Combination Dabrafenib and Trametinib Versus Combination Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Patients With Advanced BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: The DREAMseq Trial-ECOG-ACRIN EA6134.

PURPOSE: Combination programmed cell death protein 1/cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4-blockade and dual BRAF/MEK inhibition have each shown significant clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exist to guide the choice of either initial therapy or treatment sequence in this population. This study was conducted to determine which initial treatment or treatment sequence produced the best efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase III trial, patients with treatment-naive BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive either combination nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm A) or dabrafenib/trametinib (arm B) in step 1, and at disease progression were enrolled in step 2 to receive the alternate therapy, dabrafenib/trametinib (arm C) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm D). The primary end point was 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were 3-year OS, objective response rate, response duration, progression-free survival, crossover feasibility, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 265 patients were enrolled, with 73 going onto step 2 (27 in arm C and 46 in arm D). The study was stopped early by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of a clinically significant end point being achieved. The 2-year OS for those starting on arm A was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.5 to 79.1) and arm B 51.5% (95% CI, 41.7 to 60.4; log-rank P = .010). Step 1 progression-free survival favored arm A (P = .054). Objective response rates were arm A: 46.0%; arm B: 43.0%; arm C: 47.8%; and arm D: 29.6%. Median duration of response was not reached for arm A and 12.7 months for arm B (P < .001). Crossover occurred in 52% of patients with documented disease progression. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred with similar frequency between arms, and regimen toxicity profiles were as anticipated. CONCLUSION: Combination nivolumab/ipilimumab followed by BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy, if necessary, should be the preferred treatment sequence for a large majority of patients.

Androgen Receptor Modulation Optimized for Response (ARMOR) Phase I and II Studies: Galeterone for the Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Galeterone is a selective, multitargeted agent that inhibits CYP17, antagonizes the androgen receptor (AR), and reduces AR expression in prostate cancer cells by causing an increase in AR protein degradation. These open-label phase I and II studies [Androgen Receptor Modulation Optimized for Response-1 (ARMOR1) and ARMOR2 part 1] evaluated the efficacy and safety of galeterone in patients with treatment-naive nonmetastatic or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and established a dose for further study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In ARMOR1, 49 patients received increasing doses (650-2,600 mg) of galeterone in capsule formulation; 28 patients in ARMOR2 part 1 received increasing doses (1,700-3,400 mg) of galeterone in tablet formulation for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated biweekly for safety and efficacy, and pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed. RESULTS: In ARMOR1, across all doses, 49.0% (24/49) achieved a ≥30% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA; PSA30) and 22.4% (11/49) demonstrated a ≥50% PSA decline (PSA50). In ARMOR2 part 1, across all doses, PSA30 was 64.0% (16/25) and PSA50 was 48.0% (12/25). In the 2,550-mg dose cohort, PSA30 was 72.7% (8/11) and PSA50 was 54.5% (6/11). Galeterone was well tolerated; the most common adverse events were fatigue, increased liver enzymes, gastrointestinal events, and pruritus. Most were mild or moderate in severity and required no action and there were no apparent mineralocorticoid excess (AME) events. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety from ARMOR1 and ARMOR2 part 1 and the pharmacokinetic results support the galeterone tablet dose of 2,550 mg/d for further study. Galeterone was well tolerated and demonstrated pharmacodynamic changes consistent with its selective, multifunctional AR signaling inhibition.

Effects of ketoconazole and esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The metabolism of pazopanib is primarily mediated by CYP3A4. The solubility of pazopanib is pH-dependent, and an elevated gastric pH may decrease its bioavailability. This study evaluated the effect of a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, ketoconazole, and the proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety of pazopanib and its metabolites. METHODS: In Arm A, patients received pazopanib 400 mg alone once daily for 7 days followed by pazopanib 400 mg plus ketoconazole 400 mg once daily for 5 days. In Arm B, patients received pazopanib 800 mg once daily for 7 days, followed by pazopanib 800 mg plus esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for 5 days, and then pazopanib alone on the last day. RESULTS: Arm A enrolled 21 patients. In the presence of ketoconazole, mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve 24 h post-dose (AUC(0-24)) and mean maximum observed concentration (C max) of pazopanib increased by 66 and 45 %, respectively; mean AUC(0-24) and C max for pazopanib metabolites were lower or remained unchanged. Arm B enrolled 13 patients. In the presence of esomeprazole, mean pazopanib AUC(0-24) and C max decreased by 40 and 42 %, respectively; mean values of those parameters for metabolites of pazopanib also decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of pazopanib with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor should be avoided. If coadministration is necessary, pazopanib should be reduced to 400 mg. Concomitant use of pazopanib and proton pump inhibitors should also be avoided. Alternative dosing regimens that do not increase gastric pH at the time of pazopanib dosing should be considered.

A first in human phase 1 study of CG0070, a GM-CSF expressing oncolytic adenovirus, for the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: We assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics and anticancer activity of intravesical CG0070, a cancer selective, replication competent adenovirus, for the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 patients received single or multiple (every 28 days × 3 or weekly × 6) intravesical infusions of CG0070 at 1 of 4 dose levels (1 × 10(12), 3 × 10(12), 1 × 10(13) or 3 × 10(13) viral particles). Response to treatment was based on cystoscopic assessment and biopsy or urine cytology. Urine and plasma CG0070, and granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor were measured in all patients. A subset of 18 patients was assessed for retinoblastoma phosphorylation status. RESULTS: Grade 1-2 bladder toxicities were the most common adverse events observed. A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. High levels of granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor were detected in urine after administration in all patients. Virus replication was suggested based on an increase in urine CG0070 genomes between days 2 and 5 in 58.3% of tested patients (7 of 12). The complete response rate and median duration of the complete response across cohorts was 48.6% and 10.4 months, respectively. In the multidose cohorts the complete response rate for the combined groups (every 28 days and weekly × 6) was 63.6% (14 of 22 patients). In an exploratory, retrospective assessment patients with borderline or high retinoblastoma phosphorylation who received the multidose schedules had an 81.8% complete response rate (9 of 11). CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical CG0070 was associated with a tolerable safety profile and antibladder cancer activity. Granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor transgene expression and CG0070 replication were also suggested.

Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients' tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers.

PURPOSE: To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) using a treatment regimen selected by molecular profiling (MP) of a patient's tumor with the PFS for the most recent regimen on which the patient had experienced progression (ie, patient as his own control). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory metastatic cancer had tissue samples submitted for MP in two formats including formalin-fixed tissue for immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization assays and immediately frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays (all performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [CLIA]-certified laboratory). The MP approach was deemed of clinical benefit for the individual patient who had a PFS ratio (PFS on MP-selected therapy/PFS on prior therapy) of ≥ 1.3. RESULTS: In 86 patients who had MP attempted, there was a molecular target detected in 84 (98%). Sixty-six of the 84 patients were treated according to MP results. Eighteen (27%) of 66 patients had a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3 (95% CI, 17% to 38%; one-sided, one-sample P = .007). Therefore, the null hypothesis (that ≤ 15% of this patient population would have a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3) was rejected. CONCLUSION: It is possible to identify molecular targets in patients' tumors from nine different centers across the United States. In 27% of patients, the MP approach resulted in a longer PFS on an MP-suggested regimen than on the regimen on which the patient had just experienced progression. Issues to be considered in interpretation of this study include limited prior experience with patients as their own controls as a study end point and overall patient attrition.

Complete remissions observed in acute myeloid leukemia following prolonged exposure to lintuzumab: a phase 1 trial.

A multi-institutional, phase 1 dose-escalation trial of lintuzumab (humanized anti-CD33 antibody; SGN-33, HuM195) was performed in patients with CD33-positive myeloid malignancies. In this study, higher doses than previously tested and prolonged duration of treatment for responding patients were evaluated. Over the dose range of 1.5-8 mg/kg/week, lintuzumab was well tolerated, and a maximum tolerated dose was not defined. The most common adverse event was transient chills with the initial lintuzumab infusion (39%). Responses were observed in 7 of 17 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: morphologic complete remission (n = 4), partial remission (n = 2), and morphologic leukemia-free state (n = 1). Of 14 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative diseases, 1 patient had major hematologic improvement and 9 patients had stable disease. In contrast to aggressive conventional chemotherapy, lintuzumab was administered in an ambulatory clinic setting with acceptable toxicity.

Combined treatment of dendritoma vaccine and low-dose interleukin-2 in stage IV renal cell carcinoma patients induced clinical response: A pilot study.

Vaccination using dendritic/tumor cell hybrids represents a novel and promising cancer immunotherapy. We have developed a technology that can instantly purify the hybrids (dendritomas) from the fusion mixture of dendritic cells (DCs) and tumor cells. Our animal studies and a phase I study of stage IV melanoma patients demonstrated that dendritoma vaccination could be conducted without major toxicity and induced tumor cell-specific immunological and clinical responses. In this pilot study, ten stage IV renal cell carcinoma patients were studied. Dendritomas were made from autologous DCs and tumor cells and administered by subcutaneous injection. After initial vaccination, three escalating doses of IL-2 (3, 6, and 9 million units each) were followed within five days. This treatment regimen was tolerated well without severe adverse events directly related to the dendritoma vaccine. Most adverse events were related to IL-2 administration or pre-existing disease. Patient-specific immune responses were evaluated by flow cytometric measurement of interferon-gamma-producing T-cells before and after vaccination in response to stimulation with tumor antigens. Nine out of nine patients eligible for the analysis showed an increase of IFN-gamma-expressing CD4+ T cells after vaccination(s); while five out of eight patients eligible for the analysis showed an increase of IFN-gamma-expressing CD8+ T cells. Clinical responses were documented in 40% of the patients, three with stabilization of disease and one with a partial response documented by a reduction in tumor size. This pilot study demonstrated that dendritoma vaccines could be administered safely to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, while producing both clinical and immunologic evidence of response.

Dendritoma vaccination combined with low dose interleukin-2 in metastatic melanoma patients induced immunological and clinical responses.

A pilot clinical trial using dendritomas, purified hybrids from the fusion of dendritic/tumor cells combined with a low dose of IL-2, in metastatic melanoma patients was conducted in order to determine its safety and potential immunological and clinical responses. Ten metastatic melanoma patients were enrolled into this study. Dendritoma vaccines were created by fusing dendritic cells stained with green fluorescent dye with irradiated autologous tumor cells stained with red fluorescent dye and purifying the hybrids using immediate fluorescent-activated cell sorting. Initial vaccine was given subcutaneously and followed by IL-2 in serially elevated doses from 3-9 million units/m2 for 5 days. Repeated vaccinations were administered without IL-2, at 3-month intervals for a maximum of 5 times. Immune reactions were measured by the increase of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) expressing T cells. Vaccine doses ranged from 250,000 to 1,000,000 dendritomas. There was no grade 2 or higher toxicity directly attributable to the vaccine. All patients experienced toxicity due to IL-2 administration (9-grade 2, 3-grade 3, 1-grade 4). Eight of nine evaluable patients demonstrated immunologic reactions by increased IFN-gamma expressing T cells. One patient developed partial response at 12 weeks after the first vaccine. Nine months later, this patient achieved a complete response. In addition, two patients had stable disease for 9 and 4 months, respectively; one patient had a mixed response. Our findings demonstrated that dendritoma vaccines with a low dose of IL-2 can be safely administered to patients with metastatic melanoma and induce immunological and clinical responses.