Use of 3D Planning and Patient-specific Guides for Proximal Humerus Corrective Osteotomy Associated With Shoulder Prosthesis Implantation in Proximal Humeral Varus Malunion.

Humeral stem prosthesis implantation in case of proximal humerus varus malunion (type 1D fracture sequelae) is often complicated by greater tuberosity fracture and by posterosuperior rotator cuff iatrogenic damage. Moreover, the varus malunited humeral head could lead to scapular impingement and reduce the range of motion. To address this problem, we introduced a new surgical procedure consisting in a proximal humerus osteotomy, planned with three-dimensional (3D) preoperative virtual surgery, and performed with patient-specific surgical guides, to correct humerus deformity before the implantation of the prosthetic humeral stem. A 3D evaluation of the deformity, based on the comparison to the healthy contralateral side or to anatomical standard values, is firstly performed. The metaphyseal osteotomy is then planned and virtually performed. To faithfully reproduce the planned correction, 3D printed surgical guides are prepared. Before the surgery, it is advisable to perform a simulation of the planned osteotomies to verify their real feasibility and to find any critical issues. Preliminary outcomes of this surgical technique are encouraging, but formal studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility and longevity of results.

Osteochondral allograft transplantation for complex distal humeral fractures assisted by 3D computer planning and printing technology: technical note.

PURPOSE: The surgical treatment of comminuted distal humeral articular fractures (DHF) is challenging and is jeopardized by the high rate of complications. The study aims to describe the application of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for the treatment of complex DHF assisted with a 3D printed specific instrumentation. METHODS: Retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were the presence of an articular multi-fragmented DHF treated with frozen OCA. Clinical, self-reported and radiographic outcomes were collected every 6 months. CT were performed at 2 years FU. RESULTS: Four patients were included. At a mean follow-up of 37.3 months (24-49) MEPS, DASH and VAS were 90 (80-100), 11.8 (0-25) and 1 (0-3) points, respectively. Not significant complication or reoperation was recorded. Graft healing was observed in 3 cases. In all cases, we observed arthritic progression after 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: OCA transplantation can be considered a reliable and safe procedure in patients affected by a complex DHF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V. Technical Notes.

Arthroscopic Iliac Crest Bone Allograft Combined With Subscapularis Upper-Third Tenodesis Shows a Low Recurrence Rate in the Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability Associated With Critical Bone Loss.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic glenoid bone allograft combined with subscapularis upper-third tenodesis for anterior shoulder instability associated with clinically relevant bone loss and hyperlaxity. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2017, patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability associated with bone loss and hyperlaxity were selected and treated with arthroscopic iliac crest bone graft combined with subscapularis upper-third tenodesis. The selection criteria were as follows: more than 5 dislocations; positive apprehension, anterior drawer, and Coudane-Walch test results; glenoid bone defect between 15% and 30% and humeral bone defect with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion; and no previous shoulder surgery. All patients were followed up with the Constant score, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) rating, Rowe score, and visual analog scale evaluation. Assessments were performed with plain radiographs and a PICO computed tomography scan before surgery and at 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up duration of 34.6 months (range, 24-48 months). In 17 patients (89%), excellent clinical results were recorded according to the Rowe score. The Constant score improved from 82.9 (standard deviation [SD], 5.2) to 88.9 (SD, 4.3) (P = .002); Rowe score, from 25.3 (SD, 5.3) to 89.1 (SD, 21.8) (P < .001); UCLA score, from 23.7 (SD, 3) to 31.5 (SD, 4.8) (P < .001); and visual analog scale score, from 3.2 to 1.3 (P < .001). Patients met the minimal clinically important difference 94.7%, 89.5%, and 47.3% of the time for the Rowe score, UCLA score, and Constant score, respectively. Bone graft resorption was observed in all patients: partial in 9 and complete in 10. We recorded 2 recurrent traumatic dislocations (11%), with no case of persistent anterior apprehension or other complication. CONCLUSIONS: An arthroscopic glenoid bone graft combined with subscapularis upper-third tenodesis may be a valid surgical option to treat recurrent anterior instability associated with both bone loss and hyperlaxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

A new classification of impacted proximal humerus fractures based on the morpho-volumetric evaluation of humeral head bone loss with a 3D model.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to classify the pathomorphology of impacted proximal humeral fractures according to the control volume theory, with the intention to introduce a severity index to support surgeons in decision making. METHODS: In total, 50 proximal humeral fractures were randomly selected from 200 medical records of adult patients treated from 2009 to 2016. Four nonindependent observers used 2 different imaging modalities (computed tomography scans plus volume rendering; 3D model) to test the classification reliability. A fracture classification system was created according to the control volume theory to provide simple and understandable patterns that would help surgeons make quick assessments. The impacted fractures table was generated based on an evaluation of the calcar condition, determined by the impairment of a defined volumetric area under the cephalic cup and the humeral head malposition. In addition to the main fracture pattern, the comminution degree (low, medium, high), providing important information on fracture severity, could also be evaluated. RESULTS: From 3D imaging, the inter- and intraobserver reliability revealed a k value (95% confidence interval) of 0.55 (0.50-0.60) and 0.91 (0.79-1.00), respectively, for the pattern code, and 0.52 (0.43-0.76) and 0.91 (0.56-0.96), respectively, for the comminution degree. CONCLUSIONS: The new classification provides a useful synoptic framework for identifying complex fracture patterns. It can provide the surgeon with useful information for fracture analysis and may represent a good starting point for an automated system.

Analysis of early and late clinical and radiologic complications of proximal humeral fractures using open reduction, internal fixation, and intramedullary titanium cage augmentation.

BACKGROUND: An intramedullary augmentation technique using a titanium cage with different types of hardware can be considered a new option in the management of proximal humeral fractures. This study aimed to report the perioperative, early, and late complications of proximal humeral fractures using the intramedullary augmentation technique. METHODS: From 2005 to 2017, 142 displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated in the same unit by the aforementioned technique. Perioperative, early, and late complications were evaluated in all patients. Clinical evaluation was performed according to the Constant and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. Only 115 patient records could be considered to have long-term follow-up (7-12 years). RESULTS: Extra-articular migrations of K-wires, plate cutout, and screw penetration were not observed. A transitory axillary nerve palsy with inferior humeral head subluxation was observed in 41 patients (29.8%). Of the 142 patients, 2 (1.4%) manifested early signs of infection, and 1 underwent a reoperation after 30 days. Complete bone healing was obtained at a mean of 3.5 months in 140 of 142 shoulders (98.6%). We achieved long-term follow-up on only 115 patients because 14 had died, 6 lived abroad, and 7 could not participate due to illness. The results were good or excellent in 99 patients (86%), fair in 12 (10.4%), and poor in 4 (3.4%). K-wires were removed in 15 of 79 patients (11.5%). Nonunion or malunion occurred in 1 patient (0.8%). Asymptomatic avascular necrosis developed in 8 patients (6.9%) after 5 years, and secondary glenohumeral osteoarthritis occurred in 6 (5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative and postoperative analyses with short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes show that the intramedullary augmentation technique improves fracture treatment with significantly good anatomic reconstruction in complex and unstable cases. The bone healing rate is significantly high, and the technique is associated with a significantly low percentage of complications.