Validation of a prognostic model for predicting larynx preservation outcome (TALK score) in a Southern European population.

OBJECTIVE: Larynx preservation is the current standard for locally advanced (LA) laryngeal/hypopharyngeal tumors, but not all patients respond as expected. TALK score model measures four variables (T-staging, albumin levels, liquor consumption and Karnofsky score) to determine which cases are best suited to preservation treatment scheme. We aimed to validate this prognostic model in a Southern European population. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 175 patients diagnosed from July 2008 to December 2015 with LA laryngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinoma and treated with a laryngeal preservation scheme comprising induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We applied the TALK score model to predict larynx preservation rate. RESULTS: Of the 175 patients evaluated, 96.6% were men, 98.3% were smokers and 77.1% misused alcohol. Tumors were laryngeal 66.3% vs 33.7% in hypopharynx, and all were either stage III (37.7%) or stage IV (62.3%). TALK prognostic subgroups were: good risk 40.0%; intermediate risk 52.5%; and poor risk 7.5%. With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, larynx preservation rate, laryngectomy-free survival and overall survival at 3 years was 84.5%, 63.7% and 68.2%, respectively. Although TALK score was not predictive of 3-year larynx preservation rate (good risk 85.5%; intermediate risk 83.1%; poor risk 91.6%), it was predictive of 3-year overall survival (good risk 81.9%; intermediate risk 62.9%; poor risk 33.5%) and 3-year laryngectomy-free survival (good risk 75.6%; intermediate risk 59.6%; poor risk 30.7%). CONCLUSION: TALK model could predict OS and laryngectomy-free survival, helping clinicians to decide which patients should avoid laryngeal preservation and undergo laryngectomy after diagnosis.

Radiation therapy for bone-only metastases in breast cancer patients: A GOCO survey of current clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: The role of radiation therapy (RT) for patients with bone-only metastatic (BOM) breast cancer has not been investigated sufficiently. The aim of this survey was to evaluate current clinical practice in treating breast cancer patients with BOM in Radiation Therapy Departments in Catalonia and Occitania within the scope of the GOCO group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was completed by experienced radiation oncologists from fourteen RT centers. The items surveyed the professional experience, therapeutic approach, technique, dose stereotactic body RT (SBRT) availability. RESULTS: All Radiation Oncology Departments (ROD) in Catalonia (12) and Occitania (2) responded to the survey. Eleven (78.5%) of the RODs advise RT for BOM as initial treatment in the oligometastatic setting. RT to asymptomatic bone oligometastases is more often restricted for "risky lesions". The most inconsistent approaches were the treatment for asymptomatic lesions, when to treat bone metastases with respect to systemic treatment (ST) and the indication for RT after a complete response to ST. CONCLUSION: While BOM breast cancer patients have a relatively good prognosis, there is a lack of consistency in their approach with RT. This can be explained by the absence of evidence-based guidelines and an incomplete availability of SBRT.

Comparison of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) for better target volume definition in radiation therapy planning.

BACKGROUND: In cancer patients, positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) fused images present less variability in target contouring, respect to use only CT images, respectively. However, the gold standard has not yet been clearly established between radiation oncologists with regard to PET images and the methodology of contouring targets with confidence using PET/CT fused images. The aim of this study was to determine whether integrated PET/CT fused images provide advantages in virtual simulation compared with morphological contouring only with CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty cancer patients were evaluated in an adapted PET/CT hybrid in radiotherapy (RT) setup position, with 20 of them being suitable for RT: 17 were suitable for curative intent, which was the group of interest in this study. All image series were sent to the RT work station (WS) where CT and PET series were automatically fused by Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) in each case. PET series were threshold and were subjected to source-to-background contrast algorithms to fi nally redefine the original tumour description. Three different radiotherapy plans (RTP) for each patient were compared after targets were contoured: [1] planning over metabolic (PET) contoured targets, [2] planning over only morphologic (CT) targets, and [3] planning over targets obtained for treatment based on fused PET/CT images. RESULTS: PET/CT findings altered initial-stage planning in four patients (23.5%) because they had been undergoing chemotherapy. Gross target volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) based only on PET showed more homogeneity to obtain mean doses (p = 0.025) with respect to those based on PET/CT, respectively. However, no percentage differences were observed in median PTV doses between the planning methods, although there was higher variability in PET/CT planning. Morphological (CT) and PET/ CT target volumes were more voluminous than metabolic (PET) volumes. On the other hand, 20% of metabolic (PET) PTV were out of those defined by PET/CT. Thoracic RT plans based on PET preserved better bilateral lung [percentage volume of lung irradiated with a dose of 20 Gy (V20); significance, R(2) = 0.559, p = 0.006]. CONCLUSIONS: For our physicians, PET/CT fused images allowed better contouring of primary tumours in 40% of head and neck cancers and 34% of thoracic cancers. PET/CT provides useful information for virtual simulation therapy. Image treatment and planning in an RT workstation is mandatory.