Health Policy for Prostate Cancer Early Detection in the European Union and the Impact of Opportunistic Screening: PRAISE-U Consortium.

With the new policy recommendation in 2022 to explore the possibilities of screening for prostate cancer by the European Commission, the landscape for prostate cancer early detection is evolving. In line with this recommendation, the PRAISE-U project aims to evaluate the early detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer through customised and risk-based screening programmes, with the goal to align protocols across European Union member states. This systematic review is part of the PRAISE-U project, with the goal to review the policy, medical guideline recommendations, and the current level of opportunistic screening presented in the scientific literature on prostate cancer early detection from 2016 to 2023 in European Union member states. An extensive literature search was performed on 1 June 2023 in a large number of databases, including Embase.com, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, and Policy Commons. We identified 318 articles (qualitative, quantitative, and reviews), of which 41 were included in the full-text screening. Seventeen articles were ultimately identified as eligible for inclusion. The included articles revealed significant variations towards PSA-based early detection policies for prostate cancer in nine European countries. Despite official recommendations, opportunistic screening was prevalent across all nine countries regardless of recommendations for or against PSA-based early detection. This systematic review suggests that the current early detection policies are not fit for purpose. High levels of opportunistic screening and overdiagnosis persist, prompting policy recommendations for standardised guidelines, informed decision making, and increased awareness to improve efficiency and effectiveness in early detection.

Impact of the Standardization of Penile Cancer Care on the Quality of Care, Outcomes, and Academic-driven Centralization in a Single eUROGEN Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: Penile cancer (PeCa) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge given the low patient volume, which may result in inadequate physician expertise and poor guideline adherence. Since 2015, we have developed a specific care pathway for PeCa in our tertiary referral center. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a dedicated PeCa care pathway on patient management, the adequacy of pathological reporting, and oncological outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively queried our institutional registry (S-66482) to identify patients who were surgically treated for PeCa between January 1989 and April 2022. The patient numbers were evaluated within a broader national context. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We compared patient, surgery, tumor, and pathological data before and after 2015. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare local and regional recurrence rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 313 patients were included, of whom 204 (65.1%) were surgically treated after 2015. The median number of patients treated yearly was significantly higher after 2015 (26 vs 5; p < 0.01). Patients treated after 2015 more frequently had no palpable lymph nodes at diagnosis, despite similar primary tumor stage. After adoption of the PeCa care pathway, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) was more commonly performed (79.9% vs 57.8%; p < 0.01) despite local staging being similar and without observing a significant increase in positive margins. Surgical staging in patients with European Association of Urology intermediate- or high-risk tumors was conducted more frequently after 2015 (90% vs 41%; p < 0.01). Pathology reporting was standardized, and there was more frequent reporting of p16 staining status (81.4% vs 8.3%; p < 0.01), lymphovascular invasion (93.8% vs 44.3%; p < 0.01), and perineural invasion (92.4% vs 44.3%; p < 0.01) following implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a standardized care pathway for PeCa resulted in higher rates of OSS and pathological nodal staging and more complete pathology reports. Considering that these changes were associated with an increase in the number of patients treated, academic-driven centralization may play a role in optimizing the management of these patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the impact of a care pathway for patients with penile cancer on patient management, the completeness of pathology reporting, and cancer control. We found that implementation of this pathway was associated with an increase in the number of patients treated, higher rates of organ-sparing surgery and lymph node staging, and more complete pathology reports. Centralization of care may play a role in optimizing the management of penile cancer.

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer in the European Union: Combining Forces with PRAISE-U.

The European Association of Urology, together with consortium partners, has launched PRAISE-U (Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union), a project involving 25 institutions across 12 countries that is funded under the EU4Health program. The aim is to reduce the morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer in EU member states via customized and risk-based screening programs.

Diabetes, Obesity, and Pathological Upstaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Large Multi-institutional Consortium.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether clinical risk factors and morphometric features on preoperative imaging can be utilized to identify those patients with cT1 tumors who are at higher risk of upstaging (pT3a). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective international case-control study of consecutive patients treated surgically with radical or partial nephrectomy for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (cT1 N0) conducted between January 2010 and December 2018. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to study associations of preoperative risk factors on pT3a pathological upstaging among all patients, as well as subsets with those with preoperative tumors ≤4 cm, renal nephrometry scores, tumors ≤4 cm with nephrometry scores, and clear cell histology. We also examined association with pT3a subsets (renal vein, sinus fat, perinephric fat). RESULTS: Among the 4,092 partial nephrectomy and 2,056 radical nephrectomy patients, pathological upstaging occurred in 4.9% and 23.3%, respectively. Among each group independent factors associated with pT3a upstaging were increasing preoperative tumor size, increasing age, and the presence of diabetes. Specifically, among partial nephrectomy subjects diabetes (OR=1.65; 95% CI 1.17, 2.29), male sex (OR=1.62; 95% CI 1.14, 2.33), and increasing BMI (OR=1.03; 95% CI 1.00, 1.05 per 1 unit BMI) were statistically associated with upstaging. Subset analyses identified hilar tumors as more likely to be upstaged (partial nephrectomy OR=1.91; 95% CI 1.12, 3.16; radical nephrectomy OR=2.16; 95% CI 1.44, 3.25). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes and higher BMI were associated with pathological upstaging, as were preoperative tumor size, increased age, and male sex. Similarly, hilar tumors were frequently upstaged.

Morbidity of elective surgery for localized renal masses among elderly patients: A contemporary multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The aging population and the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are increasing worldwide. Over 25% of newly diagnosed LRM (localized renal masses) occur in patients over the eighth decade of life. The decision-making and treatment approach to LRM in this population represents a clinical dilemma due to inherited decreased functional reserve and competing mortality risks. Current literature reports conflicting evidence regarding age as a risk factor for worst surgical outcomes. As such, we aimed to evaluate the contemporary morbidity of elective surgery for LRM among elderly patients, focusing on intraoperative and postoperative complications. METHODS: After Ethical Committee approval, we queried our prospectively maintained databases to identify patients with preoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m [(David and Bloom, 2022) 22 and a normal contralateral kidney who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy (PN or RN) for a single cT1-T2N0M0 LRM between 1/2015-12/2021 at four high-volume European Academic Institutions. Patients were categorized by age groups: <50 yrs (young) vs. 50-75 (middle-aged) yrs vs.> 75 yrs (elderly). Postoperative complications were recorded according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. The primary objectives were the proportion of patients experiencing intraoperative (IOC), any grade (AGC), and high-grade postoperative complications (HGC), defined as CD grade 3-5. RESULTS: Overall, 2469/3076 (80.2%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 363 (14.7%) were young, 1682 (68.1%) were middle-aged, and 424 (17.2%) were elderly. Compared to middle-aged and young patients, elderly patients had a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index (6 vs. 4 vs. 0, p < 0.01) and a higher proportion of cT1 renal mass (87.6% vs. 93.0% vs. 93.6%, p < 0.01). No differences among the study groups were found regarding surgical approach (open vs. minimally-invasive) and type of surgery (PN vs. RN). We found that older patients experienced similar IOC (4.5% vs. 4.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.7) and AGC (23.1% vs. 20.0% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.4) compared to middle-aged and young patients, respectively. Similarly, there were no significant differences in HGC between the study cohorts (0.7% vs. 1.4% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.8). At multivariable analysis, open approach and PN significantly predicted the occurrence of AGCs, while only the open surgical approach was associated with the occurrence of HGCs. CONCLUSION: In kidney cancer tertiary referral centers, the risk of IOC and postoperative HGC after PN or RN for localized renal masses (LRM) is low, despite a non-negligible risk of AGC, especially in elderly patients. Further efforts should focus on identifying multidisciplinary strategies to select patients most likely to benefit from surgery among elderly candidates with LRMs and decrease the morbidity of surgery in this specific setting.

How to follow the new EU Council recommendation and improve prostate cancer early detection: the Prostaforum 2022 declaration.

An updated Council of the EU recommendation on cancer screening was adopted in December 2022 during the Czech EU presidency. The recommendation included prostate cancer as a suitable target disease for organised screening, and invited countries to proceed with piloting and further research. To support further discussions and actions to promote early detection of prostate cancer, an international conference in November 2022 (Prostaforum 2022) resulted in a joint declaration. Here we describe the EU policy background, summarise the preparation of the declaration and the key underlying evidence and expert recommendations, and report the text of the declaration. The declaration summarises the striking inequalities in prostate cancer burden in Europe and calls on all stakeholders to consider and support concrete steps for advancement of organised early detection of prostate cancer. Our aim is to request endorsement of the text and potential initiation of practical actions by all stakeholders to support the aims of the declaration. Patient summary: Prostate cancer is among the most frequent cancers and is one of the most common causes of cancer death among men. The European Union has recommended new pilot programmes for prostate cancer screening. The Prostaforum 2022 declaration invites all stakeholders to support this new recommendation with specific steps.

New-onset Chronic Kidney Disease After Surgery for Localised Renal Masses in Patients with Two Kidneys and Preserved Renal Function: A Contemporary Multicentre Study.

Background: There is a lack of evidence on acute kidney injury (AKI) and new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) after surgery for localised renal masses (LRMs) in patients with two kidneys and preserved baseline renal function. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and risk of AKI and new-onset clinically significant CKD (csCKD) in patients with a single renal mass and preserved renal function after being treated with partial (PN) or radical (RN) nephrectomy. Design setting and participants: We queried our prospectively maintained databases to identify patients with a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and a normal contralateral kidney who underwent PN or RN for a single LRM (cT1-T2N0M0) between January 2015 and December 2021 at four high-volume academic institutions. Intervention: PN or RN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The outcomes of this study were AKI at hospital discharge and the risk of new-onset csCKD, defined as eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2, during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine csCKD-free survival according to tumour complexity. A Multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the predictors of AKI, while a multivariable Cox regression analysis assessed the predictors of csCKD. Sensitivity analyses were performed in patients who underwent PN. Results and limitations: Overall, 2469/3076 (80%) patients met the inclusion criteria. At hospital discharge, 371/2469 (15%) developed AKI (8.7% vs 14% vs 31% in patients with low- vs intermediate- vs high-complexity tumours, p < 0.001). At the multivariable analysis, body mass index, history of hypertension, tumour complexity, and RN significantly predicted the occurrence of AKI. Among 1389 (56%) patients with complete follow-up data, 80 events of csCKD were recorded. The estimated csCKD-free survival rates were 97%, 93% and 86% at 12, 36, and 60 mo, respectively, with significant differences between patients with high- versus low-complexity and high- versus intermediate-complexity tumours (p = 0.014 and p = 0.038, respectively). At the Cox regression analysis, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, preoperative eGFR, tumour complexity, and RN significantly predicted the risk of csCKD during the follow-up. The results were similar in the PN cohort. The main limitation of the study was the lack of data on eGFR trajectories within the 1st year after surgery and on long-term functional outcomes. Conclusions: The risk of AKI and de novo csCKD in elective patients with an LRM and preserved baseline renal function is not clinically negligible, especially in those with higher-complexity tumours. While baseline nonmodifiable patient/tumour-related characteristics modulate this risk, PN should be prioritised over RN to maximise nephron preservation if oncological outcomes are not jeopardised. Patient summary: In this study, we evaluated how many patients with a localised renal mass and two functioning kidneys, who were candidates for surgery at four referral European centres, experienced acute kidney injury at hospital discharge and significant renal functional impairment during the follow-up. We found that the risk of acute kidney injury and clinically significant chronic kidney disease in this patient population is not negligible, and was associated with specific baseline patient comorbidities, preoperative renal function, tumour anatomical complexity, and surgery-related factors, in particular the performance of radical nephrectomy.

Radioligand therapies in cancer: mapping the educational landscape in Europe.

AIM: We performed a systematic survey to assess the existing gaps in Europe in multidisciplinary education for integration of radioligand therapy (RLT) into cancer care and to obtain detailed information on the current limitations and key contents relevant. METHODS: A high-quality questionnaire, with emphasis on survey scales, formulation, and validity of the different items, was designed. An expert validation process was undertaken. The survey was circulated among medical specialties involved in cancer treatment, universities, and nursing organizations. Questionnaires (156) were distributed, and 95 responses received. RESULTS: Sevety-eight percent of medical societies indicated that training in RLT was very important and 12% important. Eighty-eight percent indicated that their specialty training program included RLT. Twenty-six percent were satisfied with the existing structure of training in RLTs. Ninety-four percent indicated that the existing training is based on theory and hands-on experience. Main identified limitations were lack of centers ready to train and of personnel available for teaching. Sixty-five percent indicated that national programs could be expanded. Fifty percent of consulted universities indicated partial or scarce presence of RLT contents in their teaching programs. In 26% of the cases, the students do not have the chance to visit a RLT facility. A large majority of the universities are interested in further expansion of RLT contents in their curriculums. Nursing organizations almost never (44.4%) or occasionally (33.3%) include RLT contents in the education of nurses and technologists. Hands-on experience is almost never (38%) and sometimes (38%) offered. However, 67% of centers indicated high interest in expanding RLT contents. CONCLUSION: Centers involved recognize the importance of the training and indicate a need for inclusion of additional clinical content, imaging analysis, and interpretation as well as extended hands-on training. A concerted effort to adapt current programs and a shift towards multidisciplinary training programs is necessary for proper education in RLT in Europe.

Estimating Postoperative Renal Function After Surgery for Nonmetastatic Renal Masses: A Systematic Review of Available Prediction Models.

CONTEXT: A variety of models predicting postoperative renal function following surgery for nonmetastatic renal tumors have been reported, but their validity and clinical usefulness have not been formally assessed. OBJECTIVE: To summarize prediction models available for estimation of mid- to long-term (>3 mo) postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for nonmetastatic renal masses that include only preoperative or modifiable intraoperative variables. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to March 2022 according to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022303492). Risk of bias was assessed according to the Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 21 prediction models from 18 studies were included (nine for PN only; eight for RN only; four for PN or RN). Most studies relied on retrospective patient cohorts and had a high risk of bias and high concern regarding the overall applicability of the proposed model. Patient-, kidney-, surgery-, tumor-, and provider-related factors were included among the predictors in 95%, 86%, 100%, 61%, and 0% of the models, respectively. All but one model included both patient age and preoperative renal function, while only a few took into account patient gender, race, comorbidities, tumor size/complexity, and surgical approach. There was significant heterogeneity in both the model building strategy and the performance metrics reported. Five studies reported external validation of six models, while three assessed their clinical usefulness using decision curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Several models are available for predicting postoperative renal function after kidney cancer surgery. Most of these are not ready for routine clinical practice, while a few have been externally validated and might be of value for patients and clinicians. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed the tools available for predicting kidney function after partial or total surgical removal of a kidney for nonmetastatic cancer. Most of the models include patient and kidney characteristics such as age, comorbidities, and preoperative kidney function, and a few also include tumor characteristics and intraoperative variables. Some models have been validated by additional research groups and appear promising for improving counseling for patients with nonmetastatic cancer who are candidates for surgery.

Cancer literacy - Informing patients and implementing shared decision making.

In order to tailor treatment to their needs, cancer patients are encouraged to be more active and engaged in their care decisions and to be autonomous yet collaborative with their healthcare professionals when it comes to aspects of their treatment in order to get better results. However, this can only happen after providing them with accurate information about cancer and the different treatment alternatives and their potential side effects. However, sharing robust data-based information is often hindered by exposure to misleading information through different media and online platform, where patients might come across unscientifically founded health practices. Increasing health literacy and cancer-specific literacy is essential to fight this negative trend. The idea is that more knowledgeable patients will be able to debunk more easily misinformation they encounter. This is also related to inequalities among cancer patients. Not only levels of cancer literacy within Europe are uneven across and within countries, but there are social groups that, due to specific social determinants, are systematically less informed and skilled regarding cancer care. In this paper an overview of gaps in addressing literacy issues, and the importance of health literacy to empower patients in their journey through treatment is delineated, concluding with some recommendations to improve cancer literacy in Europe.

Combining PSA and PET features to select candidates for salvage lymph node dissection in recurrent prostate cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between pre-operative PSA value, 68Ga-prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) PET performance and oncologic outcomes after salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and methods: The study included 164 patients diagnosed with ≤2 pelvic lymph-node recurrence(s) of PCa documented on 68Ga-PSMA PET scan and treated with pelvic ± retroperitoneal sLND at 11 high-volume centres between 2012 and 2019. Pathologic findings were correlated to PSA values at time of sLND, categorized in early (<0.5 ng/ml), low (0.5-0.99 ng/ml), moderate (1-1.5 ng/ml) and high (>1.5 ng/ml). Clinical recurrence (CR)-free survival after sLND was calculated using multivariable analyses and plotted over pre-operative PSA value. Results: Median [interquartile range (IQR)] PSA at sLND was 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) ng/ml, and 131 (80%) patients had one positive spot at PET scan. All patients received pelvic sLND, whereas 91 (55%) men received also retroperitoneal dissection. Median (IQR) number of node removed was 15 (6, 28). The rate of positive pathology increased as a function of pre-operative PSA value, with highest rates for patients with pre-operative PSA > 1.5 ng/ml (pelvic-only sLNDs: 84%; pelvic + retroperitoneal sLNDs: 90%). After sLND, PSA ≤ 0.3 ng/ml was detected in 67 (41%) men. On multivariable analyses, pre-operative PSA was associated with PSA response (p < 0.0001). There were 51 CRs after sLND. After adjusting for confounders, we found a significant, non-linear relationship between PSA level at sLND and the 12-month CR-free survival (p < 0.0001), with the highest probability of freedom from CR for patients who received sLND at PSA level ≥1 ng/ml. Conclusions: In case of PET-detected nodal recurrences amenable to sLND, salvage surgery was associated with the highest short-term oncologic outcomes when performed in men with PSA ≥ 1 ng/ml. Awaiting confirmatory data from prospective trials, these findings may help physicians to optimize the timing for 68Ga-PSMA PET in biochemical recurrent PCa.

Predicting short- and long-term renal function following partial and radical nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To externally validate the previously published Mayo clinic model for the prediction of early (<30 days) postoperative renal failure, which relies solely on preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and develop a novel model for the prediction of long-term (>30 days) renal function after partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN), including patient factors and nephrometry scores. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, single-center cohort study on patients who underwent PN or RN for a unilateral renal tumor between 2003 and 2019 with a preoperative eGFR of at least 15 ml/min/1.73m2. Early postoperative renal failure was defined as eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 or receipt of dialysis within 30 days. We determined the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) to assess the Mayo clinic model's discriminative power. We used hierarchical linear mixed models with backward selection of candidate variables to develop a prediction model for long-term eGFR following PN and RN, separately. Their predictive ability was quantified using the marginal and conditional R2GLMM and an internal validation. RESULTS: We included 421 patients (7,548 eGFR observations) who underwent PN and 271 patients (6,530 eGFR observations) who underwent RN. The Mayo clinic model for prediction of early postoperative renal failure following PN and RN showed an AUC of 0.816 (95% CI 0.718-0.920) and 0.825 (95% CI 0.688-0.962), respectively. In multivariable models, long-term eGFR following PN was associated with age, diabetes, the presence of a solitary kidney, tumor diameter and preoperative eGFR, while long-term eGFR following RN was associated with age, body mass index, RENAL nephrometry score and preoperative eGFR. Marginal and conditional R2GLMM were 0.591 and 0.855 for the PN model, and 0.363 and 0.849 for the RN model, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo clinic model for short-term renal failure prediction showed good accuracy on external validation. Our long-term eGFR prediction models depend mostly on host factors as opposed to tumor complexity and can aid in decision-making when considering PN vs. RN.

ARNEO: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Degarelix with or Without Apalutamide Prior to Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients have a high risk of biochemical recurrence and metastatic progression following radical prostatectomy (RP). OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix plus apalutamide before RP compared with degarelix with a matching placebo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: ARNEO was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II neoadjuvant trial before RP performed between March 2019 and April 2021. Eligible patients had high-risk PCa and were amenable to RP. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to degarelix (240-80-80 mg) + apalutamide (240 mg/d) versus degarelix + matching placebo for 3 mo followed by RP. Prior to and following neoadjuvant treatment, pelvic 18F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the difference in proportions of patients with minimal residual disease (MRD; = residual cancer burden (RCB) ≤0.25 cm3 at final pathology). Secondary endpoints included differences in prostate-specific antigen responses, pathological staging, and change in TNM stage on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/MRI following hormonal treatment. Biomarkers (immunohistochemical staining on prostate biopsy [PTEN, ERG, Ki67, P53, GR, and PSMA] and PSMA PET/MRI-derived characteristics) associated with pathological response (MRD and RCB) were explored. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients were randomized to neoadjuvant degarelix + apalutamide (n = 45) or degarelix + matching placebo (n = 44) for 12 wk and underwent RP. Patients in the degarelix + apalutamide arm achieved a significantly higher rate of MRD than those in the control arm (38% vs 9.1%; relative risk [95% confidence interval] = 4.2 [1.5-11], p = 0.002). Patients with PTEN loss in baseline prostate biopsy attained significantly less MRD (11% vs 43%, p = 0.002) and had a higher RCB at final pathology (1.6 vs 0.40 cm3, p < 0.0001) than patients without PTEN loss. Following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, PSMA PET-estimated tumor volumes (1.2 vs 2.5 ml, p = 0.01) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax; 4.3 vs 5.7, p = 0.007) were lower in patients with MRD than in patients without MRD. PSMA PET-estimated volume and PSMA PET SUVmax following neoadjuvant treatment correlated significantly with RCB at final pathology (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk PCa patients, neoadjuvant degarelix plus apalutamide prior to RP results in a significantly improved pathological response (MRD and RCB) compared with degarelix alone. Our trial results provide a solid hypothesis-generating basis for neoadjuvant phase 3 trials, which are powered to detect differences in long-term oncological outcome following neoadjuvant androgen receptor signaling inhibitor therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we looked at the difference in pathological responses in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with degarelix plus apalutamide or degarelix plus matching placebo prior to radical prostatectomy. We demonstrated that patients treated with degarelix plus apalutamide achieved a significantly better tumor response than patients treated with degarelix plus matching placebo. Long-term follow-up is required to determine whether improved pathological outcome translates into better oncological outcomes.

Estetrol Prevents Hot Flushes and Improves Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy: The PCombi Study.

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is accompanied by side effects affecting health-related quality of life (HRQL). Objective: To assess the effects of the fetal estrogen estetrol (E4) on symptoms related to estrogen and androgen deficiency, and on HRQL measured using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire. Design setting and participants: This was a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with advanced PCa. Intervention: Patients receiving ADT were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to daily treatment with a high dose of E4 (HDE4; n = 41) or placebo (n = 21) for 24 wk. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was the effect of HDE4 cotreatment on hot flushes (HFs). Secondary outcomes were the Q-Man questionnaire for evaluation of the effect on estrogen and androgen deficiency symptoms, and the FACT-P questionnaire for evaluating HRQL. Results and limitations: At 24 wk, the number of patients experiencing HFs was significantly lower in the HDE4 group than in the placebo group (14.3% vs 60.0%; p < 0.001). HDE4 treatment was associated with lower incidence of night sweats, arthralgia, and fatigue, but more nipple tenderness and gynecomastia. At 24 wk, the mean HRQL score favored HDE4 over placebo for the FACT-P total score (122.2 ± 12.3 vs 118.7 ± 19.7) and for several other FACT subscales. Conclusions: Daily HDE4 coadministration almost completely prevented HFs in patients with advanced PCa treated with ADT. HDE4 also had positive effects on HRQL and counteracted other estrogen deficiency symptoms caused by ADT. These data support the dual efficacy concept of ADT and HDE4 to improve HRQL and increase the antitumor effect of ADT. Patient summary: For patients on androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer, cotreatment with a high dose of estetrol almost completely prevents the occurrence of hot flushes and improves quality of life and well-being, but nipple sensitivity and an increase in breast size may occur.

Serum PSA-based early detection of prostate cancer in Europe and globally: past, present and future.

In the pre-PSA-detection era, a large proportion of men were diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer and died of the disease; after the introduction of the serum PSA test, randomized controlled prostate cancer screening trials in the USA and Europe were conducted to assess the effect of PSA screening on prostate cancer mortality. Contradictory outcomes of the trials and the accompanying overdiagnosis resulted in recommendations against prostate cancer screening by organizations such as the United States Preventive Services Task Force. These recommendations were followed by a decline in PSA testing and a rise in late-stage diagnosis and prostate cancer mortality. Re-evaluation of the randomized trials, which accounted for contamination, showed that PSA-based screening does indeed reduce prostate cancer mortality; however, the debate about whether to screen or not to screen continues because of the considerable overdiagnosis that occurs using PSA-based screening. Meanwhile, awareness among the population of prostate cancer as a potentially lethal disease stimulates opportunistic screening practices that further increase overdiagnosis without the benefit of mortality reduction. However, in the past decade, new screening tools have been developed that make the classic PSA-only-based screening an outdated strategy. With improved use of PSA, in combination with age, prostate volume and with the application of prostate cancer risk calculators, a risk-adapted strategy enables improved stratification of men with prostate cancer and avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic procedures. This combination used with advanced detection techniques (such as MRI and targeted biopsy), can reduce overdiagnosis. Moreover, new biomarkers are becoming available and will enable further improvements in risk stratification.

EAU-EANM Consensus Statements on the Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Prostate Cancer and with Respect to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is useful for selected clinical indications in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) but it may have broader clinical utility owing to the emergence of lutetium-177-PSMA-617 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA) therapy. However, robust data regarding the impact of PSMA PET/CT on patient management and treatment are lacking, and in many areas, the role of next-generation imaging has not been defined. OBJECTIVE: To assess expert opinion on the use of PSMA-based imaging and therapy to develop interim guidance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A panel of 21 PCa experts from various disciplines received thematic topics and relevant literature. A questionnaire to assess proposed guidance statements regarding PSMA PET/CT and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy was developed for completion remotely in a first e-Delphi round. A subsequent panel discussion was conducted during a 1-d meeting, which included a second Delphi round. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Panellists voted anonymously on statements using a nine-point Likert scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 9 = strongly agree. Median scores were calculated and consensus was assessed using methods proposed by the Research and Development (RAND) corporation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Statements were developed to cover the following topics: PSMA PET/CT utility, clinical use, and choice of tracer; patient selection; and management of patients receiving [177Lu]Lu-PSMA for metastatic PCa. Consensus was reached for 33/36 statements. In-group bias is a potential limitation, as some statements were rephrased during discussions at the 1-d meeting. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of PSMA PET/CT as an imaging tool to guide [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy should be supported by indications for appropriate use. PATIENT SUMMARY: A panel of experts in prostate cancer reached a consensus for the majority of statements proposed regarding the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging and therapy, particularly the use of PSMA-based imaging in patients suitable for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy and the need to perform PSMA-based imaging before considering patients as candidates for this therapy.