Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int J Oncol ; 53(5): 1881-1896, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30132519

RESUMEN

Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumour, is also considered one of the most lethal cancers per se. It is highly refractory to therapeutic intervention, as highlighted by the mean patient survival of only 15 months, despite an aggressive treatment approach, consisting of maximal safe surgical resection, followed by radio- and chemotherapy. Radiotherapy, in particular, can have effects on the surviving fractions of tumour cells, which are considered adverse to the desired clinical outcome: It can induce increased cellular proliferation, as well as enhanced invasion. In this study, we established that differentiated glioblastoma cells alter their DNA repair response following repeated exposure to radiation and, therefore, high single-dose irradiation (SD-IR) is not a good surrogate marker for fractionated dose irradiation (FD-IR), as used in clinical practice. Integrating irradiation into a combination therapy approach, we then investigated whether the pharmacological inhibition of PI3K signalling, the most abundantly activated survival cascade in glioblastoma, enhances the efficacy of radiotherapy. Of note, treatment with GDC-0941, which blocks PI3K-mediated signalling, did not enhance cell death upon irradiation, but both treatment modalities functioned synergistically to reduce the total cell number. Furthermore, GDC-0941 not only prevented the radiation-induced increase in the motility of the differentiated cells, but further reduced their speed below that of untreated cells. Therefore, combining radiotherapy with the pharmacological inhibition of PI3K signalling is a potentially promising approach for the treatment of glioblastoma, as it can reduce the unwanted effects on the surviving fraction of tumour cells.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Indazoles/farmacología , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3 , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Diferenciación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Diferenciación Celular/efectos de la radiación , Daño del ADN/efectos de la radiación , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Células Madre Neoplásicas/efectos de los fármacos , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Células Madre Neoplásicas/efectos de la radiación , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/efectos de la radiación , Células Tumorales Cultivadas
2.
Crit Rev Oncog ; 23(1-2): 119-138, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29953371

RESUMEN

The use of radiation is an essential part of both modern cancer diagnostic assessment and treatment. Next-generation imaging devices create 3D visualizations, allowing for better diagnoses and improved planning of precision treatment. This is particularly important for primary brain cancers such as diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma or the most common primary brain tumor, glioblastoma, because radiotherapy is often the only treatment modality that offers a significant improvement in survival and quality of life. In this review, we give an overview of the different imaging techniques and the historic role of radiotherapy and its place in modern cancer therapy. Finally, we discuss three key areas of risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation: (1) brain tumor induction mainly as a consequence of the diagnostic use of radiation; (2) cognitive decline as a consequence of treating childhood brain tumors as an example of long term consequences often neglected in favor of highlighting secondary primary cancers; and (3) pro-proliferative and pro-invasive alterations that occur in tumor cells that survive radiotherapy. Throughout the discussion, we highlight areas of potential future research.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/etiología , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Radioterapia , Apoptosis/efectos de la radiación , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de la radiación , Diagnóstico por Imagen/efectos adversos , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Radiación , Dosis de Radiación , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica
3.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 5527, 2018 04 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29615749

RESUMEN

Due to the highly invasive nature of Glioblastoma (GB), complete surgical resection is not feasible, while motile tumour cells are often associated with several specific brain structures that enhance treatment-resistance. Here, we investigate the therapeutic potential of Disulfiram and Carbenoxolone, that inhibit two distinct interactions between GB and the brain tissue microenvironment: stress-induced cell-matrix adhesion and gap junction mediated cell-cell communication, respectively. Increase in cell numbers of tumour-initiating cells, which are cultured in suspension as cell clusters, and adherent differentiated cells can be blocked to a similar extent by Carbenoxolone, as both cell populations form gap junctions, but the adherent differentiated cells are much more sensitive to Disulfiram treatment, which - via modulation of NF-κB signalling - interferes with cell-substrate adhesion. Interestingly, inducing adhesion in tumour-initiating cells without differentiating them does not sensitize for Disulfiram. Importantly, combining Disulfiram, Carbenoxolone and the standard chemotherapeutic drug Temozolomide reduces tumour size in an orthotopic mouse model. Isolating GB cells from their direct environment within the brain represents an important addition to current therapeutic approaches. The blockage of cellular interactions via the clinically relevant substances Disulfiram and Carbenoxolone, has distinct effects on different cell populations within a tumour, potentially reducing motility and/or resistance to apoptosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carbenoxolona/farmacología , Disulfiram/farmacología , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Células Madre Neoplásicas/efectos de los fármacos , Microambiente Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores del Acetaldehído Deshidrogenasa/farmacología , Animales , Antiulcerosos/farmacología , Apoptosis , Neoplasias Encefálicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Adhesión Celular , Proliferación Celular , Quimioterapia Combinada , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Glioblastoma/metabolismo , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos NOD , Ratones SCID , Invasividad Neoplásica , Células Madre Neoplásicas/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Pronóstico , Transducción de Señal , Tasa de Supervivencia , Células Tumorales Cultivadas , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
4.
Int J Cancer ; 138(7): 1709-18, 2016 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26519239

RESUMEN

Cancer stem cells (CSC) have been postulated to be responsible for the key features of a malignancy and its maintenances, as well as therapy resistance, while differentiated cells are believed to make up the rapidly growing tumour bulk. It is therefore important to understand the characteristics of those two distinct cell populations in order to devise treatment strategies which effectively target both cohorts, in particular with respect to cancers, such as glioblastoma. Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumour in adults, with a mean patient survival of 12-15 months. Importantly, therapeutic improvements have not been forthcoming in the last decade. In this study we compare key features of three pairs of glioblastoma cell populations, each pair consisting of stem cell-like and differentiated cells derived from an individual patient. Our data suggest that while growth rates and expression of key survival- and apoptosis-mediating proteins are more similar according to differentiation status than genetic similarity, we found no intrinsic differences in response to standard therapeutic interventions, namely exposure to radiation or the alkylating agent temozolomide. Interestingly, we could demonstrate that both stem cell-like and differentiated cells possess the ability to form stem cell-containing tumours in immunocompromised mice and that differentiated cells could potentially be dedifferentiated to potential stem cells. Taken together our data suggest that the differences between tumour stem cell and differentiated cell are particular fluent in glioblastoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Glioblastoma/patología , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Animales , Western Blotting , Diferenciación Celular , Fragmentación del ADN , Xenoinjertos , Humanos , Ratones , Células Tumorales Cultivadas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA