RESUMEN
In this study, it was found that myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies (MSAs and MAAs) improved the recognition of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The objective of this study is to propose a clinical method to evaluate myalgia in respiratory settings as a possible tool for the recognition of MSA/MAA positivity in ILD patients. We prospectively enrolled 167 ILD patients with suspected myositis, of which 63 had myalgia evoked at specific points (M+ILD+). We also enrolled in a 174 patients with only myalgia (M+ILD-) in a rheumatological setting. The patients were assessed jointly by rheumatologists and pulmonologists and were tested for autoantibodies. M+ILD+ patients were positive for at least one MAA/MSA in 68.3% of cases, as were M-ILD+ patients in 48.1% of cases and M+ILD- patients in 17.2% of cases (p = 0.01 and <0.0001, respectively). A diagnosis of IIM was made in 39.7% of M+ILD+ patients and in 23.1% of the M-ILD+ group (p = 0.02). Myalgia was significantly associated with positivity for MSA/MAAs in ILD patients (p = 0.01, X2: 6.47). In conclusion, myalgia in ILD patients with suspected myositis is associated with MSA/MAA positivity, and could support a diagnosis of IIM. A significant proportion of M+ILD- patients also had MSA/MAA positivity, a phenomenon warranting further study to evaluate its clinical meaning.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The classification interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) includes patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with autoimmune characteristics insufficient to reach classification criteria for a specific autoimmune disease (SAD). These criteria are divided into three domains: clinical, serological and morphological. The latter domain does not include the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, which is deemed not to be significantly associated with SAD. Therefore, the enrolment of these patients is more difficult, requiring at least one item from both of the other domains. The objective of this study is to evaluate the rate of progression towards SAD of a cohort of UIP patients satisfying only one IPAF domain (we called this group "UIPAF") compared with classic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled IPF patients with radiologic and/or histologic UIP pattern, followed jointly by rheumatologists and pulmonologists from January 2017 to January 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 190 IPF patients, 38 (20%) of whom were classified as UIPAF. IPF and UIPAF patients were similar for general characteristics, severity and prognosis, at presentation and at annual check-up. However, 28.9% of UIPAF patients progressed towards SAD, compared with 2% of IPF patients (χ2=30.4, p≤0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The association between a single clinical or serological domain of IPAF and UIP pattern is predictive for the development of a SAD if compared with isolated UIP. ILD can be the first manifestation of SAD, even with a UIP pattern, therefore, the morphological domain of IPAF criteria could be removed.