Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 46(4): 646-656, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456256

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite extensive research, comprehensive characterization of leukaemic stem cells (LSC) and information on their immunophenotypic differences from normal haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is lacking. Herein, we attempted to unravel the immunophenotypic (IPT) characteristics and heterogeneity of LSC using multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and single-cell sequencing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow aspirate samples from patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were evaluated using MFC at diagnostic and post induction time points using a single tube-10-colour-panel containing LSC-associated antibodies CD123, CD45RA, CD44, CD33 and COMPOSITE (CLL-1, TIM-3, CD25, CD11b, CD22, CD7, CD56) with backbone markers that is, CD45, CD34, CD38, CD117, sCD3. Single-cell sequencing of the whole transcriptome was also done in a bone marrow sample. RESULTS: LSCs and HSCs were identified in 225/255 (88.2%) and 183/255 (71.6%) samples, respectively. Significantly higher expression was noted for COMPOSITE, CD45RA, CD123, CD33, and CD44 in LSCs than HSCs (p < 0.0001). On comparing the LSC specific antigen expressions between CD34+ (n = 184) and CD34- LSCs (n = 41), no difference was observed between the groups. More than one sub-population of LSC was demonstrated in 4.4% of cases, which further revealed high concordance between MFC and single cell transcriptomic analysis in one of the cases displaying three LSC subpopulations by both methods. CONCLUSION: A single tube-10-colour MFC panel is proposed as an easy and reproducible tool to identify and discriminate LSCs from HSCs. LSCs display both inter- and intra-sample heterogeneity in terms of antigen expressions, which opens the facets for single cell molecular analysis to elucidate the role of subpopulations of LSCs in AML progression.


Asunto(s)
Citometría de Flujo , Inmunofenotipificación , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Células Madre Neoplásicas , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/metabolismo , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Células Madre Neoplásicas/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de la Célula Individual/métodos , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Antígenos CD/análisis , Anciano
2.
Cureus ; 15(12): e50869, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38249207

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Complete diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) requires knowledge of clinical information combined with morphologic evaluation, immunophenotyping, karyotyping, and molecular genetic testing. The study intends to evaluate the demographic profile, clinical workup, and investigation, including flow cytometric immunophenotyping, in adult and pediatric age groups of AML. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of AML patients treated between January 2017 and December 2021. Clinical and demographic characteristics and investigation findings were recorded from case files and the hematology database. RESULT: A total of 896 cases of AML were registered during the given period, of which 819 cases were de-novo AML. Among those 819 cases, more than two-thirds of cases, i.e., 78.9% (N = 646), received induction chemotherapy. A significantly higher male-to-female ratio was observed (1.5:1). The median age was 22 years. The median time for diagnosis was three days and the median time for treatment intervention was four days. There were significant differences in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scores between pediatric and adult AML patients. Pediatric AML patients presented with better ECOG performance scores (ECOG performance scores 0 and 1) than adult patients (74.76% vs. 43.14%, p < 0.001). Further comparing adult vs. pediatric AML patients, normal karyotype (60.56% vs. 31.93%, p < 0.001) and NPM1 (22.25% vs. 6.72%, p < 0.001) and FLT3-ITD mutations (20.28% vs. 7.98%, p<0.001) were more common in the adult group, whereas AML-ETO (40.76% vs. 16.34%, p < 0.001) was more common in the pediatric group. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the presenting age is lower than global figures. The median time for initial diagnosis and the start of treatment is within the acceptable norms. Normal karyotype and NPM1 and FLT3 mutations were common in adult AML patients, whereas AML-ETO was more common in the pediatric cohort. These findings will help plan prospective studies and see the correlation with treatment outcomes. The laboratory workup practice currently complies with the standard guidelines at our center.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA