Surgical management of herniated intervertebral disc in children: Running title: Pediatric disc herniation.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective literature review analysis OBJECTIVE: Analyze the risk factors, characteristics, outcome, and follow up of surgical management of disc herniation in children ≤15 years old (y.o) through a review of the literature. BACKGROUND: Disc herniation is a rare disease in the pediatric population. While conservative treatment if very often tried, some cases require surgical treatment. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed data base using the terms 'pediatric/children/adolescent disc herniation' and 'surgical management' as key words. Significant manuscripts i.e: case reports, case series, reviews were identified and analyzed. The exclusion criteria were: series and cases with patients >15 y.o, results non-individualizable and medical management. RESULTS: 49 studies were identified, 28 were retained. 69 children <15 y.o were identified with a median age of 13 y.o (SD 1-15). The mean FU was 3.3 years. Trauma and repeated micro traumatism were identified as the main causes of disc herniation in this population. It is mostly a lumbar disease, with very anecdotic cases of thoracic or cervical herniation described. In the absence of neurological deficit, conservative treatment should be tried. Different types of surgery exist (open, endoscopic, tubular), with no difference in outcome or complications. The post-operative outcome was very satisfactory, with no neurological sequalae described with excellent recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric disc herniation is often caused by precipitating factors such as trauma. In the absence of resolution with conservative treatment, surgical options yield favorable short term clinical outcomes with minimal complications and no neurological sequalae.

Bilateral spheno-orbital meningiomas: surgical management, progression, and recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral spheno-orbital meningiomas (bSOMs) are a rare entity among meningiomas. These tumors are benign and predominantly affect women. They represent 4% of spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs) and are poorly described in the literature. This study aimed to describe the characteristics, risk factors, evolution, and management of bSOMs. METHODS: Twenty patients with bSOMs were enrolled in a multicentric descriptive study including 15 neurosurgical departments. RESULTS: In this study, the authors found that bSOMs affected exclusively women, with a mean age of 50 years. Approximately 65% of patients were on progestin therapy. The mean follow-up in this series was 55 months. Clinically, visual symptoms were predominant: proptosis was present in 17 of 20 patients (85%; 7 unilateral, 10 bilateral), and a decrease in visual acuity was observed in 11 of 20 patients (55%; 6/10 to 9/10 in 6 patients, 3/10 to 5/10 in 1 patient, and < 3/10 in 4 patients). Contrary to unilateral SOMs, the authors identified that intracranial hypertension was a common presentation (25%) of bSOMs. Surgical management with gross-total resection was the gold standard treatment. Recurrences only occurred following subtotal resection in 36% to 60% of patients, with a median time of 50 to 54 months after surgery. Visual improvement or stability was observed in 75% of cases postoperatively. Progesterone receptor expression levels were 70% to 100% in 10 of 11 (91%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral SOMs are usually found in female patients and are strongly associated with hormone replacement therapy. Early surgical management with gross-total resection is the most effective treatment in terms of recurrence and improves visual acuity. Given the slow progressive nature of bSOMs and their time to recurrence, which can be up to 10 years, long-term follow-up of patients is essential.

Are There Still Any Benefits to Drainage for Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis/Arthroplasty by Cervicotomy?

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study between January 2019 and January 2023. OBJECTIVE: The role and contribution of drainage in the anterior approach to the cervical spine (cervicotomy) is much debated, motivated primarily by the prevention of retropharyngeal hematoma, so are there still any benefits to drainage? BACKGROUND: The anterior approach to the cervical spine is a widespread and common procedure performed in almost all spine surgery departments for the replacement of cervical intervertebral discs and medullar or radicular decompression. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of symptomatic postoperative cervical hematoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty-one patients who had undergone cervical spine surgery by anterior cervicotomy for cervicarthrosis or cervical disc herniation (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and anterior cervical disc replacement) were consecutively included. Patients were separated into 2 groups: (1) Group A, 140 patients (with postoperative drainage) and (2) Group B, 291 patients (without drainage). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 2.8 months. The 2 groups were comparable on all criteria, but there was a predominance of arthroplasty ( P < 0.0001), use of anticoagulants/antiaggregants ( P < 0.0001) and a greater number of stages ( P < 0.0001) in group A. There were a total of 4/431 symptomatic postoperative hematomas (0.92%) in this study. Two hematomas occurred in group A (2/140, 1.4%) and 2 in group B (2/291, 0.68%; P < 0.0001). One patient in group A (0.71%) required surgical drainage for cavity hematoma revealed by marked dyspnea, swallowing, and neurological disorders. One case of hematoma diagnosed by dysphonia and neurological deficit was reported in group B (0.34%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The placement of a drain during anterior cervicotomy (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion/anterior cervical disc replacement) did not limit the occurrence of symptomatic postoperative hematoma.

Impact of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fracture (pVCF) in neurological and survival prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fractures (pVCF) are the most serious debilitating morbidities of spine metastases (SpMs) causing devastating neurological damages. The respective impact of these two metastasis-spreading entities on survival and on neurological damage is debated. METHODS: A French prospective cohort study collected 279 consecutive patients presenting with SpMs between January 2017 and 2021. We compared 174 patients with MESCC and 105 patients with pVCF. RESULTS: The median Overall Survival (OS) for the MESCC group was 13.4 months (SD 1.5) vs 19.2 months (SD 2.3) for pVCF patients (p = 0.085). Sixty-five patients (23.3 %) were operated on: 49/65 (75.4 %) in the MESCC group and 16/65 (15.2 %) in the pVCF group, p < 0.0001. At 6 months FU, in the MESCC group, 21/44 (45.4 %) of non-ambulatory patients at onset improved to ambulatory status (Frankel D-E) vs 10/13 (76.9 %) in the pVCF group (p = 0.007). In multivariable analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model, good ECOG-PS and SINS Score 7-12 [HR: 6.755, 95 % CI 2.40-19.00; p = 0.001] were good prognostic factors for preserved ambulatory neurological status. However, SpMs diagnosed synchronously with the primary tumor [HR: 0.397, 95 % CI 0.185-0.853; p = 0.018] and MESCC [HR: 0.058, 95 % CI 0.107-0.456; p = 0.007] were independent risk factors for impaired neurological function. CONCLUSION: Contrary to pVCF, MESCC causes neurological damage. Nevertheless, neurological recovery remains possible. MESCC and pVCF have no impact on survival. The management of MESCC remains to be clarified and optimized to reduce neurological damage.

Multiple Myeloma Spinal Lesion Care: Management of a Primary Bone Malignancy Rather Than a Spinal Metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is too often wrongly categorized as a spinal metastasis (SpM), although it is distinguishable from SpM in many aspects, such as its earlier natural history at the time of diagnosis, its increased overall survival (OS), and its response to therapeutic modalities. The characterization of these 2 different spine lesions remains a main challenge. METHODS: This study compares 2 consecutive prospective oncologic populations of patients with spine lesions: 361 patients treated for MM spine lesions and 660 patients treated for SpM between January 2014 and 2017. RESULTS: The mean time between the tumor/MM diagnosis and spine lesions was respectively 0.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.1) and 35.1 months (SD 21.2) for the MM and SpM groups. The median OS for the MM group was 59.6 months (SD 6.0) versus 13.5 months (SD 1.3) for the SpM group (P < 0.0001). Regardless of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, patients with MM always have a significantly better median OS than do patients with SpM: ECOG 0, 75.3 versus 38.7 months; ECOG 1, 74.3 versus 24.7 months; ECOG 2, 34.6 versus 8.1 months; ECOG 3, 13.5 versus 3.2 months and ECOG 4, 7.3 versus 1.3 months (P < 0.0001). The patients with MM had more diffuse spinal involvement (mean, 7.8 lesions; SD 4.7) than did patients with SpM (mean, 3.9; SD 3.5) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: MM must be considered as a primary bone tumor, not as SpM. The strategic position of the spine in the natural course of cancer (i.e., nurturing cradle of birth for MM vs. systemic metastases spreading for SpM) explains the differences in OS and outcome.

Spinal lesions in multiple myeloma: Primary bone tumors with distinct prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: Although prognostic factors of spinal multiple myeloma (MM) seem to differ from those of other spine metastases (SpM), the data in the literature remains scarce. METHODS: A prospective population of 361 patients treated for spine MM lesions between January 2014 and 2017. RESULTS: OS for our series was 59.6 months (SD 6.0 months; CI 95%: 47.7-71.3). Cox multivariate proportional-hazards analysis showed that bone marrow transplant [HR: 0.390, 95% CI 0.264-0.577; p < 0.0001] and light-chain isotype [HR: 0.748, 95% CI 0.318-1.759; p = 0.005] were independent predictors of longer survival. In contrast, age >80 years [HR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.3; p < 0.0001], ISS III [HR: 2.510, 95% CI 2.01-3.124; p = 0.001], IgA isotype [HR: 1.475, 95% CI 1.031-2.11; p = 0.034] and IgD/M isotype [HR: 2.753, 95% CI 1.230-6.130; p = 0.013] were independent poor prognostic factors. However, ECOG (p = 0.486), spine surgery (p = 0.391), spine radiotherapy (p = 0.260), epidural involvement (p = 0.259), the number of vertebra lesions (p = 0.222), and synchronous/metachronous timeline (p = 0.412) were not significantly associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal involvement in the context of MM does not influence OS. The main prognostic factors to consider before spinal surgery are the characteristics of the primary MM disease (ISS score, IgG isotype and systemic treatment).

Natural history of spinal cord metastasis from brain glioblastomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord metastasis arising from an intracranial glioblastoma is a rare and late event during the natural course of the disease. These pathological entities remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to identify and investigate the timeline, clinical and imaging findings, and prognostic factors of spinal cord metastasis from a glioblastoma. METHODS: Consecutive histopathological cases of spinal cord metastasis from glioblastomas in adults entered in the French nationwide database between January 2004 and 2016 were screened. RESULTS: Overall, 14 adult patients with a brain glioblastoma (median age 55.2 years) and harboring a spinal cord metastasis were included. The median overall survival as 16.0 months (range, 9.8-22.2). The median spinal cord Metastasis Free Survival (time interval between the glioblastoma diagnosis and the spinal cord metastasis diagnosis) was 13.6 months (range, 0.0-27.9). The occurrence of a spinal cord metastasis diagnosis greatly impacted neurological status: 57.2% of patients were not ambulatory, which contributed to dramatically decreased Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores (12/14, 85.7% with a KPS score ≤ 70). The median overall survival following spinal cord metastasis was 3.3 months (range, 1.3-5.3). Patients with a cerebral ventricle effraction during the initial brain surgery had a shorter spinal cord Metastasis Free Survival (6.6 vs 18.3 months, p = 0.023). Out of the 14 patients, eleven (78.6%) had a brain IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord metastasis from a brain IDH-wildtype glioblastoma has a poor prognosis. Spinal MRI can be proposed during the follow-up of glioblastoma patients especially those who have benefited from cerebral surgical resection with opening of the cerebral ventricles.

Spine Metastasis: Patients With Poor Performance Status (ECOG) Could benefit From Palliative Surgical Care! A Prospective Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: This study used a French prospective national multi-center database of patients with spine metastasis (SpM). OBJECTIVE: The main challenge was to clarify if SpM patients presenting poor ECOG-PS could benefit from a surgical intervention. BACKGROUND: Spine metastases (SpM) are debilitating lesions commonly found in the evolution of cancer. At present, patients with poor ECOG-PS do not benefit from surgical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2014 and 2017, 176 SpM patients with poor initial ECOG-PS (3 or 4) were identified. RESULTS: The median overall survival of patients was 2.1 months (SD 0.2). Seventy-one patients (40.3%) underwent surgery: for 49 patients (27.8%) the intervention consisted of a simple decompression and for 22 patients (12.5%) the previous was associated with an osteosynthesis. Patients who underwent surgery demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival than those who did not: 3.5 months (SD 0.4) versus 1.6 (SD 0.2) ( P <0.0001). No significant differences between operated/nonoperated patients were noted concerning median age (66.4 vs. 64.2 y, P =0.897), the median number of SpM (4.1 vs. 4.2, P =0.374), ECOG-PS 4 ratio (41.6 vs. 39.3%, P =0.616), or for primary tumors ( P =0.103). Patients who underwent surgery statistically improved their neurological impairment according to the Frankel score: 5/11 (45.4%) from A to C, 5/17 (29.4%) from B to C or D, 6/11 (54.5%) from C to D and 2/4 (50%). Twelve patients (16.9%) presented a postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: Patients with poor ECOG-PS could benefit from surgery. Even though survival gain is small, it permits the preservation of their neurological function. By making ambulation possible, pain is decreased during the last months of their lives.

Natural Course and Prognosis of Primary Spinal Glioblastoma: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary spinal glioblastoma (PsGBM) is extremely rare. The dramatic neurologic deterioration and unresectability of PsGBM makes it a particularly disabling malignant neoplasm. Because it is a rare and heterogeneous disease, the assessment of prognostic factors remains limited. METHODS: PsGBMs were identified from the French Brain Tumor Database and the Club de Neuro-Oncologie of the Société Française de Neurochirurgie retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older at diagnosis, spinal location, histopathologic diagnosis of newly glioblastoma according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification, and surgical management between 2004 and 2016. Diagnosis was confirmed by a centralized neuropathologic review. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Therapeutic interventions and neurologic outcomes were also collected. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with a histopathologically confirmed PsGBM (median age 50.9 years) were included (27 centers). The median OS was 13.1 months (range 2.5-23.7), and the median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (range 1.6-10.2). In multivariable analyses using Cox model, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at 0-1 was the only independent predictor of longer OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.801; p = 0.02), whereas a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score <60 (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.05-7.92; p = 0.03) and a cervical anatomical location (HR 4.14, 95% CI 1.32-12.98; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of shorter OS. The ambulatory status (Frankel D-E) (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.07-1.985; p = 0.250) was not an independent prognostic factor, while the concomitant standard radiochemotherapy with temozolomide (Stupp protocol) (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.118-1.05; p = 0.06) was at the limit of significance. DISCUSSION: Preoperative ECOG performance status, KPS score, and the location are independent predictors of OS of PsGBMs in adults. Further analyses are required to capture the survival benefit of concomitant standard radiochemotherapy with temozolomide.

Cauda Equina Syndrome: Poor Recovery Prognosis Despite Early Treatment.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective patient's database operated on a cauda equina syndrome (CES). OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to identify prognosis factors for favorable functional recovery after CES. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CES is a neurologic impairment of variable symptoms associating urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunctions with or without motor or sensitive deficits caused by nerve root compression of the cauda equina. The definition of CES remains debated, as well as the prognosis factors for favorable functional recovery and the benefit of early surgery. METHODS: One hundred forty patients were included between January 2010 and 2019. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression models were conducted. RESULTS: The patients were young with a median age of 46.8 years (range 18-86 yrs). At presentation, 60% were affected by a motor deficit, 42.8% a sensitive deficit, 70% urinary dysfunctions, and 44% bowel dysfunctions. The mean follow-up was 15.5 months. Bilateral motor deficit (P = 0.017) and an initial deficit severity of 0 to 2 (P = 0.001) represented prognosis factors of poor motor recovery. Initial anal incontinence (P = 0.007) was associated with poor bowel recovery. Only 32.8% of the patients went back to work. Initial motor deficit (P = 0.015), motor sequelae (P = 0.001), sphincter dysfunctions sequelae (P = 0.02), and long LOS (P = 0.02) were poor return-to-work prognosis factors. Time to surgery within an early timing < 24 or 48 hours or later did not represent a prognosis factor of recovery in CES. Incomplete versus complete CES did not show better recovery. CONCLUSION: CES remains a profound disabling syndrome with poor functional prognosis: in the long run, few patients go back to work. The main prognosis factors established in our series regarded the initial severity of deficits whether motor or sphincteral. Early or later surgical cauda equina decompression did not show to represent a prognosis factor for functional recovery.Level of Evidence: 4.

Spinal metastases from thyroid cancer: Some prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases (SpMs) from thyroid cancers (TC) significantly reduce quality of life by causing pain, neurological deficits in addition to increasing mortality. Moreover, prognosis factors including surgery remain debated. METHODS: Data were stored in a prospective French national multicenter database of patients treated for SpM between January 2014 and 2017. Fifty-one consecutive patients affected by TC with 173 secondary SpM were included. RESULTS: Mean overall survival (OS) time for all patients from the diagnosis of a thyroid SpM event was 9.1 years (SD 8.7 months). The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year survival estimates were 94% (SD 3.3), 83.8.0% (SD 5.2), and 74.5% (SD 9.9). The median period of time between primary thyroid tumor diagnosis and the SpM event was 31.4 months (SD 71.6). In univariate analysis, good ECOG-PS (status 0 and 1) (p < 0.0001), ambulatory status (Frankel score) (p < 0.0001) and no epidural involvement (p = 0.01), were associated with longer survival, whereas cancer subtype (p = 0.436) and spine surgery showed no association (p = 0.937). Cox multivariate proportional hazard model only identified good ECOG-PS: 0 [HR: 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.941; p < 0.0001], 1 [HR: 0.8, 95% CI 0.04-2.124; p = 0.001] and ambulatory neurological status: Frankel E [HR: 0.262, 95% CI 0.048-1.443; p = 0.02] to be independent predictors of better survival. CONCLUSION: For cases presenting SpM from TC, we highlighted that the only prognostic factors were the progression of the cancer (ECOG-PS) and the clinical neurological impact of the SpM (Frankel status). Surgery should be discussed mainly for stabilization and neurological decompression.

Are spine metastasis survival scoring systems outdated and do they underestimate life expectancy? Caution in surgical recommendation guidance.

OBJECTIVE: Survival scoring systems for spine metastasis (SPM) were designed to help surgical practice. The authors sought to validate the prognostic accuracy of the main preoperative scoring systems for SPM. METHODS: It was hypothesized that true patient survival in SPM was better than that predicted using prognosis scores. To investigate this hypothesis, the authors designed a French national retrospective study of a prospectively collected multicenter database involving 739 patients treated for SPM between 2014 and 2017. RESULTS: In this series, the median survival time for all patients from an SPM diagnosis was 17.03 ± 1.5 months. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated using the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC of Tomita's prognosis score was the lowest and poorest (0.4 ± 0.023, range 0.35-0.44), whereas the AUC of the Tokuhashi score was the highest (0.825). The Lei score presented an AUC of 0.686 ± 0.022 (range 0.64-0.7), and the Rades score showed a weaker AUC (0.583 ± 0.020, range 0.54-0.63). Differences among AUCs were all statistically significant (p < 0.001). The modified Bauer score and the Rades score had the highest rate of agreement in predicting survival, with a weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.54 and 0.41, respectively, indicating a moderate agreement. The revised Tokuhashi and Lei scores had a fair rate of agreement (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.24 and 0.22, respectively). The van der Linden and Tomita scores demonstrated the worst performance, with only a "slight" rate of agreement (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.19 and 0.16, respectively) between what was predicted and the actual survival. CONCLUSIONS: The use of prognostic scoring systems in the estimation of survival in patients with SPM has become obsolete and therefore underestimates survival. Surgical treatment decisions should no longer be based on survival estimations alone but must also take into account patient symptoms, spinal instability, and quality of life.

The trigeminal system: The meningovascular complex- A review.

Supratentorial sensory perception, including pain, is subserved by the trigeminal nerve, in particular, by the branches of its ophthalmic division, which provide an extensive innervation of the dura mater and of the major brain blood vessels. In addition, contrary to previous assumptions, studies on awake patients during surgery have demonstrated that the mechanical stimulation of the pia mater and small cerebral vessels can also produce pain. The trigeminovascular system, located at the interface between the nervous and vascular systems, is therefore perfectly positioned to detect sensory inputs and influence blood flow regulation. Despite the fact that it remains only partially understood, the trigeminovascular system is most probably involved in several pathologies, including very frequent ones such as migraine, or other severe conditions, such as subarachnoid haemorrhage. The incomplete knowledge about the exact roles of the trigeminal system in headache, blood flow regulation, blood barrier permeability and trigemino-cardiac reflex warrants for an increased investigation of the anatomy and physiology of the trigeminal system. This translational review aims at presenting comprehensive information about the dural and brain afferents of the trigeminovascular system, in order to improve the understanding of trigeminal cranial sensory perception and to spark a new field of exploration for headache and other brain diseases.

Spine metastasis in patients with prostate cancer: Survival prognosis assessment.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting spine metastasis (SpM) from prostate cancer (PC) form a heterogeneous population, through this study, we aimed to clarify and update their prognostic assessment. METHODS: The patient data used in this study was obtained from a French national multicenter database of patients treated for PC with SpM between 2014 and 2017. A total of 72 patients and 365 SpM cases were diagnosed. RESULTS: The median overall survival time for all patients following the event of SpM was 28.8 months. First, we identified three significant survival prognostic factors of PC patients with SpM: good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization personnel status (Status 0 hazard ratio [HR]: 0.031, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.008-0.127; p < .0001) or (Status 1 HR: 0.163, 95% CI: 0.068-0.393; p < .0001) and SpM radiotherapy (HR: 2.923, 95% CI: 1.059-8.069; p < .0001). Secondly, the presence of osteolytic lesions of the spine (vs. osteoblastic) was found to represent an independent prognosis factor for longer survival [HR: 0.424, 95% CI: 0.216-0.830; p = .01]. Other factors including the number of SpM, surgery, extraspinal metastasis, synchrone metastasis, metastasis-free survival, and SpM recurrence were not identified as being prognostically relevant to the survival of patients with PC. CONCLUSION: Survival and our ability to estimate it in patients presenting PC with SpM have improved significantly. Therefore, we advocate the relevance of updating SpM prognostic scoring algorithms by incorporating data regarding the timeline of PC as well as the presence of osteolytic SpM to conceive treatments that are adapted to each patient.

Spine Metastasis in Elderly: Encouraging Results for Better Survival.

MINI: The incidence of spinal metastasis (SpM) is increasing, and life expectancy for patients with malignancy is also rising. The "elderly" represent a population with steady growth in SpM proportion. Bracing is associated with lower survival. We believe that surgery should be considered, regardless of the patient's age.

Multicentric prospective study. Through this study, we aimed to clarify and update the prognostic assessment of elderly with spine metastasis (SpM). The incidence SpM is rising, in parallel life expectancy is getting longer and the number of elderly patients presenting malignancy is increasing. Elderly patients with SpM constitute a growing heterogeneous population The patient data used in this study were obtained from a French national multicenter database of patients treated for SpM between 2014 and 2017. Two hundred and forty-three consecutive patients >70 years' old were diagnosed. Median overall survival (OS) time for elderly patients following the event of SpM was 16.3 months. First, we identified significantly worse survival prognostic factors for elderly patients with SpM: poor WHO status 3/4: (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.245, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.899­2.655; P  < 0.0001), >80 years (HR: 1.758, 95% CI 1.117­2.765; P  = 0.015) no-ambulatory neurological status (Franckel A/B status [HR: 3.219, 95% CI 1.621­6.390; P  < 0.0001)], gastrointestinal cancer (HR: 3.530, 95% CI 1.75­7.1; P  < 0.0001), lung cancer (HR: 3.452, 95% CI 1.784­6.680; P  < 0.0001), orthopedic brace treatment (HR: 1.329; 95% CI 1.050­1.683; P  = 0.018), and epiduritis (HR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.041­2.22; P  = 0.03) were independently poor prognostic factors of survival. The only good prognosis factor identified was thyroid cancer (HR: 0.257, 95% CI 0.07­0.952; P  = 0.04). Prognosis factors concerning the survival of elderly patients seem to be the same as those for the general population such as primary cancer histology, neurological status, WHO status, and epiduritis. Age >80 years also appears to be an independently poor prognosis factor. Our data suggest that orthopedic brace treatment is also associated with lower survival. Level of Evidence: 2.

Spinal metastases from lung cancer: Survival depends only on genotype, neurological and personal status, scarcely of surgical resection.

BACKGROUND: For patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the spinal column is the most common site for bone metastasis. Studies that assess survival prognostic factors associated with specific lung spinal metastases (SpM) are weak and required the incorporation of genotype mutations. METHODS: A prospective French national multicenter database of patients treated for SpM between January 2014 and 2017.818 lung SpM were diagnosed over the course or at the time of diagnosis of 210 consecutive patients with NSCLC. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) time for all patients from the lung SpM event was 5.9 months (SD 0.609). For 122 patients (61%), lung tumor and SpM were diagnosed synchronously. In univariate analysis, good World Health Organisation (WHO) status (p < 0.0001), ambulatory status (Frankel score) (p < 0.0001), the absence of spine epiduritis (p < 0.0001), immunotherapy after SpM diagnosis (p < 0.0001), ALK gene rearrangement (p < 0.0001) and EGFR mutation (p < 0.0001) were associated with longer survival, whereas spine surgery showed no association (0.141). Cox multivariate proportional hazard model identified that EGFR + status (HR: 0.339, 95% CI 0.166-0.693; p = 0.003), good WHO status (p < 0.0001) and good neurological status (Frankel E; p < 0.001 and D; p = 0.018) were associated with higher median OS. Whereas the other factors, including ALK + status, epiduritis and immunotherapy were not independent prognostic factors of survival. CONCLUSION: Survival in SpM must be prognosticated from general health performance status: clinical (WHO) and neurological (Frankel) as well as the EGFR mutation status. Immunotherapy, surgery and epiduritis have not demonstrated prognostic value. Therefore, surgical prognostic scoring algorithms should incorporate genotype subtypes in NSCLC cancers to adapt surgical treatment.

Microsurgical Transcranial Approach of 112 Paraoptic Meningiomas: A Single-Center Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of visual outcomes after optic nerve decompression are controversial. OBJECTIVE: To identify the predictors of poor visual outcomes after surgery of meningiomas responsible of a compressive optic neuropathy. METHODS: We focused on paraoptic meningiomas (POMs), which gathered tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) and anterior clinoid meningiomas (ACMs) responsible for visual impairment or threatening visual function, that underwent surgery at our institution between January 2009 and December 2015 and analyzed the clinical and radiological findings of our patients. RESULTS: Among 112 patients who underwent surgery for a POM, a preoperative visual deficit was present in 108 patients (96.4%). Six months after surgery, 79 patients (70.5%) had a visual improvement, 15 patients (13.4%) had an unchanged vision, and 18 patients (16.1%) had deteriorated vision. A preoperative visual deficit of 6 mo or more was a strong predictor of poor visual outcome after surgery (P = .034). Poor visual outcome after surgery was not significantly related to the size of the tumor (P = .057), the age of the patient (P = .94), or the tumor extension into the optic canal (P = .47). CONCLUSION: The duration of preoperative visual deficit was found to be a strong predictor of poor visual outcomes after surgery in POMs Other predictors of poor visual outcomes are still needed and are currently under evaluation in a prospective study at our institution.

Survival in breast cancer patients with spine metastases: Prognostic assessment involving molecular markers.

BACKGROUND: To clarify and update the prognostic assessment for heterogeneous population of patients with breast cancer and spine metastases (SpM), using molecular markers. METHODS: The patient data used in this study was obtained from a French national multi-center database of patients treated for breast cancer with SpM between 2014 and 2017. 556 SpM cases were diagnosed. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) time for all patients following the SpM event was 43.9 months. First, we confirmed 3 previously known significant prognostic factors for survival of patients with SpM: young age [HR: 2.019, 95% CI 1.343-3.037; p = 0.001], good WHO status [ Status 0 HR: 2.823, 95% CI 1.231-3.345; p < 0.0001] or [ Status 1 HR: 1.956, 95% CI 0.768-2.874; p = 0.001] and no-ambulatory neurological status: Frankel A-C [HR: 0.438, 95% CI 0.248-0.772; p = 0.004]. Secondly, we determined the effect of gene mutations on survival in patients with SpM, and we identified that HER2+ cancer subtype [HR: 1.567, 95% CI 0.946-2.557; p = 0.008] was an independent predictor of longer survival, whereas basal cancer subtype [HR: 0.496, 95% CI 0.353-0.699; p < 0.0001] was associated with a poorer prognosis. Other factors including the number of SpM, surgery, extraspinal metastases, synchrone metastases, metastasis-free survival, and SpM recurrence were not identified as prognostically relevant to survival. CONCLUSION: Survival and our ability to estimate it in breast cancer patients with SpM has improved significantly. Therefore, SpM prognostic scoring algorithms should be updated and incorporate genotypic data on subtypes to make treatment more adaptive.