Surgical complications after targeted muscle reinnervation at a safety-net hospital.

BACKGROUND Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) can reduce rates of neuroma formation and phantom limb pain (PLP) after lower extremity (LE) amputation. However, these techniques have not been examined for patients at safety-net hospitals. The purpose of this study is to examine surgical complication rates after TMR and/or RPNI at a safety-net hospital. METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients >18 years who had prior above- (AKA) or below-knee (BKA) guillotine amputation and underwent stump formalization with TMR and/or RPNI from 2020 to 2022. Demographics, medical history, operative and postoperative characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was any surgical complication, defined as infection, dehiscence, hematoma, neuroma, or reoperation. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify variables associated with surgical complications and PLP. RESULTS Thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 52 years, and 75% were male. BKA was the most common indication for formalization (93.8%). Most patients (56.3%) had formalization with TMR and RPNI, 34.4% patients had TMR only, and 9.4% had RPNI alone. The incidence of postoperative complications was 46.9%, with infection being the most common (31.3%). There was no significant difference in demographics, medical history, or operative characteristics between patients who did and did not have surgical complications. However, there was a trend toward higher rates of PLP in patients who had a postoperative wound infection (odds ratio 6.2, 95% CI 0.70-84.6, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION Overall complication rates after LE formalization with TMR and/or RPNI at our safety-net hospital were similar to what has been reported in the literature. Given the benefits of these surgical techniques, including reduced chronic pain and decreased healthcare cost, we believe that these techniques should be widely adopted at other safety-net hospitals.

The Hidden Risks of Perioperative Transfusions in Traumatic Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions have been associated with surgical complications; however, these studies are not specific to lower extremity (LE) reconstruction. We evaluated the effect of perioperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions on LE free flap outcomes in trauma patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing LE free flap reconstruction following acute injuries from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The perioperative period for transfusions was defined as ± 3 days from the procedure. Parameters included demographics, perioperative characteristics, and outcomes. Major complications were complications requiring reoperation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations. RESULTS: Of the 205 patients, 48% received PRBCs perioperatively. There was a trend toward higher major complications rate in the transfusion group (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.09). Wound size, injury severity score (ISS), and intraoperative estimated blood loss were greater in the transfusion group (p < 0.01). Preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were lower in the transfusion group (p < 0.001). Units of PRBCs transfused were independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.70, p = 0.015) and length of hospital stay (LOS; OR = 1.05, CI: 1.02-1.08, p = 0.002). Infection, wound size, ISS, and preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were independently associated with increased LOS (p < 0.05) but not with major complications. CONCLUSION: The number of units of PRBCs given perioperatively was the only variable independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis and was one of many variables associated with increased LOS. These findings suggest the usage of restrictive transfusion protocols in trauma patients requiring LE reconstruction.

Use of Questionnaire-Based Research in Hand Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Questionnaire-based research is ubiquitous, and careful survey design is paramount to obtaining meaningful results. This study characterizes the use of questionnaire-based studies in the current hand surgery literature. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of questionnaire-based studies published between 2010 and 2020 in 4 major American journals. We included studies in which questionnaire results represented a primary outcome. Validation status of the survey instruments was assessed, and topics of study were categorized. Nonvalidated instruments were assessed for reporting of parameters to limit bias. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-four studies were identified, including 186 (52.5%) using validated instruments, 98 (27.7%) using nonvalidated instruments, 64 (18.1%) using a combination, and 6 (1.7%) that sought to validate an instrument. Of the studies that used validated instruments, 84.9% focused on patient-reported outcomes and 15.1% focused on other patient-centered topics. In contrast, of studies that used nonvalidated instruments, 44.9% focused on physician practice, 30.6% were patient centered, and 13.3% focused on education. Among nonvalidated questionnaires, 74.5% did not report predistribution testing, 49.0% did not publish full survey questions, and 33.3% did not report response rates. CONCLUSIONS: Survey research is common in the hand surgery literature. Forty-six percent of examined studies included at least some nonvalidated elements. Techniques to limit bias in the design and reporting of studies based on nonvalidated surveys were not uniformly disclosed. Identified areas for improvement include (1) pilot testing to assess for question clarity; (2) publication of full texts to improve transparency; and (3) better reporting on sample selection, respondents, and nonrespondents.

An Alternative Dermal Template for Reconstruction of Complex Upper Extremity Wounds.

The management of upper extremity soft-tissue defects with full-thickness skin loss and denuded tendon and/or bone traditionally requires vascularized tissue reconstruction. Herein, we present patient outcomes utilizing Novosorb Bio-degradable Temporizing Matrix (PolyNovo, Wilmington, Del.), a novel bilaminar dermal regenerative template, followed by skin grafting, for reconstruction of complex upper extremity injuries with exposed tendon and/or bone. We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated at our Level I trauma center with upper extremity trauma and exposed tendon and/or bone who had application of Novosorb Bio-degradable Temporizing Matrix over a 1-year period. At the time of surgery, all nonviable tissue was debrided, and the product was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. If required, split thickness skin grafting was performed once neodermis appeared perfused, or after the sealing layer delaminated spontaneously. Six patients (four men, two women) with an average age of 49.8 (35-60) years were included in the study. Average defect size measured 97 cm2 (10-440). Average time to complete healing was 45 days (27-57). Three patients reepithelialized spontaneously and did not require grafting; average defect size in these patients was 26 cm2 (10-42). There were no infections and no loss of the dermal matrix or skin graft, when performed. All patients healed without complication after grafting and did not require further surgical treatment. Therefore, we contend that Novosorb BTM is a dermal regenerative template that shows potential as an alternative option to flap reconstruction in select patients after upper extremity trauma and soft-tissue defects with exposed tendon and/or bone. Further studies will be required to refine indications and evaluate outcomes.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Partial Hand Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation for the treatment of symptomatic neuromas after upper limb amputation has been described for shoulder disarticulation and for transhumeral and transradial amputations. Early clinical outcomes are promising and demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in phantom limb pain and a decrease in residual limb pain. METHODS: We performed a cadaver dissection of the motor branches arising from the median and ulnar nerves to assess whether this technique could be applied to symptomatic neuromas after partial hand and finger amputations. RESULTS: After identification of all branches under 4.5x loupe magnification, we performed simulated transfers of digital nerves to lumbrical motor branches, common digital nerves to lumbrical motor branches or the recurrent motor branch, and the common sensory portion of the ulnar nerve to a hypothenar motor branch. CONCLUSIONS: The proximity of all sensory nerves to motor branches and the numerous redundant motor nerve targets available support our hypothesis that targeted muscle reinnervation is possible after partial hand or finger amputation. Further studies will be required to refine clinical indications and evaluate outcomes.

The Anterolateral Thigh-Medial Femoral Condyle Chimeric Flow-through Flap for Posttraumatic Wrist Arthrodesis.

Wrist arthrodesis in the setting of segmental bone loss can have high failure rates. Therefore, vascularized bone grafting has been advocated for select patients. Patients suffering concomitant large soft tissue loss present even greater challenge. To that end, we describe for the first time successful anterolateral thigh-medial femoral condyle chimeric flow-through flap for posttraumatic wrist arthrodesis and soft tissue coverage. This is a case report of a 19-year-old male laborer who suffered a large blast injury resulting in significant bone and soft tissue injury to the dominant right hand and wrist. After multiple debridements, there was a segmental bone defect from the distal radius and ulna to the metacarpal bases, as well as a 12×8 cm dorsal soft tissue defect. This was reconstructed with a anterolateral thigh-medial femoral condyle chimeric flow-through flap and concomitant wrist arthrodesis in a single stage. Besides a donor site thigh seroma, recovery was uneventful with clinical and radiographic evidence of fusion by >9 weeks postoperation.

Horizontal Forehead Lines: A Reflection of Eyelid Ptosis or Blepharodermachalasia.

BACKGROUND: In his facial aesthetics practice, the senior author (B.G.) observed that many patients presenting with horizontal forehead lines also demonstrated upper eyelid ptosis or enough blepharodermachalasia to require compensation. This study was conducted to investigate this observation. METHODS: Photographs of patients presenting for facial rejuvenation were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of forehead lines, ptosis, brow ptosis, and blepharodermatochalasia. Patient age, gender, and race were reported. Only patients over age 50 were included. Patients who had previous eyelid or forehead surgery, congenital abnormalities, or post-traumatic deformities were excluded. Ptosis was defined as more than 1.5-mm overlap between the upper eyelid and the iris. Patients were divided into two groups based on presence of forehead lines for comparative analysis. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients, including 100 patients with and 60 patients without horizontal forehead lines, were included. Patients with forehead lines were likely to be older (age 61.56 ± 8.93 vs. 58.58 ± 7.59; P = 0.0337), male (36 vs. 11.67%; P = 0.0008), have ptosis (90 vs. 76.67%; P = 0.0377), and have blepharodermatochalasis (20 vs. 5%; P = 0.0097). All 28 patients with unilateral forehead lines (17 left, 11 right) had ipsilateral ptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Ptosis and blepharodermatochalasis may result in the development of horizontal forehead lines through compensatory frontalis activation. Whenever horizontal forehead rhytids are noted, it is imperative to search for ptosis or blepharodermachalasia in repose. Otherwise, forehead rejuvenation may fail to eliminate these compensatory forehead lines, and chemodenervation may have significant adverse effects on the visual field by forcibly blocking frontalis compensation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The importance of surgical maneuvers during treatment of frontal migraines (site I): A prospective, randomized cohort study evaluating foraminotomy/fasciotomy, myectomy, and arterectomy.

BACKGROUND: The current prospective, blinded, randomized cohort study aims to delineate the relative contribution of different surgical treatments for frontal migraines. METHODS: Patients undergoing migraine surgery in the frontal region (site I) were prospectively enrolled and blindly randomized into one of the following four groups: (1) myectomy alone, (2) myectomy and foraminotomy/fasciotomy, (3) myectomy and arterectomy, and (4) foraminotomy/fasciotomy alone. Pre- and post-surgical migraine headache severity, duration, Migraine Headache Index (MHI) score, and migraine-free days (MFDs) were obtained. RESULTS: Thirteen patients agreed to participate in the study. For all patients, the mean pre- and post-operative MHI scores demonstrated a significant improvement from 52.6 (3.8-85) to 4.7 (0-21.3) (p = 0.0001). Thirty-one percent of patients required a site I revision that included an arterectomy. Patients who had an arterectomy at their initial surgery demonstrated statistically significant improvement in both frequency (12 vs. 6.11; p = 0.02) and MHI scores (51.71 vs. 5.55; p < 0.01). Arterectomy patients also demonstrated a significant improvement in the number of MFDs following surgery, from 18 to 24 MFDs (p = 0.021). Those patients not undergoing arterectomy demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the number of MFDs after their initial surgery (13.25 MFDs, p = 0.01), but the improvement was significantly less when compared to the arterectomy group (13.25 vs. 24 MFDs; p = 0.026). Following revision arterectomy, both groups had statistically equivalent improvement in MFDs (20.75 vs. 24 MFDs; p = 0.178). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that arterectomy is necessary for successful treatment of frontal migraines (site I).