Ipilimumab with or without nivolumab in PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade refractory metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase 2 trial.

In this randomized phase 2 trial, blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) with continuation of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma who had received front-line anti-PD-1 or therapy against programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 and whose tumors progressed was tested in comparison with CTLA-4 blockade alone. Ninety-two eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab, or ipilimumab alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included the difference in CD8 T cell infiltrate among responding and nonresponding tumors, objective response rate, overall survival and toxicity. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival over ipilimumab (hazard ratio = 0.63, 90% confidence interval (CI) = 0.41-0.97, one-sided P = 0.04). Objective response rates were 28% (90% CI = 19-38%) and 9% (90% CI = 2-25%), respectively (one-sided P = 0.05). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57% and 35% of patients, respectively, which is consistent with the known toxicity profile of these regimens. The change in intratumoral CD8 T cell density observed in the present analysis did not reach statistical significance to support the formal hypothesis tested as a secondary endpoint. In conclusion, primary resistance to PD-1 blockade therapy can be reversed in some patients with the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03033576 .

Multicenter phase II trial (SWOG S1609, cohort 51) of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma: a substudy of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART).

PURPOSE: Angiosarcoma is a rare aggressive endothelial cell cancer with high mortality. Isolated reports suggest immune checkpoint inhibition efficacy in angiosarcoma, but no prospective studies have been published. We report results for angiosarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab as a cohort of an ongoing rare cancer study. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) for metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free (PFS) and overall survival, and toxicity. A two-stage design was used. RESULTS: Overall, there were 16 evaluable patients. Median age was 68 years (range, 25-81); median number of prior lines of therapy, 2. Nine patients had cutaneous and seven non-cutaneous primary tumors. ORR was 25% (4/16). Sixty per cent of patients (3/5) with primary cutaneous scalp or face tumors attained a confirmed response. Six-month PFS was 38%. Altogether, 75% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE) (at least possibly related to drug) (25% grade 3-4 AE); 68.8%, an immune-related AE (irAE) (2 (12.5%), grade 3 or 4 irAEs (alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase increase and diarrhea)). There were no grade 5 toxicities. One of seven patients in whom tumor mutation burden (TMB) was assessed showed a high TMB (24 mutations/mb); that patient achieved a partial response (PR). Two of three patients with PDL1 immunohistochemistry assessed had high PDL1 expression; one achieved a PR. CONCLUSION: The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated an ORR of 25% in angiosarcoma, with three of five patients with cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face responding. Ipilimumab and nivolumab warrant further investigation in angiosarcoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02834013.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults with melanoma or cutaneous malignancies: The Wilmot Cancer Institute experience.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between age and frailty with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) among patients with cutaneous malignancies receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients receiving ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab for treatment of cutaneous malignancies at the Wilmot Cancer Institute between 1 Jan 2011 and 3 Apr 2017. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (age <70 N = 68, age ≥70 N = 52; range, 26-93) were identified. 44.1%[95%CI:32-57%] of patients age <70 and 31.4%[95%CI:19-46%] of patients age ≥70 experienced ≥1 irAE on 1st line ICI therapy (P = 0.158). A total of 3 adults died of irAEs (2 age ≥70; 1 age <70). Patients ≥70 were more frequently treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy than dual checkpoint blockade or ipilimumab (P < 0.01) in the first line setting. Among patients on first line anti-PD-1 monotherapy for cutaneous melanoma, 21 were age <70 and 20 were age ≥70, with similar observed rates of irAEs (52.4%[95%CI 29.8-74.3] and 63.2%[95%CI 38.4-83.7]). Indirect frailty markers in patients age ≥70 such as having fallen in the prior six months, ECOG PS ≥2 or Charlson comorbidity scores ≥11 experienced similar rates of response and toxicity. Among 9 patients with a PS = 3, 8 died, 6 due to progressive disease. No deaths due to irAEs occurred in this frail subgroup. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 monotherapy for older adults with cutaneous malignancies have similar response and irAE rates when compared to those of younger patients. Deaths from disease progression were more frequent than those from toxicity in both age subgroups.

Management of melanoma in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Melanoma is significantly more common and is associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with an underlying B-cell malignancy. This study reports on the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) and a subsequent diagnosis of melanoma. In the Wilmot Cancer Institute CLL cohort, which includes 470 patients followed for 2849 person-years, 18 patients (3.8%) developed 22 melanomas. Fourteen melanomas were invasive, a significantly higher rate as compared with the age and sex matched general population (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 6.32 (95% CI 3.45; 10.60). Melanomas were most often detected (n = 15; 68.2%) through active surveillance in a dermatology clinic. Most melanomas (n = 17; 77.3%) were detected at a non-advanced stage (pathological stage grouping < III). The most common management was wide local excision without sentinel lymph node biopsy (n = 13, 59.1%). Management for the 4 (18.2%) patients with metastatic disease included the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab (n = 1), systemic chemotherapy with dacarbazine (n = 1), and palliative care (n = 2). The patient treated with ICI is in sustained remission of her melanoma after 23 cycles of therapy while her TP53 disrupted CLL continues to respond to ibrutinib therapy. We conclude that patients with CLL may benefit from active surveillance for melanoma leading to early excision of locally-manageable disease. In patients with metastatic melanoma, combined treatment with targeted kinase inhibitors and ICIs can be successful and tolerable. Larger prospective studies should be considered to further evaluate these approaches.