Vascular anatomy-based localization of intervertebral discs assisting needle puncture for constructing a mouse model of mechanical injury-induced lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) may be the primary cause of low back pain. Potential therapeutics for IDD must be validated in animal models, and their effectiveness quantified using functional metrics. Needle puncture of intervertebral discs (IVDs) has been used to induce IDD in mice and rats. Due to operational challenges, most animal IDD models are constructed using needle puncture of the caudal IVDs in mice, or by using larger animals, such as rats and rabbits. However, mouse IDD models involving lumbar IVD puncture are preferable because mice are genetically similar to humans and are the most commonly used transgenic animals, and because human IDD commonly affects the lumbar spine. We constructed a needle puncture-based mouse IDD model that relies on vascular anatomy to pinpoint lumbar IVDs. We evaluated the morphological and molecular changes in this model by using radiological, pathological, and immunostaining examinations. In our mechanical injury-induced IDD model, lumbar IVDs were accurately localized by injecting colored perfusates into the common iliac artery and vein, and right iliolumbar vein, which helped to visualize puncture positions, avoid neuromuscular injury, shorten the operation time, and decrease bleeding. Nucleus pulposus cells, defined by Krt19, and the disc height index gradually decreased after the surgery, and the degenerative effects peaked at 1 week. In conclusion, we established a mouse IDD model by performing precise puncture of lumbar IVDs via the ventral anterior approach assisted by vessel position. Our model effectively simulated the effects of IDD, and may serve as an efficient research tool.

Epac1, PDE4, and PKC protein expression and their correlation with AKAP95 and Cx43 in esophagus cancer tissues.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the expression of exchange protein directly activated by cAMP1 (Epac1), PDE4, and PKC in esophageal cancer tissues, and analyzed the association of each protein with the pathological parameters of the samples. METHODS: Epac1, PDE4, and PKC protein expression was evaluated by PV-9000 two-step immunohistochemical techniques in 51 esophageal cancer specimens and 10 para-carcinoma tissues. RESULTS: The positive expression rates of Epac1 and PKC in esophageal cancer tissues (62.7% and 68.6%, respectively) were higher compared to those in para-carcinoma tissues (20% and 20%, respectively) (P < 0.05). The positive expression rate of PDE4 in esophageal cancer tissues (54.1%) was higher than in para-carcinoma tissues (30%), (P > 0.05). Epac1, PDE4, and PKC protein expression levels were not associated with the extent of tumor differentiation and/or lymph node metastasis (P > 0.05). Epac1 protein expression levels correlated with PDE4, PKC, and AKAP95 protein expression levels. In addition, there was a correlation between PKC and Cx43 protein levels (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The expression rates of Epac1, PDE4, and PKC protein in esophageal cancer tissues were significantly higher compared to the rates in para-carcinoma tissues, suggesting an association between these proteins and the development and progression of esophageal cancer. The correlations between these proteins also revealed that they may exert a synergistic effect during the development of esophageal cancer.

Epac1, PDE4, and PKC protein expression and their association with AKAP95, Cx43, and cyclinD2/E1 in breast cancer tissues.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac1), PDE4, and PKC expression in breast cancer tissues, and the correlation between these proteins and AKAP95, Cx43, cyclin D2, and cyclin E1. METHODS: PV-9000 two-step immunohistochemistry was used to analyze protein expression. RESULTS: The positive rate of Epac1 protein expression in breast cancer tissues (58%) was higher than in para-carcinoma tissues (10%) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the positive rates of PDE4 and PKC expression between breast cancer and para-carcinoma tissues (P > 0.05). The positive expression rate of PDE4 was higher in the P53 protein positive group compared to the P53 negative group (P < 0.05). Correlations between Epac1 and cyclin D2, PDE4 and cyclin D2, AKAP95 and PKC, Cx43 and PKC, and cyclin D2 and PKC proteins were observed (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Epac1 expression in breast cancer tissues was increased, suggesting that the protein may be involved in the development of breast cancer. Correlations between Epac1 and cyclin D2, PDE4 and cyclin D2, AKAP95 and PKC, Cx43 and PKC, and cyclin D2 and PKC proteins suggested synergistic effects among these proteins in the development of breast cancer.

Rare RET Variant p.D707E in a Chinese Pedigree with Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma (HMTC) is thought to be associated with germline mutations of the RET proto-oncogene. METHODS: We detected RET proto-oncogene germline mutations from a pedigree with HMTC in the east of China and investigated the characteristics of these mutations in this pedigree and their correlation with HMTC by direct sequencing of all 21 exons in the RET gene of all 46 subjects. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Thirteen types of RET gene variants were detected in this pedigree. Of these, p.F285S in exon 4, c.854_855CA in exon 4, and p.D707E in exon 11 are reported for the first time in our study. (2) Both linkage disequilibrium analysis and logistic regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the p.D707E variant and HMTC (LOD = 3.69, OR = 4.413, p = 0.000167), indicating that this variant is a risk factor for medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). (3) The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) G691S in exon 11 (rs1799939), S904S in exon 15 (rs1800863), and rs2075912 and rs2565200 in the 3'-untranslated region of the RET proto-oncogene are in complete linkage disequilibrium (D' = 1, r2 = 1); no correlation of these SNP and MTC was observed in this pedigree. (4) No hot-spot mutation of the RET proto-oncogene was detected in this pedigree. We drew the conclusion that the heterozygous nonsynonymous variant p.D707E in the RET proto-oncogene is rare, but it is a risk factor for hereditary MTC.

AKAP95 promotes cell cycle progression via interactions with cyclin E and low molecular weight cyclin E.

AKAP95 in lung cancer tissues showed higher expression than in paracancerous tissues. AKAP95 can bind with cyclin D and cyclin E during G1/S cell cycle transition, but its molecular mechanisms remain unclear. To identify the mechanism of AKAP95 in cell cycle progression, we performed AKAP95 transfection and silencing in A549 cells, examined AKAP95, cyclin E1 and cyclin E2 expression, and the interactions of AKAP95 with cyclins E1 and E2. Results showed that over-expression of AKAP95 promoted cell growth and AKAP95 bound cyclin E1 and E2, low molecular weight cyclin E1 (LWM-E1) and LWM-E2. Additionally AKAP95 bound cyclin E1 and LMW-E2 in the nucleus during G1/S transition, bound LMW-E1 during G1, S and G2/M, and bound cyclin E2 mainly on the nuclear membrane during interphase. Cyclin E2 and LMW-E2 were also detected. AKAP95 over-expression increased cyclin E1 and LMW-E2 expression but decreased cyclin E2 levels. Unlike cyclin E1 and LMW-E2 that were nuclear located during the G1, S and G1/S phases, cyclin E2 and LMW-E1 were expressed in all cell cycle phases, with cyclin E2 present in the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane, with traces in the nucleus. LMW-E1 was present in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. The 20 kDa form of LMW-E1 showed only cytoplasmic expression, while the 40 kDa form was nuclear expressed. The expression of AKAP95, cyclin E1, LMW-E1 and -E2, might be regulated by cAMP. We conclude that AKAP95 might promote cell cycle progression by interacting with cyclin E1 and LMW-E2. LMW-E2, but not cyclin E2, might be involved in G1/S transition. The binding of AKAP95 and LMW-E1 was found throughout cell cycle.

Dynamic changes in protein interaction between AKAP95 and Cx43 during cell cycle progression of A549 cells.

Here we show that A-kinase anchoring protein 95 (AKAP95) and connexin 43 (Cx43) dynamically interact during cell cycle progression of lung cancer A549 cells. Interaction between AKAP95 and Cx43 at different cell cycle phases was examined by tandem mass spectrometry(MS/MS), confocal immunofluorescence microscopy, Western blot, and co-immunoprecipitation(Co-IP). Over the course of a complete cell cycle, interaction between AKAP95 and Cx43 occurred in two stages: binding stage from late G1 to metaphase, and separating stage from anaphase to late G1. The binding stage was further subdivided into complex binding to DNA in interphase and complex separating from DNA in metaphase. In late G1, Cx43 translocated to the nucleus via AKAP95; in anaphase, Cx43 separated from AKAP95 and aggregated between two daughter nuclei. In telophase, Cx43 aggregated at the membrane of the cleavage furrow. After mitosis, Cx43 was absent from the furrow membrane and was located in the cytoplasm. Binding between AKAP95 and Cx43 was reduced by N-(2-[P-Bromocinnamylamino]-ethyl)-5-isoquinolinesulfonmide (H89) treatment and enhanced by Forskolin. dynamic interaction between AKAP95 and Cx43 varies with cell cycle progression to regulate multiple biological processes.

Correlation between the protein expression of A-kinase anchor protein 95, cyclin D3 and AKT and pathological indicators in lung cancer tissues.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the protein expression of A-kinase anchor protein 95 (AKAP95), cyclin D3 and AKT with pathological indicators in lung cancer tissues. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the protein expression levels of the proteins in 51 lung cancer tissue samples and 15 pericarcinoma tissue samples. The percentage of cyclin D3 positive samples in the lung cancer and pericarcinoma tissues was 68.63 and 28.57%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). However, cyclin D3 expression was not shown to correlate with differentiation grade, histological type or lymph node metastasis. In addition, the percentage of AKT positive samples in the cancer and pericarcinoma tissues was 76.47 and 38.46%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). AKT expression was found to significantly correlate with the grade of cancer tissue differentiation (P<0.05); however, no correlations were observed with histological type or lymph node metastasis (P>0.05). AKAP95 expression was shown to correlate with cyclin D3 and AKT expression in the lung cancer tissue (P<0.05); however, there was no correlation between cyclin D3 and AKT expression. The present study provided evidence suggesting that AKAP95 may have a role in regulation of the cell cycle.

Expression of AKAP95, Cx43, CyclinE1 and CyclinD1 in esophageal cancer and their association with the clinical and pathological parameters.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate correlations among A-kinase anchor protein95 (AKAP95), Connexin43 (Cx43), CyclinE1 and CyclinD1 in esophageal squamous cell cancer tissues, and their relationship with clinical and pathological parameters. METHODS: The protein levels of AKAP95, Cx43, CyclinE1 and CyclinD1 in 54 cases of esophageal squamous cell cancer tissues were determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The expression of AKAP95, CyclinE1 and CyclinD1 in esophageal squamous cell cancer tissues (53.70%, 88.89%, 72.22%, respectively) was significantly increased when compared to pericarcinoma tissues (20.00%, P < 0.05; 6.67%, P < 0.01; and 20.00%, P < 0.05; respectively). By contrast, Cx43 expression in esophageal squamous cell cancer tissues (22.22%) was lower than that in pericarcinoma tissues (60.00%, P < 0.05). The expression of AKAP95, Cx43, CyclinE1 and CyclinD1 in the tissues of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was unrelated to lymph node metastasis and the degree of differentiation. The expression of Cx43, CyclinE1, CyclinD1 in the tissues of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was significantly correlated with AKAP95, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Expression levels of AKAP95, CyclinE1 and CyclinD1 were higher, and that of Cx43 lower in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tissues as compared pericarcinoma tissues, which suggests their importance in the incidence and development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The expression of Cx43, CyclinE1, CyclinD1 in the tissues of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was correlated with AKAP95, respectively. The expression of AKAP95, Cx43, CyclinE1 and CyclinD1 in the tissues of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was unrelated to the degree of differentiation and lymph node metastasis.

Synergistic effects of AKAP95, Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, and Cx43 in the development of rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the expression of A-kinase anchor protein 95 (AKAP95), Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, and Connexin43 (Cx43) in rectal cancer tissues and assess the associations between each of the proteins and pathological parameters, as well as their inter-relationships. METHODS: AKAP95, Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, and Cx43 protein expression rates were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 50 rectal cancer specimens and 16 pericarcinoma tissues. RESULTS: The positive rates of AKAP95, Cyclin E1, and Cyclin D1 proteins were 54.00 vs. 18.75%, 62.00 vs. 6.25%, and 72.00 vs. 31.25% in rectal cancer specimens and pericarcinoma tissues, respectively, representing statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The positive rate of Cx43 protein expression in rectal cancer tissues was 44.00% and 62.50% in pericarcinoma tissues, and the difference between them was not significant (P > 0.05). No significant associations were found between protein expression of AKAP95, Cyclin E1, Cyclin D1, and Cx43, and the degree of differentiation, histological type, and lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer (P > 0.05). However, significant correlations were obtained between the expression rates of AKAP95 and Cyclin E1, Cyclin E1 and Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1 and Cx43 protein, and Cyclin D1 and Cx43, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: AKAP95, Cyclin E1, and Cyclin D1 protein expression rates were significantly higher in rectal cancer tissues compared with pericarcinoma samples, suggesting an association between these proteins and the development and progression of rectal cancer. In addition, the significant correlations between the proteins (AKAP95 and Cyclin E1, Cyclin E1 and Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1 and Cx43 protein, and Cyclin D1 and Cx43) indicate the possible synergistic effects of these factors in the development and progression of rectal cancer.

Roles of Cx43 and AKAP95 in ovarian cancer tissues in G1/S phase.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression of A-kinase anchor protein 95 (AKAP95), cell cycle protein E1 (cyclinE1) and D1 (cyclinD1), and gap junction protein connexin 43 (Cx43) in ovarian cancer tissues, the relationship between four proteins and clinicopathologic parameters, and the correlation between these proteins. METHODS: The expression of proteins in 54 cases of ovarian cancer tissues was detected by immunohistochemical method. RESULTS: The positive expression rates of AKAP95, cyclinD1 and cyclinE1 in ovarian cancer tissues were 72.22%, 66.67% and 79.63%, respectively, which were higher than that of ovarian pericarcinoma tissues expressing as 33.33%, 25% and 8.30% (P<0.05). The positive expression rate of Cx43 in ovarian cancer tissues was 40.74%, which was lower than that of ovarian pericarcinoma tissues expressing as 75%; respectively, and the difference was statistically significant between groups (P<0.05). The expression of cyclinD1 in ovarian cancer tissues was related to the histologic type (P<0.05) while it showed no correlation with the degree of differentiation (P>0.05). Additionally, the expression of AKAP95, Cx43 and cyclinE1 in ovarian cancer tissues showed no correlation with the degree of differentiation or the histologic type (P>0.05). Protein expressions of AKAP95, Cx43 and cyclinE1 were correlated with each other (P<0.05), and the expressions of cyclinD1, cyclinE1 and Cx43 were also correlated with each other (P<0.05). However, AKAP95 and cyclinD1 showed no correlation (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: AKAP95, cyclinD1 and cyclinE1 play an important role in promoting the process of ovarian cancer formation. The tumor inhibitory effects of Cx43 protein on the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer were weakened. The expression of cyclinD1 in ovarian cancer tissues is related to the histologic type while it shows no correlation with the degree of differentiation. Additionally, the expression of AKAP95, Cx43 and cyclinE1 in ovarian cancer tissues shows no correlation with the degree of differentiation or the histologic type. AKAP95 expression is correlated with Cx43 and cyclinE1 expression; Cx43 expression is correlated with AKAP95, cyclinD1 and cyclinE1 expression; cyclinE1 expression is correlated with AKAP95, Cx43, cyclinD1 expression; cyclinD1 expression is correlated with Cx43 and cyclinE1 expression, while AKAP95 and cyclinD1 show no correlation.

[Relationship between AKAP95, cyclin E1, cyclin D1, and clinicopathological parameters in lung cancer tissue].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between expression of A-kinase anchoring protein 95 (AKAP95) and protein expression of cyclin E1 and cyclin D1 in lung cancer tissue. METHODS: Fifty-one cases of lung cancer were included in the study. The protein expression of AKAP95, cyclin E1, and cyclin D1 were measured by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The protein expression of cyclin E1 in lung cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in para-cancerous tissues (positive rate: 75.56%vs 20%, P < 0.01); its expression showed no relationship with histopathological type, lymph node metastasis, and cellular differentiation (P > 0.05). The protein expression of cyclin D1 in lung cancer tissues was higher than that in para-cancerous tissues (positive rate: 69.39% vs 14.29%); its expression showed a significant relationship with histopathological type (P < 0.05). The expression of AKAP95 was correlated with the protein expression of cyclin E1 and cyclin D1 in lung cancer tissues (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Cyclin E1 and cyclin D1 are highly expressed in lung cancer tissue, suggesting that they play an important role in the development and progression of lung cancer. The protein expression of cyclin E1 has no relationship with cellular differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and histopathological type of lung cancer, and the protein expression of cyclin D1 has a significant relationship with histopathological type. The expression of AKAP95 is correlated with the protein expression of cyclin E1 and cyclin D1 in lung cancer tissue.