Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rofo ; 195(7): 579-585, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés, Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36863369

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer incidence has greatly increased over the past century. Moreover, the lung is the most common site of metastatic involvement. Despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of lung malignancies, patient prognosis is still unsatisfactory. Locoregional chemotherapeutic techniques for the treatment of lung malignancies are the current focus of research. The aim of this review article is to present different locoregional intravascular techniques and their treatment principles and to assess the pros and cons of each of them as a palliative and neoadjuvant treatment method in the treatment of lung malignancy. METHOD: The different methods for the treatment of malignant lung lesions such as isolated lung perfusion (ILP), selective pulmonary artery perfusion (SPAP), transpulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE), bronchial artery infusion (BAI), bronchioarterial chemoembolization (BACE), and intraarteriel chemoperfusion (IACP) are evaluated comparatively. RESULTS: Locoregional intravascular chemotherapy procedures are proving to be promising treatment options in the management of malignant lung tumors. In order to achieve optimal results, the locoregional technique should be used to achieve the highest possible uptake of the chemotherapeutic agent into the target tissue with rapid systemic clearance. CONCLUSION: Among the various treatment options for lung malignancies, TPCE is the best evaluated treatment concept. However, further studies are necessary to define the optimal treatment concept with the best clinical outcomes. KEY POINTS: · There are various intravascular chemotherapy methods for the treatment of lung malignancies.. · Transpulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) is currently the most extensively evaluated treatment method for lung malignancies.. · Thermoablation after neoadjuvant chemoperfusion is a promising therapy for treating lung malignancies.. CITATION FORMAT: · Vogl TJ, Mekkawy A, Thabet DB. Intravascular Treatment Techniques for Locoregional Therapies of Lung Tumors. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 579 - 585.


Asunto(s)
Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Pulmón/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos
2.
Eur Radiol ; 29(4): 1939-1949, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30338364

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate tumor response, local tumor control, and patient survival after the treatment of pulmonary metastases using transpulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) in palliative and neoadjuvant intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-three patients (mean age 56.7 ± 13.4 years) underwent repetitive TPCE (mean number of sessions 5.8 ± 2.9) between June 2005 and April 2017 for the treatment of unresectable lung metastases, not responding to systemic chemotherapy. Patients had predominant lung metastases with bilateral lung involvement in 80.4% of the cases. Regional delivery of the chemotherapeutic agents was performed through selective catheterization of the tumor-supplying pulmonary arteries with subsequent injection of iodized oil and microspheres. Patients, who underwent subsequent ablation (n = 51), either for all lesions (complete) or dominant lesions (incomplete), constituted the neoadjuvant group, and those who underwent TPCE alone represented the palliative treatment intent (n = 92). The response was assessed according to the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: Partial response was achieved in 11.9% (n = 17), stable disease in 66.4% (n = 95), and progressive disease in 21.7% (n = 31). The mean survival time and time to progression were 24.5 ± 1.7 and 7.5 ± 0.5 months, respectively. The mean survival time was shorter for the palliative group (19.7 ± 2), compared to the neoadjuvant group (30.1 ± 2.6 months). The use of TPCE alone or with incomplete ablation had a significantly increased hazard of death of 4.6- (p = 0.002) and 3.1-fold (p = 0.027), respectively, in comparison with TPCE with subsequent complete ablation. CONCLUSION: TPCE has the potential to improve local tumor control and to prolong survival with a neoadjuvant potential when combined with ablation therapy. KEY POINTS: • Transpulmonary chemoembolization (TPCE) is a locoregional technique for delivering chemotherapy in higher intratumoral concentrations and with reduced systemic toxicity. • TPCE can be an alternative treatment for patients with pulmonary metastases who failed prior systemic chemotherapy or with post-operative recurrence. • The current retrospective study revealed that TPCE is a feasible treatment option for patients with unrespectable lung secondaries in both palliative and neoadjuvant intent and has the potential of improving local control and prolonging survival.


Asunto(s)
Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Niño , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Masculino , Microesferas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA