An anatomo-functional study of the interactivity between the paracentral lobule and the primary motor cortex.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to understand the anatomical and functional connections between the paracentral lobule (PCL) and the primary motor cortex (M1) of the human brain. METHODS: This retrospective study included 16 patients who underwent resection of lesions located near M1. Nine patients had lesions in the dominant hemisphere. Tractography was performed to visualize the connectivity between two regions of interest (ROIs)-the convexity and the interhemispheric fissure-that were shown by functional MRI to be activated during a finger tapping task. The number, mean length, and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the fibers between the ROIs were estimated. During surgery, subdural electrodes were placed on the brain surface, including the ROIs, using a navigation system. Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) were evoked by applying electrical stimuli to the hand region of M1 using electrodes placed on the convexity and were measured with electrodes placed on the interhemispheric fissure. To verify CCEP bidirectionality, electrical stimuli were applied to electrodes on the interhemispheric fissure that showed CCEP responses. Correlations of CCEP amplitudes and latencies with the number, mean length, and mean FA value obtained from tractography were determined. The correlations between these parameters and perioperative motor functions were also analyzed. RESULTS: Fibers of 14 patients were visualized by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Unidirectional CCEPs between the PCL and M1 were measurable in all 16 patients, and bidirectional CCEPs between them were measurable in 14 patients. There was no significant difference between the two directions in the maximum CCEP amplitude or latency (amplitude, p = 0.391; latency, p = 0.583). Neither the amplitude nor latency showed any apparent correlation with the number, mean length, or mean FA value of the fibers obtained from tractography. Pre- and postoperative motor function of the hands was not significantly correlated with CCEP amplitude or latency. The number and mean FA value of fibers obtained by DTI, as well as the maximum CCEP amplitude, varied between patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an anatomical connection and a bidirectional functional connection between the PCL, including the supplementary motor area, and M1 of the human brain. The observed variability between patients suggests possible motor function plasticity. These findings may serve as a foundation for further studies.

Intraoperative nerve stimulation during vagal nerve stimulator placement.

Background: Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is a palliative treatment for refractory epilepsy and intraoperative nerve stimulation is applied to the vagal and other nerves to prevent electrode misplacement. We evaluated these thresholds to establish intraoperative monitoring procedures for VNS surgery. Methods: Forty-six patients who underwent intraoperative nerve stimulation during VNS placement were enrolled. The vagal nerve and other exposed nerves were electrically stimulated during surgery, and muscle contraction was confirmed by electromyography of the vocal cords and visual recognition of cervical muscle contraction. The nerve thresholds and the most sensitive parts of the vagal nerve were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The stimulation of vagal nerves induced vocal cord responses in all 46 patients; the median thresholds of the most sensitive parts and all parts were 0.2 mA (range: 0.05-0.75 mA) and 0.25 mA (range: 0.15-1.5 mA), respectively. The medial middle region was identified as the most sensitive part of the vagal nerve in the majority of participants (82.5%). In 11 patients, other cervical nerves were stimulated and sternohyoid muscle contraction was induced with a median threshold of 0.35 mA (range: 0.1-0.7 mA) in eight patients, while sternocleidomastoid muscle contraction was induced with a median threshold of 0.2 mA (range: 0.1-0.2 mA) in three. Conclusion: Intraoperative stimulation of vagal nerves induces vocal cord responses with locational variations, and the middle part stimulation could minimize the stimulus intensities. The nerves innervating the sternohyoid and sternocleidomastoid muscles may be exposed during the procedure. Knowledge of these characteristics will enhance the effectiveness of this technique in future applications.

Effect of a Low Concentration of Sevoflurane Combined With Propofol on Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential: A Case Series.

Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential (TCeMEP) is used to monitor the integrity of intraoperative motor function. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is the preferred method because its effect on MEP is relatively smaller than volatile anesthetics. However, maintaining the balanced anesthesia in long-time surgery using TIVA is challenging and may sometime cause problems including body movement during microsurgery. Such problems can be avoided by intraoperative anesthesia management using a mixture of propofol and a low concentration of sevoflurane. We recorded TCeMEP under a mixture of propofol and low concentration of sevoflurane anesthesia in three cases of neurosurgery. Anesthesia was induced with a 5.0 µg/mL target-controlled infusion of propofol and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. General anesthesia was maintained by propofol and 0.1-0.25 µg/kg/min remifentanil infusion. After the recording of control TCeMEP, sequential inhalation of 0.2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and 0.5 MAC of sevoflurane was performed. The duration of each sevoflurane inhalation was 10 minutes, and the MACs were adjusted by the patient's age. In our cases, the combination of propofol and 0.2 MAC sevoflurane suppressed the amplitude of TCeMEP to 38.0±21.7% (379.8±212.0 µV), but the amplitude was high enough for evaluation of motor function monitoring. On the other hand, the combination of 0.5 MAC sevoflurane greatly decreased the amplitude of TCeMEP to 6.3±6.0% (71.9±66.9 µV) resulting in less than 150 µV, and it was difficult to record the change in TCeMEP amplitude over time. The combination of 0.2 MAC sevoflurane with TIVA might enable TCeMEP monitoring with TIVA.

Effect of remimazolam on intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring of visual-evoked potential: a case series.

There are very few reports on the effects of benzodiazepines such as midazolam and diazepam on intraoperative visual-evoked potential (VEP), and there is no report on the effect of remimazolam at all. Five patients underwent neurosurgery using VEP monitoring for avoiding surgical injury to the optic nerve. In all cases, drug administration was based on actual body weight. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil, and then maintained with propofol at target concentrations of 2.7-3.5 µg/ml for maintaining bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 60. After resection of the tumor under stable VEP, we discontinued propofol immediately followed by infusion of remimazolam at 12 mg/kg/h for a few seconds, then reduced to 1 mg/kg/h. After a time, when blood levels of remimazolam appeared to be stable, VEP was monitored again and compared to controls. In all cases, we were able to confirm that there was reproducibility. Remimazolam may provide a comparable quality of anesthesia to that of existing drugs for VEP in neurosurgery.

The intraoperative motor-evoked potential when propofol was changed to remimazolam during general anesthesia: a case series.

Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine that was approved for clinical use in 2020. We report three patients who underwent surgery for cerebral and spinal cord tumors, in whom transcranial electrical stimulation-motor-evoked potential (TES-MEP) was successfully monitored under general anesthesia with remimazolam. During total intravenous anesthesia with propofol at a target concentration of 2.7 - 3.5 µg/mL and 0.1 - 0.35 µg/kg/min of remifentanil, delayed awakening, bradycardia, and hypotension during propofol anesthesia were expected in all three cases. With patient safety as the top priority, we considered changing the anesthetic agent. Propofol was replaced with remimazolam at a loading dose of 12 mg/kg/h for a few seconds (case 3), followed by 1 mg/kg/h for maintenance (cases 1-3). TES-MEP was recorded during propofol and remimazolam administration in all three patients. Amplitudes of TES-MEP during anesthesia with propofol and remimazolam were 461.5 ± 150 µV and 590.5 ± 100.9 µV, 1542 ± 127 µV and 1698 ± 211 µV, and 581.5 ± 91.3 µV and 634 ± 82.7 µV sequentially from Case 1. Our findings suggest that intraoperative TES-MEP could be measured when anesthesia was managed with remimazolam at 1 mg/kg/h.

Intraoperative Monitoring for Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation is a palliative treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy; however, the misplacement of electrodes may cause complications and thus needs to be avoided. METHODS: We herein report an intraoperative monitoring technique to prevent the misplacement of electrodes. Endotracheal tube electrodes were inserted to record electromyographic activity from the vocal cords and identify the vagus nerve. Electromyography electrodes were placed on the sternomastoid muscle, sternohyoid muscle, geniohyoid muscle, and trapezius muscle to record muscle activities innervated by the ansa cervicalis. The vagus nerve and ansa cervicalis were electrically stimulated during surgery, and electromyography of the vocal cords and muscles innervated by the ansa cervicalis was recorded. The threshold of vagus nerve activation ranged between 0.05 and 0.75 mA. RESULTS: The vagus nerve was successfully identified and differentiated from the nerve root of the ansa cervicalis using this technique. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative monitoring of the vagus nerve and ansa cervicalis is useful for safe and effective vagus nerve stimulation.