Health-related quality of life and functional status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis randomly assigned to receive etanercept or placebo.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional status and well-being of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were randomly assigned to receive placebo, etanercept 10 mg, or etanercept 25 mg during a 26-week, phase III, double-blind clinical trial. BACKGROUND: No single indicator of disease activity, severity, or therapeutic efficacy has been established for RA. During the past decade, health-related quality of life, a multidimensional way to assess physical, emotional, and social aspects of a disease or its treatment, has become an important outcome in RA studies and in assessments of RA drug therapies. METHODS: A total of 234 patients completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) (n = 48 patients), items assessing energy and mental health from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS), and a single-item rating scale assessing current health (feeling thermometer) at baseline and several times during 6 months. RESULTS: Significant improvements from baseline to last assessment were reported with etanercept versus placebo and in the HAQ Disability Index score (ie, the total HAQ score) and all 8 HAQ categories (P < 0.05), with the exception of grip. Significant improvements with etanercept in the MOS energy and mental health subscales, current health (from the feeling thermometer), and mental and physical function components of the SF-36 were reported (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving 10- or 25-mg doses of etanercept reported significantly better functional status and well-being than did patients receiving placebo.

Quality of life and cancer pain: satisfaction and side effects with transdermal fentanyl versus oral morphine.

PURPOSE: To compare pain-related treatment satisfaction, patient-perceived side effects, functioning, and well-being in patients with advanced cancer who were receiving either transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ) or sustained-release oral forms of morphine (MS Contin, Perdue Frederick Co, Norwalk, CT, or Oramorph SR, Roxanne Laboratories, Columbus, OH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 504 assessable cancer patients participated in this cross-sectional, quality-of-life study. Relevant elements of four validated scales were used--the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) questionnaire, and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS)--as well as original scales that were developed and validated for this study. RESULTS: The majority of patients in both treatment groups had late-stage (IV/D) cancer. Patients who received transdermal fentanyl were more satisfied overall with their pain medication than those who received sustained-release oral forms of morphine (P = .035). Fentanyl patients also experienced a significantly lower frequency (P < .002) and impact (P < .001) of pain medication side effects. These results occurred despite the fact that cancer patients who received fentanyl were significantly older (P < .001) and had significantly lower functioning and well-being scores (P = .001). Measures of pain intensity, sleep adequacy, and symptoms demonstrated no significant differences between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that patients are more satisfied with transdermal fentanyl compared with sustained-release oral forms of morphine. A lower frequency and reduced impact of side effects with transdermal fentanyl may be one reason cancer patients who receive fentanyl are more satisfied with their pain management.

Strategic planning for applied pharmacoeconomics programs.

Escalating costs are changing the infrastructure in which health care is provided. Managed care programs are financing an ever-increasing share; rationing has already become reality in at least one state; and the federal government is once again examining the concept of a national health care plan. The primary goal of each of these initiatives is to control cost: the increasing cost of providing drug therapy is a major target. Increasing demands for shrinking resources will demand demonstration of value for money spent. Pharmacoeconomics provides a mechanism to establish the value of drug therapy. Using the strategic planning process, the Division of Pharmacy at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and the Department of Pharmacy Services at Oregon Health Sciences University Hospital and Clinics have developed pharmacoeconomics programs to provide the focus for ensuring that every dollar spent on drug therapy and pharmaceutical services buys the best outcomes. These two case studies illustrate the processes for developing an applied pharmacoeconomics program and the activities such a program should embrace.