Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 187(1): 1-7, 2019 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31034554

RESUMEN

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is used to treat patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and with lower urinary obstructive tract symptoms. It is an interventional procedure which uses fluoroscopy equipment and can result in exposure to high doses of radiation in patients and staff. We aimed to demonstrate the reduction of radiation doses received by staff during PAE by implementing an optimised protocol called Radiation Exposure Curtailment for Embolisation (RECiFE). This protocol was implemented in cooperation with the medical team and technical team using Siemens Combined Applications to Reduce Exposure (CARE) protocol. The results showed approximately 83% reduction in the radiation doses received by the main physician during PAE. Thus, by adjusting the acquisition parameters of the angiographic equipment and implementing the RECiFE protocol, it is possible to optimise the PAE procedure and reduce the staff radiation dose.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Brasil , Humanos , Masculino
2.
J Radiol Prot ; 35(3): 629-47, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26270613

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to evaluate organ and tissue absorbed doses to patients undergoing hepatic chemoembolization procedures performed in two hospitals in the city of Recife, Brazil. Forty eight patients undergoing fifty hepatic chemoembolization procedures were investigated. For the 20 cases with PA projection only, organs and tissues dose to KAP conversion coefficients were calculated using the mesh-based anthropometric phantom series FASH and MASH coupled to the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. Clinical, dosimetric and irradiations parameters were registered for all patients. The maximum organ absorbed doses found were 2.4 Gy, 0.85 Gy, 0.76 Gy and 0.44 Gy for skin, kidneys, adrenals and liver, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional , Glándulas Suprarrenales/efectos de la radiación , Adulto , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/efectos de la radiación , Hígado/efectos de la radiación , Masculino , Método de Montecarlo , Fantasmas de Imagen , Piel/efectos de la radiación
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 165(1-4): 263-7, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25870436

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient and medical staff absorbed doses received from transarterial chemoembolisation of hepatocellular carcinoma, which is the most common primary liver tumour worldwide. The study was performed in three hospitals in Recife, capital of the state of Pernambuco, located in the Brazilian Northeastern region. Two are public hospitals (A and B), and one is private (C). For each procedure, the number of images, irradiation parameters (kV, mA and fluoroscopy time), the air kerma-area product (PKA) and the cumulative air kerma (Ka,r) at the reference point were registered. The maximum skin dose (MSD) of the patient was estimated using radiochromic film. For the medical staff dosimetry, thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLD-100) were attached next to the eyes, close to the thyroid (above the shielding), on the thorax under the apron, on the wrist and on the feet. The effective dose to the staff was estimated using the algorithm of von Boetticher. The results showed that the mean value of the total PKA was 267.49, 403.83 and 479.74 Gy cm(2) for Hospitals A, B and C, respectively. With regard to the physicians, the average effective dose per procedure was 17 µSv, and the minimum and maximum values recorded were 1 and 41 µSy, respectively. The results showed that the feet received the highest doses followed by the hands and lens of the eye, since the physicians did not use leaded glasses and the equipment had no lead curtain.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aire , Algoritmos , Brasil , Calibración , Dosimetría por Película/métodos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ropa de Protección , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación , Radiometría , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Dosimetría Termoluminiscente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA