Cardiorespiratory Optimisation By Arteriovenous fistula Ligation after renal Transplantation (COBALT): study protocol for a multicentre randomised interventional feasibility trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular events are a major cause of mortality following successful kidney transplantation.Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are considered the best option for haemodialysis, but may contribute to this excess mortality because they promote adverse cardiac remodelling and ventricular hypertrophy. This raises the question whether recipients with a well-functioning kidney transplant should undergo elective AVF ligation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The COBALT feasibility study is a multicentre interventional randomised controlled trial (RCT) that will randomise renal transplant patients with stable graft function and a working AVF on a 1:1 basis to standard care (continued conservative management) or to AVF ligation. All patients will perform cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on recruitment and 6 months later. Daily functioning and quality of life will be additionally assessed by questionnaire completion and objective measure of physical activity. The primary outcome-the proportion of approached patients who complete the study (incorporating rates of consent, receipt of allocated intervention and completion of both CPETs without withdrawal)-will determine progression to a full-scale RCT. Design of the proposed RCT will be informed by an embedded qualitative assessment of participant and healthcare professional involvement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (22/EM/0002) and the Health Research Authority. The results of this work will be disseminated academically through presentation at national and international renal meetings and via open access, peer-reviewed outputs. Existing networks of renal patient groups will also be used to disseminate the study findings to other key stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN49033491.

Evaluation of surgical approaches to anatomical segmentectomies: the transition to minimal invasive surgery improves hospital outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We aim to evaluate the transition process from open to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomical segmentectomies in a regional thoracic surgical unit. METHODS: In a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2015, we identified all anatomical segmentectomies performed in our unit. Pre, peri and postoperative data were compared between the three years (2013, 2014 and 2015) and according to operative approach. Thoracotomy after VATS intraoperative biopsy was considered a conversion for the purposes of the study. RESULTS: A total of 86 consecutive cases [56 females and 30 males, median age 70 years (range, 43 to 83 years); median FEV1 of 78% predicted (range, 41% to 126%)] were included. There was a significant change in the surgical approach with time. Fifty-two cases underwent VATS (73% via single-port) and 34 open surgeries, including nine conversions. There were no postoperative deaths in the VATS group and one in the open group. Operative outcomes were similar over time with no haemorrhagic events, equivalent R1 resection and nodal stations explored in all lymph node positive patients. In node negative cases however, open surgery was associated with more extensive mediastinal exploration. Patients in 2015 had a shorter hospital stay in comparison to those in previous years [median 4 days (range, 1-15 days) vs. median 6 days (range, 3-27 days), P=0.01]. There were no differences in the incidence of complications or readmissions to hospital over time. CONCLUSIONS: The transition over a short period of time from open to single-port VATS segmentectomy has allowed us to significantly reduce postoperative hospital stay without compromising operative or postoperative outcomes.

Epidermal growth factor receptor status in early stage breast cancer is associated with cellular proliferation but not cross-talk.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a therapeutic target in a number of settings in solid malignancies, but its role in breast cancer has remained unclear and controversial. In 810 primary breast cancers derived from patients suitable for cytotoxic chemotherapy, EGFR was prospectively measured and interactions with tumour and clinical correlates were tested to observe whether postulated cross-talk mechanisms are likely to modulate breast cancer metastasis and proliferation. A minority (79 tumours, 9.8%) were EGFR positive; in a multivariate analysis the likelihood of being EGFR positive was significantly increased for patients with grade 3 disease, compared with grade 1 (OR 15.6; 95% CI 2 to 122, p=0.0001), and for oestrogen receptor-negative status compared with positive (OR 24.1; 95% CI 12.7 to 46.00, p=0.0001). EGFR expression may play a role in breast cancer proliferation, but appears unlikely to modify tumour pathology via postulated mechanisms of oestrogen receptor/EGFR-mediated cross-talk.