Comparison of bleomycin polidocanol foam vs electrochemotherapy combined with polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the difference in safety and efficacy between two treatments for venous malformations (VMs), electrochemotherapy combined with polidocanol foam (ECP) and bleomycin polidocanol foam (BPF), providing alternative therapies for VMs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 152 patients with VMs treated with ECP and BPF. Pre- and post-treatment magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were collected, and clinical follow-up assessments were performed. Imaging results were used to calculate lesion volume changes. Clinical outcomes included changes in pain and improvements in perceived swelling. Patients were followed up at 1 week and 6 months after surgery. All emerging complications were documented in detail. RESULTS: Of the 152 patients, 87 (57.2%) received BPF treatment, and 65 (42.8%) received ECP treatment. The most common location of VMs was the lower extremities (92/152; 60.2%), and the most common symptom was pain (108/152; 71.1%). Forty-three patients had previously undergone therapy in the BPF group (43/87; 49.4%), whereas 30 patients had received prior treatment in the ECP group (30/65; 46.2%). The study found that the percentage of lesion volume reduction in the BPF group was not significantly different from that in the ECP group (75.00% ± 17.85% vs 74.69% ± 8.48%; P = .899). ECP was more effective when the initial lesion volume was greater than 30 mL (67.66% ± 12.34% vs 73.47% ± 8.00%; P = .048). Patients treated with BPF had significantly less posttreatment pain than those treated with ECP, in different baseline lesion size. In the overall sample, pain relief was significantly higher in the BPF group than in the ECP group (4.21 ± 1.19 vs 3.57 ± 0.76; P = .002). However, there was no difference in pain relief between the two groups for the treatment of initially large VMs (4.20 ± 0.94 vs 3.70 ± 0.87; P = .113). The ECP group was significantly more likely to develop hyperpigmentation (5/87; 5.75% vs 11/65; 16.92%; P = .026) and swelling (9/87; 10.34% vs 16/65; 24.62%; P = .019) 1 week after surgery than the BPF group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that both BPF and ECP are effective treatments for VMs, with BPF being a safer option. ECP is a better choice for patients with the initial lesion volume greater than 30 mL, but it is more likely to lead to early swelling and hyperpigmentation.

Comparison of polidocanol foam versus bleomycin polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to retrospectively investigate the difference of safety and efficacy between polidocanol foam and bleomycin polidocanol foam (BPF) in the treatment of venous malformations (VMs), and provide clinical evidence for the application of BPF for VMs. METHODS: Patients with VMs treated with polidocanol foam and BPF were included between July 2018 and July 2020. The VM tissue involvements and symptoms were collected. The treatment outcomes were evaluated by the clinical improvement of symptoms and the degree of devascularization on ultrasound examination or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were followed up for 1, 3, and 6 months after the sclerotherapy. Immediate and delayed complications were closely followed and recorded. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included, including 34 females and 17 males with a mean age of 26.8 years (range, 5-65 years). The most commonly involved sites were lower extremities (31/60 [51.7%]) and the most common symptom was pain (33/51 [64.7%]). Fifty-four sclerotherapies were performed with a mean of 1.06 ± 0.24 sessions (range, 1-2 sessions) per patient. The reduction percentage of lesion volume in the BPF group was significantly higher than the polidocanol foam group (79.4 ± 1.6% vs 55.7 ± 6.1%; P < .001). Patient satisfaction scores in the BPF group were significantly higher than the polidocanol foam group (7.2 ± 1.1 vs 5.7 ± 0.8; P < .001). No major complication was observed in either group. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) grade 1 complications occurred in 5 of 21 patients in the BPF group and 7 of 30 patients in the polidocanol foam group, CIRSE grade 2 complications occurred in 5 of 21 patients in the BPF group and 4 of 30 patients in the polidocanol foam group; there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: BPF is a safe and effective sclerosant for VMs, showing better efficacy and similar safety as commonly used mild sclerosants. It could be a promising agent to treat VMs or other slow-flow vascular malformations.

Acute carotid stent thrombosis: A case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Acute carotid stent thrombosis (ACST) is a rare but devastating complication in the carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedure. The aim of this article is to report a case and review cases of ACST reported in the literature, and investigate risk factors and management strategies for ACST. CASE SUMMARY: We reviewed the treatment process of a patient with ACST after CAS. Then multiple databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting ACST from 2005 to 2020. The demographic data, risk factors, treatment strategies, and prognosis were extracted and analyzed. CONCLUSION: The reason for ACST is multifactorial. Proper patient selection, normative anti-platelet treatment, and perfect technical detail may decrease the incidence of ACST. Several treatment strategies such as thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and open surgery may be options for the treatment of ACST. Limited data have shown that carotid endarterectomy is effective with favorable results.

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Bare Nitinol Stent in Femoropopliteal Artery: 12 Months Outcome from a Single Center in China.

OBJECT: The study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) with bare nitinol stent in patients with complex femoropopliteal(FP) lesions in real-world practice. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic (Rutherford stage 2 to 5) femoropopliteal lesions who underwent DCB or bare nitinol stent implantation at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of China-Japan Friendship Hospital from June 2016 to September 2017 were included. Demographics, angiographic and procedural variables were included. Freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency and major adverse events were obtained from follow-up results at 3,6 and12 months. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables. RESULTS: A total of 90 eligible patients were enrolled, which included 51 DCB subjects (mean age, 63.1 ± 13.2 years; 76.5% male) with 55 lesions and 39 nitinol stent subjects (mean age, 66.5 ± 10.5 years; 61.5% male) with 42 lesions. Significant higher primary patency was observed in the DCB group compared with the stent group (74.5% vs. 52.4%; log-rank test P = 0.018; HR 0.335, 95%CI 0.124-0.903, P = 0.031). The rates of freedom from TLR (f-TLR) were 78.2% and 59.5% (log-rank test P = 0.032) for the DCB group and the stent group, respectively, at 12 months. CD-TLR rates were 18.2% vs. 38.1% with a P-value of 0.023. Female sex (HR 6.122, 95%CI 1.880-19.934, P = 0.003), lesion length over 20 cm (HR 5.514, 95%CI 2.312-13.148, P < 0.001) and renal insufficiency (HR 2.609, 95%CI 1.087-6.260, P = 0.032) were suggested as independent risk factors of reducing primary patency. There were no significant differences in major adverse events between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The result above demonstrates that DCB treatment has higher primary patency and lower TLR at 12 months than nitinol stent. These data confirm the safety and effectiveness of the DCB for patients with complex femoropopliteal lesions.

Hairy/enhancer of Split Homologue-1 Suppresses Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-induced Angiogenesis via Downregulation of Osteopontin Expression.

Angiogenesis plays a critical role in the progression and vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques; however, the orchestration of angiogenesis in atherosclerotic plaque formation remains unclear. The results of microarray analysis, real-time PCR and immunohistochemical analyses showed that Hairy/enhancer of split homologue-1 (Hes-1) expression was significantly decreased, while that of osteopontin (OPN) was increased, in atherosclerotic plaques. Meanwhile, immunofluorescence results demonstrated that both Hes-1 and OPN were expressed in endothelial cells (ECs) of neovessels in atherosclerotic plaques. The results of an in vitro study showed that Hes-1 was downregulated, while OPN was upregulated, in a time- and dose-dependent manner in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by VEGF treatment. In addition, Hes-1 knockdown was found to have transcriptional promotion effect on OPN expression in HUVECs and enhance OPN-induced angiogenesis in response to VEGF. On the contrary, Hes-1 overexpression inhibited OPN expression in HUVECs and reduced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. The results of this study suggest that decreased Hes-1 expression in atherosclerotic plaques exaggerate VEGF-induced angiogenesis by upregulating OPN. Therefore, restoring Hes-1 expression and inhibiting OPN expression may be a promising strategy to prevent vulnerable plaque formation in patients with atherosclerosis.

Feasibility and Safety of Simultaneous Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting for Bilateral Carotid Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience using a Hybrid Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The treatment for bilateral carotid stenosis (BCS) is challenging, and the optimal treatment strategy is not clear. We report our experience of treating 8 patients with BCS by simultaneous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS), thereby providing an alternative for vascular surgeons. METHODS: Between October 2010 and August 2014, 8 patients (5 males and 3 females; range, 53-82 years; mean, 69 ± 8.8 years) underwent simultaneous CEA and CAS in our hospital. CEA before CAS was done in 5 patients, and CAS before CEA was done in 3 patients. One patient also underwent simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting due to unstable angina. Intraoperative transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, carotid shunts, patches, and embolic protection devices were used in all patients. Instances of hyperperfusion syndrome (HPS), hemodynamic depression, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death were recorded. RESULTS: All patients completed the procedure. One patient developed postprocedural HPS. After systemic treatment, he recovered completely. There were no deaths, major and/or minor strokes, or MI, nor did any patient exhibit lower palsy in cranial nerves in the perioperative period (<30 days) or on clinical follow-up (3 and 6 months). We observed no restenosis and no recurrent symptoms during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: After careful preoperative assessment and preparation, simultaneous CEA and CAS for high-grade BCS may be considered as an alternative management strategy in carefully selected patients.

[Clinical experience of combined surgical thrombectomy and endovascular intervention for acute deep venous thrombosis].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of surgical venous thrombectomy and simultaneous stenting in patients with acute, symptomatic iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: From October 2008 to December 2010, a total of 15 patients with acute symptomatic DVT underwent combined surgical venous thrombectomy and endovascular stenting in ipsilateral iliac vein. There were 6 male and 9 female patients, with a mean age of 57.4 years (ranging from 36 to 71 years). All patients underwent Duplex ultrasonography for diagnosis of DVT. The location of thrombosis was femoro-ilio-caval vein in 2 cases, bilateral iliac vein in 1 case and left iliofemoral vein in 12 cases. All patients had leg swelling and 12 cases had severe leg pain. The mean time of symptomatic DVT occurring at operation was 3.3 d. The factors related to DVT were operation in 6 cases, DVT reoccur in 2 cases. Coexist diseases were digestive tract bleeding in 1 case, gastric ulcer in 1 case, hypertension in 3 cases and 1 case had cerebral infarction. The inferior vena cava filter was inserted before thrombectomy, iliac vein compression and residual stenosis were treated with a self-expandable stent after thrombectomy. RESULTS: Intraoperative venography showed severe venous stenosis in all patients including 80% of iliac vein compression syndrome, 18 self-expandable stents were inserted successfully, the procedural successful rate was 100%, the 30-day mortality rate was 0.One case was suffered from hematoma at incision after operation. 3 patients were lost during follow-up. Median follow-up was 10.3 months (ranging from 2 to 26 months). There was no case of re-thrombosis. Leg pain was disappeared in all cases and only 2 patients showed slight leg swelling after excise. CONCLUSION: Combined surgical thrombectomy and endovascular treatment for patients with acute symptomatic iliofemoral venous thrombosis is an effective and safe technique with low morbidity and good clinical results.

[Open surgery for femoro-popliteal arterial occlusive disease].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the mid-term surgical results of arterial revascularization for femoro-popliteal arterial occlusive disease (lesion type C and D). METHODS: From January 2005 to February 2009, 191 arterial bypass had been performed on 170 patients (21 cases bilateral). There were 108 male and 62 female, age ranged from 45 to 85 years old with an average of 67 years old. The operative indication was claudication in 78 cases, rest pain in 62 cases, ischemic ulcer in 19 cases, and distal tissue necrosis in 11 cases. Arterial angiography were performed on all cases. According to TASC II document, type C lesions were seen in 127 limbs, type D lesions were seen in 64 limbs. Autogenous greater saphenous vein bypass in situ were done on 15 limbs, autogenous greater saphenous vein bypass reversed in 20 limbs, revascularization with artificial prosthesis in 128 limbs, composite grafts consisting of a prosthetic conduit with a distal venous segment in 28 limbs. RESULTS: There were no 30-day mortality. Follow-up periods ranged 6 to 36 months with an average of (24 + or - 6) months. Seventy-three cases were lost during follow-up periods, follow-up rate was 57% (109/191). Primary patency rate was 84.4% (92/109). The patency rate was 88.2% with artificial prosthesis, 70.8% with greater saphenous vein (in situ or reversed). Secondary patency rate was 89.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial revascularization with artificial prosthesis is main treatment for diffused superficial femoral artery occlusive disease (TASC II type C and D lesion) with satisfied surgical results.

[Surgical treatment for varicose vein].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the techniques and outcomes of the surgical treatment for varicose vein. METHODS: Totally 2 200 patients with varicose vein received surgical treatment in our hospital from July 2000 to January 2006. The latest techniques for endovenous occlusion were used for most cases, among which 1 802 cases were treated with endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) combined with transilluminated powered phlebectomy (TIPP), 82 cases with radiofrequency endovenous occlusion (RFO) combined with TIPP, and 218 cases with limited invaginated vein stripping and foam sclerotherapy. The remaining 98 cases were treated with laser, radiofrequency or ligation for saphenous vein trunk, and with resection, electric coagulation, and transfixation for vein clusters as additional methods. Perforators were also cut and ligated as well. RESULTS: Satisfied surgical results were obtained in all cases. The average operative time was 40 minutes (range 20-78 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Limited invaginated vein stripping, EVLT, and RFO can be used to treat saphenous vein reflux. Surgical resection, transfixation, electric coagulation, and sclerotherapy are reasonable options for vein cluster or tributaries. Transection and ligation of the perforators are important. TIPP is ideal for the treatment of vein clusters.