Palopegteriparatide Treatment Improves Renal Function in Adults with Chronic Hypoparathyroidism: 1-Year Results from the Phase 3 PaTHway Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with chronic hypoparathyroidism managed with conventional therapy (active vitamin D and calcium) have an increased risk for renal dysfunction versus age- and sex-matched controls. Treatments that replace the physiologic effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) while reducing the need for conventional therapy may help prevent a decline in renal function in this population. This post hoc analysis examined the impact of palopegteriparatide treatment on renal function in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism. METHODS: PaTHway is a phase 3 trial of palopegteriparatide in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism that included a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 26-week period followed by an ongoing 156-week open-label extension (OLE) period. Changes in renal function over 52 weeks (26 weeks blinded + 26 weeks OLE) were assessed using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A subgroup analysis was performed with participants stratified by baseline eGFR < 60 or ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: At week 52, over 95% (78/82) of participants remained enrolled in the OLE and of those, 86% maintained normocalcemia and 95% achieved independence from conventional therapy (no active vitamin D and ≤ 600 mg/day of calcium), with none requiring active vitamin D. Treatment with palopegteriparatide over 52 weeks resulted in a mean (SD) increase in eGFR of 9.3 (11.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline (P < 0.0001) and 43% of participants had an increase ≥ 10 mL/min/1.73 m2. In participants with baseline eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 52 weeks of treatment with palopegteriparatide resulted in a mean (SD) increase of 11.5 (11.3) mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). One case of nephrolithiasis was reported for a participant in the placebo group during blinded treatment; none were reported through week 52 with palopegteriparatide. CONCLUSION: In this post hoc analysis of the PaTHway trial, palopegteriparatide treatment was associated with significantly improved eGFR at week 52 in addition to previously reported maintenance and normalization of serum and urine biochemistries. Further investigation of palopegteriparatide for the preservation of renal function in hypoparathyroidism is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04701203.

Chronic hypoparathyroidism is caused by inadequate parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Hypoparathyroidism is managed with conventional therapy (active vitamin D and calcium), but over time the disease itself and conventional therapy can increase the risk of medical complications including kidney problems. This study looked at how a new treatment for chronic hypoparathyroidism, palopegteriparatide (approved in the European Union under the brand name YORVIPATH^®), affects kidney function in adults in the PaTHway clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive palopegteriparatide or a placebo injection once daily along with conventional therapy. For both groups, clinicians used a protocol to eliminate conventional therapy while maintaining normal blood calcium levels. After 26 weeks, participants on placebo switched to palopegteriparatide. Ninety-five percent of participants were still enrolled in the PaTHway trial after 52 weeks. Of those, 86% had normal blood calcium levels and 95% did not need conventional therapy (not taking vitamin D and not taking therapeutic doses of calcium [> 600 mg/day]). After 52 weeks of treatment with palopegteriparatide, significant improvements were seen in a measure of kidney function called estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Improvements in eGFR from the beginning of the trial to week 52 were considered clinically meaningful for over 57% of participants. In participants with impaired kidney function at the beginning of the trial, eGFR improvements were even greater, and 74% of participants had a clinically meaningful improvement. These results suggest that palopegteriparatide treatment may be beneficial for kidney function in adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism, especially those with impaired kidney function.

Role of patient specific 3D printed models in patient confidence, understanding and satisfaction of care in Singapore.

Introduction: Patient specific 3D models have been widely used for pre-op planning and intra-op guidance in orthopaedic surgery. These models however are not often used in pre-operative doctor-patient communication. This study evaluates the roles of customized 3D models in improving patient understanding, confidence, and satisfaction of patient care when they were used during preoperative counselling. Materials and methods: A prospective survey was conducted on 33 orthopaedic trauma patients who were required to rate on a scale of 1-5, the effectiveness of patient specific 3D models in: 1) improving patient's understanding and, 2) helping patients cope with the condition, 3) boosting patients' confidence in the treatment and 4) in the surgeon; and on a scale of 0-10, their overall satisfaction. Subgroup analysis was done to compare ratings of patients by age and by education levels. Results: Over 90% patients rated agree or strongly agree on customised 3D models' effectiveness in improving understanding of injury and boosting confidence in treatments and surgeons. 87% patients agreed or strongly agreed that the models enhanced patient self-efficacy. No significant correlation was identified between age and patients' perceived effectiveness of customised 3D models in improving patient care. Ratings on four areas evaluated by pre-secondary and post-secondary groups were comparable. Post-secondary group had significantly higher satisfaction level than the pre-secondary group. Conclusion: Customized 3D models help patients visualise complex pathology to facilitate patients' understanding of their condition and treatment, resulting in improved self-efficacy, confidence, and overall satisfaction. The use of patient specific 3D models in pre-operative counselling allows greater patient involvement therefore prompting patient-centred healthcare. Age does not influence patients' perceived effectiveness of customised 3D models in improving patient care. Patients with higher education level are likely to experience higher satisfaction level due to their willingness to take responsibility for their care.

Smoking history and pulmonary arterial hypertension: Demographics, onset, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence and its association with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) outcomes have not been described in patients in the United States. METHODS: Using the US-based Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL), the prevalence, demographics, and outcomes in ever- versus never-smokers with PAH were determined. RESULTS: Ever-smoking status was more prevalent in males (61.7%) than in females (42.9%) enrolled in REVEAL. Ever-smokers were older than never-smokers at the time of PAH diagnosis and REVEAL enrollment. The time to first hospitalization, transplant-free survival, and survival did not differ between ever- and never-smokers overall; however, in newly diagnosed males, ever-smoking was associated with earlier death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.0; p = 0.0199), the composite of transplant or death (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.6; p = 0.0008), and first hospitalization (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7; p = 0.0063), though smoking exposure (pack-years) did not differ between newly and previously diagnosed males. CONCLUSIONS: REVEAL PAH data demonstrate that smoking prevalence in male PAH patients is disproportionate. The prevalence of cigarette smoking was significantly higher in males than females enrolled in REVEAL. Ever-smoking status was associated with increased age at PAH diagnosis and, in newly diagnosed male PAH patients, earlier time to hospitalization and shorter survival after PAH diagnosis.

Prolonged survival in patients with breast cancer and a history of brain metastases: results of a preplanned subgroup analysis from the randomized phase III BEACON trial.

PURPOSE: Conventional chemotherapy has limited activity in patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BCBM). Etirinotecan pegol (EP), a novel long-acting topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, was designed using advanced polymer technology to preferentially accumulate in tumor tissue including brain metastases, providing sustained cytotoxic SN38 levels. METHODS: The phase 3 BEACON trial enrolled 852 women with heavily pretreated locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer between 2011 and 2013. BEACON compared EP with treatment of physician's choice (TPC; eribulin, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, or docetaxel) in patients previously treated with anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine, including those with treated, stable brain metastases. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was assessed in a pre-defined subgroup of BCBM patients; an exploratory post hoc analysis adjusting for the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) index was also conducted. RESULTS: In the trial, 67 BCBM patients were randomized (EP, n = 36; TPC, n = 31). Treatment subgroups were balanced for baseline characteristics and GPA indices. EP was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.51; P < 0.01) versus TPC; median OS was 10.0 and 4.8 months, respectively. Improvement in OS was observed in both poorer and better GPA prognostic groups. Survival rates at 12 months were 44.4% for EP versus 19.4% for TPC. Consistent with the overall BEACON population, fewer patients on EP experienced grade ≥3 toxicity (50 vs. 70%). CONCLUSIONS: The significant improvement in survival in BCBM patients provides encouraging data for EP in this difficult-to-treat subgroup of patients. A phase three trial of EP in BCBM patients is underway (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02915744).

Health-related quality of life in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer treated with etirinotecan pegol versus treatment of physician's choice: Results from the randomised phase III BEACON trial.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) enhances understanding of treatment effects that impact clinical decision-making. Although the primary end-point was not achieved, the BEACON (BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102) trial established etirinotecan pegol, a long-acting topoisomerase-1 (TOP1) inhibitor, as a promising therapeutic for patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) achieving clinically meaningful benefits in median overall survival (OS) for patients with stable brain metastases, with liver metastases or ≥ 2 sites of metastatic disease compared to treatment of physician's choice (TPC). Reported herein are the findings from the preplanned secondary end-point of HRQoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HRQoL, assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) (version 3.0) supplemented by the breast cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-BR23), was evaluated post randomisation in 733 of 852 patients with either anthracycline-, taxane- and capecitabine-pretreated locally recurrent or MBC randomised to etirinotecan pegol (n = 378; 145 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (q3wk)) or single-agent TPC (n = 355). Patients completed assessments at screening, every 8 weeks (q8wk) during treatment, and end-of-treatment. Changes from baseline were analysed, and the proportions of patients achieving differences (≥5 points) in HRQoL scores were compared. RESULTS: Differences were seen favouring etirinotecan pegol up to 32 weeks for global health status (GHS) and physical functioning scales (P < 0.02); numerical improvement was reported in other functional scales. The findings from HRQoL symptom scales were consistent with adverse event profiles; etirinotecan pegol was associated with worsening gastrointestinal symptoms whereas TPC was associated with worsened dyspnoea and other systemic side-effects. Analysis of GHS and physical functioning at disease progression showed a decline in HRQoL in both treatment arms, with a mean change from baseline of -9.4 and -10.8 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was evidence of benefit associated with etirinotecan pegol compared with current standard of care agents in multiple HRQoL measurements, including global health status and physical functioning, despite worse gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. diarrhoea). Patients in both arms had a decline in HRQoL at disease progression. STUDY NUMBER: NCT01492101.

Safety and tolerability of etirinotecan pegol in advanced breast cancer: analysis of the randomized, phase 3 BEACON trial.

PURPOSE: New treatments with novel mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicities are needed for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor with a unique toxicity profile. The randomized phase 3 BEACON study that compared EP to treatment of physician's choice (TPC) demonstrated its clinical activity. We now present detailed safety data from the BEACON trial. METHODS: Patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had received at least two prior cytotoxic regimens for advanced disease were randomized to EP or TPC. Prior treatment with an anthracycline, a taxane and capecitabine was required. The frequencies of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were evaluated for the safety population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. RESULTS: A total of 831 patients were evaluated (n = 425, EP; n = 406, TPC). Compared with TPC, EP was associated with a slightly higher median relative dose intensity (98.3 vs. 92.8 %, respectively) and significantly fewer grade ≥3 toxicities (48.0 vs. 63.1 %, P < 0.0001). The most commonly reported grade ≥3 toxicities in the EP arm were diarrhea (9.6 %) and neutropenia (9.6 %) and in the TPC arm, neutropenia (30.8 %). Median time to onset of grade ≥3 diarrhea was delayed with EP relative to TPC (43 vs. 7 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The differentiated mechanism of action of EP resulted in a safety profile that is substantially distinguished from that of current widely used therapies for the treatment of women with advanced breast cancer.

Etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) versus treatment of physician's choice in women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine (BEACON): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: New options are needed for patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer. Etirinotecan pegol is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor that prolongs exposure to, but reduces the toxicity of, SN38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan). We assessed whether etirinotecan pegol is superior to currently available treatments for patients with previously treated, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study (BEACON; BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102), conducted at 135 sites in 11 countries, patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine (and two to five previous regimens for advanced disease) were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally via an interactive response system to etirinotecan pegol (145 mg/m(2) as a 90-min intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) or single-drug treatment of physician's choice. Patients with stable brain metastases and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. Randomisation was stratified with a permuted block scheme by region, previous eribulin, and receptor status. After randomisation, patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01492101. FINDINGS: Between Dec 19, 2011, and Aug 20, 2013, 852 patients were randomly assigned; 429 to etirinotecan pegol and 423 to treatment of physician's choice. There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (median 12·4 months [95% CI 11·0-13·6] for the etirinotecan pegol group vs 10·3 months [9·0-11·3] for the treatment of physician's choice group; hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·75-1·02]; p=0·084). The safety population includes the 831 patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment (425 assigned to etirinotecan pegol and 406 to treatment of physician's choice). Serious adverse events were recorded for 128 (30%) patients treated with etirinotecan pegol and 129 (32%) treated with treatment of physician's choice. Fewer patients in the etirinotecan pegol group had grade 3 or worse toxicity than those in the treatment of physician's choice group (204 [48%] vs 256 [63%]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (41 [10%] in the experimental group vs five [1%] in the control group), neutropenia (41 [10%] vs 125 [31%]), and peripheral neuropathy (two [<1%] vs 15 [4%]). Three patients in the etirinotecan pegol group died of treatment-related adverse events (pneumonia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute renal failure) and two in the treatment of physician's choice group (neutropenic sepsis and septic shock). INTERPRETATION: This trial did not demonstrate an improvement in overall survival for etirinotecan pegol compared to treatment of physician's choice in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer. The toxicity profile noted in the etirinotecan pegol group differed from that in the control group. In view of the frequency of cross-resistance and overlapping toxicities noted with many available drugs and the need for effective drugs in highly refractory disease, etirinotecan pegol may warrant further research in some subgroups of patients. FUNDING: Nektar Therapeutics.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial comparing two schedules of etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in women with recurrent platinum-resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) is a unique, long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor with prolonged systemic exposure to SN38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin), the active metabolite of irinotecan. This randomized phase II trial investigated two dosing schedules of etirinotecan pegol in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 71 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive etirinotecan pegol 145 mg/m(2) every 14 or 21 days until progression or unacceptable adverse events (AEs). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST (version 1.0). Secondary end points included response by Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria, duration of ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The overall confirmed ORR was 20% (95% CI, 10% to 30%): 20% for once every 14 days, and 19% for once every 21 days. Median response duration was 4.1 months for once every 14 days and 4.0 months for once every 21 days. Median PFS for every 14 and every 21 days was 4.1 and 5.3 months, respectively, and median OS was 10.0 and 11.7 months, respectively. Etirinotecan pegol was well tolerated, with the most common grade 3 to 4 AEs being dehydration (24%) and diarrhea (23%). Diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, and neutropenia were less frequent with the schedule of once every 21 days than with that of once every 14 days. CONCLUSION: Both schedules of etirinotecan pegol showed activity in patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer, with encouraging ORR and PFS rates. The schedule of once every 21 days was better tolerated and had slightly longer PFS and OS rates. The treatment schedule of etirinotecan pegol 145 mg/m(2) once every 21 days was selected for the expanded phase II study and is preferred for future phase III studies. These findings provide support to directly compare etirinotecan pegol versus one of the approved drugs (eg, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Two schedules of etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer: a randomised phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: New therapeutic options are needed for patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer. Etirinotecan pegol is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor designed to provide prolonged tumour-cell exposure to SN38, the active metabolite. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of two etirinotecan pegol dosing schedules in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer to determine an optimum dosing schedule for phase 3 trials. METHODS: In this randomised, two-stage, open-label phase 2 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older who had received taxane therapy and undergone two or fewer previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, from 18 sites in three countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to etirinotecan pegol 145 mg/m(2) every 14 days or every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a confirmed objective response as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0, analysed by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. FINDINGS: 70 patients (35 in each group) were randomly assigned to treatment between Feb 17, 2009 and April 13, 2010. Of the 70 patients, 20 (29%; 95% CI 18·4-40·6) achieved an objective response (two [3%] had a complete response and 18 [26%] had a partial response). Ten patients on the 14-day schedule achieved an objective response (29%; 95% CI 14·6-46·3; eight partial responses, two complete responses) as did ten on the 21-day schedule (29%; 95% CI 14·6-46·3; all partial responses). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were delayed diarrhoea (seven [20%] of 35 patients on the 14-day schedule vs eight [23%] of 35 patients on the 21-day schedule), fatigue (five [14%] vs three [9%]), neutropenia (four [11%] vs four [11%]), and dehydration (three [9%] vs four [11%]); 14 [20%] patients discontinued treatment because of drug-related toxicity. There were two possible drug-related deaths (acute renal failure and septic shock) in the 14-day group; other drug-related serious adverse events reported by more than one patient included ten [14%] patients with diarrhoea (six [17%] patients on the 14-day schedule vs four [11%] on the 21-day schedule), six [9%] with dehydration (two [6%] vs four [11%]), two [3%] with nausea (two [6%] vs none), and two [3%] with vomiting (two [6%] vs none). INTERPRETATION: On the basis of the overall clinical data, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability profile, etirinotecan pegol 145 mg/m(2) every 21 days has been selected for a phase 3 trial against treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced breast cancer.