Definition of the Rectum: An International, Expert-based Delphi Consensus.

BACKGROUND: The wide global variation in the definition of the rectum has led to significant inconsistencies in trial recruitment, clinical management, and outcomes. Surgical technique and use of preoperative treatment for a cancer of the rectum and sigmoid colon are radically different and dependent on the local definitions employed by the clinical team. A consensus definition of the rectum is needed to standardise treatment. METHODS: The consensus was conducted using the Delphi technique with multidisciplinary colorectal experts from October, 2017 to April, 2018. RESULTS: Eleven different definitions for the rectum were used by participants in the consensus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the most frequent modality used to define the rectum (67%), and the preferred modality for 72% of participants. The most agreed consensus landmark (56%) was "the sigmoid take-off," an anatomic, image-based definition of the junction of the mesorectum and mesocolon. In the second round, 81% of participants agreed that the sigmoid take-off as seen on computed tomography or MRI achieved consensus, and that it could be implemented in their institution. Also, 87% were satisfied with the sigmoid take-off as the consensus landmark. CONCLUSION: An international consensus definition for the rectum is the point of the sigmoid take-off as visualized on imaging. The sigmoid take-off can be identified as the mesocolon elongates as the ventral and horizontal course of the sigmoid on axial and sagittal views respectively on cross-sectional imaging. Routine application of this landmark during multidisciplinary team discussion for all patients will enable greater consistency in tumour localisation.

Better Function With a Colonic J-Pouch or a Side-to-end Anastomosis?: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Complications, Functional Outcome, and Quality of Life in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer After a J-Pouch or a Side-to-end Anastomosis.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: We aimed to compare prospectively the complications and functional outcome of patients undergoing a J-Pouch (JP) or a side-to-end anastomosis (SE) for treatment of low rectal cancer at a 2-year time point after resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: A multicenter study was conducted on patients with low rectal cancer who were randomized to receive either a JP or SE and were followed for 24 months utilizing SF-12 and FACT-C surveys to evaluate the quality of life (QOL). Fecal incontinence was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI). Bowel function, complications, and their treatments were recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-eight patients (165 males) were randomized with 167 final eligible patients, 80 in the JP group and 87 in the SE group for evaluation. The mean age at surgery was 61 (range 29 to 82) years. The overall mean recurrence rate was 12 of 238, 5% and similar in both groups. COMPLICATIONS: Overall, 37 of 190 (19%) patients reported complications, 14 of these were Clavien Dindo Grade 3b and 2 were 3a: leak 3 (2 JP,1 SE), fistula 4 (1 JP, 3 SE), small bowel obstruction 4 (3JP, 1 SE), stricture 4 (3 SE, 1 SA), pouch necrosis 2 (JP), and wound infection 5 (2 JP, 3 SE). QOL scores using either instrument between the 2 groups at 12 and 24 months were similar (P > 0.05). Bowel movements, clustering, and FISI scores were similar. CONCLUSION: At time points of 1 and 2 years after a JP or a SE for low rectal cancer, QOL, functional outcome, and complications are comparable between the groups. Although choosing a particular procedure may depend on surgeon/patient choice or anatomical considerations at the time of surgery, SE functions similar to JP and may be chosen due to the ease of construction.

C-Reactive Protein Values After Colorectal Resection: Can We Discharge a Patient With a C-Reactive Protein Value >100? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein is a useful negative predictive test for the development of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Evolution of procedures (laparoscopy, enhanced recovery program, early discharge, complex redo surgery) may influence C-reactive protein values; however, this is poorly studied to date. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate C-reactive protein as an indicator of postoperative complication and as a predictor for discharge. DESIGN: This is retrospective study of a consecutive monocentric cohort. SETTINGS: All patients undergoing a colorectal resection with anastomosis (2014-2015) were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: C-reactive protein, leukocytosis, type of resection, and postoperative course were the primary outcomes measured. RESULTS: A total of 522 patients were included. The majority had either a colorectal (n = 159, 31%) or coloanal anastomosis (n = 150, 29%). Overall morbidity was 29.3%. C-reactive protein was significantly higher among patient having intra-abdominal complications at an early stage (day 1-2) (164.6 vs 136.2; p = 0.0028) and late stage (day 3-4) (209.4 vs 132.1; p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, early C-reactive protein was associated with BMI (coefficient, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.2-6.5; p < 0.0001) and open surgical procedures (coefficient, 43.1; 95% CI, 27-59.1; p < 0.0001), while late C-reactive protein value was influenced by BMI (coefficient, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.5-7.0; p = 0.0024) and associated extracolonic procedures (coefficient, 34.2; 95% CI, 2.7-65.6; p = 0.033). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values for intra-abdominal complication were 85.9%, 33.6%, 89.3%, and 27.1% for an early C-reactive protein <100 mg/L and 72.7%, 75.4%, 89.4%, and 49.2% for a late C-reactive protein <100 mg/L. Four hundred seven patients with an uneventful postoperative course were discharged at day 8 ± 6.4 with a mean discharge C-reactive protein of 83.5 ± 67.4. Thirty-eight patients (9.3%) were readmitted and had a significantly higher discharge C-reactive protein (138.6 ± 94.1 vs 77.8 ± 61.2, p = 0.0004). Readmission rate was 16.5% for patients with a discharge C-reactive protein >100 mg/L vs 6% with C-reactive protein <100 mg/L (p = 0.0008). For patients included in an enhanced recovery program (discharge at day 4 ± 2.4), the threshold should be higher because discharge is around day 3 or 4. With a C-reactive protein <140, readmission rate was 2% vs 19%, (p = 0.056). LIMITATIONS: This study includes retrospective data. CONCLUSION: C-reactive protein <100 mg/L is associated with a lower risk of intra-abdominal complication and readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A749.

Postoperative Peritonitis After Digestive Tract Surgery: Surgical Management and Risk Factors for Morbidity and Mortality, a Cohort of 191 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative peritonitis (POP) following gastrointestinal surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with no clear management option proposed. The aim of this study was to report our surgical management of POP and identify pre- and perioperative risk factors for morbidity and mortality. METHODS: All patients with POP undergoing relaparotomy in our department between January 2004 and December 2013 were included. Pre- and perioperative data were analyzed to identify predictors of morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients required relaparotomy for POP, of which 16.8% required >1 reinterventions. The commonest cause of POP was anastomotic leakage (66.5%) followed by perforation (20.9%). POP was mostly treated by anastomotic takedown (51.8%), suture with derivative stoma (11.5%), enteral resection and stoma (12%), drainage of the leak (8.9%), stoma on perforation (8.4%), duodenal intubation (7.3%) or intubation of the leak (3.1%). The overall mortality rate was 14%, of which 40% died within the first 48 h. Major complications (Dindo-Clavien > 2) were seen in 47% of the cohort. Stoma formation occurred in 81.6% of patients following relaparotomy. Independent risk factors for mortality were: ASA > 2 (OR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.07-7.62, p = 0.037), multiorgan failure (MOF) (OR = 5.22, 95% CI = 2.11-13.5, p = 0.0037), perioperative transfusion (OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.05-7.47, p = 0.04) and upper GI origin (OR = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.32-9.56, p = 0.013). Independent risk factors for morbidity were: MOF (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.26-6.19, p = 0.013), upper GI origin (OR = 3.74, 95% CI = 1.59-9.44, p = 0.0034) and delayed extubation (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.14-0.55, p = 0.0027). CONCLUSION: Mortality following POP remains a significant issue; however, it is decreasing due to effective and aggressive surgical intervention. Predictors of poor outcomes will help tailor management options.

Hartmann's reversal after colonic perforation or anastomosis leakage, is it the same procedure? A retrospective study of 150 patients.

PURPOSE: The high morbidity rates reported might influence surgeons' decisions of whether to perform Hartmann's reversal (HR). Our aim was to report the results of HR after "primary" Hartmann's procedure (HP) or in redo surgery for failed anastomosis. METHODS: All patients operated between 2007 and 2015 were included. Data and postoperative course were obtained from a review of medical records and databases. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients (age 60, range (20-91) years, 62% male) were included. Eighty-six patients (57%) were ASA ≥ 2. HP was mostly performed for diverticulitis (29.3%) and anastomotic leakage (24%). HR was possible in 145(97%) patients including six with previous failed attempt. Overall morbidity was 22.7% including 11.7% severe complications (Dindo 3-4). Operative blood loss and Charlson comorbidity index were the only significant risk factor for postoperative pelvic complications (p = 0.03; p = 0.0002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a colorectal tertiary center, HR was feasible in 97% with a low morbidity and a 3.4% anastomotic leakage rate.

Metachronous colorectal cancer risk in Lynch syndrome patients-should the endoscopic surveillance be more intensive?

PURPOSE: Regular follow-up for patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) is vital due to the increased risk of colorectal (50-80%), endometrial (40-60%), and other cancers. However, there is an ongoing debate concerning the best interval between colonoscopies. Currently, no specific endoscopic follow-up has been decided for LS patients who already have an index colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of metachronous cancers (MC) after primary CRC in a LS population and to determinate if endoscopic surveillance should be more intensive. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hereditary CRC since 2009 was included. Patients with LS and a primary CRC were the cohort of choice. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients were included with a median age of 44 years(16-70). At least one MC occurred in 39 patients (32.2%), with a median interval of 67 months (6-300) from index cancer. Fifteen (38.5%) developed two or more MCs during follow-up, with a median number of two (2-6) tumors occurring. Metachronous CRC were diagnosed after a median interval of 24 (6-57) months since last colonoscopy and were more commonly seen in MSH2 mutation carriers (58 vs. 35%, p = 0.001). After a median follow-up of 52.9 (3-72) months, no cancer-related deaths were recorded. CONCLUSION: Patients with LS have an increased risk of MC, especially CRCs. With a median time period of 24 months between colonoscopy and metachronous CRC, the interval between surveillance colonoscopies following primary CRC should not exceed 18 months, especially in patients with MSH2 mutation.

Postoperative Morbidity Risks Following Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease Treated With Anti-TNF Alpha Therapy: A Retrospective Study of 360 Patients.

Background: Despite the effectiveness of anti-TNF alpha (ATA) treatment to induce and maintain remission in Crohn's disease, surgical intervention is frequently required. Results of previous studies on the impact of anti-TNF on postoperative course are discordant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ATA on postoperative morbidity following ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Methods: A retrospective review of Crohn's disease patients undergoing ileocolic resection was performed. Patients receiving medical treatment ≤8 weeks prior to surgery were included and followed up for postoperative morbidity. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used for grading complications. Risk factors for postoperative morbidity were assessed on multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 360 patients underwent ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease between 2002 and 2013; 15.3% of patients had ATA ≤8 weeks prior to surgery. Laparoscopic resections were performed in 110 cases (31%), of which 6% were converted to an open operation. Primary anastomosis without the formation of a diverting ileostomy was performed in 301 cases. Overall morbidity was 24.2%, with a mortality rate of 0.8%. ATA use prior to surgery was identified as an independent risk factor for overall morbidity (odds ratio [OR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-3.82; P = 0.027) and septic complications (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.03-4.29; P = 0.04). In subgroup analysis of patients with a primary anastomosis, ATA use had no significant impact on septic or overall morbidity. Conclusions: Preoperative ATA use is a risk factor for overall postoperative morbidity and septic complications. However, the formation of a primary anastomosis should not be influenced by preoperative ATA use.

Surveillance of Duodenal Polyposis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Should the Spigelman Score Be Modified?

BACKGROUND: Duodenal polyposis is a manifestation of adenomatous polyposis that predisposes to duodenal or ampullary adenocarcinoma. Duodenal polyposis is monitored by upper GI endoscopies and may require iterative resections and prophylactic radical surgical treatment when malignancy is threatening. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate severity scoring for surveillance and treatment in a large series of duodenal polyposis. DESIGN: From 1982 to 2014, every patient surveyed by upper GI endoscopies for duodenal polyposis was included. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: We performed 1912 upper GI endoscopies in 437 patients (median = 3; interquartile range, 2-6 endoscopies). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conservative treatment was performed in 103 patients (159 endoscopic and 17 surgical resections), whereas radical surgical treatment (Whipple procedure or duodenectomy) was required in 52 (median age, 47.5 y; range, 43.0-57.3 y) because of high-grade dysplasia or unresectable lesions. RESULTS: Genes involved were APC (n = 274; 62.7%) and MUTYH (n = 21; 4.8%). First upper GI endoscopies (median age, 32 y; range, 21-44 y) revealed duodenal polyposis in 190 (43.5%). Rates of low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and duodenal or ampulary adenocarcinoma at 5 years were 65% (range, 61.7%-66.9%), 12.1% (range, 10.3%-13.9%), and 2.4% (range, 1.5%-3.3%), whereas 10-year rates were 75.8% (range, 73.1%-78.5%), 20.8% (range, 18.2%-23.4%), and 5.4% (range, 3.8%-7.0%). The rate of ampullary abnormalities rose during surveillance from 18.3% at the first upper GI endoscopies to 47.4% at the fourth. Predictive factors for high-grade dysplasia were age at first upper GI endoscopy, type and age of colorectal surgery, Spigelman score, presence of an ampullary abnormality, and number of endoscopic treatments. In multivariate analysis, only age at first upper GI endoscopy and presence of an ampullary abnormality were independent predictive factors. Histologic analysis after radical surgical treatment showed high-grade dysplasia in 30 patients and duodenal or ampulary adenocarcinoma in 11 (4 patients had lymph node involvement). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective analysis of a prospective database. CONCLUSIONS: More than 20% of patients developed high-grade dysplasia with duodenal polyposis after 10 years. Iterative endoscopic resections allowed extended control, but surgery remained necessary in 12% of the patients and happened too late in many cases; 20% of those operated had developed duodenal or ampulary adenocarcinoma, whereas 8% exhibited malignancy with lymph node involvement. The trigger for prophylactic surgery required a more accurate predictive score leading to closer endoscopic surveillance. Modifying the Spigelman score by accounting for ampullary abnormalities should be considered as a means to increase compliance with closer endoscopic follow-up in high-risk patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A430.

Long-term Follow-up After Ileorectal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A GETAID/GETAID Chirurgie Multicenter Retrospective Cohort of 343 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cumulative incidence and the prognostic factors of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) failure after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). BACKGROUND: Although ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is recommended after colectomy for UC, IRA is still performed. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study, which included patients with IRA for UC performed between 1960 and 2014. IRA failure was defined as secondary proctectomy and/or rectal cancer occurrence. Uni- and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Cox-proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients from 13 French centers were included. Median follow up after IRA was 10.6 years. IRA failure rates were estimated at 27.0% (95% confidence interval, CI, 22-32) and 40.0% (95% CI 33-47) at 10 and 20 years, respectively. Median survival time without IRA failure was estimated at 26.8 years. Two thirds of secondary proctectomies were performed for refractory proctitis, and 20% for rectal neoplasia. Univariate analysis identified factors associated with IRA failure: IRA performed after 2005, a longer duration of disease at the time of IRA, indication for colectomy and having received immunomodulative agents before IRA. In multivariate analysis, treatment with both immunosuppressant (IS) and anti-TNF before colectomy was independently associated with IRA failure (HR=2.9, 95% CI 1.2-7.1). Conversely, colectomy for severe acute colitis was associated with decreased risk of IRA failure (HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.97). DISCUSSION: Patients with UC have a high risk of IRA failure, particularly when colectomy is performed for refractory disease. However, IRA could be discussed after colectomy for severe acute colitis, or in patients naive to IS and anti-TNF.

Effect of Interval (7 or 11 weeks) Between Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy and Surgery on Complete Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial (GRECCAR-6).

Purpose A pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0N0) of a rectal tumor after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) is associated with an excellent prognosis. Several retrospective studies have investigated the effect of increasing the delay after RCT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the interval between the end of RCT and surgery on the pCR rate. Methods GRECCAR6 was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group controlled trial. Patients with cT3/T4 or Tx N+ tumors of the mid or lower rectum who had received RCT (45 to 50 Gy with fluorouracil or capecitabine) were included. Patients were randomly included in the 7-week or the 11-week (11w) group. Primary end point was the pCR rate defined as a ypT0N0 specimen (NCT01648894). Results A total of 265 patients from 24 centers were enrolled between October 2012 and February 2015. The majority of the tumors were cT3 (82%). After RCT, surgery was not performed in nine patients (3.4%) because of the occurrence of distant metastasis (n = 5) or other reasons. Two patients underwent local resection of the tumor scar. A total of 47 (18.6%) specimens were classified as ypT0 (four had invaded lymph nodes [8.5%]). The primary end point (ypT0N0) was not different (7 weeks: 20 of 133, 15.0% v 11w: 23 of 132, 17.4%; P = .5983). Morbidity was significantly increased in the 11w group (44.5% v 32%; P = .0404) as a result of increased medical complications (32.8% v 19.2%; P = .0137). The 11w group had a worse quality of mesorectal resection (complete mesorectum [I] 78.7% v 90%; P = .0156). Conclusion Waiting 11 weeks after RCT did not increase the rate of pCR after surgical resection. A longer waiting period may be associated with higher morbidity and more difficult surgical resection.

Female sexual function and fertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

PURPOSE: A potential complication in women after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is sexual impairment and reduced fertility. The aim was to evaluate sexual function and fertility after IPAA. METHODS: All female patients who underwent an IPAA between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively included. Sexual function, fertility, and continence were explored by the female sexual function index (FSFI), telephonic interview, and Wexner's score. RESULTS: Among 127 women included, 93 responded to the questionnaires (73.2%). Seventy five were sexually active, and 48 (64%) had normal sexual function (FSFI > 26). In univariate analysis, there was a significant relationship between ulcerative colitis (p = 0.0161), age > 40 years (p = 0.01311), number of bowel movements (p = 0.0238), nocturnal pouch activity (p = 0.0094), use of loperamide (p = 0.0283), and existence of sexual dysfunction. After multivariate analysis, age and nocturnal pouch activity were associated with a worse sexual function (p = 0.0235, OR = 3.3 (1.2-9.9) and p = 0.0094, OR = 4.1 (1.4-13.5)). Of 16 patients who wished to have children, 10 (63%) became pregnant without recourse to in vitro fertilization, of whom 3 had two or more pregnancies. In total, there were 13 children born after IPAA. The mean time between the first pregnancy and surgery was 24.8 ± 22 months. At 12 and 24 months after cessation of contraception, 57 and 67% had at least one pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: While sexual function is impaired in a limited number of patients, the impact of surgery can be regarded as modest. Age and nocturnal pouch activity were some independent factors of worse sexual function. The risk of infertility should not preclude consideration of IPAA as a treatment option.

Partial Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Morbidity and Oncological Outcome.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical approach for the treatment of tumors of the upper third of the rectum remains controversial. Several publications have shown that partial excision of the mesorectum (PME) with division of the mesorectum and rectum 5 cm below the tumor could be a reasonable approach although total mesorectal excision (TME) is still considered the gold standard for all rectal cancers in many studies. We aimed to assess the specifics risks of anterior resection with PME and colorectal anastomosis (CRA) in rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Files of all of the patients who underwent a PME between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed in consecutive order. Complications that occurred within 3 months after surgery, oncological outcome, local and distant recurrences, and survival were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients had a PME with CRA of whom 49 (28.5%) had a dysfunctional stoma. Grade III to IV complications occurred in 18 (10.5%) patients and 2 (1.2%) died. Thirteen (7.6%) developed an anastomotic leakage, and 5 (2.9%) resulted with a permanent stoma. Mean follow-up was 151 months (range, 0-151 months). The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5.3%. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival assessed in the 147 patients without synchronous metastasis were 93.2% and 79.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Partial excision of the mesorectum can be performed safely, in 1 stage in many patients, with a low risk of definitive stoma. The local recurrence and the survival rates that we observed indicate that the prognosis is not altered compared with TME. Therefore, PME can be recommended in the treatment of upper and some mid rectal tumors.

Management of postoperative bladder emptying after proctectomy in men for rectal cancer. A retrospective study of 190 consecutive patients.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of urinary drainage after rectal resection and identification of criteria associated with postoperative urinary dysfunction (UD). UD remains a clinical problem for up to two thirds of patients after rectal resection. Currently, there are no guidelines concerning duration or type of drainage. METHODS: One hundred ninety consecutive rectal resections (abdomino-perineal resection (APR = 47), mechanical coloanal anastomosis (MechCAA = 48), manual coloanal anastomosis (ManCAA = 47), colorectal anastomosis (CRA = 48)) in male patients were included. In patients with a transurethral catheterization (TUC), the drainage was removed at day 5. Patients with a suprapubic catheterization (SPC) underwent drainage removal according to the results of a clamping test at day 5. UD was defined as drainage removal after day 6 and/or acute urinary retention (AUR). RESULTS: Drainage types were SPC (n = 136, 72%) and TUC (n = 54, 28%). SPC was used more frequently after total mesorectal excision (TME) (APR, ManCAA, MechCAA) (83-92%). Complications rates of SPC and TUC were 20 and 9%. The clamping test was positive for 61 patients (48%), and SPC was removed before/on POD6 without any episode of AUR. After TUC removal, two patients (4%) had AUR. Seventy-two (38%) patients had UD: 11 (6%) were discharged with an indwelling catheter, and in 61 (32%), the catheter was removed after day6. Three independent factors were associated with UD: diabetes (OR = 2.9 (1.2-7.7)), urological history (OR = 2.9 (1.2-7.6)), and TME (OR = 5.2 (2.3-13.5)). CONCLUSION: The UD rate after surgery for rectal cancer was 38%. The clamping test is accurate to prevent AUR after SPC removal. The three risk factors may serve to select good candidates for early catheter removal.

Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess mortality after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and determine the influencing factors with a specific focus on institutional caseload and surgical approach in France. BACKGROUND: RPC is an uncommonly performed and demanding procedure; case volume may exert a significant influence on outcome. METHODS: Data of all patients who underwent RPC in France between 2009 and 2012, including demographics, diagnosis, procedures, mode of admission, discharge, and hospital type were collected. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred sixty-six RPCs were performed in 237 centers (mean: 1.65 procedure/year/center). Rate of laparoscopic procedures was 47.1% (n = 549). Mortality reached 1.5% (n = 17). Independent factors for mortality were ageless than 45 years (odds ratio, OR = 3.9) and surgery in a center performing less than 3 RPC per year (OR = 3.2). Centers performing less than 3 RPC per year represented 89% of all centers, accounted for 37% (n = 431) of all patients and represented 70.6% of all deaths (n = 12). Underlying pathology exerted a significant effect on mortality; mortality rate after "classical" indications (polyposis and inflammatory bowel disease) was 0.7% (8/1078) and was 16.7% (9/54) for "nonclassical" indications (peritonitis, carcinomatosis, and so on) (P < 0.0001). Nonclassical diagnoses were observed more frequently in centers performing less than 3 RPC per year [40/412 (7.3%) vs 24/720 (3.3%), P = 0.0027]. A laparoscopic approach was associated with a low mortality rate on univariate analysis (0.7% vs 1.2%, P = 0.05), a shorter hospital stay (15.8 ±â€Š0.6 vs 17.8 ±â€Š0.55, P = 0.0053) and more frequently performed in experienced centers ≥3 RPC/year (50.8% vs 40.7%, P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after RPC in centers performing 3 or less RPC per year was significantly higher, and accounted for more than half of all deaths. In France, consolidating all RPCs to higher volume centers may lead to better outcomes.

Combined stoma reversal and liver resection: a matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Stoma reversal can be performed during liver resection (LR) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRCLM) whose primary colorectal tumor has been previously resected with a diverting loop ileostomy. This combined procedure is reputed to be associated with an increased morbidity. This study investigates the impact of simultaneous loop ileostomy closure (LIC) on the postoperative outcome of LR for CRCLM. METHODS: From November 1996 to April 2012, 408 patients who underwent LR for CRCLM were retrospectively studied from a prospective database. Patients who underwent simultaneous LR and LIC were matched for the type of the main liver procedure, the use of preoperative chemotherapy and the need for greater than or equal to 6 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy with LR only patients. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (6%) with simultaneous LR and LIC were matched with 72 patients with LR only. Both groups were comparable for patients' demographics and intraoperative findings. Liver related (P = .957) and overall postoperative morbidity (P = .643) rates did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: The combined procedure appeared to be safe when strict surgical technique is used.

Desmoid tumour in familial adenomatous polyposis patients: responses to treatments.

No guidelines for desmoid tumors (DT) management are available and DT have now become the first cause of death in FAP patients who had restorative proctocolectomy. We aimed to assess the results of the different treatments used for DT in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) patients. All patients followed for FAP who developed a DT between 1970 and 2010 were collated. We analysed separately the history of DT according to location: mesenteric, parietal or mixed. 79 FAP patients [45 females (56 %); mean age 33.3 ± 12.5] presented 149 DT and were included; 16(20 %) had a DT diagnosed during or before first abdominal surgery and 47 (59 %) had isolated mesenteric DT. 11 patients had only surgical treatment, 17 only medical treatments, 31 had combined treatment and 20 had no treatment with spontaneous DT regression or stabilization. Overall, 80 treatment lines were administered to patients with a progression free or regression rate of 43 % (34/80). Response rates were: chemotherapy 77 % (10/13); Sulindac + tamoxifen 50 % (6/12); Tamoxifen 40 % (6/15); Imatinib 36 % (4/11); Sulindac 28 % (8/29). Among the 42 surgical procedures, an R0 resection was performed in 26 (62 %) allowing the absence of recurrence for 54 %. After a median follow-up of 81 months, 8 patients died of their DT and 6 died of other cause. Overall and DT-specific survival at 20 years were 52 and 79 %, respectively. Chemotherapy was the most efficient treatment. For intra-abdominal DT, we consider it as a first choice treatment and reserve surgery when it is impossible or when DT are life threatening.

Management of Acute Appendicitis in Ambulatory Surgery: Is It Possible? How to Select Patients?

OBJECTIVE: Establish a protocol of management of acute appendicitis (AA) in ambulatory surgery (AmbSurg) on the basis of preoperative criteria. BACKGROUND: Ambulatory laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for AA has not been yet reported. METHODS: All patients who underwent LA between 2010 and 2012 were reviewed. A multivariate analysis was performed to create a predictive score of discharge within the first 24 hours. The score was prospectively used on every AA from January 1, 2013, to December 15, 2013. All patients with 5 or 4 points were proposed for AmbSurg. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients were included retrospectively, 181(38.7%) were discharged within the first 24 hours. In multivariate analysis, predictive factors of early discharge were body mass index less than 28 kg/m, white cell count less than 15,000/mL, C-reactive protein less than 30 mg/L, no radiological signs of perforation, and appendix diameter of 10 mm or smaller. Rate of discharge at day 1 was 72%, 45%, 39%, 21%, 0%, and 0% according to the score 5 to 0 (P < 0.0001). Prospectively, 184 patients had AA and 103 (56%) had a score of 4 or 5. Thirty-eight underwent ambulatory LA [16 (42%) patients were postponed to the next day and went back home]. All patients were directly discharged from recovery room, except 1 (2.6%) patient, after a mean hospital stay of 8.4 hours ± 6.9 hours. A total of 146 patients underwent LA in conventional surgery and 58% were discharged at day 1. Rate of early discharge was significantly associated with the score ranging from 0% to 92% for a score 0 or 5, validating prospectively the score (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We establish a simple validated predictive score of early discharge. When applied to AmbSurg, it allowed us to select patients eligible with a success rate of 97%.