PD-L1 expression as a potential predictor of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy and survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials.

Background: The predictive value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the optimal threshold of PD-L1 expression in predicting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) NPC. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed by retrieving relevant literature from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Data on the pooled risk ratio (RR), mean overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) with 95% confidence interval, and 1%, 10%, and 25% PD-L1 expression cutoff points were obtained to examine the role of PD-L1 as a biomarker in R/M NPC patients receiving immunotherapy. Results: In total, 1,312 patients from 14 studies were included. An improvement in PFS was observed in both patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.92, P = 0.005) and those with PD-L1 < 1% (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.35-1.32, P = 0.26) who received first-line treatment with immunotherapy, with no significant difference between these subgroups. The pooled ORR was significantly higher in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (ORR = 0.37) than in those with PD-L1 < 1% (ORR = 0.22) (P < 0.01) undergoing subsequent-line treatment. However, when we used the PD-L1 cutoff values of 10% and 25%, there was no significant difference between the positive (PD-L1 expression ≥ the cutoff value) and negative (PD-L1 expression < the cutoff value) subgroups. PD-L1 ≥ 1% also tended to be associated with better PFS and OS. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggested that first-line immunotherapy could significantly improve PFS in R/M NPC patients, regardless of the PD-L1 expression levels. Positive PD-L1 expression (≥ 1%) might be a potential predictive biomarker for a better overall response to immunotherapy in R/M NPC patients in subsequent-line setting. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024495841 PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024495841.

Dosimetric parameters predict radiation-induced temporal lobe necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review examines the role of dosimetric parameters in predicting temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). TLN is a serious late complication that can adversely affect the quality of life of NPC patients. Understanding the relationship between dosimetric parameters and TLN can guide treatment planning and minimize radiation-related complications. A comprehensive search identified relevant studies published up to July 2023. Studies reporting on dosimetric parameters and TLN in NPC patients undergoing 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT were included. TLN incidence, follow-up duration, and correlation with dosimetric parameters of the temporal lobe were analyzed. The review included 30 studies with median follow-up durations ranging from 28 to 110 months. The crude incidence of TLN varied from 2.3 % to 47.3 % and the average crude incidence of TLN is approximately 14 %. Dmax and D1cc emerged as potential predictors of TLN in 3D-CRT and IMRT-treated NPC patients. Threshold values of >72 Gy for Dmax and >62 Gy for D1cc were associated with increased TLN risk. However, other factors should also be considered, including host characteristics, tumor-specific features and therapeutic factors. In conclusion, this systematic review highlights the significance of dosimetric parameters, particularly Dmax and D1cc, in predicting TLN risk in NPC patients undergoing 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT. The findings provide valuable insights that can help in developing optimal treatment planning strategies and contribute to the development of clinical guidelines in this field.

The impact of the multi-disciplinary molecular tumour board and integrative next generation sequencing on clinical outcomes in advanced solid tumours.

Background: The integration of next-generation sequencing (NGS) comprehensive gene profiling (CGP) into clinical practice is playing an increasingly important role in oncology. Therefore, the HKU-HKSH Multi-disciplinary Molecular Tumour Board (MTB) was established to advance precision oncology in Hong Kong. A multicenter retrospective study investigated the feasibility of the HKU-HKSH MTB in determining genome-guided therapy for treatment-refractory solid cancers in Hong Kong. Methods: Patients who were presented at the HKU-HKSH MTB between August 2018 and June 2022 were included in this study. The primary study endpoints were the proportion of patients who receive MTB-guided therapy based on genomic analysis and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with actionable genomic alterations, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). The Kaplan-Meier method was used in the survival analyses, and hazard ratios were calculated using univariate Cox regression. Findings: 122 patients were reviewed at the HKU-HKSH MTB, and 63% (n = 77) adopted treatment per the MTB recommendations. These patients achieved a significantly longer median OS than those who did not receive MTB-guided therapy (12.7 months vs. 5.2 months, P = 0.0073). Their ORR and DCR were 29% and 65%, respectively. Interpretation: Our study demonstrated that among patients with heavily pre-treated advanced solid cancers, MTB-guided treatment could positively impact survival outcomes, thus illustrating the applicability of NGS CGPs in real-world clinical practice. Funding: The study was supported by the Li Shu Pui Medical Foundation. Dr Aya El Helali was supported by the Li Shu Pui Medical Foundation Fellowship grant from the Li Shu Pui Medical Foundation. Funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report.

A meta-analysis with systematic review: Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Background: While the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is increasingly recognized in advanced gastric cancer (aGC), overall survival (OS) has not been consistently improved across the different randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the efficacy and safety of ICI and explore potential predictive tumor tissue biomarkers in aGC. Methods: A random-effect pairwise meta-analysis was used to evaluate the primary outcome of OS. Sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the effects of ICIs on PD-L1 status, TMB, MSI-H, and the Asian patient population. We extracted the OS Kaplan-Meier curves from the included trials to compare the effect of PD-L1 status on response to ICIs using DigitizeIt 2.5 and Guyot's algorithm. Results: A pairwise meta-analysis of seven RCTs included in this study showed that ICIs were more effective than the comparator in improving OS (pooled HR: 0.84). We demonstrated that PD-1 ICIs were additive when combined with the comparator arm (pooled HR: 0.79). A sensitivity analysis showed that PD-1 ICIs were associated with better OS outcomes in the Asian patient population as monotherapy (pooled HR: 0.66) or in combination with chemotherapy (pooled HR: 0.83). We demonstrated that tumors with PD-L1 ≥1 (P = 0.02) and PD-L1 ≥10 (P = 0.006) derived OS benefit from ICI monotherapy. Equally, MSI-H (P <0.00001) and TMB-high (P <0.0001) tumors derived favorable survival benefits from ICIs. Conclusions and relevance: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that ICIs result in improved OS outcomes in aGC. The benefits varied with different ethnicities, class of ICI, PD-L1 expression, MSI status, and TMB. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42019137829).

Comparing diagnostic performance of Cantonese-Chinese version of Rome IV criteria and a short Reference Standard for functional dyspepsia in China.

INTRODUCTION: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is diagnosed based on self-reported symptoms and negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings. The Rome criteria were not adopted as a diagnostic instrument in clinical guidelines due to their complexity. Different guidelines used relatively simple symptom assessment schemes with contents that vary significantly. A previously evaluated short Reference Standard may serve as a more standardised tool for guidelines. We evaluated its diagnostic accuracy against the Rome IV criteria in a cross-sectional study in Hong Kong. METHODS: A total of 220 dyspeptic patients sampled consecutively from a tertiary hospital and the community completed the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire, which was translated into Cantonese-Chinese, and the Reference Standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. RESULTS: Among the participants, 160 (72.7%) fulfilled the Reference Standard with negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopic results. The Reference Standard identified patients with Rome IV-defined FD with 91.1% (95% CI 82.6%-96.4%) sensitivity and 37.6% (95% CI 29.6%-46.1%) specificity. The positive and negative LRs were 1.46 (95% CI 1.26-1.69) and 0.24 (95% CI 0.11-0.49), respectively. The AUC value was 0.64 (95% CI 0.59-0.69). CONCLUSIONS: The Reference Standard can rule out patients without Rome IV-defined FD. It may be used as an initial screening tool for FD in settings where the use of the Rome IV criteria is impractical. It may also provide a uniform definition and diagnostic rule for future updates of clinical guidelines.

Particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background/purpose: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to better understand the benefits of particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treatment. The survival outcomes and toxicity of primary and recurrent NPC patients treated with proton or carbon ion beam therapy were investigated. Method: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched between 1 January 2007 to 3 November 2021. The inclusion and exclusion criteria included studies with either primary or recurrent NPC patients, sample size of ≥10 patients, and proton or carbon ion beam therapy as interventions. Twenty-six eligible studies with a total of 1502 patients were included. We used a random-effect meta-analysis to examine the impact of particle beam therapy on primary NPC patients and qualitatively described the results among recurrent patients. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and toxicity. Results: The pooled OS at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year and 5-year for primary NPC patients who received particle beam therapy were 96 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 92 %-98 %), 93 % (95 % CI = 83 %-97 %), 90 % (95 % CI = 73 %-97 %) and 73 % (95 % CI = 52 %-87 %) respectively. The pooled 1-year and 2-year PFS, and LC for these patients were above 90 %. For locally recurrent NPC patients, the 1-year OS rate ranged from 65 % to 92 %, while the 1-year LC rate ranged from 80 % to 88 %. Both proton and carbon ion beam therapy were generally safe among primary and recurrent patients, with ≥G3 late toxicity rates of 20 % or less. Approximately a 5 % mortality rate was reported among recurrent patients. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated particle beam therapy has great potential in treating NPC, yielding excellent survival outcomes with low toxicity. However, further investigations are needed to assess the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this newer form of radiotherapy.

Epstein-Barr virus directed screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in individuals with positive family history: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence to support Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-directed population nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) screening has been growing. Familial aggregation is a well-recognized phenomenon in endemic regions. This systematic review summarizes the role of EBV-directed screening in individuals with a positive family history (FH+) of NPC. METHODS: We searched four electronic databases from their inception to October 2021. We included studies on individuals with FH+ of NPC who had undergone EBV-directed investigations, with no restriction in the testing methods or analytic techniques. The primary and secondary outcomes were EBV positivity rates and NPC incidence rates, respectively. Meta-analyses were performed using the random-effect model. RESULTS: Ten cross-sectional studies (n = 7436) and three cohort studies (n = 4306) were included. The pooled relative risk (RR) of EBV positivity between individuals with and without FH+ of NPC were 2.79 (95 % CI 1.37-5.68, p = 0.005) for viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgA, 3.09 (95 % CI 0.65-14.83, p = 0.16) for Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA1) IgA, and 1.76 (95 % CI 1.04-2.96, p = 0.03) for combined EBNA1/VCA IgA. In the three cohort studies, the NPC incidence rates ranged from 90.2 to 266 per 100 000 person-years with high proportions of early-stage diseases. FH+ individuals who were EBV-positive had a 2.5 to 30.7-fold risk of NPC development compared to their EBV-negative counterparts. CONCLUSION: Family members of NPC patients had significantly higher EBV positivity rates than the general population. FH+ individuals who are EBV-positive had high risks of developing NPC. Familial screening using EBV serology may facilitate early NPC detection in endemic areas.

A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis: the role of anti-angiogenic agents in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

The efficacy of anti-angiogenic agents (AAAs) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to synthesize evidence of their comparative effectiveness for improving overall survival (OS) among EOC patients. We searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to February 2021. We performed an NMA with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%-confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate comparative effectiveness among different AAAs in chemotherapy-naïve and recurrent EOC. P-score was used to provide an effectiveness hierarchy ranking. Sensitivity NMA was carried out by focusing on studies that reported high-risk chemotherapy-naïve, platinum-resistant, and platinum-sensitive EOC. The primary outcome was OS. We identified 23 RCTs that assessed the effectiveness of AAAs. In recurrent EOC, concurrent use of trebananib (10 mg/kg) with chemotherapy was likely to be the best option (P-score: 0.88, HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.94; 2.94). The NMA indicated that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy followed by maintenance bevacizumab (P-score: 0.99) and pazopanib combined with chemotherapy (P-score: 0.79) both had the highest probability of being the best intervention for improving OS in high-risk chemotherapy-naïve and platinum-resistant EOC, respectively. AAAs may not play a significant clinical role in non-high-risk chemotherapy-naïve and platinum-sensitive EOC.

Prioritizing Chinese medicine clinical research questions in cancer palliative care from patient and caregiver perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Chinese medicine (CM) modalities, including acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), are popular palliative interventions among patients with cancer, but further clinical research is required to assess their effectiveness and safety. OBJECTIVE: To prioritize top ten important CM clinical research questions from patients with cancer, cancer survivors and caregivers' perspectives via a face-to-face prioritization workshop in Hong Kong. METHODS: A list of 25 CM clinical research questions for cancer palliative care, which were identified from existing systematic reviews (SRs) and overview of SRs, was presented to 17 participants (patients with cancer [n = 5], cancer survivors [n = 6] and caregivers [n = 6]). The participants were then invited to establish consensus on prioritizing top ten research questions. RESULTS: Among the top ten priorities, five (50%) focused on acupuncture and related therapies, while five (50%) were on CHM. The three most important research priorities were (i) manual acupuncture plus opioids for relieving pain; (ii) CHM for improving quality of life among patients receiving chemotherapy; and (iii) concurrent use of CHM plus loperamide for reducing stomatitis. CONCLUSION: The top ten participant-endorsed CM clinical research priorities for cancer palliative care can guide local researchers on future direction. They can also inform local research funders on patient-centred allocation of limited funding. Under limited research funding, the most important co-prioritized research question from professional and patient perspectives may be addressed first. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients with cancer, cancer survivors and caregivers participated in conduct of the study to prioritize CM clinical research questions.

Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework.

Objectives: Existing evidence supports the use of certain Chinese medicine (CM) interventions for symptom management among palliative cancer patients. However, evidence-based service recommendations tailored to the local context are needed for CM planning and implementation. In response, we aimed to establish consensus on CM clinical service recommendations for cancer palliative care among Hong Kong experts. Methods: Seven CM interventions showing statistically significant favorable results in existing systematic reviews (SRs) and overviews of SRs were subjected to a GRADE-ADOLOPMENT-based 2-round Delphi survey. Twelve Hong Kong experts in cancer palliative care, including conventionally trained physicians, CM practitioners, and nurses (n = 4 from each category), were invited to participate. Use of the Evidence to Decision framework within the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach enabled experts to consider aspects of problem priority, benefits, harms, equity, acceptability, and feasibility when making CM recommendations in cancer palliative care. Results: Three evidence-based CM interventions reached positive consensus as service recommendations, namely: (1) acupuncture for reducing fatigue among palliative cancer patients; (2) acupressure for reducing fatigue among palliative cancer patients; and (3) moxibustion for reducing nausea and vomiting among patients receiving chemotherapy. Median rating of recommendation ranged from 2.5 to 3.0 (interquartile range = 0.00-1.00) on a 4-point Likert-type scale, and the percentage agreement ranged from 83.4% to 91.7%. Conclusions: The GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach facilitates a consensus-based process of reaching 3 evidence-based CM recommendations for cancer palliative care. Future studies may develop tailored strategies to implement these recommendations in the Hong Kong health system.

Prevalence and predictors of mind-body medicine use among women diagnosed with gynecological cancer: Findings from the 2017 US National Health Interview Survey.

BACKGROUND: Gynecological cancer is a major health burden globally. In the US, it is common for cancer patients to utilize different types of complementary medicine. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of mind-body medicine use among US women diagnosed with gynecological cancer. METHODS: We used data from the 2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to investigate prevalence and predictors of mind-body medicine utilization in the past 12 months among gynecological cancer patients in a representative sample of the US population (N = 26,742). We descriptively analyzed the 12-month prevalence of any mind-body medicine use, separately for women with a prior diagnosis of gynecological cancer and those without. Using and b multiple logistic regression analyses, we identified predictors of mind-body medicine use. RESULTS: A weighted total of 2,526,369 women (2.0%) reported having received a diagnosis of gynecological cancer. More women diagnosed with gynecological cancer (weighted n = 964,098; 38.2%) than those not diagnosed with gynecological cancer (weighted mean = 36,102,852; 28.8%) had used mind-body medicine in the past 12 months. A higher prevalence of mind-body medicine use was associated with being non-Hispanic White, living in Western US and having received higher education. Spiritual meditation was found to be the most frequently used mind-body medicine modality, followed by yoga and progressive relaxation. CONCLUSIONS: While mind-body medicine is popular among US gynecological cancer patients, clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness of different mind-body medicine modalities is yet to be established. Randomized controlled trials should be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of popular modalities like spiritual meditation or yoga to inform clinical decision and patient choice.

Prioritizing Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Questions in Cancer Palliative Care: International Delphi Survey.

CONTEXT: Chinese medicine modalities, including acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), have been used as palliative interventions among cancer patients. More research should be conducted to confirm their effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to prioritize Chinese medicine clinical research questions for cancer palliative care. METHODS: Twelve international experts, including physicians, Chinese medicine practitioners, nurses, and clinical research methodologists (n = 3 from each category), from Asia, North America, Australia, and Europe participated in a two-round Delphi survey for prioritizing 29 research questions identified from existing systematic reviews. The experts were asked to 1) rate clinical importance of answering the questions on a nine-point Likert scale; 2) provide qualitative comments on their ratings; and 3) suggest outcome measurement approaches. RESULTS: Eight research priorities reached positive consensus after the two-round Delphi survey. Six of the priorities focused on acupuncture and related therapies, of which median ratings on importance ranged from 7.0 to 8.0 (interquartile range: 1.00 to 2.50), and the percentage agreement ranged from 75.0% to 91.7%. The remaining two priorities related to CHM, with median ratings ranged from 7.0 to 8.0 (interquartile range: 1.00 to 1.50) and percentage agreement ranged from 75.0% to 83.3%. Neither positive nor negative consensus was established among the remaining 21 questions. CONCLUSION: The findings will inform rational allocation of scarce research funding for evaluating the effectiveness of Chinese medicine for cancer palliative care, especially on acupuncture and related therapies. Further research on herb safety and herb-drug interaction should be performed before conducting international trials on CHM.