Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 131(5): 891-898, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630007

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine blood transfusion practices and develop a standardized bundle of interventions to address the high rate of perioperative red blood cell transfusion among patients with ovarian and endometrial cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Our primary aim was to determine whether an implemented bundled intervention was associated with a reduction in perioperative red blood cell transfusions among cases of laparotomy for cancer. Secondary aims included comparing perioperative demographic, surgical, complication, and cost data. Interventions included blood transfusion practice standardization using American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines, an intraoperative hemostasis checklist, standardized intraoperative fluid status communication, and evidence-based use of tranexamic acid. Prospective data from women undergoing laparotomy for ovarian or endometrial cancer from September 28, 2015, to May 31, 2016, defined the study cohort and were compared with historical controls (September 1, 2014, to September 25, 2015). Outcomes were compared in the full unadjusted cohorts and in propensity-matched cohorts. RESULTS: In the intervention and historical cohorts, respectively, 89 and 184 women underwent laparotomy for ovarian cancer (n=74 and 152) or advanced endometrial cancer (n=15 and 32). Tranexamic acid was administered in 54 (60.7%) patients. The perioperative transfusion rate was lower for the intervention group compared with historical controls (18.0% [16/89] vs 41.3% [76/184], P<.001), a 56.4% reduction. This improvement in the intervention group remained significant after propensity matching (16.2% [13/80] vs 36.2% [29/80], P=.004). The hospital readmission rate was also lower for the intervention group compared with historical controls (1.1% [1/89] vs 12.5% [23/184], P=.002); however, this improvement did not attain statistical significance after propensity matching (1.2% [1/80] vs 7.5% [6/80], P=.12). Cost analysis demonstrated that this intervention was cost-neutral during index hospitalization plus 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: Application of a standardized bundle of evidence-based interventions was associated with reduced blood use in our gynecologic oncology practice.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Laparotomía , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Transfusión Sanguínea/normas , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Laparotomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 149(1): 121-126, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29402500

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To increase genetic counseling referrals for patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: A practice-gap analysis was performed after measuring baseline genetic counseling referral rates to identify barriers to referral from the multidisciplinary single institution EOC care group. A Genetics Referral Toolkit consisting of a referral template, a genetic risk checklist, family history worksheet and provider and patient awareness was developed to address identified gaps with the goal of increasing referral rates. Clinical characteristics, referral placement, completion of genetic counseling/testing were abstracted for a historic cohort and intervention cohort. Data for the two cohorts were compared using chi-square, Fisher's exact test, or t-test. Association with referral was determined by univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Eighty one patients from July through December 2013 (historic cohort) and 62 patients from July through December 2015 (intervention cohort) were identified as having a new diagnosis of EOC. Among these women, genetic counseling referral rates increased from 48.1% (39/81) in 2013 to 74.2% (46/62) in 2015 (p=0.002) after implementation of the toolkit. In a subset of patients without a previous genetic counseling referral, 87.9% (29/33) completed counseling and 79.3% (23/29) pursued testing from the historic cohort. In the intervention cohort, 60% (24/40) were seen for counseling and 100% (24/24) had testing. CONCLUSION: Application of a quality improvement process to create a Genetics Referral Toolkit increased the genetic counseling referral rate in patients with a new diagnosis of EOC. The majority of patients who were referred completed genetics consultation and elected genetic testing.


Asunto(s)
Asesoramiento Genético/métodos , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA