Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 95
Filtrar
1.
J Thorac Dis ; 15(5): 2458-2468, 2023 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37324070

RESUMEN

Background: Radiation pneumonitis and immune-related pneumonitis have been studied independently, but little information has emerged on the interactions between radiation therapy (RT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). We examine whether RT and ICI are synergistic in causing pneumonitis. Methods: A retrospective cohort was assembled using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, including Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th ed. (AJCC) stages IIIB-IV NSCLC between 2013-2017. Exposures to RT and ICI were determined by evaluating for treatment within 12 months of diagnosis (RT group and ICI group) and for a second exposure (e.g., ICI after RT) within 3 months after the first exposure (RT + ICI group). Untreated controls were matched to treated patients who were diagnosed in the same three-month window. A validated algorithm for identifying cases of pneumonitis in claims data was used to evaluate for the outcome within 6 months after treatment. The primary outcome was the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), a quantitative measure of additive interaction between two treatments. Results: There were 18,780 patients included in the analysis with 9,345 (49.8%), 7,533 (40.2%), 1,332 (7.1%), and 550 (2.9%) in the control, RT, ICI, and RT + ICI groups, respectively. Relative to controls, the hazards ratios of pneumonitis were 11.5 (95% CI: 7.9 to 17.0), 6.2 (95% CI: 3.8 to 10.3), and 10.7 (95% CI: 6.0 to 19.2) in the RT, ICI, and RT-ICI groups, respectively. The RERIs were -6.1 (95% CI: -13.1 to -0.6, P=0.97) and -4.0 (95% CI: -10.7 to 1.5, P=0.91) in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses, respectively, consistent with no evidence of additive interaction (RERI ≤0) between RT and ICI. Conclusions: In this study of Medicare beneficiaries with advanced NSCLC, RT and ICI were, at most, additive rather than synergistic in causing pneumonitis. Pneumonitis risk in patients treated with RT and ICI is not more than could be expected from each therapy alone.

2.
Ann Surg Open ; 3(3)2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35990734

RESUMEN

Whether patients undergo the more morbid and costly emergent rather than an elective type of surgery, may depend on many factors. Since tertiary prevention (preventing poor outcomes from emergency surgery) carries a much higher mortality than secondary prevention (preventing emergency surgery) or primary prevention (preventing the disease requiring surgery), the overall United States mortality might be reduced significantly, if emergency surgery could be avoided via high-quality primary prevention and non-surgical therapy or increasing elective surgery at the expense of emergency procedures, e.g., secondary prevention. The practice and study of acute care surgery then has the potential to broaden from a focus on the patient in the hospital emergency and operating rooms to the patient who no longer requires either, whose disease is treated or prevented in his/her/their community.

3.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 30(12): 1624-1629, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34378828

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Non-infectious pneumonitis (NIP) is a common complication of treatments for lung cancer. We know of no existing validated algorithm for identifying NIP in claims databases, limiting our ability to understand the morbidity and mortality of this toxicity in real-world data. METHODS: Electronic health records (EHR), cancer registry, and administrative data from a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center were queried for patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 10/01/2015-12/31/2020. Health insurance claims were searched for ICD-10-CM codes that indicate an inpatient or outpatient diagnosis with possible NIP. A 20-code (Algorithm A) and 11-code (Algorithm B) algorithm were tested with and without requiring prescription with corticosteroids. Cases with a diagnosis of possible NIP in the 6 months before their first lung cancer diagnosis were excluded. The algorithms were validated by reviewing the EHR. The positive predictive value (PPV) for each algorithm was computed with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Seventy patients with lung cancer had a diagnosis code compatible with NIP: 36 (51.4%) inpatients and 34 (48.6%) outpatients. The PPV of Algorithm A was 77.1% (95% CI: 65.6-86.3). The PPV of Algorithm B was 86.9% (95% CI: 75.8-94.2). Requiring a documented prescription for a systemic corticosteroid improved the PPV of both Algorithm A and Algorithm B: 92.5% (95% CI: 79.6-98.4) and 100.0% (95% CI: 90.0-100.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated ICD-10-CM and prescription-claims-based definitions of NIP in lung cancer patients. All algorithms have at least reasonable performance. Enriching the algorithm with corticosteroid prescription records results in excellent performance.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonía , Algoritmos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/epidemiología
4.
Pediatrics ; 144(4)2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31527173

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Off-label drug use in children is common and potentially harmful. In most previous off-label use research, authors studied hospitalized children, specific drug classes, or non-US settings. We characterized frequencies, trends, and reasons for off-label systemic drug orders for children in ambulatory US settings. METHODS: Using nationally representative surveys of office-based physicians (National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, 2006-2015), we studied off-label orders of systemic drugs for children age <18 based on US Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling for age, weight, and indication. We characterized the top classes and diagnoses with off-label orders and analyzed factors and trends of off-label orders using logistic regression. RESULTS: Physicians ordered ≥1 off-label systemic drug at 18.5% (95% confidence interval: 17.7%-19.3%) of visits, usually (74.6%) because of unapproved conditions. Off-label ordering was most common proportionally in neonates (83%) and in absolute terms among adolescents (322 orders out of 1000 visits). Off-label ordering was associated with female sex, subspecialists, polypharmacy, and chronic conditions. Rates and reasons for off-label orders varied considerably by age. Relative and absolute rates of off-label orders rose over time. Among common classes, off-label orders for antihistamines and several psychotropics increased over time, whereas off-label orders for several classes of antibiotics were stable or declined. CONCLUSIONS: US office-based physicians have ordered systemic drugs off label for children at increasing rates, most often for unapproved conditions, despite recent efforts to increase evidence and drug approvals for children. These findings can help inform education, research, and policies around effective, safe use of medications in children.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Intervalos de Confianza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 800, 2019 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31409314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption is associated with increased risk of breast cancer; however, its association with subsequent risk of breast cancer death is unclear. METHODS: We followed 4523 women with complete information on relevant risk factors for mortality; these women were 35 to 64 years of age when diagnosed with incident invasive breast cancer between 1994 and 1998. During follow up (median, 8.6 years), 1055 women died; 824 died from breast cancer. The information on alcohol consumption before diagnosis was collected shortly after breast cancer diagnosis (average: 5.1 months) during an in-person interview which used a structured questionnaire. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer-specific mortality, mortality due to causes other than breast cancer, and all-cause mortality associated with alcohol consumption from age 15 years until breast cancer diagnosis and during recent periods of time prior to breast cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Average weekly alcohol consumption from age 15 years until breast cancer diagnosis was inversely associated with breast cancer-specific mortality (Ptrend = 0.01). Compared to non-drinkers, women in the highest average weekly alcohol consumption category (≥7 drinks/week) had 25% lower risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.56-1.00). Breast cancer mortality risk was also reduced among women in the highest average weekly alcohol consumption category in two recent time periods (5-year period ending 2-years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.95; 2-year period immediately prior to breast cancer diagnosis: HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.56-0.95). Furthermore, analyses of average weekly alcohol consumption by beverage type from age 15 years until breast cancer diagnosis suggested that wine consumption was inversely associated with breast cancer-specific mortality risk (wine Ptrend = 0.06, beer Ptrend = 0.24, liquor Ptrend = 0.74). No association with any of these alcohol consumption variables was observed for mortality risk due to causes other than breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found no evidence that alcohol consumption before breast cancer diagnosis increases subsequent risk of death from breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Población Negra , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Población Blanca , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Vigilancia de la Población , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
6.
BMJ Open ; 7(7): e016788, 2017 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28733303

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We studied oral glucocorticoids and osteonecrosis, a rare but serious bone disease, in individuals with various chronic inflammatory diseases. We hypothesised that we would find stronger associations in adults versus children and in people with autoimmune diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Population-representative data (1994-2013) from general practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Children and adults diagnosed with asthma; inflammatory bowel disease; juvenile, psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis; psoriasis; or systemic lupus. EXPOSURES: Oral glucocorticoid patterns. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnosed osteonecrosis (primary) and osteonecrosis plus clinical features (eg, symptoms, pain medication, surgical repair) (secondary). Discrete time failure models estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of incident osteonecrosis following oral glucocorticoid exposure. Hypothesis testing was one sided (with corresponding 90% CI) since glucocorticoids were unlikely protective. RESULTS: After adjusting for demographic, disease-related and health utilisation factors, glucocorticoid exposure was associated with osteonecrosis in adults (ages 18-49, aHR 2.1 (90% CI 1.5 to 2.9); ages ≥50, aHR 1.3 (90% CI 1.01 to 1.7)). However, low-dose glucocorticoids, corresponding to average doses <7.5 mg prednisolone daily and maximum doses <30 mg daily, were not associated with osteonecrosis in adults. Furthermore, even at high glucocorticoid doses, there was no evidence of increased osteonecrosis among glucocorticoid-exposed children (p=0.04 for interaction by age) (any glucocorticoid exposure, ages 2-9: aHR 1.1 (90% CI 0.7 to 1.7); ages 10-17: aHR 0.6 (90% CI 0.3 to 1.6)). Arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and lupus were independently associated with osteonecrosis, but there was a similar dose relationship between glucocorticoids and osteonecrosis among adults with low-risk and high-risk diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Glucocorticoid use was clearly associated with osteonecrosis in a dose-related fashion in adults, especially young adults, but this risk was not detectable in children. The absolute risk of glucocorticoid-associated osteonecrosis in the general paediatric population and in adults taking low glucocorticoid doses is at most extremely small.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteonecrosis/inducido químicamente , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
8.
JAMA ; 314(3): 265-77, 2015 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26197187

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Studies suggest pioglitazone use may increase risk of cancers. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether pioglitazone use for diabetes is associated with risk of bladder and 10 additional cancers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort and nested case-control analyses among persons with diabetes. A bladder cancer cohort followed 193,099 persons aged 40 years or older in 1997-2002 until December 2012; 464 case patients and 464 matched controls were surveyed about additional confounders. A cohort analysis of 10 additional cancers included 236,507 persons aged 40 years or older in 1997-2005 and followed until June 2012. Cohorts were from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. EXPOSURES: Ever use, duration, cumulative dose, and time since initiation of pioglitazone as time dependent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident cancer, including bladder, prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectum, and melanoma. RESULTS: Among 193,099 persons in the bladder cancer cohort, 34,181 (18%) received pioglitazone (median duration, 2.8 years; range, 0.2-13.2 years) and 1261 had incident bladder cancer. Crude incidences of bladder cancer in pioglitazone users and nonusers were 89.8 and 75.9 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Ever use of pioglitazone was not associated with bladder cancer risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.26). Results were similar in case-control analyses (pioglitazone use: 19.6% among case patients and 17.5% among controls; adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.78-1.80). In adjusted analyses, there was no association with 8 of the 10 additional cancers; ever use of pioglitazone was associated with increased risk of prostate cancer (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.26) and pancreatic cancer (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16-1.71). Crude incidences of prostate and pancreatic cancer in pioglitazone users vs nonusers were 453.3 vs 449.3 and 81.1 vs 48.4 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. No clear patterns of risk for any cancer were observed for time since initiation, duration, or dose. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pioglitazone use was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of bladder cancer, although an increased risk, as previously observed, could not be excluded. The increased prostate and pancreatic cancer risks associated with ever use of pioglitazone merit further investigation to assess whether they are causal or are due to chance, residual confounding, or reverse causality.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/inducido químicamente , Tiazolidinedionas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Pioglitazona , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapéutico
9.
Ann Intern Med ; 160(6): 369-79, 2014 Mar 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24723077

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence and determinants of hepatic decompensation have been incompletely examined among patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, and few studies have compared outcome rates with those of patients with chronic HCV alone. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of hepatic decompensation between antiretroviral-treated patients co-infected with HIV and HCV and HCV-monoinfected patients and to evaluate factors associated with decompensation among co-infected patients receiving ART. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Veterans Health Administration. PATIENTS: 4280 co-infected patients who initiated ART and 6079 HCV-monoinfected patients receiving care between 1997 and 2010. All patients had detectable HCV RNA and were HCV treatment-naive. MEASUREMENTS: Incident hepatic decompensation, determined by diagnoses of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or esophageal variceal hemorrhage. RESULTS: The incidence of hepatic decompensation was greater among co-infected than monoinfected patients (7.4% vs. 4.8% at 10 years; P < 0.001). Compared with HCV-monoinfected patients, co-infected patients had a higher rate of hepatic decompensation (hazard ratio [HR] accounting for competing risks, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.31 to 1.86]). Co-infected patients who maintained HIV RNA levels less than 1000 copies/mL still had higher rates of decompensation than HCV-monoinfected patients (HR, 1.44 [CI, 1.05 to 1.99]). Baseline advanced hepatic fibrosis (FIB-4 score >3.25) (HR, 5.45 [CI, 3.79 to 7.84]), baseline hemoglobin level less than 100 g/L (HR, 2.24 [CI, 1.20 to 4.20]), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.88 [CI, 1.38 to 2.56]), and nonblack race (HR, 2.12 [CI, 1.65 to 2.72]) were each associated with higher rates of decompensation among co-infected patients. LIMITATION: Observational study of predominantly male patients. CONCLUSION: Despite receiving ART, patients co-infected with HIV and HCV had higher rates of hepatic decompensation than HCV-monoinfected patients. Rates of decompensation were higher for co-infected patients with advanced liver fibrosis, severe anemia, diabetes, and nonblack race. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.


Asunto(s)
Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Adulto , Ascitis/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Coinfección , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/epidemiología , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , VIH/genética , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Peritonitis/epidemiología , ARN Viral/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Viral
10.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 23(6): 636-45, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24764283

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The observed association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer could be causal or because of bias in the design of prior studies. We hypothesize that proteinuria testing may lead to detection bias if routine test results for proteinuria lead to a full urinalysis. METHODS: We reanalyzed patients with diabetes mellitus within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Logistic and Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, race, and smoking were used to assess the association of proteinuria testing with pioglitazone use, subsequent full urinalysis, and diagnosis with bladder cancer. RESULTS: Patients treated with pioglitazone were more likely than others with diabetes to undergo testing for proteinuria (p < 0.001). The odds of positive tests for proteinuria were higher among pioglitazone-treated patients (OR = 1.41, 95%CI 1.36-1.46). A positive proteinuria test was associated with increased odds of completing a urinalysis in the following 6 months (OR = 1.78, 95%CI 1.73-1.85). Negative and positive proteinuria test results were inversely (hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95%CI 0.52-0.75) and positively associated (HR 2.45, 95%CI 2.12-2.82) with bladder cancer risk, respectively. Adjustment for negative and positive proteinuria testing reduced the magnitude of association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer by only 5 to 10% (ever-exposed HR: from 1.06 to 1.01 and >4 years exposure HR: from 1.38 to 1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Proteinuria testing may be a confounder in studies of pioglitazone and bladder cancer but does not fully explain the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer in this cohort. Optimal adjustment for proteinuria testing likely requires knowledge of the test result.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Proteinuria/epidemiología , Tiazolidinedionas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pioglitazona , Proteinuria/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico
11.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 21(5): 744-52, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24590007

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether endometrial ablation is associated with increased risk or delayed diagnosis of endometrial cancer compared with medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding. DESIGN: Multi-centered retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: The study was performed using data from The Health Improvement Network, a representative population-based cohort of patients in 495 outpatient general practitioner practices in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS: Women aged >25 years with abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosed between June 1994 and September 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Endometrial ablation, medical management, or both. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 234 721 women met study inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4776 of whom underwent endometrial ablation and the remaining 229 945 received medical management. Cox models compared endometrial cancer rates between ablation and medical management groups using hazard ratios. To investigate a possible diagnostic delay, the median time from bleeding diagnosis to endometrial cancer diagnosis in women in whom endometrial cancer developed was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. All statistical tests were 2-tailed, with α = .05. During a median observation period of 4.07 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.88-7.17), endometrial cancer developed in 3 women in the ablation group and 601 women in the medical management group (ablation hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.40; p = .17). Median time to diagnosis was 237 in the ablation group, and 299 days in the medical management group (ablation IQR, 155-1350; medical management IQR, 144-1133.5; p = .99). Adjusted and sensitivity analyses did not change the results. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in endometrial cancer rates, and there was no delay in diagnosis when comparing endometrial ablation vs medical management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of previous ablation exposure on histology or cancer stage at manifestation of endometrial cancer.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación Endometrial , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Menorragia/terapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Diagnóstico Tardío , Técnicas de Ablación Endometrial/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Menorragia/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía
12.
Breast Cancer Res ; 15(5): R90, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24070170

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The association of breast cancer patients' mortality with estrogen receptor (ER) status (ER + versus ER-) has been well studied. However, little attention has been paid to the relationship between the quantitative measures of ER expression and mortality. METHODS: We evaluated the association between semi-quantitative, immunohistochemical staining of ER in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas and breast cancer-specific mortality risk in an observational cohort of invasive breast cancer in 681 white women and 523 black women ages 35-64 years at first diagnosis of invasive breast cancer, who were followed for a median of 10 years. The quantitative measures of ER examined here included the percentage of tumor cell nuclei positively stained for ER, ER Histo (H)-score, and a score based on an adaptation of an equation presented by Cuzick and colleagues, which combines weighted values of ER H-score, percentage of tumor cell nuclei positively stained for the progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) results. This is referred to as the ER/PR/HER2 score. RESULTS: After controlling for age at diagnosis, race, study site, tumor stage, and histologic grade in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, both percentage of tumor cell nuclei positively stained for ER (Ptrend = 0.0003) and the ER H-score (Ptrend = 0.0004) were inversely associated with breast cancer-specific mortality risk. The ER/PR/HER2 score was positively associated with breast cancer-specific mortality risk in women with ER + tumor (Ptrend = 0.001). Analyses by race revealed that ER positivity was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer-specific mortality in white women and black women. The two quantitative measures for ER alone provided additional discrimination in breast cancer-specific mortality risk only among white women with ER + tumors (both Ptrend ≤ 0.01) while the ER/PR/HER2 score provided additional discrimination for both white women (Ptrend = 0.01) and black women (Ptrend = 0.03) with ER + tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support quantitative immunohistochemical measures of ER, especially the ER/PR/HER2 score, as a more precise predictor for breast cancer-specific mortality risk than a simple determination of ER positivity.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Población Blanca , Adulto , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Núcleo Celular/genética , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos/genética , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo
13.
J Clin Oncol ; 31(20): 2607-18, 2013 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23733771

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Endometrial cancers have long been divided into estrogen-dependent type I and the less common clinically aggressive estrogen-independent type II. Little is known about risk factors for type II tumors because most studies lack sufficient cases to study these much less common tumors separately. We examined whether so-called classical endometrial cancer risk factors also influence the risk of type II tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual-level data from 10 cohort and 14 case-control studies from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium were pooled. A total of 14,069 endometrial cancer cases and 35,312 controls were included. We classified endometrioid (n = 7,246), adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (n = 4,830), and adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation (n = 777) as type I tumors and serous (n = 508) and mixed cell (n = 346) as type II tumors. RESULTS: Parity, oral contraceptive use, cigarette smoking, age at menarche, and diabetes were associated with type I and type II tumors to similar extents. Body mass index, however, had a greater effect on type I tumors than on type II tumors: odds ratio (OR) per 2 kg/m(2) increase was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.21) for type I and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.14) for type II tumors (P heterogeneity < .0001). Risk factor patterns for high-grade endometrioid tumors and type II tumors were similar. CONCLUSION: The results of this pooled analysis suggest that the two endometrial cancer types share many common etiologic factors. The etiology of type II tumors may, therefore, not be completely estrogen independent, as previously believed.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Obesidad/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Fumar/epidemiología , Análisis de Supervivencia
14.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 225, 2013 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23642215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Black women are more likely than white women to have an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that is associated with higher mortality and this may contribute to the observed black-white difference in mortality. However, few studies have investigated the black-white disparity in mortality risk stratified by breast cancer subtype, defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Furthermore, it is not known whether additional consideration of p53 protein status influences black-white differences in mortality risk observed when considering subtypes defined by ER, PR and HER2 status. METHODS: Four biomarkers were assessed by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded breast tumor tissue from 1,204 (523 black, 681 white) women with invasive breast cancer, aged 35-64 years at diagnosis, who accrued a median of 10 years' follow-up. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to assess subtype-specific black-white differences in mortality risk. RESULTS: No black-white differences in mortality risk were observed for women with triple negative (ER-negative [ER-], PR-, and HER2-) subtype. However, older (50-64 years) black women had greater overall mortality risk than older white women if they had been diagnosed with luminal A (ER-positive [ER+] or PR+ plus HER2-) breast cancer (all-cause hazard ratio, HR, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.18 to 2.99; breast cancer-specific HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.83 to 2.74). This black-white difference among older women was further confined to those with luminal A/p53- tumors (all-cause HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.79; breast cancer-specific HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.93 to 3.86). Tests for homogeneity of race-specific HRs comparing luminal A to triple negative subtype and luminal A/p53- to luminal A/p53+ subtype did not achieve statistical significance, although statistical power was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the subtype-specific black-white difference in mortality risk occurs mainly among older women diagnosed with luminal A/p53- breast cancer, which is most likely treatable. These results further suggest that factors other than subtype may be relatively more important in explaining the increased mortality risk seen in older black women.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Estados Unidos
15.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 104(18): 1411-21, 2012 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22878886

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione (TZD), may increase the risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this study, we assessed the risk of bladder cancer associated with the use of TZDs and between pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, an alternative TZD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who initiated treatment with a TZD (n = 18 459 patients) or a sulfonylurea (SU) (n = 41 396 patients) between July 1, 2000, and August 31, 2010, using The Health Improvement Network database in the United Kingdom. Incident cancers were identified for 196 708 person-years of follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of bladder cancer in the TZD cohort compared with the SU cohort (referent), adjusted for potential confounders. Risk associated with increasing duration of drug exposure was also examined. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified 60 incident bladder cancers in the TZD cohort and 137 cancers in the SU cohort. No difference in bladder cancer risk was found between the two cohorts (TZD vs SU, HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.68 to 1.29) in analyses that did not account for duration of exposure. However, the risk of bladder cancer was increased among patients with the longest duration of TZD vs SU therapy (≥ 5 years of use, HR = 3.25, 95% CI = 1.08 to 9.71) and among those with the longest time since initiation of therapy (≥ 5 years since first use, HR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.12 to 5.77). Risk of bladder cancer also increased with increasing time since initiation of pioglitazone (P (trend) < .001) and rosiglitazone (P (trend) = .006). Comparison of pioglitazone to rosiglitazone use did not demonstrate difference in cancer risk (P = .49). CONCLUSION: Long-term TZD therapy (≥ 5 years) in patients with type 2 diabetes may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer, which may be common to all TZDs.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Tiazolidinedionas/administración & dosificación , Tiazolidinedionas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pioglitazona , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Proyectos de Investigación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Rosiglitazona , Reino Unido/epidemiología
16.
Am J Epidemiol ; 176(4): 269-78, 2012 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22831825

RESUMEN

Childbearing at an older age has been associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer, but whether the association is independent of the number of births or other factors remains unclear. Individual-level data from 4 cohort and 13 case-control studies in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium were pooled. A total of 8,671 cases of endometrial cancer and 16,562 controls were included in the analysis. After adjustment for known risk factors, endometrial cancer risk declined with increasing age at last birth (P(trend) < 0.0001). The pooled odds ratio per 5-year increase in age at last birth was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.90). Women who last gave birth at 40 years of age or older had a 44% decreased risk compared with women who had their last birth under the age of 25 years (95% confidence interval: 47, 66). The protective association was similar across the different age-at-diagnosis groups and for the 2 major tumor histologic subtypes (type I and type II). No effect modification was observed by body mass index, parity, or exogenous hormone use. In this large pooled analysis, late age at last birth was independently associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer, and the reduced risk persisted for many years.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/etiología , Edad Materna , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , China/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Paridad , Polonia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Cancer Causes Control ; 23(5): 671-81, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22418777

RESUMEN

Racial differences in breast cancer risk, including the risks of hormone receptor subtypes of breast cancer, have been previously reported. We evaluated whether variation in genes related to estrogen metabolism (COMT, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1, ESR1, GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1, HSD17B1, SULT1A1, and UGT1A1) contributes to breast cancer risk and/or racial differences in risk within the CARE study, a multi-centered, population-based case-control study of breast cancer. Genetic variation was assessed as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), haplotypes, and SNP-hormone therapy (HT) interactions within a subset of 1,644 cases and 1,451 controls, including 949 Black women (493 cases and 456 controls), sampled from the CARE study population. No appreciable associations with breast cancer risk were detected for single SNPs or haplotypes in women overall. We detected SNP-HT interactions in women overall within CYP1B1 (rs1800440; p (het) = 0.003) and within CYP17A1 (rs743572; p (het) = 0.009) in which never users of HT were at a decreased risk of breast cancer, while ever users were at a non-significant increased risk. When investigated among racial groups, we detected evidence of an SNP-HT interaction with CYP1B1 in White women (p value = 0.02) and with CYP17A1 in Black women (p value = 0.04). This analysis suggests that HT use may modify the effect of variation in estrogen-related genes on breast cancer risk, which may affect Black and White women to a different extent.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Estrógenos/genética , Estrógenos/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Variación Genética , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Factores de Riesgo , Población Blanca
18.
Contraception ; 85(4): 342-50, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22067757

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While evidence on the association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and breast cancer generally suggests little or no increased risk, the question of whether breast cancer risk varies by OC formulation remains controversial. Few studies have examined this issue because large samples and extensive OC histories are required. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from a multicenter, population-based, case-control investigation. Women aged 35-64 years were interviewed. To explore the association between OC formulation and breast cancer risk, we used conditional logistic regression to derive adjusted odds ratios, and we used likelihood ratio tests for heterogeneity to assess whether breast cancer risk varied by OC formulation. Key OC exposure variables were ever use, current or former use, duration of use and time since last use. To strengthen inferences about specific formulations, we restricted most analyses to the 2282 women with breast cancer and the 2424 women without breast cancer who reported no OC use or exclusive use of one OC. RESULTS: Thirty-eight formulations were reported by the 2674 women who used one OC; most OC formulations were used by only a few women. We conducted multivariable analyses on the 10 formulations that were each used by at least 50 women and conducted supplemental analyses on selected formulations of interest based on recent research. Breast cancer risk did not vary significantly by OC formulation, and no formulation was associated with a significantly increased breast cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: These results add to the small body of literature on the relationship between OC formulation and breast cancer. Our data are reassuring in that, among women 35-64 years of age, we found no evidence that specific OC formulations increase breast cancer risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/inducido químicamente , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Carcinogenesis ; 32(12): 1862-6, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21965274

RESUMEN

Recent large--scale association studies, both of genome-wide and candidate gene design, have revealed several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which are significantly associated with risk of developing breast cancer. As both breast and endometrial cancers are considered to be hormonally driven and share multiple risk factors, we investigated whether breast cancer risk alleles are also associated with endometrial cancer risk. We genotyped nine breast cancer risk SNPs in up to 4188 endometrial cases and 11,928 controls, from between three and seven Caucasian populations. None of the tested SNPs showed significant evidence of association with risk of endometrial cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
20.
J Clin Oncol ; 29(25): 3358-65, 2011 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21788570

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of obesity on survival among black women and white women with invasive breast cancer and to determine whether obesity explains the poorer survival of black women relative to white women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We observed 4,538 (1,604 black, 2,934 white) women who were 35 to 64 years of age when diagnosed with incident invasive breast cancer between 1994 and 1998. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to examine the effect of body mass index (BMI, in kilograms per square meter) 5 years before diagnosis on risk of death from any cause and from breast cancer. RESULTS: During a median of 8.6 years of follow-up, 1,053 women died (519 black, 534 white), 828 as a result of breast cancer (412 black, 416 white). Black women were more likely to die than white women (multivariate-adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.53). Compared with women with BMI of 20 to 24.9 kg/m(2), those who were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) had a greater risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.47) and breast cancer-specific mortality (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.46). These associations were observed among white women (all-cause RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.96; breast cancer RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.92), but not among black women (all-cause RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.29; breast cancer RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.33). CONCLUSION: Obesity may play an important role in mortality among white but not black patients with breast cancer. It is unlikely that differences in obesity distributions between black women and white women account for the poorer survival of black women.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Composición Corporal , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , California , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA