The clinical outcome of balloon-assisted maturation procedure between autogenous radiocephalic fistula and brachiocephalic fistula in a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) by an endovascular method plays an important role in treating an immature arteriovenous fistula. However, the results between radiocephalic fistula and brachiocephalic fistula were rarely reported. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and outcome of BAM in different sites of autogenous arteriovenous fistulas. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent BAM procedures from January 2015 to December 2016. Of 148 patients, 117 and 31 patients had a radiocephalic fistula (RC) and a brachiocephalic fistula (BC), respectively. The primary outcome was BAM success. Data regarding fistula lesions, balloon types and size, frequency of procedures, and maturation time were collected for BAMs. The secondary outcome was the patency of a fistula in the follow-up period. RESULTS: No difference was observed in procedure of BAM frequency between the RC and BC groups. The total success rate was 77.7%, without significant difference between the RC and BC groups (81.20% vs 64.50%; P = .055). Within the procedures, the culprit lesion of juxta-anastomosis segment (73.5% vs 25.5%; P < .001) and arterial inlet (21.2% vs 7.8%; P = .04) were more common in the RC group, whereas the venous outlet was more common in the BC group (88.2% vs 57.7%; P < .001). Both groups had an equivalent patency rate after the BAM within the follow-up period (P = .272). CONCLUSIONS: BAM was an effective procedure for immature fistulas, without significant difference between RCs and BCs. Through the procedure, the culprit lesions causing non-maturation were found to be different between the two groups. The patency rate between the two groups after surgery seems to be equivalent within the follow-up period.

Elevation Transposition Method for Superficialization of the Basilic Vein Achieves Better Patency Rate than Tunnel Transposition.

BACKGROUND: To compare the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition methods used for superficialization of the basilic vein in terms of complication and patency rates. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent 2-stage basilic vein transposition between August 2016 and December 2019. Patients were categorized into brachial-basilic fistula tunnel transposition (n = 32) and elevation transposition (n = 21) groups using medical records. Primary patency was defined as a conduit that remains patent without any re-intervention to maintain patency. Primary assisted patency was defined as a conduit that has undergone intervention to maintain patency but has never been thrombosed. RESULTS: The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar between the 2 groups. Coronary artery disease was the only variable that was significantly different between the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition groups (31.1% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.035). The tunnel transposition group had a greater amount of blood loss (P < 0.001) and a longer period of hospitalization (P = 0.002) than the elevation transposition group. The rates of suture repair to stop bleeding from the conduit was significantly different between the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition groups (31.8% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.035), whereas those of other complications were not significantly different. The elevation transposition group had a significantly higher primary patency rate than the tunneled transposition group (P = 0.033); however, primary assisted patency was achieved in all patients (100%) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Elevation transposition might be a more reliable method than tunnel transposition for superficialization of a basilic venous fistula.

Comparison between Totally Percutaneous Approach and Femoral Artery Cut-Down in Endovascular Aortic Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Single Hospital.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcome of totally percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (pEVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) compared with femoral cut-down endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with ruptured AAAs that underwent EVAR between March 2010 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, preoperative vital signs, preoperative laboratory data, method of anesthesia, procedure duration, aneurysm morphology, brand of device used, length of hospital stay, access complications, and short-term outcomes were recorded. Univariate as well as multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 77 patients with ruptured AAAs, 17 (22.1%) received cEVAR and 60 (77.9%) received pEVAR. Significant differences in the procedure time (P = 0.004), method of anesthesia (P = 0.040), and 30-day mortality (P = 0.037) were detected between the cEVAR and pEVAR groups. Local anesthesia plus intravenous general anesthesia (odds ratio = 0.141, P = 0.018) was an independent factor associated with 30-day mortality and local anesthesia was better than general anesthesia for 24-hr mortality (P = 0.001) and 30-day mortality (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In patients with ruptured AAAs, pEVAR procedures took less time than cEVAR procedures, but the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly. The 30-day mortality rate was lower with pEVAR than with cEVAR. Local anesthesia may be the key factor in EVAR to improved technical and clinical success.

Total Resection of Infected Peripheral Hemodialysis Grafts Has a Favorable Impact on Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection could be an eradication treatment for patients with infected hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of 3 surgical methods, including total resection, subtotal resection, and revision. METHODS: The patients who underwent surgical excision of infected AVGs performed at a single center from August 2012 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The following 3 surgical methods were used in our study: revision, subtotal resection, and total resection. Patients' demographics, medical history, perioperative details, reconstruction time, and follow-up data were collected. The outcomes including perioperative complications (within 30 days), mortality, reinfection rate of AVGs, with new access reconstruction or not, and the outcomes between reconstruction and nonreconstruction in the follow-up period were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-one patients had infected AVGs in our study. Patients' mean age was 62 years, and 65.9% of the patients were female. The mean duration from the time of diagnosis to the operation was 14.4 days. Signs and symptoms at presentation included fever (51.2 %), swelling (43.9%), pain (58.5%), erythematous change (92.7%), and more severe features, such as altered consciousness (14.6%) and hypotension (12.2%). The pathological changes in the infected grafts included bleeding (29.3%), pus formation (73.2%), pseudoaneurysm (26.8%), and graft exposure (17.1%). Wound and graft cultures revealed an infectious etiology with fungi (7.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.2%), Enterococcus spp. (2.4%), and Staphylococcus spp. (58.5%), with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus accounting for only 7.3%. Total resection, subtotal resection, and revision surgery were performed in 17.1%, 63.4%, and 19.5% of patients, respectively. Seven patients with complications required reoperation (17.1%), and adhesion ileus and hospital-acquired pneumonia occurred in only 2.4% and 7.3% of patients, respectively. During follow-up, most patients (82.9%) had reconstruction of the peripheral hemodialysis access with mean time of 64.3 (range: 21-92) days; mean time of use of new access was 90.5 days; and mean time of removal of catheter was about 106.3 days. Mortality rates in patients without and with reconstructed AV access during follow-up were 50% and 18%, respectively (P < 0.004). Eight cases (19.5%) had recurrence of AV access infections during follow-up; of these, 2 had revision surgery and 6 had subtotal resection. However, no patient with total resection had recurrent infections. CONCLUSIONS: The total resection group had no recurrent infection compared to the subtotal and revision groups. In addition, patients with reconstruction of peripheral hemodialysis access had a low mortality rate during the follow-up period.

Outpatient Percutaneous Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of outpatient percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic repair (PEVAR) versus inpatient PEVAR without or with adjunct procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and June 2019, a cohort of 359 patients comprising 168 (46.8%) outpatients and 191 (53.2%) inpatients who had undergone PEVAR were enrolled. All the patients were asymptomatic but had indications for endovascular aortic repair, ie, fit for intravenous anesthesia and anatomically feasible with standard devices. Patient sex, age, comorbidities, smoking status, type of anesthesia, adjunct procedures, type of graft device, operative times, mortality, complications, and readmissions were analyzed. RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 16.5 months (interquartile range, 9-31 months). Except for a higher percentage of tobacco use (42.6% vs 28.8%; P = .04), dyslipidemia (39.7% vs 19.2%; P < .01), and use of local anesthesia (99.4% vs 82.2%; P < .01) in the outpatients, there was no significant difference in the type of graft and adjunct procedures used. No outpatient mortality occurred. There was no difference in the number, severity, and onset of complications (all P > .05). Outpatient unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were 4.8%, 2.4% (P = .13), and 10% (P < .01), respectively. Operative times for outpatient PEVAR without adjunct procedures were shorter (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient PEVAR can be performed with a safety profile similar to that of inpatient PEVAR. The unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were low. The outpatient PEVARs without adjunct procedures took less time.

Transarterial embolization of a large high-flow right renal arteriovenous fistula using stents and an across-stent wire-trapping technique.

Renal arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are rare vascular abnormalities. Their high-flow nature may result in increased cardiac output and lead to heart failure. Transcatheter endovascular management of renal AVFs with various embolization materials has been the treatment of choice in recent years. Embolization of large renal AVFs poses a risk of embolization through the AVF to the pulmonary circulation. Herein, we present the case of a patient whose large high-flow renal AVF was treated by a novel method involving the use of a bare stent and detachable metallic coils-called a wire-trapping technique-as well as compare this method with vascular plugs.

A prospective randomized study of stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with prosthetic graft outflow stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis graft outflow stenosis is a significant complication occurring in hemodialysis patients with prosthetic grafts for vascular access. Balloon angioplasty remains the first-line endovascular treatment of this complication, although covered stent graft implantation after balloon angioplasty also appears to be an effective and promising treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty in comparison to balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of graft outflow stenosis in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized study of 98 patients with clinically significant dialysis graft outflow stenosis treated in the vascular surgery section of a tertiary medical center. The patients were randomized into two groups; 49 patients were treated with stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty, and 49 patients were treated with balloon angioplasty alone. All patients underwent angiography of the graft site at 3 and 6 months after intervention, and restenosis rates were compared between the two groups. In addition, the duration of postintervention primary patency in the two groups was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The postintervention restenosis rate of the stent graft placement group was superior to that seen in the balloon angioplasty alone group (9% vs 69% at 3 months [P < .0001] and 29% vs 72% at 6 months [P < .0001]). The mean postintervention primary patency duration was 380.22 ± 28.54 days for the stent graft placement group and 151.08 ± 16.79 days for the balloon angioplasty alone group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of stent grafts in hemodialysis patients with graft outflow stenosis yielded superior results compared with the results seen in hemodialysis patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone. Patients treated with stent grafts after balloon angioplasty had a lower restenosis rate and a longer duration of postintervention primary patency. The placement of a stent graft after balloon angioplasty appears to be an optimal therapeutic approach for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with graft outflow stenosis.

Management of Type II Endoleak From Internal Iliac Artery Immediately After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Inadvertent coverage of origin of internal iliac artery (IIA) during endovascular aneurysm repair may lead to type II endoleak. Except for open surgery, the endovascular solution is limited. We report a case with such complication that was successfully treated with coil embolization using retrograde extrastent approach. This is a new technique that has not been reported before, and as such, had been useful in the treatment of type II endoleak from IIA as an alternative to open ligation of IIA origin.

The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation.

Vascular cutdown and echo guide puncture methods have its own limitations under certain conditions. There was no available algorithm for choosing entry vessel. A standard algorithm was introduced to help choose the entry vessel location according to our clinical experience and review of the literature. The goal of this study is to analyze the treatment results of the standard algorithm used to choose the entry vessel for intravenous port implantation.During the period between March 2012 and March 2013, 507 patients who received intravenous port implantation due to advanced chemotherapy were included into this study. Choice of entry vessel was according to standard algorithm. All clinical characteristic factors were collected and complication rate and incidence were further analyzed.Compared with our clinical experience in 2006, procedure-related complication rate declined from 1.09% to 0.4%, whereas the late complication rate decreased from 19.97% to 3.55%. No more pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, fractures, and pocket erosion were identified after using the standard algorithm. In alive oncology patients, 98% implanted port could serve a functional vascular access to fit therapeutic needs.This standard algorithm for choosing the best entry vessel is a simple guideline that is easy to follow. The algorithm has excellent efficiency and can minimize complication rates and incidence.

Deltoid branch of thoracoacromial vein: a safe alternative entry vessel for intravenous port implantation.

An entry vessel is crucial for intravenous port implantation. A safe alternative entry vessel that can be easily explored is crucial for patients without feasible cephalic vein or for those who need port reimplantation because of disease relapse. In this study, we tried to analyze the safety and feasibility of catheter implantation via the deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial vein.From March 2012 to November 2013, 802 consecutive oncology patients who had received intravenous port implantation via the superior vena cava were enrolled in this study. The functional results and complications of different entry vessels were compared.The majority of patients (93.6%) could be identified as thoracoacromial vessel. The deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial vein is located on the medial aspect of the deltopectoral groove beneath the pectoralis major muscle (85.8%) and in the deep part of the deltopectoral groove (14.2%). Due to the various calibers employed and tortuous routes followed, we utilized 3 different methods for catheter implantation, including vessel cutdown (47.4%), wire assisted (17.9%), and modified puncture method (34.6%). The functional results and complication rate were similar to other entry vessels.The deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial vein is located in the neighborhood of the cephalic vein. The functional results of intravenous port implantation via the deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial vein are similar to other entry vessels. It is a safe alternative entry vessel for intravenous port implantation.