Utilization of In-Hospital Orthopaedic Spine Consultations: Evaluating the Impact of Health Care Policy.

Access to specialty and private practice providers has been a divisive policy issue over the last decade, complicated by the conflict between a reduction in government-funded health care reimbursement and the need for health care providers to sustain a financially sound practice. This study evaluates the orthopedic spine consult service at an academic tertiary care center at 2 separate time points over a 5-year period to better understand the impact of decreasing orthopedic reimbursement rates and the increasing prevalence of federally supported medical insurance on the access to specialty care. In total 500 patients in 2017 and 480 patients in 2021 were included for the final analysis. A higher percentage of consults in 2021 came from the emergency department (74.0% versus 60.4%, P < 0.001); however, the emergency department saw fewer spinal cord injuries (11.9% versus 21.4%, P < 0.001), and the spinal cord injuries were less severe (3.1% versus 6.2% Association Impairment Scale A or B, P = 0.034). A smaller percentage of patients in 2021 went on to receive orthopedic spine surgery following consultation (35.2% versus 43.8%, P = 0.007), and those receiving surgery had an operation performed farther out from the initial consultation (4.73 versus 4.09 days, P < 0.001). Additionally, fewer patients with Medicare insurance (23.5% versus 30.8%) and more patients with Medicaid insurance (20.2% versus 12.4%) were seen in 2021 compared with 2017 (P = 0.003). Overall, this study found an increased proportion of Medicaid patients seen by the spine consult service but a decrease in the acuity of consults. Measures to improve access to health insurance under the Affordable Care Act have revealed the complexity of this issue in health care. This study's findings have demonstrated that while more patients did have insurance coverage following the Affordable Care Act, they still face a barrier to accessing outpatient orthopedic spine providers.

Reasons for transfer and subsequent outcomes among patients undergoing elective spine surgery at an orthopedic specialty hospital.

Objective: To evaluate the reasons for transfer as well as the 90-day outcomes of patients who were transferred from a high-volume orthopedic specialty hospital (OSH) following elective spine surgery. Materials and Methods: All patients admitted to a single OSH for elective spine surgery from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. Ninety-day complications, readmissions, revisions, and mortality events were collected and a 3:1 propensity match was conducted. Results: Thirty-five (1.5%) of 2351 spine patients were transferred, most commonly for arrhythmia (n = 7; 20%). Thirty-three transferred patients were matched to 99 who were not transferred, and groups had similar rates of complications (18.2% vs. 10.1%; P = 0.228), readmissions (3.0% vs. 4.0%; P = 1.000), and mortality (6.1% vs. 0%; P = 0.061). Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrates a low transfer rate following spine surgery. Risk factors should continue to be optimized in order to decrease patient risks in the postoperative period at an OSH.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior and Posterior Surgical Approaches for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes between approach techniques for the treatment of multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both anterior and posterior approaches for the surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy are successful techniques in the treatment of myelopathy. However, the optimal treatment has yet to be determined, especially for multilevel disease, as the different approaches have separate complication profiles and potentially different impacts on HRQoL metrics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively managed single institution database of patient-reported outcome measures after 3 and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for DCM. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes whereas preoperative radiographs were analyzed for baseline cervical lordosis and sagittal balance. Bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to compare the two groups. RESULTS: We identified 153 patients treated by ACDF and 43 patients treated by PCDF. Patients in the ACDF cohort were younger (60.1 ± 9.8 vs . 65.8 ± 6.9 yr; P < 0.001), had a lower overall comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index: 2.25 ± 1.61 vs . 3.07 ± 1.64; P = 0.002), and were more likely to have a 3-level fusion (79.7% vs . 30.2%; P < 0.001), myeloradiculopathy (42.5% vs . 23.3%; P = 0.034), and cervical kyphosis (25.7% vs . 7.69%; P = 0.027). Patients undergoing an ACDF had significantly more improvement in their neck disability index after surgery (-14.28 vs . -3.02; P = 0.001), and this relationship was maintained on multivariate analysis with PCDF being independently associated with a worse neck disability index (+8.83; P = 0.025). Patients undergoing an ACDF also experienced more improvement in visual analog score neck pain after surgery (-2.94 vs . -1.47; P = 0.025) by bivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients undergoing an ACDF or PCDF for multilevel DCM have similar outcomes after surgery.

Radiation-Induced Laryngeal Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid.

OBJECTIVES: Bullous pemphigoid has previously been linked to radiotherapy, but here we report the first case of MMP suspected to be a consequence of RT. METHODS: The patient described is an 85-year-old male who underwent RT to treat squamous cell carcinoma of the palatine tonsil. Shortly after therapy, the patient developed blisters with worsening dyspnea and dysphonia. RESULTS: This patient was successfully treated with a combination of oral immunosuppressants and surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: This incident underscores that not all episodes of mucosal ulceration following radiation are a result of mucositis and MMP should be considered in the differential. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Biomechanical Effects of Surgical Reconstruction for Flexible Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is frequently treated with reconstructive surgery. Multiple studies have documented successful treatment based on improvements in symptoms and physical examination findings. However, it is not well-established whether there are corresponding improvements in gait function following surgical treatment for PCFD. METHODS: A systematic review of biomechanical outcomes of treatments for flexible PCFD was conducted on PubMed. The 4 articles chosen involved patients with symptomatic flexible PCFD who underwent a reconstructive surgery. Surgical interventions included osteotomy, tendon transfer, and/or ligament repair or reconstruction. Primary outcomes involved objective quantifiable measurements of kinematic, kinetic, or temporospatial parameters. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 605 articles, from which 26 were retained after screening the title and abstract. Twenty-two were eliminated yielding 4 articles. Temporospatial, kinematic, and kinetic parameters were all altered after the patients underwent surgical intervention. Specifically, stride length, cadence, and walking speed all improved postoperatively. Walking kinetics also improved with restoration of normal motion in the frontal and sagittal planes and improvements in the dorsiflexion angle. There were also improvements in sagittal power. DISCUSSION: Surgical intervention to treat flexible PCFD improves objective biomechanical outcomes; however, more follow-up studies are needed to establish the reliability and durability of these improvements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Systematic review.

A Swollen Supraglottis.

A woman in her late 20s presented with difficulty phonating and singing for the past 15 months and no improvement from prior treatment with steroids and antibiotics for chronic laryngitis. What is your diagnosis?

Evaluating the Impact of Modic Changes on Operative Treatment in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Modic changes (MCs) are believed to be potential pain generators in the lumbar and cervical spine, but it is currently unclear if their presence affects postsurgical outcomes. We performed a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All studies evaluating cervical or lumbar spine postsurgical outcomes in patients with documented preoperative MCs were included. A total of 29 studies and 6013 patients with 2688 of those patients having preoperative MCs were included. Eight included studies evaluated cervical spine surgery, eleven evaluated lumbar discectomies, nine studied lumbar fusion surgery, and three assessed lumbar disc replacements. The presence of cervical MCs did not impact the clinical outcomes in the cervical spine procedures. Moreover, most studies found that MCs did not significantly impact the clinical outcomes following lumbar fusion, lumbar discectomy, or lumbar disc replacement. A meta-analysis of the relevant data found no significant association between MCs and VAS back pain or ODI following lumbar discectomy. Similarly, there was no association between MCs and JOA or neck pain following ACDF procedures. Patients with MC experienced statistically significant improvements following lumbar or cervical spine surgery. The postoperative improvements were similar to patients without MCs in the cervical and lumbar spine.

Patients From Socioeconomically Distressed Communities Experience Similar Clinical Improvements Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) when categorizing patients based on socioeconomic status. Secondarily, we sought to compare PROMs based on race. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Social determinants of health are believed to affect outcomes following spine surgery, but there is limited literature on how combined socioeconomic status metrics affect PROMs following ACDF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors identified patients who underwent primary elective one-level to four-level ACDF from 2014 to 2020. Patients were grouped based on their distressed community index (DCI) quintile (Distressed, At-Risk, Mid-tier, Comfortable, and Prosperous) and then race (White or Black). Multivariate regression for ∆PROMs was performed based on DCI group and race while controlling for baseline demographics and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: Of 1204 patients included in the study, all DCI groups improved across all PROMs, except mental health component score (MCS-12) for the Mid-tier group ( P =0.091). Patients in the Distressed/At-Risk group had worse baseline MCS-12, visual analog scale (VAS) Neck, and neck disability index (NDI). There were no differences in magnitude of improvement between DCI groups. Black patients had significantly worse baseline VAS Neck ( P =0.002) and Arm ( P =0.012) as well as worse postoperative MCS-12 ( P =0.016), PCS-12 ( P =0.03), VAS Neck ( P <0.001), VAS Arm ( P =0.004), and NDI ( P <0.001). Multivariable regression analysis did not identify any of the DCI groupings to be significant independent predictors of ∆PROMs, but being White was an independent predictor of greater improvement in ∆PCS-12 (ß=3.09, P =0.036) and ∆NDI (ß=-7.32, P =0.003). CONCLUSIONS: All patients experienced clinical improvements regardless of DCI or race despite patients in Distressed communities and Black patients having worse preoperative PROMs. Being from a distressed community was not an independent predictor of worse improvement in any PROMs, but Black patients had worse improvement in NDI compared with White patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Does Age and Medicare Status Affect Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if Medicare status and age affect clinical outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical discectomy and fusion between 2014 and 2020 with complete preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were grouped based on Medicare status and age: no Medicare under 65 years (NM < 65), Medicare under 65 years (M < 65), no Medicare 65 years or older (NM ≥ 65), and Medicare 65 years or older (M ≥ 65). Multivariate regression for ΔPROMs (Δ: postoperative minus preoperative) controlled for confounding differences between groups. Significant was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1288 patients were included, with each group improving in the visual analog score (VAS) Neck (all, P < 0.001), VAS Arm (M < 65: P = 0.003; remaining groups: P < 0.001), and Neck Disability Index (M < 65: P = 0.009; remaining groups: P < 0.001) following surgery. Only M < 65 did not significantly improve in the Physical Component Score (PCS-12) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score (P = 0.256 and P = 0.092, respectively). When comparing patients under 65 years, non-Medicare patients had better preoperative PCS-12 (P < 0.001), Neck Disability Index (P < 0.001), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P < 0.001), as well as better postoperative values for all PROMs (P < 0.001), but there were no differences in ΔPROMs. Multivariate analysis identified M < 65 to be an independent predictor of decreased improvement in ΔPCS-12 (ß = -4.07, P = 0.015), ΔVAS Neck (ß = 1.17, P = 0.010), and ΔVAS Arm (ß = 1.15, P = 0.025) compared to NM < 65. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of age and Medicare status, all patients undergoing cervical discectomy and fusion had significant clinical improvement postoperatively. However, Medicare patients under age 65 have a smaller magnitude of improvement in PROMs.

Prognostic and Treatment Differences Between T1a and T1b Glottic Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate significant differences in treatment and survival outcomes between patients with T1a and T1b glottic cancer. METHODS: Patients within the SEER Research Plus, 18 Registries dataset who were diagnosed with Stage I T1a or T1b cancer of the glottis between 2004 and 2015 were included in this study. Data prior to 2004 could not be included, as the SEER database did not distinguish between T1a and T1b glottic cancer until that year. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-specific survival for T1a patients was significantly better than that of patients diagnosed with T1b glottic cancer. Age and year of diagnosis were also independent factors that impacted mortality. More patients who were diagnosed with T1b glottic cancer underwent external beam radiation than those diagnosed with T1a glottic cancer. CONCLUSION: Our data shows that there are several independent factors effecting mortality including T classification, age at time of diagnosis, and year of diagnosis. T1a glottic cancers also show a significantly better prognosis compared with T1b. T1b glottic cancers are much more likely to be treated with primary radiotherapy compared with surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:2187-2193, 2022.

Use of treatment pathway improves neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the trends of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) use since its introduction in our practice pathway in patients with cT2 + bladder cancer over a 20-year period. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with cT2 + bladder cancer who underwent RC between 01/01/1998 and 01/01/2018 that aimed to evaluate the trends of NAC use and associated after implementation of a multidisciplinary treatment pathway. Cohorts were stratified into eras: pre-NAC (1998-2007) to NAC eras (2008-2018). Univariate analysis was conducted using Chi-squared test and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate survival. RESULTS: In 904 total patients who underwent RC, there were 493 with cT2 + UCC disease. The rate of NAC peaked at 84.2% in the most recent year of analysis in all patients and was 100% in cT2 + patients eligible for NAC. There was an increased rate of complete response (downstage to pT0) from 8.7% to 15.8% (p = 0.018) between the two eras. Unadjusted survival analysis revealed improved overall survival (OS) between eras with 5-year OS 53.2% vs. 42.7% and 10-year OS 42.7% vs. 26.4% in the NAC vs. pre-NAC cohorts, respectively (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: In this review of 20 years of experience, we report a dramatic rise in the use of NAC after adoption of a multidisciplinary pathway that is associated with expected survival benefits.

Robot Assisted Renal Allograft Nephrectomy: Initial Case Series and Description of Technique.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and perioperative complication rates following robot- assisted transplant nephrectomy ((RATN). METHODS: All patients who underwent RATN at our institution were included. No exclusion criteria were applied. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed and reported. This included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes. Complications were reported utilizing the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Descriptive statistics were reported using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, means and standard deviation for continuous variables. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and April 2018, 15 patients underwent RATN. Most patients had the transplant in the right iliac fossa (13/15). Ten patients underwent a concomitant procedure. The total operative time for the entire cohort was 336 (±102) minutes (including cases who had concomitant procedures) and 259 (±46 minutes) when cases with concomitant procedures were excluded. Mean estimated blood loss was 383 (±444) mL. Postoperatively, 3 patients required blood transfusion. Average hospital stay was 4 (±2.7) days. Most patients had finding consistent with graft rejection on final pathology. There were 5 complications; 3 of which were minor (grade 2 = 2 and grade 3 = 1); one patient had a wound infection requiring dressing (3A) and one patient died due to pulmonary embolism following discharge. Limitations include small series and retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSION: This case series demonstrate that RATN is technically feasible. With continued experience and larger case series, the robotic approach may provide a minimally invasive alternative to open allograft nephrectomy.

Comparison of Open and Robot Assisted Radical Nephrectomy With Level I and II Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes associated with open radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombus (O-RNTT) vs robot assisted radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombus (RA-RNTT). Renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus has traditionally been managed through an open surgical approach. The robot assisted approach may offers improved perioperative outcomes compared to open, but there are few studies comparing these 2. METHODS: We analyzed patients with renal cell carcinoma and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus between 1998 and 2018, comparing perioperative and oncologic outcomes of these patients with Level I and Level II thrombus. Cohorts were stratified by surgical approach: O-RNTT vs RA-RNTT. Univariate analysis was conducted using chi-squared test and t tests when appropriate. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATION: Twenty-seven patients were in the O-RNTT group, and 24 in the RA-RNTT group. Patients in the RA-RNTT group, compared to the O-RNTT group, demonstrated shorter length of stay (3 vs 7 nights, P = .03), lower estimate blood loss (450 vs 1800 mL, P <.01), and lower transfusion rate (21% vs 82%, P <.01). The RA-RNTT group had 26% fever complications compared to the open (17% vs 43%, P <.01). There was no significant difference in estimated overall survival or recurrence-free survival between the O-RNTT and RA-RNTT groups. CONCLUSION: RA-RNTT produced a shorter length of stay, less transfusions, and a lower rate of complications with no significant difference in overall survival.