lead extraction and to identify potential predictors among patient and lead characteristics. METHODS: We studied 637 consecutive patients who underwent transvenous extraction of 678 ICD leads from 1997 to 2013. RESULTS: Procedural success rate was 99%, without major complications. Areas of adherence were found in the subclavian vein (78%), innominate vein (65%), superior vena cava (66%), and heart (73%). Dwell-time, passive fixation, and dual-coil lead design were independently associated with adherences. Dual-coil lead design was associated with adherences in the innominate vein and superior vena cava, whereas coil treatment (eg, expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-coated or medical adhesive back-filled strategies) prevented adherences. Passive fixation mechanism was associated with adherences in the heart. CONCLUSION: ICD leads, after long dwell-time, are affected by fibrous adherences uniformly distributed along the lead course. Lead features represent major predictors of the phenomenon. Careful lead selection is recommended at the time of implantation to prevent adherences. In addition, lead-related risk stratification is mandatory before a transvenous extraction procedure.

Updated national multicenter registry on procedural safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite catheter ablation (CA) becoming an accepted treatment option for symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF), safety of this procedure continues to be cause for concern. Aim of the present multicenter registry was to assess the incidence of early CA complications and detect their predictors in a contemporary, unselected AF population METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, data from 2,323 consecutive patients who underwent CA (median age 60 [52-67]; 72.3% male) for AF in 29 Italian centers were collected. All major complications occurring to the patient from admission to 30th postprocedural day were recorded. No procedure-related death was observed. Major complications occurred in 94 patients (4.0%): 50 patients (2.2%) suffered vascular access complications; 12 patients (0.5%) developed cardiac tamponade; 14 patients (0.6%) presented with pericarditis; 5 patients (0.2%) had transient ischemic attack; 4 patients had stroke; 3 patients (0.1%) had phrenic nerve paralysis; 3 patients (0.1%) had hemothorax. Other isolated but serious adverse events were documented in 3 patients (0.1%). Female gender (OR 2.643; 95% CI 1.686-4.143; P < 0.0001) and longer procedural duration (OR 2.195; 95% CI 1.388-3.473; P < 0.001) independently predicted a higher risk of complications. CONCLUSION: Major complications occurred in 4.0% of the CA procedures for AF, with vascular access complications being the most frequent events.

Port-a-Cath complicated by infection or migration not removed by manual traction: usefulness of cardiac pacing leads extraction techniques.

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of Port-a-Caths (PACs) is related to device-related delayed complications. The aim of this study is to describe the high success rate and safety of cardiac pacing lead extraction techniques used for PACs complicated by infection or migration and not removed by manual traction. METHODS: During a 13-year period (1997-2010), 19 consecutive PAC recipients (54.1±13 years, 11 females) were referred to our hospital for PAC-related delayed complications and PACs not removable by manual traction (mean dwelling time 29.3±31 months). RESULTS: PAC implantation indications included gastrointestinal cancer (21%), breast cancer (15.7%), other malignant diseases (52.6%), and nonmalignant diseases (10.5%). PAC removal indications were breakdown due to subclavian crush (63.1%), breakdown due to unsuccessful previous removal attempt (21%), sepsis (10.5%), or malfunction (5.3%). Removal of fractured free-floating catheters (16) migrated toward the venous blood course was attempted by tool-guided traction in all cases except 1 in whom mechanical dilation was necessary. For the 3 intact ones (2 infected and one malfunctioning) we used tool-guided traction and single-sheath mechanical dilation, depending on the vascular/cardiac-catheter setting. By using multiple venous approaches we removed 18 catheters completely and 1 partially, achieving clinical success in all of the patients. The most commonly used venous approach was transfemoral (TFA; 73.6%), followed by the original venous entry site approach (VEA; 15.7%) and internal transjugular approach (ITA; 10.5%). No major or minor complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced centers, cardiac pacing lead extraction techniques may be considered as an additional, efficacious, safe option for extraction of otherwise nonremovable entrapped PACs before surgery.

Large, single-center experience in transvenous coronary sinus lead extraction: procedural outcomes and predictors for mechanical dilatation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate procedural outcomes of coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction, focusing on predictors and need for mechanical dilatation (MD) in the event that manual traction (MT) is ineffective. METHODS: The study assessed results in 145 consecutive patients (age 69 ± 10 years; 121 men)--a total of 147 CS pacing leads--who underwent transvenous CS lead removal between January 2000 and March 2010. RESULTS: All leads but one (99%) (implantation time 29 ± 25 months) were successfully removed. MT was effective in 103 (70%), and MD was necessary in the remaining 44 (30%) procedures. In multivariate analyses, unipolar design (odds ratio [OR] 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-7.7; P = 0.005) and noninfective indication (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.8-13, P = 0.002) were independent predictors for MD (P < 0.0001), with a predictive trend for prior cardiac surgery (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.98-5.26; P = 0.06). Five (3.4%) complex procedures required a transfemoral vein approach (TFA) or repeat procedure. No deaths occurred, and there was one major complication (0.7%), cardiac tamponade, after MT. No complication predictors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: CS leads were safely and effectively removed in nearly all patients, and 70% were removed with MT alone; 30% required MD. Preoperative predictors suggesting the need for MD or TFA were noninfective indication and unipolar lead design. Complications were rare, and there was no predictable pattern among MT or MD removal techniques.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy after coronary sinus lead extraction: feasibility and mid-term outcome of transvenous reimplantation in a tertiary referral centre.

AIMS: Few data are available on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and mid-term outcome of transvenous CS lead reimplantation in a tertiary referral centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled all patients who were referred to our hospital for CS lead removal from December 2000 through to May 2009 and were transvenously reimplanted with a CRT system before June 2009. One-year follow-up was performed to evaluate the incidence of infections, malfunctions, and mortality. We studied 113 consecutive patients undergoing successful CS lead extraction; 90 patients (75 male, mean age 69.2, range 35-84) underwent CS lead reimplantation (success rate: 95.6%; right-sided approach: 64.4%). In these patients, cardiac device infection was the usual indication for extraction (74.4%) and the subsequent reimplantation was performed after a median time of 3 days. The coronary sinus lead was usually positioned in the left ventricular (LV) postero-lateral region (62.2%); two procedures were required in two cases (2.2%). Balloon angioplasty was necessary for two patients (failure in one), whereas for the others we used a conventional implant technique. During follow-up, we observed four cases (4.4%) of local infection and six cases (6.7%) of system malfunction, requiring reintervention (two cases during the same hospitalization). One-year mortality was 5.5%. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular lead reimplantation is in our experience an effective and safe procedure, also in the case of right-sided approach. During follow-up, 1-year mortality was particularly low, whereas overall infection rate was higher than first implant procedures.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia using intracardiac echocardiography in pregnancy.

We describe a case report of a 32-year-old woman during the 10th week of pregnancy with symptomatic and recurrent atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia successfully treated by conventional radiofrequency ablation, under intracardiac echocardiography surveillance.

Usefulness of mechanical transvenous dilation and location of areas of adherence in patients undergoing coronary sinus lead extraction.

AIMS: Few data have been currently reported on the outcome of coronary sinus (CS) lead removal, particularly using mechanical dilation (MD). We aimed to evaluate feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of CS lead extraction, focusing on MD usefulness, in the event that lead traction (LT) was ineffective. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 37 consecutive patients (30 males, mean age 68.1, range 52-80), who underwent left ventricle (LV) pacing lead removal; the indication for extraction was local infection in 16 patients (43.3%), sepsis in 11 patients (29.7%), and lead malfunction in 10 patients (27%). The procedure was first attempted by LT, followed, if unsuccessful, by MD using polypropylene sheaths. All CS leads (time from implant 19.5 +/- 16.5, range 2-84 months) were successfully removed; LT was effective (LT group) in 27 patients (73%) and ineffective in 10 patients (27%), for whom MD was necessary (MD group). There were no major complications. The areas of adherence were in the CS in only one patient. No differences were noted in the data analysed between LT and MD groups; in particular, time from implant was similar in the two groups (MD vs. LT group: 17 +/- 8.9 vs. 20.4 +/- 18.6 months; P = ns). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that CS leads, after medium-term implantation, can be effectively and safely removed using MD with polypropylene sheaths, in the case of unsuccessful LT. No pre-operative elements predictive of LT failure could be identified. Areas of adherence were rarely located in the CS or its tributaries.