Birth and first-year costs for mothers and infants attributable to maternal smoking.

Maternal smoking during pregnancy has been linked to high costs. This study estimates the magnitude of excess costs attributable to smoking during pregnancy for mothers and infants. The model estimates smoking-attributable costs for 11 infant and maternal conditions. From a claims database of 7784 mothers and 7901 infants who had deliveries during 1996, we estimated total cost over the infants' first year of life for each mother and infant and identified each complication of interest, based on ICD-9 codes. The average cost for smokers and non-smokers could not be computed directly because smoking status is not available in claims data. Therefore, the population attributable risk percentage (PAR%) due to smoking for each complication was identified from the literature. Multiple linear regression was used to provide estimates of the incremental cost associated with each smoking-related complication. The total cost attributable to smoking was computed as a function of the incremental cost of each complication and the PAR% for each complication. The conditions associated with the largest incremental costs compared to patients without those conditions were abruptio placenta ($23,697) and respiratory distress syndrome ($21,944). Because they were more common, the conditions with the largest smoking-attributable cost were low birth weight ($914) and lower respiratory infection ($428). The sum of the additional costs attributable to smoking for all conditions yielded a total in the first year after birth ranging from $1142 to $1358 per smoking pregnant woman. It was concluded that maternal smoking during pregnancy results in an economic burden to payers and society. These estimates may be useful in formal cost-effectiveness evaluations of individual smoking cessation strategies.

An economic evaluation of a chlorhexidine chip for treating chronic periodontitis: the CHIP (chlorhexidine in periodontitis) study.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously suggested that an adjunctive, controlled-release chlorhexidine, or CHX, chip may reduce periodontal surgical needs at little additional cost. This article presents an economic analysis of the CHX chip in general dental practice. METHODS: In a one-year prospective clinical trial, 484 chronic periodontitis patients in 52 general practices across the United States were treated with either scaling and root planing, or SRP, plus any therapy prescribed by treating, unblinded dentists; or SRP plus other therapy as above but including the CHX chip. Economic data were collected from bills, case report forms and 12-month treatment recommendations from blinded periodontist evaluators. RESULTS: Total dental charges were higher for SRP + CHX chip patients vs. SRP patients when CHX chip costs were included (P = .027) but lower when CHX chip costs were excluded (P = .012). About one-half of the CHX chip acquisition cost was offset by savings in other charges. SRP + CHX chip patients were about 50 percent less likely to undergo surgical procedures than were SRP patients (P = .021). At the end of the trial, periodontist evaluators recommended similar additional procedures for both groups: SRP, about 46 percent; maintenance, about 37 percent; surgery, 56 percent for SRP alone and 63 percent for SRP + CHX chip. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive CHX chip use for general-practice patients with periodontitis increased costs but reduced surgeries over one year. At study's end, periodontists recommended similar additional surgical treatment for both groups. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In general practice, routine use of the CHX chip suggests that costs will be partially offset by reduced surgery over at least one year.

The cost-effectiveness of octreotide acetate in the treatment of carcinoid syndrome and VIPoma.

Markov modeling was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of octreotide in treating carcinoid syndrome and VIPoma. For each condition, using octreotide was associated with doubled survival time. Octreotide was cost-effective for treating carcinoid tumor ($752 per additional year of life, two additional years on average), and cost saving for VIPoma.