A nationwide database study on colectomy and colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: what is the role of appendectomy?

AIM: Although has been suggested that an appendectomy has a positive effect on the disease course in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), recent studies indicate a potential increase in risk of colectomy and colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to evaluate the rates of colectomy and CRC after appendectomy in UC patients using a nationwide prospective database [the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Parelsnoer Institute - Inflammatory Bowel Disease (ICC PSI-IBD) database]. METHOD: All UC patients were retrieved from the ICC PSI-IBD database between January 2007 and May 2018. Primary outcomes were colectomy and CRC. Outcomes were compared in patients with and without appendectomy, with a separate analysis for timing of appendectomy (before or after UC diagnosis). RESULTS: A total of 826 UC patients (54.7% female; median age 46 years, range 18-89 years) were included. Sixty-three (7.6%) patients had previously undergone appendectomy: 24 (38.1%) before and 33 (52.4%) after their diagnosis of UC. In multivariate analysis, appendectomy after UC diagnosis was associated with a significantly lower colectomy rate compared with no appendectomy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.16, 95% C: 0.04-0.66, P = 0.011], and the same nonsignificant trend was seen in patients with an appendectomy before UC diagnosis (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08-1.41, P = 0.138). Appendectomy was associated with delayed colectomy, particularly when it was performed after diagnosis of UC (P = 0.009). No significant differences were found in the CRC rate between patients with and without appendectomy (1.6% vs 1.2%; P = 0.555). CONCLUSION: Appendectomy in established UC is associated with an 84% decreased risk of colectomy and a delay in surgery. Since the colon is in situ for longer, the risk of developing CRC remains, which underscores the importance of endoscopic surveillance programmes.

Prospective cohort study of appendicectomy for treatment of therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Appendicectomy may reduce relapses and need for medication in patients with ulcerative colitis, but long-term prospective data are lacking. This study aimed to analyse the effect of appendicectomy in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre cohort series, all consecutive patients with refractory ulcerative colitis referred for proctocolectomy between November 2012 and June 2015 were counselled to undergo laparoscopic appendicectomy instead. The primary endpoint was clinical response (reduction of at least 3 points in the partial Mayo score) at 12 months and long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo score of 1 or less), failure (colectomy or start of experimental medication), and changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) (range 32-224), EQ-5D™ and EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (13 women; median age 40·5 years) underwent appendicectomy. The mean baseline IBDQ score was 127·0, the EQ-5D™ score was 0·65, and the EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL score was 41·1. At 12 months, 13 patients had a clinical response, five were in endoscopic remission, and nine required a colectomy (6 patients) or started new experimental medical therapy (3). IBDQ, EQ-5D™ and EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores improved to 167·1 (P < 0·001), 0·80 (P = 0·003) and 61·0 (P < 0·001) respectively. After a median of 3·7 (range 2·3-5·2) years, a further four patients required a colectomy (2) or new experimental medical therapy (2). Thirteen patients had a clinical response and seven were in endoscopic remission. The improvement in IBDQ, EQ-5D™ and the EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: Appendicectomy resulted in a clinical response in nearly half of patients with refractory ulcerative colitis and a substantial proportion were in endoscopic remission. Elective appendicectomy should be considered before proctocolectomy in patients with therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis.

ANTECEDENTES: La apendicectomía puede reducir las recaídas y la necesidad de medicación en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa (ulcerative colitis, UC), sin embargo, faltan datos a largo plazo obtenidos de forma prospectiva. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el efecto de la apendicectomía en pacientes con UC refractarios al tratamiento. MÉTODOS: En esta serie prospectiva de cohortes multicéntrica, a todos los pacientes consecutivos con UC refractaria remitidos para proctocolectomía entre noviembre de 2012 y junio de 2015 se les recomendó en su lugar someterse a una apendicectomía laparoscópica. El criterio de valoración principal fue la respuesta clínica (disminución de ≥ 3 puntos del sistema de puntuación parcial de Mayo que varía de 0 a 9) a los 12 meses y en el seguimiento a largo plazo. Los criterios de valoración secundarios incluyeron la remisión endoscópica (puntuación endoscópica de Mayo ≤ 1), fracaso (colectomía o inicio de medicación experimental) y cambios en el IBDQ (rango 32-224), EQ-5D y EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL. RESULTADOS: En total, 28 pacientes (13 mujeres, mediana de edad 40,5) se sometieron a una apendicectomía. El IBDQ de referencia promedio fue de 127,0; el EQ-5D 0,65 y el EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL 41,1. A los 12 meses, 13 pacientes presentaban una respuesta clínica, cinco estaban en remisión endoscópica y nueve precisaron colectomía (n = 6) o un nuevo tratamiento médico experimental (n = 3). El IBDQ, EQ-5D y EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL mejoraron a 167,1 (P < 0,001); 0,80 (P = 0,003) y 61,0 (P < 0,001) respectivamente. Después de una mediana de 3,7 años (rango 2,3-5,2), otros cuatro pacientes requirieron una colectomía (n = 2) o un nuevo tratamiento médico experimental (n = 2). Trece pacientes presentaron respuesta clínica y siete se encontraban en remisión endoscópica. La mejora del IBDQ, el EQ-5D y el EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL se mantuvo estable a lo largo del tiempo. CONCLUSIÓN: La apendicectomía consiguió una respuesta clínica en casi la mitad de los pacientes con UC refractaria. La apendicectomía electiva debería ser considerada antes que la proctocolectomía en pacientes con UC refractaria al tratamiento.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endorectal advancement flap and ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for cryptoglandular and Crohn's high perianal fistulas.

Background: High perianal fistulas require sphincter-preserving surgery because of the risk of faecal incontinence. The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure preserves anal sphincter function and is an alternative to the endorectal advancement flap (AF). The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of these procedures in patients with cryptoglandular and Crohn's perianal fistulas. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. All RCTs, cohort studies and case series (more than 5 patients) describing one or both techniques were included. Main outcomes were overall success rate, recurrence and incontinence following either technique. A proportional meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results: Some 30 studies comprising 1295 patients were included (AF, 797; LIFT, 498). For cryptoglandular fistula (1098 patients), there was no significant difference between AF and LIFT for weighted overall success (74·6 (95 per cent c.i. 65·6 to 83·7) versus 69·1 (53·9 to 84·3) per cent respectively) and recurrence (25·6 (4·7 to 46·4) versus 21·9 (14·8 to 29·0) per cent) rates. For Crohn's perianal fistula (64 patients), no significant differences were observed between AF and LIFT for overall success rate (61 (45 to 76) versus 53 per cent respectively), but data on recurrence were limited. Incontinence rates were significantly higher after AF compared with LIFT (7·8 (3·3 to 12·4) versus 1·6 (0·4 to 2·8) per cent). Conclusion: Overall success and recurrence rates were not significantly different between the AF and LIFT procedure, but continence was better preserved after LIFT.

Risk Factors for Small Bowel Obstruction After Laparoscopic Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multivariate Analysis in Four Expert Centres in Europe.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although laparoscopy is associated with a reduction in adhesions, no data are available about the risk factors for small bowel obstruction [SBO] after laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]. Our aims here were to identify the risk factors for SBO after laparoscopic IPAA for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic IPAA for IBD in four European expert centres were included and divided into Groups A [SBO during follow-up] and B [no SBO]. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2015, SBO occurred in 41/521 patients [Group A; 8%]. Two-stage IPAA was more frequently complicated by SBO than 3- and modified 2-stage IPAA [12% vs 7% and 4%, p = 0.04]. After multivariate analysis, postoperative morbidity (odds ratio [OR] = 3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-7, p = 0.002), stoma-related complications [OR = 3, 95% CI = 1-6, p = 0.03] and long-term incisional hernia [OR = 6, 95% CI = 2-18, p = 0.003] were predictive factors for SBO, while subtotal colectomy as first surgery was an independent protective factor [OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8, p = 0.002]. In the subgroup of patients receiving restorative proctocolectomy as first operation, stoma-related or other surgical complications and long-term incisional hernia were predictive of SBO. In the patient subgroup of subtotal colectomy as first operation, postoperative morbidity and long-term incisional hernia were predictive of SBO, whereas ulcerative colitis and a laparoscopic approach during the second surgical stage were protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: We found that SBO occurred in less than 10% of patients after laparoscopic IPAA. The study also suggested that modified 2-stage IPAA could potentially be safer than procedures with temporary ileostomy [2- and 3-stage IPAA] in terms of SBO occurrence.

The role of the defaecating pouchogram in the assessment of evacuation difficulty after restorative proctocolectomy and pouch-anal anastomosis.

AIM: Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the most frequently performed operation for intractable ulcerative colitis (UC) and for many patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). It can be complicated by a functional evacuation difficulty, which is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the role of defaecating pouchography in an attempt to assess the mechanism of evacuation difficulty in pouch patients. METHOD: All RPC patients who had had a defaecating pouchogram for evacuation difficulty at one hospital between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The findings and features were correlated with the symptoms. Demographic, clinical and radiological variables were analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven [55 (63%) female] patients aged 47.6 ± 12.5 years (mean standard ± SD) were identified. Thirty-five had a mechanical outlet obstruction and 52 had no identified mechanical cause to explain the evacuation difficulty. The mean age of these 52 [33 (63%) female] patients was 48.2 ± 13 years. Of these 52 patients, significantly more used anti-diarrhoeal medication (P = 0.029), complained of a high frequency of defaecation (P = 0.005), experienced a longer time to the initiation of defaecation (P = 0.049) and underwent pouchoscopy (P = 0.003). Biofeedback appeared to improve the symptoms in 7 of 16 patients with a nonmechanical defaecatory difficulty. The most common findings on defaecating pouchography included residual barium of more than 33% after an attempted evacuation (46%, n = 24), slow evacuation (35%, n = 18) and mucosal irregularity (33%, n = 17). Correlation between radiological features and symptoms showed a statistically significant relationship between straining, anal pain, incontinence and urgency with patterns of anismus or pelvic floor descent or weakness seen on the defaecating pouchogram. Symptoms of incomplete evacuation, difficulty in the initiation of defaecation, high defaecatory frequency and abdominal pain were not correlated with the radiological features of the pouchogram. CONCLUSION: Defaecating pouchography may be useful for identifying anismus and pelvic floor disorders in pouch patients who have symptoms of straining, anal pain or incontinence. In patients with a high frequency of defaecation and abdominal pain it does not provide clinically meaningful information. Patients who complain of straining, incontinence, anal pain or urgency and have anismus or pelvic floor disorders may benefit from behavioural therapy.

Iron therapy for the treatment of preoperative anaemia in patients with colorectal carcinoma: a systematic review.

AIM: Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative iron supplementation in the treatment of anaemia, and its effect on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal carcinoma. METHOD: This systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library to assess current evidence on the role of iron supplementation in the treatment of preoperative anaemia. Our main outcomes were absolute increase in haemoglobin, blood transfusion rate and postoperative morbidity. Main inclusion criteria were: preoperative iron supplementation, presence of colorectal carcinoma and elective surgery. The Downs-Black questionnaire was used for quality assessment of the included studies. RESULTS: Of the 605 studies analysed, seven, three randomized controlled trials and four cohort studies, were included. Despite iron supplementation, the three randomized controlled trials showed a decrease in haemoglobin level. This was contrary to the four cohort studies which all showed a significant increase. All studies showed a decreased blood transfusion rate following iron supplementation. None of the included studies assessed postoperative morbidity. Due to heterogeneity in study design, duration of treatment, dosages and variation in iron substrates, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: In anaemic patients who require surgery for colorectal carcinoma, current evidence is of inadequate quality to draw a definitive conclusion on the efficacy of the various measures to treat preoperative anaemia.