Contribution of ultrasound examination in the detection of unexpected uterine and adnexal findings in reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Objective: Current urogynaecology practice allows preservation of the uterus in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, thus not reducing oncologic risk. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound (USG) in dia-gnosing unexpected uterine and adnexal pathologies in women referred for POP. Furthermore, the benefit of USG examination by a specialist in gynaecology-oncology ultrasound was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All women after a hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy in the course of a POP surgery at our tertiary centre in 2013-2018 with preoperative USG were enrolled in the study. Women with recurrent uterine bleeding, abnormal cytology, using tamoxifen, or women with already dia-gnosed uterine or adnexal pathology were excluded. RESULTS: 289 women were enrolled in the study - 157 (54.3%) expert USG vs. 132 (45.7%) non-expert USG. Abnormal findings were observed on the cervix in one case (non-expert USG), the endometrium 30 (10.4%) cases - 13 (8.3%) expert vs. 17 (12.9%) non-expert USG, the adnexa three (2.3%) cases (all non-expert USG), and no suspicion of malignancy on myometrium was observed. USG was false negative in four (1.4%) cases - two (1.3%) expert vs. two (1.5%) non-expert USG. Conversely, the examination was false positive in 34 (11.8%) cases - 13 (8.3%) expert vs. 21 (15.9%) non-expert USG. CONCLUSION: The risk of unexpected uterine or adnexal pathologies in POP surgery was 1.4%. The agreement between USG and histopathological benign, abnormal or malign findings was 87.2%. A sonographer specialized in oncologic sonography is able to reduce the number of false positive findings; however, this does not increase the sensitivity of the ultrasound.

Molecular classification of endometrial cancers translated into practice.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the article is to clearly inform healthcare professionals about the newly implemented molecular classification of endometrial cancer into practice. METHODS: Summary of current knowledge, recommendations and new procedures relating to molecular genetic examination of the tissues of patients with endometrial carcinoma. RESULTS: Endometrial cancer is currently dia-gnosed on the base of histopathological morphology. According to the classical Bokhman division, we distinguish between two relatively wide groups of tumors which are different in pathogenesis: type I - estrogen-dependent tumors, clinically usually indolent, and type II - non-endometroid tumors, clinically aggressive, without dependence on estrogen stimulation. This classification fulfills a didactic purpose and provides easy orientation for epidemiological data, but is not suitable for stratification due to the overlap of clinical, pathological and molecular features. The Cancer Genome Atlas project classifies endometrial tumors into 4 groups based on molecular genetic features. CONCLUSION: Integration of the histopathological findings along with molecular classification appears to be the best approach for evaluating each individual tumor. This will help to achieve the ideal stratification of patients for treatment  regimens.

Diagnostic Reliability, Accuracy and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Biopsy and Ascites Puncture in Primarily Inoperable Ovarian Tumours.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the diagnostic reliability, accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided biopsy (Tru-Cut biopsy) and ascites puncture in patients with a primarily inoperable malignant ovarian tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the studied methods in consecutively examined patients and a prospective validation of these methods. 79 women with a suspected primarily inoperable ovarian tumor underwent Tru-Cut biopsies and were included in the ultrasound-guided biopsy group. In addition, 55 patients after ascites puncture were enrolled in the comparison group. Both procedures were performed in 48 patients for the prospective validation. RESULTS: Significant differences in favour of ultrasound-guided biopsy were found in all studied variables (malignancy confirmation 72.9% vs. 95.8%, tumor origin 52.1% vs. 89.6%, histologic subtype 43.8% vs. 85.4% and accuracy, i.e. agreement of preoperative and definitive diagnosis 43.7% vs. 95.4%). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate, reliable, safe and minimally invasive method. Owing to the high reliability and accuracy, it has the capacity to replace ascites puncture with cytologic examination or a more invasive method (laparoscopy, laparotomy) for adequate tumor sampling.

One-step nucleic acid amplification vs ultrastaging in the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Utilisation of the one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) molecular biology method for the detection of the metastatic involvement of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in endometrial cancer (EC) patients. A comparison with histopathological ultrastaging and a description of the clinical consequences. METHODS: Surgically treated EC patients underwent detection of SLNs. Nodes greater than 5 mm were cut into sections 2-mm thick parallel to the short axis of the node. Odd sections were examined according to the OSNA method, while even ones according to an appropriate ultrastaging protocol. Nodes less than or equal to 5 mm were cut into halves along the longitudinal axis with one half examined according to the OSNA method and the other half by ultrastaging. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included and 135 SLNs were acquired. Both ultrastaging and OSNA agreed on 116 results. According to the OSNA method, 20.69% more patients were classified into International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III. When comparing the results of the OSNA method to the conclusions of ultrastaging as a reference method, sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 85.5% and concordance of 85.9% were attained. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the OSNA method showed a higher frequency of detection of micrometastases and included 20.69% more patients into FIGO stage III.

CD44 as a cancer stem cell marker and its prognostic value in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

The aim of our study was to clarify whether the CD44 adhesion molecule as a cancer stem cell marker could also serve as a prognostic factor in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). A retrospective study was performed on 87 patients with histologically verified EOC. Specimens of both primary tumour and implantation metastases were tested from 48 of them. CD44 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. We looked for the cut-off levels of CD44 expression using the Cox regression model. We confirmed statistically significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFI) to be: stage of the disease, postoperative residual tumour and papillary serous histological type. We demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between low CD44 expression and serous papillary carcinoma histotype, tumour recurrence and chemoresistance at a value below 2%. CD44 was neither a prognostic factor of OS nor of DFI. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known about this subject: Epithelial ovarian cancer is the second most common gynaecological cancer in developed countries. Despite great efforts devoted to ovarian cancer research during past decades, levels of patient mortality have changed very little. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are subpopulations of cells with typical characteristics of stem cells - i.e. the ability to self-renew and differentiate in a variety of cell types. The main surface marker typical for CSCs is CD44. The aim of our study was to clarify whether the CD44 as a CSCs marker could serve as a prognostic factor in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Previous studies published on this topic revealed controversial results. The novelty of our study lies in looking for the cut-off using the Cox regression model. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: We demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between low CD44 expression and serous papillary carcinoma histotype, tumour recurrence and chemoresistance at a value below 2%, however, CD44 was neither a prognostic factor of overall survival nor of disease-free interval. We propose to investigate other markers including other CSCs as a prognostic factors or potential aims for targeted therapy in ovarian cancer.

Importance of Preoperative Knowledge of the Biomarker HE4 in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer Regarding Surgical Management.

AIM: To analyze the utility of HE4 assessment in preoperative management of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer for stratification into low-risk and high-risk groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The following data were prospectively collected from patients operated for endometrial cancer from 05/2012 till 9/2016; age, HE4, CA125, expert ultrasound examination of the pelvis, histotype, grade, FIGO stage. RESULTS: In total, 124 patients were enrolled. A cut-off of ≥113 pmol/l HE4 demonstrated 40.3% sensitivity and 83.9% specificity for detection of high-risk patients. Correlations of HE4 with age (p<0.001), depth of myometrial invasion (p=0.001), clinical stage of the disease according to ultrasound - T1a vs. T1b (63.6 pmol/l vs. 110.6 pmol/l, p<0.001) were found. However, no correlation of HE4 with lymph node invasion (p=0.07) and tumor grade (p=0.212) was identified. CONCLUSION: HE4 levels correspond to clinical and FIGO stage of the disease. The sensitivity and specificity does not reach the transvaginal ultrasound results in preoperative assessment of the extent of the disease. Combination of HE4 with ultrasound does not improve the stratification of patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. Preoperative assessment of HE4 is useful providing no imaging method is available.

CA125 and HE4 levels in a Czech female population diagnosed with endometrial cancer in preoperative management.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the use of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) biomarkers in patients with endometrial cancer for preoperative management and to particularly focus on relationship between CA125 and HE4 and disease stage in predicting myometrial invasion or intrauterine tumor spread. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and 32 healthy controls were enrolled into the pilot study in the period between May 2012 and March 2013. Blood from all the females was collected and examined for CA125 and HE4. Based on standardized ultrasound examination, including gynecological examination, the clinical disease stage was determined. RESULTS: We found a significant difference (p<0.0001) for means of serum levels of HE4: females with endometrial cancer, 75.5 pmol/l, versus healthy females, 40.0 pmol/l. A non-significant statistical difference was found for mean serum CA125 levels (p=0.4442): females with endometrial cancer 19.0 IU/l, versus healthy females, 15 IU/l. A significant correlation with histopathological disease stage was found for both biomarkers (Spearman correlation). Sensitivity and specificity, and the related cut-off for HE4 suggest that HE4 would be a more appropriate biomarker for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant states. CONCLUSION: Based on our pilot study, we found that parallel examination of HE4 and CA125 may support endometrial ultrasound finding verification prior to biopsy. This study is ongoing and we expect that results on a larger population may enable HE4 measurement to be implemented in routine practice.