Long term survival outcomes of surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for perforated low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) are very rare, accounting for approximately 0.2%-0.5% of gastrointestinal tumors. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to explore the impact of different surgical procedures combined with HIPEC on the short-term outcomes and long-term survival of patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of 91 LAMN perforation patients from 9 teaching hospitals over a 10-year period, and divided them into HIPEC group and non-HIPEC group based on whether or not underwent HIPEC. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients with LAMN, 52 were in the HIPEC group and 39 in the non-HIPEC group. The Kaplan-Meier method predicted that 52 patients in the HIPEC group had 5- and 10-year overall survival rates of 82.7% and 76.9%, respectively, compared with predicted survival rates of 51.3% and 46.2% for the 39 patients in the non-HIPEC group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2 = 10.622, p = 0.001; χ2 = 10.995, p = 0.001). Compared to the 5-year and 10-year relapse-free survival rates of 75.0% and 65.4% in the HIPEC group, respectively, the 5-year and 10-year relapse-free survival rates of 48.7% and 46.2% in the non-HIPEC group were significant different between the two outcomes (χ2 = 8.063, p = 0.005; χ2 = 6.775, p = 0.009). The incidence of postoperative electrolyte disturbances and hypoalbuminemia was significantly higher in the HIPEC group than in the non-HIPEC group (p = 0.023; p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that surgery combined with HIPEC can significantly improve 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates and relapse-free survival rates of LAMN perforation patients, without affecting their short-term clinical outcomes.

Primary intracranial papillary meningioma: Analysis of factors of prognosis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Papillary meningioma is rare and displays an aggressive clinical behavior with poor prognosis. Therefore, we performed an extensive literature review to evaluate the adverse factors and treatment strategy of survival. METHOD: We performed Ovid, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science and Cochrane database queries for articles published between 1938 and 2019 with the search term "WHO grade III meningioma" or "papillary meningioma" and "central nervous system", "cerebral", or "intracranial". RESULTS: After a careful evaluation, a total of 19 studies were included. The entire cohort included the 67 patients, 34 (50.7%) were male and 33 (49.3%) were female with a mean age of 32.6 ± 2.1 years ranging from 4.5 months to 74 years. Gross total resection was achieved in 48 (71.6%) cases, and 29 (51.8%) patients received postoperative radiation. The mean follow-up period was 42.3 ± 4.4 months (range, 2-197 months). Thirty-six (53.7%) patients happened to recurrences, 11 (16.4%) patients happened to extracranial metastasis and 25 (37.3%) patients died. Univariate analysis revealed that the MIB > 5% trended toward a shorter time to recurrence (p = 0.084). Gross total resection was associated with favorable progression-free survival (p = 0.007) and overall survival (p = 0.001). Postoperative radiation was associated with favorable progression-free survival (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gross total resection and adjuvant radiation were recommended as the initial treatment option for patients with papillary meningioma.

Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The different advantages of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robotic gastrectomy (RG), two new minimally invasive surgical techniques for gastric cancer, remain controversial. PURPOSE: To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of LG and RG. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center comparative study of 1044 patients (LG = 750, RG = 294) was conducted. Patients undergoing LG and RG were matched (2:1 ratio) according to sex, age, BMI, extent of gastric resection, and pathologic stage. The primary outcomes were morbidity and mortality and perioperative recovery parameters; major types of complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: After matching, 798 patients (LG = 532, RG = 266) were included. Both the LG and RG groups showed similar overall complication rates (LG = 12.8% vs RG = 12.4%) and operative mortality (LG = 0.4% vs RG = 0.4%). Compared to those who underwent LG, patients undergoing RG had significantly longer operative times (236.92 ± 57.28 vs 217.77 ± 65.00 min, p < 0.001), higher total costs (US$16,241.42 vs US$12,497, p < 0.001), less operative blood loss (77.07 ± 64.37 vs 103.68 ± 86.92 ml, p < 0.001), higher numbers of retrieved lymph nodes (32.0 vs 29.9, p < 0.001), and higher rates of retrieving more than 16 lymph nodes (94.0 vs 85.5%; p < 0.001). No significant differences between groups were noted in terms of the rate of reoperation, time until a soft diet was consumed, or length of hospital stay. The major complication and readmission rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: RG and LG produced similar short-term clinical outcomes, indicating that RG is a safe and beneficial surgical procedure.