Prognostic Impact of the Administration of Antibiotics and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background/Aim: The prognostic impact of the administration of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced cancer has recently been documented. However, how these drugs affect the outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 128 patients with RCC who received first-line ICI combination therapy. The patients were grouped according to their history of antibiotics and PPIs use one month before the initiation of ICI combination therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after ICI combination therapy were compared between patients treated with and without antibiotics or PPIs. Results: Of the 128 patients, 30 (23%) and 44 (34%) received antibiotics and PPIs, respectively. Patients treated with antibiotics exhibited shorter PFS and OS compared to those who did not receive antibiotics (median PFS: 4.9 vs. 16.1 months, p<0.0001; OS: 20.8 vs. 49.0 months, p=0.0034). Multivariate analyses showed that antibiotic administration was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio: 2.54: p=0.0002) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.56: p=0.0067) after adjusting for other covariates. In contrast, there were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between patients who received PPIs and those who did not. (PFS: p=0.828; OS: p=0.105). Conclusion: Antibiotics administration before ICI combination therapy was negatively associated with outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. Therefore, careful monitoring is required for potentially high-risk patients undergoing ICI combination therapy.

PD-L1 has a heterogeneous and dynamic expression in gastric cancer with implications for immunoPET.

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, spatial heterogeneity, and binding affinity of FDA-approved anti-PD-L1 antibodies (avelumab and atezolizumab) in gastric cancer. Additionally, we determined how PD-L1 glycosylation impacts antibody accumulation in gastric cancer cells. Methods: Dynamic PD-L1 expression was examined in NCIN87 gastric cancer cells. Comparative binding studies of avelumab and atezolizumab were conducted in gastric cancer models, both in vitro and in vivo. Antibody uptake in tumors was visualized through positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. PD-L1 glycosylation status was determined via Western blot analyses before and after PNGase F treatment. Results: Consistent findings revealed time-dependent PD-L1 induction in NCIN87 gastric cancer cells and spatial heterogeneity in tumors, as shown by PET imaging and immunofluorescence. Avelumab displayed superior binding affinity to NCIN87 cells compared to atezolizumab, confirmed by in vivo PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution analyses. Notably, PD-L1 glycosylation at approximately 50 kDa was observed, with PNGase F treatment inducing a shift to 35 kDa in molecular weight. Tissue samples from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) validated the presence of both glycosylated and deglycosylated PD-L1 (degPD-L1) forms in gastric cancer. Immunofluorescence microscopy and binding assays demonstrated enhanced avelumab binding post-deglycosylation. Discussion: This study provides an understanding of dynamic and spatially heterogeneous PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer. Anti-PD-L1 immunoPET was able to visualize gastric tumors, and PD-L1 glycosylation has significant implications for antibody recognition. These insights contribute to demonstrating the complexities of PD-L1 in gastric cancer, holding relevance for refining PD-L1 imaging-based approaches.

Optimal Number of Cycles of First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In recent years, switch maintenance after platinum-based chemotherapy has been a standard of care. However, the appropriate number of systemic chemotherapy cycles against advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma (UC) remains unclear. This study assessed the survival outcomes of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy according to treatment cycles in patients with metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with metastatic bladder and upper urinary tract cancer who received platinum-based combination therapy. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 179 patients, 47 (26.3%) were women, and 73 (40.8%) had upper urinary tract cancer. Furthermore, 47 (26.3%) who were not eligible for cisplatin received carboplatin. The median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range=1-14 cycles). The rates of progressive disease within two cycles, from two to four cycles, and from four to six cycles were 18.4%, 19.2%, and 30.6%, respectively. The median OS of patients with 2, 3, 4, 5-6, and ≥7 treatment cycles were 8.6, 14.3, 21.3, 24.4, and 26.1 months, respectively. The OS did not significantly differ between patients receiving four treatment cycles and those receiving ≥5 treatment cycles. In patients with disease control (complete or partial response or stable disease) receiving ≥4 treatment cycles, there was no significant difference in terms of OS between patients receiving four cycles and those receiving six cycles. CONCLUSION: Four cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy can be effective in patients with metastatic UC.

Difference of oncological efficacy between two immune checkpoint inhibitors following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with unresectable, metastatic, advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter real-world Japanese cohort.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance avelumab is currently recommended for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic (mUC) achieving at least stable disease (SD) on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1L-CT). Pembrolizumab is an alternative therapeutic avenue for this patient cohort in clinical practice. We investigated real-world data, focusing on the correlation between response to 1L-CT and oncological efficacy of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with avelumab or pembrolizumab. METHODS: A multicenter database registered 626 patients with mUC diagnosed from 2008-2023; among these, 175 receiving 2-6 cycles of 1L-CT followed by ICI therapy. Patients were categorized based on response to 1L-CT using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1). Objective response rate on ICI, progression to ICI-free survival (ICI-PFS), and overall survival from start of 1L-CT were compared between avelumab-treated and pembrolizumab-treated patients in each response subgroup. RESULTS: ICI-PFS was significantly longer in patients achieving partial response on 1L-CT and subsequently receiving pembrolizumab compared to those receiving avelumab. Notably, patients achieving SD on 1L-CT and subsequently receiving pembrolizumab manifested significantly higher objective response rate (14% and 41%, respectively) and prolonged ICI-PFS relative to those receiving avelumab. In contrast, overall survival did not delineate difference between patients treated with avelumab versus pembrolizumab. Similar findings were discerned in the subanalysis of patients having favorable SD (tumor shrinkage, from - 29 to 0%) and unfavorable SD (tumor enlargement, from + 1 to + 19%) on 1L-CT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides real-world evidence regarding difference of oncological efficacy between maintenance avelumab and subsequent pembrolizumab in patients with mUC who achieved partial response or SD on 1L-CT.

Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: real-world results from a Korean expanded access program.

Background: The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of avelumab administered as first-line (1L) maintenance treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) without disease progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. This study provides the first real-world data from Korea regarding avelumab 1L maintenance treatment, comprising data obtained from a nationwide expanded access program (EAP). Methods: This open-label EAP was conducted at five centers from September 2021 until June 2023. Eligible patients had unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC and were progression free after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks per local prescribing information. Safety and effectiveness were assessed by treating physicians according to routine practice. Results: Overall, 30 patients were enrolled. At initial UC diagnosis, 20 patients (66.7%) had stage 4 disease and 12 (40.0%) had visceral metastases. The most common 1L chemotherapy regimen was gemcitabine + cisplatin (21 patients; 70.0%). All but one patient (96.7%) had received 4-6 cycles of 1L chemotherapy. The median interval from end of 1L chemotherapy to start of avelumab was 4.4 weeks. Median duration of avelumab treatment was 6.2 months (range, 0.9-20.7); nine patients (30.0%) received >12 months of treatment. Adverse events related to avelumab occurred in 21 patients (70.0%) and were grade ≥3 or classified as serious in three patients (10.0%). Median progression-free survival was 7.9 months (95% CI, 4.3-13.1). Overall survival was not analyzed because only one patient died. Conclusion: Results from this EAP demonstrated the clinical activity and acceptable safety of avelumab 1L maintenance treatment in Korean patients with advanced UC, consistent with previous studies.

The Evolving Landscape of Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Genitourinary Cancers.

In the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved for treatment of genitourinary malignancies and have revolutionized the treatment landscape of these tumors. However, despite the remarkable success of these therapies in some GU malignancies, many patients' tumors do not respond to these therapies, and others may experience significant side effects, such as immune-related adverse events (iRAEs). Accordingly, biomarkers and improved prognostic tools are critically needed to help predict which patients will respond to ICI, predict and mitigate risk of developing immune-related adverse events, and inform personalized choice of therapy for each patient. Ongoing clinical and preclinical studies continue to provide an increasingly robust understanding of the mechanisms of the response to immunotherapy, which continue to inform biomarker development and validation. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of biomarkers of the response to immunotherapy in GU tumors and their role in selection of therapy and disease monitoring.

Avelumab maintenance therapy for node-positive muscle invasive bladder cancer: a report of two cases.

Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with nodal involvement is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality. Treatment of node-positive MIBC is complex due to disease heterogeneity and a lack of evidence-based treatment options, especially alternatives to radical cystectomy. We describe a bladder-sparing management approach involving systemic therapy followed by maintenance therapy, illustrated with two cases of node-positive MIBC. Case presentation: Two patients with node-positive MIBC received upfront gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), and avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) maintenance therapy. Both patients achieved complete remission without recurrence or distant metastasis post-avelumab maintenance therapy. At the last follow-up, Patient 1 (45-year-old male) was in remission for over two years, and Patient 2 (57-year-old male) was in complete remission for over one year post-chemotherapy. Avelumab treatment was well-tolerated, with no immune-related adverse events, and quality of life (QoL) was maintained. Conclusion: Both cases showed a good response and extended remission on avelumab maintenance, supporting its use in conjunction with local consolidation therapy as a bladder-preserving approach in node-positive MIBC. Further research, such as the ongoing INSPIRE trial, is required to refine treatment strategies for this patient group.

J-AVENUE: A retrospective, real-world study evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial showed that avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We report findings from J-AVENUE (NCT05431777), a real-world study of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan. METHODS: Medical charts of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma without disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, who received avelumab maintenance between February and November 2021, were reviewed. Patients were followed until June 2022. The primary endpoint was patient characteristics; secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure and progression-free survival. RESULTS: In 79 patients analyzed, median age was 72 years (range, 44-86). Primary tumor site was upper tract in 45.6% and bladder in 54.4%. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen was cisplatin + gemcitabine (63.3%). Median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. Best response to chemotherapy was complete response in 10.1%, partial response in 58.2%, and stable disease in 31.6%. Median treatment-free interval before avelumab was 4.9 weeks. With avelumab first-line maintenance therapy, the disease control rate was 58.2%, median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.4), and median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-9.7). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from J-AVENUE show the effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan in clinical practice, with similar progression-free survival to JAVELIN Bladder 100 and previous real-world studies, supporting its use as a standard of care.

First-line avelumab treatment in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: 4-year follow-up from part B of the JAVELIN Merkel 200 study.

BACKGROUND: Results from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 study led to the approval of avelumab [an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody] for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) in multiple countries and its inclusion in the treatment guidelines as a preferred or recommended therapy in this setting. Here, we report 4-year follow-up results from the cohort of patients with mMCC who received avelumab as first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In part B of JAVELIN Merkel 200, a single-arm, open-label, phase II study, patients with mMCC who had not received prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease received avelumab 10 mg/kg via intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. In this analysis, long-term overall survival (OS), patient disposition, and subsequent treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 116 patients received first-line avelumab. At the data cutoff (2 February 2022), the median follow-up was 54.3 months (range 48.0-69.7 months). Seven patients (6.0%) remained on treatment and an additional 21 patients remained in follow-up (18.1%); 72 patients (62.1%) had died. The median OS was 20.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.4-42.0 months], with a 4-year OS rate of 38% (95% CI 29% to 47%). In patients with PD-L1+ or PD-L1- tumors, the 4-year OS rate was 48% (95% CI 26% to 67%) and 35% (95% CI 25% to 45%), respectively. In total, 48 patients (41.4%) received poststudy anticancer drug therapy, most commonly etoposide (20.7%), carboplatin (19.0%), and avelumab (12.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Avelumab first-line monotherapy in patients with mMCC resulted in meaningful long-term OS, which compared favorably with historical studies of first-line chemotherapy. These results further support the role of avelumab as a standard of care for patients with mMCC.

Prognostic role of circulating cytokines and inflammation indexes for avelumab maintenance in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Background: Avelumab maintenance after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy represents a cornerstone for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, identifying prognostic biomarkers is paramount for optimizing patients' benefits while minimizing toxicity. Cytokines represent circulating mediators of the complex interaction between cancer, the immune system, and inflammation. Inflammation, a hallmark of cancer, can be expressed by circulating factors. In different tumor subtypes, peripheral blood biomarkers, such as circulating cytokines, and systemic inflammatory indexes, have been addressed as potential prognostic factors for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, their role in mUC still needs to be determined. Methods: Between February 2021 and April 2023, we prospectively collected plasma cytokines and inflammation indexes in 28 patients with mUC before starting avelumab as first-line maintenance. The primary endpoint was the relationship between baseline cytokines and inflammatory indexes with the clinical benefit (CB), defined as the number of Responders. Secondary endpoints included the correlation of baseline cytokines and inflammatory indexes with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the number and grade of immune-related adverse events. Results: High pre-treatment levels of interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-2, and low levels of IL-6, IL-8, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic-inflammation index (SII) were associated with clinical benefit and longer survival. In the multivariate analysis, low IL-8, NLR, and SII levels maintained a positive prognostic value for OS. Conclusion: Our data suggest that, in mUC patients receiving avelumab, pre-treatment levels of plasma cytokines and inflammatory indexes may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers for response and efficacy. In particular, patients with signs of pre-therapeutic inflammation showed a significantly lower response and survival to avelumab. On the contrary, low systemic inflammation and high levels of cytokines characterized responders and longer survivors.

MITO END-3: efficacy of avelumab immunotherapy according to molecular profiling in first-line endometrial cancer therapy.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared to first-line chemotherapy alone in advanced endometrial cancer (EC), with a much larger effect size in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cases. New biomarkers might help to select patients who may have benefit among those with a microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a pre-planned translational analysis of the MITO END-3 trial, we assessed the significance of genomic abnormalities in patients randomized to standard carboplatin/paclitaxel without or with avelumab. RESULTS: Out of 125 randomized patients, 109 had samples eligible for next-generation sequencing analysis, and 102 had MSI tested. According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), there were 29 cases with MSI-H, 26 with MSS TP53 wild type (wt), 47 with MSS TP53 mutated (mut), and 1 case with POLE mutation. Four mutated genes were present in >30% of cases: TP53, PIK3CA, ARID1A, and PTEN. Eleven patients (10%) had a BRCA1/2 mutation (five in MSI-H and six in MSS). High tumor mutational burden (≥10 muts/Mb) was observed in all MSI-H patients, in 4 out of 47 MSS/TP53 mut, and no case in the MSS/TP53 wt category. The effect of avelumab on PFS significantly varied according to TCGA categories, being favorable in MSI-H and worst in MSS/TP53 mut (P interaction = 0.003); a similar non-significant trend was seen in survival analysis. ARID1A and PTEN also showed a statistically significant interaction with treatment effect, which was better in the presence of the mutation (ARID1A P interaction = 0.01; PTEN P interaction = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The MITO END-3 trial results suggest that TP53 mutation is associated with a poor effect of avelumab, while mutations of PTEN and ARID1A are related to a positive effect of the drug in patients with advanced EC.

Comparison of the efficacy of enfortumab vedotin between patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were treated with avelumab or pembrolizumab: real-world data from a multi-institutional study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) refractory to prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the difference in efficacy of EV after each ICIs and prognostic factors are not well known. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EV in patients with metastatic UC who were treated with avelumab or pembrolizumab and to identify the prognostic factors. METHODS: The records of 100 patients with advanced metastatic UC who received EV after the administration of either avelumab or pembrolizumab were retrospectively collected from five academic hospitals in Japan. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 6.7 months. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the EV after avelumab/pembrolizumab group were not reached/14.7 months (p = 0.17) and 10.4/5.2 months (p = 0.039), respectively. The objective response rates (ORR) were 66.6% and 46.8% in EV after avelumab and EV after pembrolizumab groups, respectively (p = 0.14). Multivariate analysis identified histological variants, liver metastasis, low serum albumin levels, and high serum CRP level as significant poor prognostic factors. The median OS and PFS of cachexia patients with both low serum albumin levels and high serum CRP levels were 6.0 months and 0.93 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: PFS was superior in patients treated with EV after avelumab to EV after pembrolizumab. However, OS showed no significant difference between the two groups. Because the prognosis of patients with cachexia is extremely poor, the initiation of EV should be discussed in these patients.

Combination immune checkpoint and targeted protein kinase inhibitors for the treatment of renal cell carcinomas.

Kidney cancers comprise about 3% of all new malignancies in the United States. Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are the most common type of renal malignancy making up about 85% of kidney cancer cases. Signs and symptoms of renal cell carcinomas can result from local tumor growth, paraneoplastic syndromes, or distant metastases. The classic triad of presentation with flank pain, hematuria, and a palpable abdominal mass occurs in fewer than 10% of patients. Most diagnoses result from incidental imaging findings (ultrasonography or abdominal CT imaging) performed for another reason. Localized disease is treated by partial nephrectomy, total nephrectomy, or ablation (tumor destruction with heat or cold). When the tumors have metastasized, systemic therapy with protein-tyrosine kinase antagonists including sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, and tivozanib that target vascular endothelial, platelet-derived, fibroblast, hepatocyte, and stem cell factor growth factor receptors (VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, MET, and Kit) were prescribed after 2005. The monoclonal antibody immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (targeting programed cell death protein 1, PD1) was approved for the treatment of RCCs in 2015. It is usually used now in combination with ipilimumab (targeting CTLA-4) or cabozantinib (a multikinase blocker). Other combination therapies include pembrolizumab (targeting PD1) and axitinib (a VEGFR and PDGFR blocker) or lenvatinib (a multikinase inhibitor). Since the KEYNOTE-426 clinical trial, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors is now the standard of care for most patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas and monotherapies are used only in those individuals who cannot receive or tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed. SUMMARY: Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy. CONCLUSION: Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.

A case of complete response to avelumab plus axitinib combination therapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a kidney undergoing dialysis.

Introduction: Combination therapies of immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for end-stage kidney disease and patients on hemodialysis need careful consideration as few case reports provide suitable management decisions. Case presentation: A 70-year-old man who had undergone hemodialysis for 6 years due to nephrosclerosis. Avelumab plus axitinib combination therapy was performed for repeated lung metastasis, and a complete response was achieved without major side effects. Conclusion: A complete response was achieved after Ave plus Axi combination therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a patient undergoing dialysis. This suggests that Ave plus Axi combination therapy may be safe and effective for dialysis patients.

Avelumab plus axitinib for translocation renal cell carcinoma: A case series and literature review.

Introduction: Patients with translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) have a poor prognosis without standardized treatment. Case presentation: The first case was of a 72-year-old woman who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for a left renal tumor and was pathologically diagnosed with tRCC. Recurrence was observed in the left retroperitoneal soft tissue. After treatment with avelumab-axitinib, continued progression-free survival was confirmed at the 90-week follow-up. The second case was of a 41-year-old woman referred to our hospital and presented with translocation renal cell carcinoma metastasis to a para-aortic lymph node. After treatment with avelumab-axitinib, continued progression-free survival was confirmed at the 43-week follow-up. Conclusion: The outcomes of these cases indicate that avelumab-axitinib therapy has a long-term antitumor effect in some patients with tRCC.

Avelumab Plus Intermittent Axitinib in Previously Untreated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. The Tide-A Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Combinations of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) against PD1/PD-L1 are the standard first-line therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), irrespective of the prognostic class. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of withdrawing VEGFR-TKI but continuing anti-PD1/PD-L1 in patients who achieve a response to their combination. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a single-arm phase 2 trial in patients with treatment-naïve mRCC with prior nephrectomy, without symptomatic/bulky disease and no liver metastases. INTERVENTION: Enrolled patients received axitinib + avelumab; after 36 wk of therapy those who achieved a tumour response interrupted axitinib and continued avelumab maintenance until disease progression. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the rate of patients without progression 8 wk after the axitinib interruption. The secondary endpoints were the median value for progression-free (mPFS) and overall (mOS) survival and the safety in the overall population. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled and 75 were evaluated for efficacy. A total of 29 (38%) patients had axitinib withdrawn, as per the study design, with 72% of them having no progression after 8 wk and thus achieving the primary endpoint. The mPFS of the overall population was 24 mo, while the mOS was not reached. The objective response rate was 76% (12% complete response and 64% partial response), with 19% of patients having stable disease. In the patients who discontinued axitinib, the incidence of adverse events of any grade was 59% for grade 3 and 3% for grade 4. This study was limited by the lack of a comparative arm. CONCLUSIONS: The TIDE-A study demonstrates that the withdrawal of VEGFR-TKI with ICI maintenance is feasible for selected mRCC patients with evidence of a response to the VEGFR-TKI + ICI combination employed in first-line therapy. Axitinib interruption with avelumab maintenance leads to decreased side effects and should be investigated further as a new strategy to delay tumour progression. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated whether certain patients with advanced kidney cancer treated with the fist-line combination of axitinib plus avelumab can interrupt the axitinib in case of a tumour response after 36 wk of therapy. We found that axitinib interruption improved the safety of the combination, while the maintenance with avelumab might delay tumour progression.

Safety and effectiveness of avelumab in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma in general clinical practice in Japan: Post-marketing surveillance.

Avelumab, a programmed cell death ligand 1 blocking antibody, was approved for its first indication in Japan in September 2017 to treat unresectable Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Given that the pivotal JAVELIN Merkel 200 study only included a few Japanese patients, this post-marketing surveillance (PMS) evaluated the safety and effectiveness outcomes of patients with MCC who received avelumab in general clinical practice in Japan. This prospective, non-comparative, multicenter PMS included data from all patients with unresectable MCC who received avelumab between November 22, 2017 (avelumab launch date) and October 31, 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate avelumab safety (i.e., adverse events [AEs], adverse drug reactions [ADRs], and ADRs of safety specifications). The secondary objective was to evaluate avelumab effectiveness (i.e., objective response rate and overall survival [OS] rate). Seventy-five evaluable patients were included, of whom 81.3% experienced AEs of any grade (57.3% experienced AEs of grade ≥ 3; 41.3% experienced AEs of grade 5) and 61.3% experienced ADRs (14.7% experienced ADRs of grade ≥ 3; no grade 5 ADRs were observed). The most common ADRs were pyrexia (18.7%), infusion related reaction (10.7%), and chills (6.7%). The most common ADRs of safety specifications were infusion reactions (any grade: n = 21 [28.0%]; grade 3 or 4: n = 3 [4.0%]), thyroid dysfunction (n = 7 [9.3%]), and hepatic function disorders (n = 4 [5.3%]). The median observation period was 51 weeks. An objective response was achieved by 34/75 patients (45.3%; complete response, 24.0%; partial response, 21.3%) and 6- and 12-month OS rates were 77.7% and 59.6%, respectively. This PMS confirmed the clinical tolerability and effectiveness of avelumab in patients with MCC, with no new safety concerns. The risk-benefit profile of avelumab was comparable with that observed in clinical trials and remains favorable for use in general clinical practice in Japan.

A multiplex UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of three PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab, in human serum.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To support pharmacokinetic studies, a multiplex UPLC-MS/MS assay was developed and validated to quantify PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab in serum. METHODS: A bottom-up sample pre-treatment procedure was developed to determine atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab in serum. This procedure consisted of (1) precipitation of the monoclonal antibody with ammonium sulfate, (2) reduction with dithiothreitol, (3) denaturation with methanol, and (4) tryptic digestion of the protein. The unique signature peptides resulting after sample pre-treatment of the antibodies were measured using UPLC-MS/MS with a total run time of 11 minutes. The clinical application was evaluated by analyzing 114 atezolizumab patient samples. RESULTS: The developed method was found to be accurate and precise for all three analytes over a concentration range of 3.00-150 µg/mL. No endogenous interference was present in serum samples. Cross-interference experiments showed no cross-analyte interference and acceptable cross-internal standard interference. In addition, no substantial carry-over was observed. The stable isotopically labeled signature peptides were most effective in compensating for matrix effects. Recovery based on back-calculated concentrations of calibration standards and quality control samples was found to be high. The analytes were stable for at least three freeze-thaw cycles, for 42 hours at processing conditions, for at least two days at 2-8°C in the final extract, for five days before re-injection analysis at 4°C, and long-term for at least 11 months at -70°C. The assay was tested for its applicability in clinical practice. For this purpose, 114 atezolizumab patient samples were measured. CONCLUSION: A multiplex UPLC-MS/MS assay was developed and validated to quantify atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab in human serum. The applicability of this method was demonstrated by the analysis of clinical atezolizumab samples. The method is suitable to support clinical pharmacokinetic studies involving atezolizumab, avelumab, or durvalumab.