Genomic and clinical landscape of metastatic hormone receptors-positive breast cancers carrying ESR1 alterations.

BACKGROUND: Somatic genetic alterations of the estrogen receptor 1 gene (ESR1) are enriched in endocrine therapy-resistant, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Herein, we investigated and compared the clinical and genomic landscape of ESR1-mutant (ESR1MUT) and ESR1 wild type (ESR1WT) ER+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- mBCs. METHODS: Clinical and genomic data were retrieved from cBioPortal using the publicly-available MSK MetTropism dataset. Metastatic, ER+/HER2- mBC samples were included in the analysis. Only oncogenic and likely oncogenic alterations according to OncoKB were included. Statistical analyses were carried out using alpha level of 0.05, with a false discovery rate threshold of 10% for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. RESULTS: Among 679 samples, 136 ESR1MUT among 131 tumors were found (19.2%). The frequency of ESR1MUT was higher in ductal versus lobular mBC (21.2% versus 13.8%, P = 0.052) and enriched in liver metastasis compared with other sites (22.5% versus 12.7%; q = 0.02). Compared with ESR1WT mBC, ESR1MUT tumors showed higher fraction of genome altered (FGA) {[0.28 interquartile range (IQR), 0.15-0.43] versus 0.22 (0.11-0.38); P = 0.04} and tumor mutational burden (TMB) [4.89 (IQR 3.46-6.85) versus 3.92 (2.59-6.05) mut/Mb; P = 0.001]. Tumors harboring p.E380X alterations showed higher TMB compared with those with H11-12 alterations [8.24 (IQR 5.06-15.3) versus 4.89 (IQR 3.46-6.75) mut/Mb; P = 0.01]. Genetic alterations of TP53 were enriched in ESR1WT tumors (36% versus 14%) [odds ratio (OR) 3.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.88-5.64, q = 0.001]. Considering signaling pathways, ESR1MUT tumors showed a lower occurrence of TP53 (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.74; q = 0.003) and MAPK (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.65; q = 0.009) alterations. TP53 (q < 0.001), CDH1 (q < 0.001), and ERBB2 (q < 0.001) demonstrated mutual exclusivity with ESR1MUT. CONCLUSIONS: ER+/HER2- mBCs carrying ESR1MUT exhibit a divergent genomic background, characterized by a lower prevalence of TP53 and MAPK pathway alterations. Less common ESR1 alterations falling outside the H11-H12 region seem to occur in tumors with higher TMB, deserving further investigation to understand their potential actionability.

Management of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after trastuzumab deruxtecan failure.

The current treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been greatly impacted in the past decade by the introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which represent a relatively novel therapeutic class with the peculiar ability to deliver otherwise overtly toxic chemotherapeutics to tumor sites by exploiting the specificities of monoclonal antibodies. Indeed, drug engineering refinements in ADC design, such as through the introduction of cleavable linkers and hydrophobic payloads, resulted in improved patient outcomes in recent years. Two different ADCs, namely trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have already entered clinical practice for the treatment of HER2-positive ABC. In this scenario, T-DXd has shown to portend better survival outcomes compared to T-DM1, while leaving a large unsought area of unmet medical need upon T-DXd failure. Treatment decision and benefit of cancer drugs following T-DXd still represent an area of clinical controversy, where a preclinical investigation and clinical development should be prioritized. As the pace of innovation is currently accelerating, and with novel ADC formulations advancing in early-phase clinical trials, the whole BC field is changing at an unprecedented rate, with potential broadenings of therapeutic indications. In this review, we present the clinical landscape of HER2-positive advanced BC and discuss our vision on how to tackle T-DXd resistance, providing a perspective on the priority areas of the cancer research in this setting.

Seroconversion in patients with cancer and oncology health care workers infected by SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer have high risk for severe complications and poor outcome to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related disease [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)]. Almost all subjects with COVID-19 develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) within 3 weeks after infection. No data are available on the seroconversion rates of cancer patients and COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, observational, prospective study that enrolled (i) patients and oncology health professionals with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by real-time RT-PCR assays on nasal/pharyngeal swab specimens; (ii) patients and oncology health professionals with clinical or radiological suspicious of infection by SARS-CoV-2; and (iii) patients with cancer who are considered at high risk for infection and eligible for active therapy and/or major surgery. All enrolled subjects were tested with the 2019-nCoV IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette, which is a qualitative membrane-based immunoassay for the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. The aim of the study was to evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion rate in patients with cancer and oncology health care professionals with confirmed or clinically suspected COVID-19. RESULTS: From 30 March 2020 to 11 May 2020, 166 subjects were enrolled in the study. Among them, cancer patients and health workers were 61 (36.7%) and 105 (63.3%), respectively. Overall, 86 subjects (51.8%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by RT-PCR testing on nasopharyngeal swab specimen, and 60 (36.2%) had a clinical suspicious of COVID-19. Median time from symptom onset (for cases not confirmed by RT-PCR) or RT-PCR confirmation to serum antibody test was 17 days (interquartile range 26). In the population with confirmed RT-PCR, 83.8% of cases were IgG positive. No difference in IgG positivity was observed between cancer patients and health workers (87.9% versus 80.5%; P = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibody detection do not differ between cancer patients and healthy subjects.

5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and early organ damage in primary hypertension.

Hyperhomocyst(e)inemia is a known risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic vascular damage. Plasma homocyst(e)ine levels are influenced by nutritional and hereditary factors. A point mutation (cytosine to thymidine substitution; C677T) in the gene encoding 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) makes the enzyme thermolabile and has been associated with elevated homocyst(e)ine levels in homozygous carriers (TT genotypes). We evaluated the relationship between the T allele encoding for the thermolabile variant of MTHFR and several biochemical risk factors and early signs of hypertensive and atherosclerotic organ damage in 206 untreated patients with primary hypertension. The MTHFR genotype was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction. Albuminuria was measured as albumin-to-creatinine ratio in three nonconsecutive first morning urine samples (negative urine culture). Persistent Mi (Alb+) was defined as an average albumin-to-creatinine ratio between 2.38 and 19 (men) and 2.96 and 20 (women). Left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI) was assessed by M-B mode echocardiography (LV hypertrophy, LVH = LVMI > or = 125 g/m2), carotid geometry by high-resolution ultrasound scan, and retinal vascular changes by direct ophthalmoscopy (Keith-Wagener classification). The prevalence of Mi, LVH, and retinopathy was 14%, 45%, and 42%, respectively. The prevalence of carotid plaque was 25%. Allele frequencies for C (wild-type allele) and T allele (mutant allele) were 56% and 44%, respectively. Genotype frequencies were CC 29%, CT 54%, TT 17% according to Hardy Weinberg equilibrium. There were no differences as for age, sex, body mass index, blood pressure levels, lipid profile, smoking habits, and alcohol intake, and LVMI and urinary albumin excretion on the basis of MTHFR genotype. Patients with TT polymorphism showed a higher prevalence of retinal vascular changes (TT, 61% v CT + CC, 38%; P < .02) and carotid plaque (TT, 42% v CT + CC, 21%; P < .05) compared to patients with CC and CT polymorphism. Moreover, patients with T allele showed increased carotid artery size as demonstrated by intima plus media thickness (IT, 0.79 +/- 0.05 mm v CT + CC, 0.67 +/- 0.02 mm; P < .02), relative wall thickness (TT, 0.23 +/- 0.01 mm v CT + CC, 0.20 +/- 0.005 mm; P < .02), and surface area (TT, 19 +/- 1.9 mm2 v CT + CC, 15 +/- 0.55 mm2; P < .05). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that MTHFR genotype and systolic blood pressure independently influence intima-media thickness and together account for about 11% of its variations (r2 = 0.11, F = 9.7, dF = 1-205, P < .0001). Homozygosity for the T allele of the MTHFR gene is an independent risk factor for the development of early atherosclerotic organ damage in hypertensive patients.