Poor midterm clinical outcomes and a high percentage of unsatisfying results are reported after seizure-related shoulder injuries, especially after posterior proximal humerus fracture-dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Treating seizure-related shoulder injuries is challenging, and an evidence-based consensus to guide clinicians is lacking. The aim of this prospective single-center observational clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical results of a cohort of patients undergoing treatment of seizure-related shoulder injuries, to categorize them according to the lesion's characteristics, with special focus on patients with proximal humerus fracture-dislocations (PHFDs), and to define groups at risk of obtaining unsatisfactory results. We hypothesized that patients with a PHFD, considered the worst-case scenario among these injuries, would report worse clinical results in terms of the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (qDASH) as compared to the other patients. METHODS: Patients referred to a tertiary epilepsy center who have seizure-related shoulder injuries and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. A quality-of-life assessment instrument (EQ-5D-5L), a district-specific patient-reported outcome measure (qDASH), and a pain assessment tool (visual analog scale [VAS]) were used for the clinical outcome evaluation. Subjective satisfaction and fear of new shoulder injuries was also documented. Categorization and subgroup analysis according to the presence and features of selected specific lesions were performed. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were deemed eligible and 83 were available for follow-up (median age 38 years, 30% females), accounting for a total of 107 injured shoulders. After a median follow-up of 3.9 (1.6-8.2) years, overall moderate clinical results were reported. In addition, 34.1% of the patients reported a VAS score ≥35 mm, indicating moderate to severe pain, and 34.1% a qDASH score ≥40 points, indicating severe disability of an upper limb. These percentages rose to, respectively, 45.5% and 48.5% in the subgroup of patients with PHFDs and to 68.8% and 68.8% in patients experiencing posterior PHFD. Overall, 46.9% of the patients considered themselves unsatisfied with the treatment and 62.5% reported a persistent fear of a new shoulder injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with seizure-related shoulder injuries reported only moderate clinical results at their midterm follow-up. Older age, male sex, and absence or discontinuation of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment were identified as characterizing features of patients with posterior dislocation episodes. In patients with PHFD, a tendency to worse clinical results was observed, with posterior PHFD patients emerging as a definite subgroup at risk of reporting unsatisfying results after treatment.

[The third-generation modern cementing technique in hip and knee arthroplasty]. / Moderne Zementiertechnik der dritten Generation in der Knie- und Hüftendoprothetik.

BACKGROUND: Implant loosening is the most common reason for revision surgery. OBJECTIVES: Contribution of modern cementing technique to the long-term stability of an implant. METHODS: Evaluation of the available evidence on modern cementing technique. RESULTS: Modern cementing technique in hip arthroplasty is considered established and leads to better cementing results. In knee arthroplasty, there are also specific recommendations, including intensive cleaning of the bone bed, mixing of bone cement under vacuum and application of bone cement to the implant and the bone. CONCLUSIONS: The use of modern cementing technique in hip and knee arthroplasty facilitates cementing, increases safety, and minimizes the risk of mechanical loosening.

Temporary arthrodesis through static spacer implantation in two-stage treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the knee requires the removal of the implant and thorough debridement, with reimplantation in a second stage surgery. Intramedullary spacers can be helpful during the interval between explantation and reimplantation and provide a temporary arthrodesis which fixes the knee in extension preserving leg length and administers local antibiotic therapy. INDICATIONS: Periprosthetic joint infection of the knee with large bony defects and severe infection of the native joint with advanced destruction/infiltration of the cartilage and bone and/or ligament insufficiency. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Suspected antibiotic resistance of the microbiological pathogen to local antibiotic drugs, incompliant patient, and known allergy to bone cement or antibiotic. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: After implant removal, suitable metal rods are coated with antibiotic-loaded bone cement and inserted into the cleaned intramedullary canals of femur and tibia. Rods are joined at the joint line with a connector and joint space is filled with more bone cement to achieve temporary and very stable arthrodesis. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial weight-bearing and no flexion/extension while spacer is in place; second stage reimplantation as soon as infection is controlled. RESULTS: Complications related to the spacer were rare (5.3%). Reimplantation of an implant was possible in 95 of 113 patients (84%), of those, 23 (20%) received an arthrodesis. Of the 95 patients that were reimplanted, 14 showed signs of recurrent infection. Mean time to last follow-up was 15.6 months post reimplantation. Mean knee pain was 2.9/10; overall function was good; 6 patients had an extension lag; mean total range of motion was 88°.

Surgical technique and preliminary results of a moulded, mobile spacer for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: Mobile knee spacers can be utilized in the first stage of a two-stage exchange in periprosthetic joint infection or septic arthritis of the knee to prevent soft tissue contraction, enable local antibiotic elution, and improve patient mobility. Commercially made moulds enable the surgeon to prepare a reproducible spacer design and match the preparation of the arthroplasty, which will be carried out in a second step. INDICATIONS: Periprosthetic joint infection of the knee and severe cases of septic arthritis of the knee with advanced destruction/infiltration of the cartilage. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Antibiotic resistance of the microbiological pathogen to available antibiotic agents, incompliant patient, large osseous defect preventing proper fixation, known allergy to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or antibiotic, severe soft tissue damage with high ligament instability, especially deterioration of extensor mechanism and insufficient patella/quadricep tendon. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: After thorough debridement and removal of all foreign material, cutting blocks are used to shape femur and tibia to the implant design required. Using a silicone mould, PMMA with suitable antibiotics is moulded into the shape of the future implant. After polymerization, the implants are fixed onto the bone with additional PMMA without pressurize for the sake of easy removal. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial weight bearing with no restriction of flexion/extension while spacer is in place; second stage reimplantation as soon as infection is controlled. RESULTS: In all, 22 cases were treated, mostly with a PMMA spacer containing gentamicin and vancomycin. Pathogens were detected in 13 of 22 cases (59%). We observed two complications (9%). Twenty of 22 patients (86%) were reimplanted with a new arthroplasty; 16 of the 20 patients remained revision-free and infection-free at the last follow-up (average time to follow-up 13 months, range 1-46 months). Average range of motion in flexion and extension at follow-up was 98°.

Effects of an Integrated Geriatric-Orthopedic Co-management (InGerO) on the Treatment of Older Orthopedic Patients with Native and Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

PURPOSE: In view of our aging society, co-management with a geriatrician is becoming increasingly important. While such collaborations have been working successfully in trauma surgery for years, it is still unclear whether they are also helpful for non-trauma patients in orthopedics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of such a cooperation in orthopedic non-trauma patients with native and periprosthetic joint infections on the basis of five key areas. RESULTS: Analysis was carried out with 59 patients "with" and 63 "without" geriatric co-management. In the co-management group, delirium was detected significantly more often (p < 0.001), significantly lower pain intensities were measured at the time of discharge (p < 0.001), transfer ability had clearly improved more (p = 0.04), and renal function was more frequently noted (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found with respect to principal diagnoses, surgical procedures performed, complication rates, pressure ulcer and delirium incidence, operative revisions, or length of inpatient stay. CONCLUSION: Orthogeriatric co-management in orthopedic patients with native and periprosthetic joint infections and nontraumatic surgery appears to have positive impacts on recognition and treatment of delirium, pain management, transfer performance, and attention to renal function. Further studies should follow in order to conclusively assess the value of such co-management in orthopedic nontraumatic surgery patients.

Commercially manufactured spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection remains a common and serious complication after hip arthroplasty. To improve function and patient comfort after joint removal in two-stage revision, commercially manufactured spacers for the hip joint allow retention of the anatomical joint geometry thereby limiting soft tissue contraction and allow mobilization. INDICATIONS: Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip, septic arthritis with severe destruction of the hip cartilage and/or bone requiring arthroplasty. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Allergies to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or antibiotics, severe hip dysplasia with insufficient cranial support, incompliant patient, large osseous defect of the acetabulum, insufficient metaphyseal/diaphyseal support of the femoral bone, resistance of the microbiological pathogen to spacer-inert antibiotic medication, inability to perform primary wound closure requiring temporary open-wound therapy. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperative templating on radiograph; removal of joint prosthesis and thorough debridement with removal of all foreign material; trial spacer selection and insertion and trial reduction of the joint, fixing the spacer with PMMA to the proximal femur, final reduction, radiograph and stability test. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from patients treated between 2016 and 2021. In all, 20 patients were treated with preformed spacers and 16 with custom-made spacers. Pathogens were detected in 23 of the 36 cases (64%). Polymicrobial infections were present in 8 of 36 cases (22%). In patients who received preformed spacers, there were 6 cases of spacer-related complications (30%). Of the 36 patients (83%), 30 were reimplanted with a new implant; 3 patients died due to septic or other complications before reimplantation (8%). Average follow-up was 20.2 months after reimplantation. There were no major differences between the two groups of spacers. Patient comfort was not measured.

APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A-C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period. RESULTS: Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with k values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed k values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement. CONCLUSION: The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting.

Femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification.

INTRODUCTION: The complex field of femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty displays a lack of standardized, intuitive pre- and intraoperative assessment. To address this issue, the femoral defect classification (FDC) is introduced to offer a reliable, reproducible and an intuitive classification system with a clear therapeutic guideline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The FDC is based on the integrity of the main femoral segments which determine function and structural support. It focuses on the femoral neck, the metaphysis consisting of the greater and lesser trochanter, and the femoral diaphysis. The four main categories determine the location of the defect while subcategories a, b and c are being used to classify the extent of damage in each location. In total, 218 preoperative radiographs were retrospectively graded according to FDC and compared to intraoperatively encountered bone defects. To account for inter-rater and intra-rater agreement, 5 different observers evaluated 80 randomized cases at different points in time. RESULTS: A Cohens kappa of 0.832 ± 0.028 could be evaluated, accounting for excellent agreement between preoperative radiographs and intraoperative findings. To account for inter-rater reliability, 80 patients have been evaluated by 5 different observers. Testing for inter-rater reliability, a Fleiss Kappa of 0.688 could be evaluated falling into the good agreement range. When testing for intra-rater reliability, Cohens Kappa of each of the 5 raters has been analyzed and the mean was evaluated at 0.856 accounting for excellent agreement. CONCLUSION: The FDC is a reliable and reproducible classification system. It combines intuitive use and structured design and allows for consistent preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. A therapeutic algorithm has been created according to current literature and expert opinion. Due to the combination of the FDC with the recently introduced Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) a structured approach to the entire field of hip revision arthroplasty is now available.

Practicability of a Virtual Consultation to Evaluate the Shoulder Joint. / Durchführbarkeit einer digitalen Sprechstunde zur Untersuchung des Schultergelenkes.

OBJECTIVE: In the course of the corona pandemic, resource conservation and the protection of further infections have made it necessary to break new ground in the organisation of orthopaedic and trauma surgery consultations. One solution is consistent digitisation and the offer of video consultation hours. In this study, non-contact examination of patients with shoulder disorders is described and critically examined. METHODS: Thirty patients who presented with pathologies of the shoulder joint in a university outpatient clinic were subjected to a physical examination in a conventional and contactless manner. The data obtained on mobility, function and provocation test of both examinations were compared to draw conclusions about the virtual feasibility. RESULTS: 46% of the patients suffered from a traumatic shoulder lesion, and 54% showed degenerative lesions. The assessment of mobility showed a high correlation of 70 - 90% between the two examinations. Common tests to evaluate the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis and the long head of the biceps could be adequately performed in a contactless version by more than three quarters of the patients, but with low-to-moderate performance values. CONCLUSION: Contact-less examination is particularly disadvantageous when evaluating stability criteria. For the medical history and functional test, there were no significant differences between the classic consultation and contactless consultation. Although virtual consultation is a widespread and valuable addition in pandemic times, it cannot replace a safe assessment and indication by personal examination.

Epidemiology and specific features of shoulder injuries in patients affected by epileptic seizures.

PURPOSE: Epileptic seizures can cause multiple shoulder injuries, the most common of which are dislocations, recurrent instability, fractures, and isolated lesions of the rotator cuff. Currently, only limited literature exists which describes the frequency and types of lesions in cohorts of epileptic patients and the corresponding treatment outcome. This study aims to document the occurrence of shoulder lesions in patients affected by seizures and to provide detailed information on trauma dynamics, specific lesion characteristics and treatment complications. METHODS: All patients referring to a tertiary epilepsy center were screened for shoulder injuries and the clinical records of those sustaining them during a seizure were reviewed. Demographic information, lesions' characteristics and trauma dynamics were analysed, as wells as-when carried out-the type of surgical intervention and any postoperative complications. RESULTS: The average age at the time of injury of 106 included patients was 39.7 ± 17.5 years and a male predominance was recorded (65%). Bilateral injuries occurred in 29 patients, simultaneously in 17 cases. A younger age, bilateral shoulder injuries and shoulder dislocations were significantly associated with the occurrence of a shoulder injury solely by muscular activation (p = 0.0054, p = 0.011, p < 0.0001). The complication rate in 57 surgically treated patients with follow-up data was 38.7%, with recurring instability being the most frequently reported complication (62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Uncontrolled muscle activation during a seizure is a distinctive but not exclusive dynamic of injury in epileptic patients, accounting for more than the half of all shoulder lesions, especially in the younger. This can lead both to anterior and posterior dislocations or fracture-dislocations and is frequently cause of bilateral lesions and of instability recurrence after surgery. The high complication rates after surgical treatment in this selected subgroup of patients require that appropriate preventative measures are taken to increase the probability of treatment success. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cohort study, level III.

Video Based Assessment of Treatment Urgency in Outpatient Orthopaedic and Trauma Patients - a Pilot Trial. / Videobasierte Einschätzung der Behandlungsdringlichkeit - eine Pilotstudie für ambulante Patienten in der Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie.

INTRODUCTION: When consulting a specialist in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, personal assessment and manual clinical examination by the doctor on site are essential. Nevertheless, implementation of video consultation hours has been made legally easier in Germany. The present pilot study examines the possibility of video-based assessment of the urgency of treatment in outpatient orthopaedic and trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within an ex ante study design, 40 patients with an orthopaedic clinical picture for trauma surgery with elective, urgent or emergency indication were selected from consultation hours. A short questionnaire was filled in based on the information provided and a medical colleague simulated a movement sequence based on the patient information. After modification to the "red flags" and "yellow flags" established in spinal orthopaedics, nine short questions were recorded, which inquire about the urgency of a medical consultation. The video-based movement sequence is based on a 60 s long instruction video in which motor tests and movement sequences are demonstrated: Cervical spine movement in all levels, elevation of the upper extremity, test of the finger-floor distance when "bending forward over-bending", possibility of crouching from standing and getting up again, standing on heels and toes. RESULTS: In 91.1% (n = 328) of the cases, the diagnosis was associated with the same joint or the same pathological entity. In 37.5% (n = 135) of the cases an emergency indication was seen, in 10.8% (n = 39) of the cases an urgent indication and in 51.6% (n = 186) of the cases it was seen to offer an elective indication. 12.5% (n = 45) of the cases were evaluated as "false positives" with regard to an emergency or urgent presentation. This means that the test persons were classified as "emergency" or "urgent", although there was no preventable dangerous course or medical emergency. 18 cases (5%) were evaluated as "false negative". DISCUSSION: The screening questionnaire presented and the short video assessment are technically feasible and practicable method for the initial evaluation in video-based online medical consultation. In addition, the questionnaire presented in combination with the short video assessment was suitable as an instrument for assessing the urgency of the consultation and selecting preventable dangerous processes and acute emergencies. CONCLUSION: The questionnaire, in combination with the short video assessment, is a suitable method for the social distancing requirements during limited accessibility of the medical system. Nevertheless, a false negative rate of 5% is too high to implement the questionnaire presented into daily clinics without further optimisation.

Indication for spinal surgery: associated factors and regional differences in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Rising surgery rates have raised questions about the indications for spinal surgery. The study investigated patient-level and regional factors associated with spinal surgery for patients with spinal diseases. METHODS: We undertook a cohort study based on routine healthcare data from Germany of 18.4 million patients within 60.9 million episodes of two patient-years before a possible spinal surgery in the time period 2008 to 2016. Using a Poisson model, the effects of a broad range of patient-related (sociodemographic, morbidity, social status), disease- and healthcare-related (physicians' specialty, conservative treatments) and regional variables were analyzed. RESULTS: There was substantial regional heterogeneity in the occurrence of spinal surgery which decreased by only one quarter when controlling for the various determinants assessed. Previous musculoskeletal and mental health disorders as well as physical therapy were associated with a lower probability of surgery in the fully-adjusted model. Prescriptions for pain medication and consultations of specialists were associated with a higher probability of surgery. However, the specific severity of the vertebral diseases could not be taken into account in the analysis. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of patients with surgery did not receive a consultation with an outpatient specialist (29.5%), preoperative diagnostics (37.0%) or physical therapy (48.3%) before hospital admission. CONCLUSION: This large study on spinal diseases in Germany highlights important patterns in medical care of spinal diseases and their association with the probability of spinal surgery. However, only a relatively small proportion of the regional heterogeneity in spinal surgery could be explained by the extensive consideration of confounders, which suggests the relevance of other unmeasured factors like physicians' preferences.

Economic Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in 2020. / Wirtschaftliche Auswirkungen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie im Jahr 2020.

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic necessitated an adjustment to the care structure in all medical facilities in Germany. In this study we analysed the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic using the data from the annual balance sheet of a university department and maximum care provider for orthopaedics and trauma surgery. METHODS: Data analysis was performed on the clinic's performance parameters from 2019 and 2020. The analysis included 52943 outpatient and 7980 inpatient cases, together with the Case Mix Index (CMI), and the costs and revenues. RESULTS: As a result of the reduction in scheduled surgeries, the mean number of inpatients in March and April 2020 decreased by 10.4% (p = 0.004). Due to the focus on complex cases, the CMI increased by 29.5% (p = 0.007). The number of outpatient surgical procedures increased by 16.9% (n = 84). Rising costs of consumables due to the purchase of protective equipment were offset by a reduced need for orthopaedic implants. CONCLUSION: By reducing the number of elective inpatient surgical treatments, the focus was shifted to treating complex cases; this is reflected in the increased CMI. Due to internal compensation mechanisms, the clinic was able to conserve intensive care capacities while still achieving an increase in revenue.

[Patient optimization before hip revision arthroplasty: : How to handle comorbidities]. / Patientenoptimierung für einen Hüft-TEP-Wechsel : Umgang mit Komorbiditäten.

Preoperative optimization of the therapeutic regime of comorbidities can lead to an improvement of the postoperative outcome and has the potential to reduce the financial burden on the health care system in revision hip arthroplasty. Patient-related factors and an increasing incidence of comorbidities lead to a higher risk of implant failure and revision for all causes. Important and potentially modifiable risk factors like preoperative anemia, coagulopathy, infectious disease (dental status, urinary tract infections, colonization with staphylococcus), metabolic conditions (obesity, malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis), and smoking need to be addressed. To achieve an optimal preoperative condition a multidisciplinary approach should be applied.

[Use of custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) as part of a two-stage procedure in patients with severe periacetabular bone loss]. / "Custom-made acetabular components" (CMAC) beim zweizeitigen Wechsel und bei höhergradigen periazetabulären Knochendefekten.

OBJECTIVE: Implantation of custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) with load transmission onto the remaining bone stock and reconstruction of the "center of rotation" (COR) in cases of severe periacetabular bone defects. INDICATIONS: Severe periacetabular bone loss (Paprosky type IIIA/B) with or without pelvic discontinuity after septic or aseptic loosening with inadequate load capacity of the dorsal pillar and/or large supraacetabular defects. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Acute or local infections, lack of compliance, taking into account the risks and complications: missing or limited expected postoperative functional gain, multimorbid patients with potential inoperability during the first and/or second intervention. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Lateral transgluteal or posterolateral approach while protecting neurovascular and muscular structures. Preparation of the implant site based on preoperative planning with augmentation of bone defects as far as possible. Primarily stable anchoring with 2 angle-stable pole screws in the ilium, an optional pole screw in the pubic bone for determination of COR, and stabilization screws in the iliac wing (optionally angle-stable). Use of dual mobility cup according to the soft tissue tension and intraoperative stability. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: For the first 6 weeks postoperative partial weight-bearing (20 kg), followed by a gradual increase of the load (10 kg per week). RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2018, 47 patients with a Paprosky type III defect underwent implantation of a monoflanged CMAC. Main complication was a periprosthetic joint infection with subsequent need for implant removal in 9 of 10 cases. Harris Hip Score improved from 21.1 to 61.5 points. X­ray imaging displayed an angle of inclination of 42.3 ± 5.3°, an anteversion of 16.8 ± 6.2°, a ∆ H of 0.5 ± 0.2 mm and a ∆ V of 17.7 ± 1.1 mm according to Roessler et al.

The Impact of Lead Aprons on Posture of Orthopaedic Surgeons. / Der Einfluss von Röntgenschürzen auf die Körperhaltung von Orthopäden und Unfallchirurgen.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons working in orthopedics and trauma surgery are frequently exposed to repetitive actions and non-ergonomic positions in their operative activities with the regular use of lead aprons. Musculoskeletal complaints of the neck and back among surgeons are reported in the literature as up to 80%. In this study, the effects of lead aprons on the posture of surgeons are examined using videorasterstereography, foot pressure measurement and questionnaires. METHODOLOGY: All subjects (n = 31) were examined before and after exposure to wearing lead aprons during surgery using videorasterstereography and pedography. In addition, a survey with a separately created questionnaire and the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) was carried out. RESULTS: An average duration of lead apron use of 102.6 min showed an increase in forefoot load (p = 0.002) especially in the elderly subjects and thoracic kyphosis (p < 0.001) especially in the younger doctors with a significant lateral deviation (p = 0.006). In addition, the lateral deviation was shown to correlate with an increasing body size or a shorter period of employment (p = 0.008; r = 0.51/p = 0.026; r = - 0.44). Significantly fewer surgeons experienced back complaints on working days without lead apron use in the operating room compared to days in the OR (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The impact of wearing front covered lead aprons during operations in the field of orthopaedics and trauma surgery leads to more frequent back complaints, even among young and healthy doctors. Under an average duration of surgery of 102 min a temporary postural deviation occurs that can be demonstrated by means of videorasterstereography and foot pressure measurement. The subjects showed a shifted weight distribution on the forefoot, a gain in thoracic kyphosis and an increase in lateral deviation, which also correlated with an increasing height and shorter length of employment.

Clinical and patient reported outcome in total ankle replacement compared to ankle fusion in end-stage haemophilic arthropathy.

BACKGROUND: Ankle arthropathy is a frequent complication of haemophilia, reducing the patients' quality of life. Despite intensive conservative therapy, end-stage arthropathy requires surgical treatment, either by ankle fusion (AF) or total ankle replacement (TAR). METHODS: Eleven consecutive AFs were performed in nine patients and 11 TARs were implemented in 10 patients. Outcomes were assessed clinically by AOFAS score and radiologically by the Pettersson and Gilbert scores. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in these groups were 35.7 years and 49.4 years, respectively. Of the 11 ankles that underwent fusion, 10 showed bony consolidation not later than 12 weeks after surgery, whereas one still showed non-union after 6 months. VAS pain scores decreased significantly in both groups. Mean AOFAS scores also improved significantly, from 28.1 before to 80.3 after AF and from 21.5 before to 68.0 after ankle replacement. No perioperative complications were observed in either group. Late deep infection was observed in two patients that underwent TAR, which required removal of the implant. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that both AF and TAR result in significantly reduced pain in patients with haemophilia with end-stage haemophilic arthropathy. While TAR is associated with a higher risk of deep infection and minimal persistent pain, it preserves the pre-operative range of motion. AF on the other hand is associated with the risk of non-union and a longer post-operative recovery period but results in greater pain reduction.

[Quality criteria in arthroplasty]. / Qualitätskriterien in der Endoprothetik.

The discipline of orthopedics and trauma surgery strives for constant improvement of the quality of results in arthroplasty; however, in order to enable targeted alterations to the establish standard operating procedures, dedicated documentation of the current quality of results is necessary. This can be achieved by so-called external quality assurance, evaluation of routine data of healthcare providers, analysis of clinical studies and the consultation of registry data. To achieve further improvement of the quality of results, legislature has been passed setting requirements for minimum quantities and by the specialist society (German Society for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, DGOOC) the adherence to certain process and structural guidelines within the framework of the certification system EndoCert®. A valid score for risk adjustment for assessment of the level of difficulty of orthopedic surgical interventions is so far lacking. As a future direction, the application of risk stratification concerning patient-specific anatomy should be developed. Through the combination of dedicated certification systems, the recording and evaluation of external inpatient quality assurance data, further quality assurance through routinely collected data and the development of adequate minimum quantity regulations, sustainable improvement of the quality of results can be achieved.

Examining the Hand in the Video Consultation. / Die Untersuchung der Hand in der Videosprechstunde.

BACKGROUND: Video consultations could support patient care in hand surgery during social distancing in the COVID-19 era. According to the literature, images of hand and fingers can support telediagnosis in hand emergencies. We present this feasibility study on online video consultation in hand surgery. METHODS: A structured examination was designed to query the medical history and examine motor skills, sensitivity, strength and function tests of the hand. Thirty examinations on both hands were carried out by online video consultation, then in direct contact and compared with each other. RESULTS: With 4560 evaluated range of movement of the hand and finger joints, there was a high correlation between the measurement methods of R = 0.995 (p < 0.0001, confidence interval 0.9946 - 0.9954). In the video-based examination, 84.6% of the measured values showed a deviation of less than 5° compared to the direct examination, 92.8% less than 10° deviation. Good accordance was also found in the patient's medical history. An estimating examination of sensitivity, function and strength during video examination is feasible with simple auxiliary aids. Deficits are evident in the detection of scars, in function tests and the absence of haptic findings. CONCLUSION: Online video consultation allows hand examination with sufficient documentation of hand and finger movements (range of motion) and proper evaluation of symptoms. It cannot replace direct examination but complement patient care in hand surgery even beyond the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Evaluation of the Feasibility of a Telemedical Examination of the Hip and Pelvis - Early Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. / Evaluation der Durchführbarkeit einer telemedizinischen Untersuchung des Hüftgelenks und des Beckens ­ frühe Lehren aus der COVID-19-Pandemie.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, the German Health Ministry has issued restrictions applying to the field of orthopaedics and trauma surgery. Besides postponement of elective surgeries, outpatient consultations have been drastically reduced. Parallel to these developments, an increase in telemedical consultations has reflected efforts to provide sufficient patient care. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a clinical examination of the hip joint and pelvis by way of a telemedical consultation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients of a German university clinic were recruited and assessed in both telemedical and conventional examinations. Agreement between the two examinations was then assessed, and connections between the observed agreement and patient-specific factors such as age, BMI and ASA classification were investigated. RESULTS: The inspections agreed closely with a mean Cohen's kappa of 0.76 ± 0.37. Palpation showed adequate agreement with a mean Cohen's kappa of 0.38 ± 0.19. Function showed good agreement with a mean Cohen's kappa of 0.61 ± 0.26 and range of motion showed adequate agreement with a mean Cohen's kappa of 0.36 ± 0.19. A significant positive correlation was observed between the number of deviations in the different examinations and age (p = 0.05), and a significant positive correlation was shown between the number of non-feasible examinations and age (p < 0.01), BMI (p < 0.01) and ASA classification score (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Inspection and function can be reliably evaluated, whereas the significance of palpation, provocation and measurement of range of motion is limited. The small sample size puts limitations on the significance of a statistically relevant correlation between patient-specific factors such as age, BMI and ASA classification score and valid and successful implementation of a telemedical examination. The authors recommend targeted patient selection. If, however, patients are being evaluated who are very old (> 75 years), obese (BMI > 30) or with multiple comorbidities (ASA 3 and above), caution is advised. Large, prospective studies are needed in the future to fully validate telemedical consultations in the fields of orthopaedics and trauma surgery. CONCLUSION: A telemedical examination of the hip joint and pelvis can be performed with certain limitations. Patient-specific factors such as age, BMI, and extent of comorbidities appear to have a relevant impact on validity and execution of the examination. Patients with multiple comorbidities (ASA 3 and above), advanced age (> 75 years) or obesity (BMI > 30) should, whenever possible, be examined in a conventional outpatient setting.