Features and efficacy of triple-targeted therapy for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer with acquired BRAF alterations who are resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The recommended first-line treatment for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). BRAF alterations have been identified as resistance mechanisms. We aimed to identify features of and subsequent treatment strategies for such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of NSCLC patients harboring acquired BRAF alterations. Additionally, BRAF-altered NSCLC patients who progressed from EGFR-TKIs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were screened. Patient characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included, 2 of whom came from our center. Seventy-five patients (72.1%) harbored BRAF mutations (57 class I mutations, 7 class II mutations, 9 class III mutations, and 2 non-class I-III mutations), and 29 (27.9%) harbored BRAF fusions. Eighteen patients received triple-targeted therapy, including prior EGFR-TKIs plus dabrafenib and trametinib, and 23 patients received other treatments. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients receiving triple-targeted therapy than in those receiving other treatments (8.0 versus 2.5 months, P < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in patients with BRAF mutations (9.0 versus 2.8 months, P = 0.004), particularly in those with BRAF class I mutations (9.0 versus 2.5 months, P < 0.001). A potential benefit was also observed among patients with BRAF fusions (5.0 versus 2.0 months, P = 0.230). Twenty patients (48.8%) experienced adverse events. Dose reduction of RAF or MEK inhibitor was required in five patients (12.2%). Five patients (12.2%) permanently discontinued treatment (three on triple-targeted therapy; one on prior EGFR-TKI plus vemurafenib; one on prior EGFR-TKI plus trametinib). CONCLUSIONS: BRAF alterations, specifically BRAF mutations and BRAF fusions, facilitate resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Triple-targeted therapy is effective and safe for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with acquired BRAF alterations, mainly among patients with BRAF class I mutations and potentially in patients with BRAF fusions.

HER3 is widely expressed across diverse subtypes of NSCLC in a retrospective analysis of archived tissue samples.

Aim: This noninterventional study (NCT05769764) aimed to characterize human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by patient, clinical or tumor characteristics.Methods: HER3 immunohistochemistry was performed in archival tissue samples from patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Samples were scored for membrane percent positivity and intensity. Membrane H-scores were calculated.Results: Of 203 evaluable samples, HER3 expression was observed in 98.5%, including all histologies, genomic subtypes and regardless of prior systemic anticancer treatments. The median H-score was 140, and 70.4% had a HER3 intensity of 3+.Conclusion: HER3 is widely expressed in NSCLC, indicating that HER3-directed therapy may be broadly applicable across diverse subtypes of NSCLC.

[Box: see text].

Epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung carcinomas with insufficient response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

Administration of single-agent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a standard treatment option for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinomas with EGFR exon 19 deletions (ex19del) and L858R substitutions. However, there is a significant interpatient heterogeneity with regard to the degree of the response and its duration. Patients with EGFR ex19del mutation, TP53 wild-type, good performance status, low tumor burden and no circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline have the best chances to derive pronounced benefit from TKI therapy. In contrast, subjects with EGFR L858R substitution, mutated TP53, poor overall condition, high tumor volume and detectable ctDNA are generally poor responders to EGFR inhibitors. ctDNA dynamics in the first days or weeks of treatment allows reliable identification of patients, who are very unlikely to derive clinically meaningful benefit from single-agent TKIs. These patients are candidates for clinical trials, which may involve the addition of chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs to patients, who failed to achieve immediate benefit from TKI monotherapy.

[Box: see text].

Analysis of the effect of baseline detection and early clearance of ct-DNA, on survival outcomes among patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To determine if circulating tumor DNA (ct-DNA) dynamics of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in plasma can identify a subset of patients with EGFR-mutant (EGFR- m) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with inferior survival outcomes, we analyzed and compared survival outcomes among patients with and without baseline presence and early clearance of EGFR ct-DNA in plasma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 66 patients newly dia-gnosed with EGFR- m NSCLC, plasma samples were collected at baseline and 1st response assessment at 12-24 weeks for extraction of ct-DNA. Estimation of ct-DNA (EGFR exons 18, 19, 20 and 21) was done using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (dd-PCR) on the QX200 ddPCR system (BioRad, USA). Patients with detectable EGFR ct-DNA at baseline (sample 1), with either undetectable or persistent detectable ct-DNA in sample 2 were classified as clearers and non-clearers, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients received 1st/ 2nd generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and 13 received either 3rd generation TKI (osimertinib) or chemotherapy plus gefitinib. The baseline ct-DNA-positive group had more patients with extra thoracic disease (60.4 vs. 48.5%). For the entire cohort, there was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) among baseline ct-DNA-negative (13.57 months) vs. ct-DNA-positive patients (12.32 months) (HR 0.74). There was a significant improvement of PFS among early ct-DNA clearers vs. non-clearers (12.32 vs. 9.92 months; HR 0.57). For those treated with 1st/ 2nd generation EGFR TKIs, this improvement in median PFS among early ct-DNA clearers vs. non-clearers was more apparent (11.76 vs. 6.8 months; HR 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline detection of the presence of ct-DNA of EGFR mutation in plasma was not predictive of first-line PFS, but is associated with extra thoracic disease. Patients with EGFR mutation and persistence of ct-DNA at first follow-up have worse PFS and overall survival (OS) in comparison to those clearing the same in plasma, especially among those treated with 1st/ 2nd generation EGFR TKIs.

Baseline genetic abnormalities and effectiveness of osimertinib treatment in patients with chemotherapy-naïve EGFR-mutated NSCLC based on performance status.

BACKGROUND/AIM: For patients treated with osimertinib as first-line therapy, there have been no studies comparing both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to performance status (PS). Furthermore, no studies have examined differences in baseline genetic abnormalities between patients with poor and good PS. Therefore, we aimed to investigate differences in baseline genetic abnormalities and treatment effects between patients with poor and good PS who received osimertinib as the primary treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the ELUCIDATOR study, which is a multi-center prospective observational study in Japan that assessed mechanisms underlying resistance to osimertinib as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. RESULTS: There were 153 and 25 patients in the good and poor PS groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant between-group differences in PFS (hazards ratio [HR]: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.72, p = 0.946). Multivariate analysis of OS revealed that poor PS was a poor prognostic factor (HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.43-4.73, p = 0.003). Regarding baseline genetic abnormalities, there was a significant increase in APC-positive cases (20.0% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.009) and a trend toward more CTNNB1-positive cases in the poor PS group than in the good PS group (14.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.062). CONCLUSION: There was no between-group difference in PFS, although OS was significantly inferior in the poor PS group. Additionally, there was a significant increase in APC-positive cases and a trend toward more CTNNB1-positive cases in the poor PS group.

Molecular heterogeneity and treatment outcome of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: insights from a large-scale real-world study.

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study aimed to investigate treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR20ins in China. EGFR20ins mutations are associated with poor responses to EGFR-TKIs, and limited real-world data exist regarding the efficacy of various treatment modalities. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, treatment outcomes, including PFS and ORR, were evaluated for different treatment regimens based on imaging assessments. The impact of mutation heterogeneity on treatment efficacy was also explored. RESULTS: Data from 302 patients diagnosed with NSCLC with EGFR20ins were analyzed. EGFR-TKI monotherapy demonstrated suboptimal PFS compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line setting (3.00 m vs. 6.83 m, HR = 3.674, 95%CI = 2.48-5.44, p < 0.001). Platinum plus pemetrexed plus bevacizumab combination therapy showed improved PFS and ORR compared to platinum plus pemetrexed (7.50m vs. 5.43 m, HR = 0.593, 95%CI = 0.383-0.918, p = 0.019). In later-line treatments, monotherapy with EGFR-TKIs or ICIs exhibited suboptimal efficacy. The specific EGFR20ins subtype, A763_Y764insFQEA, showed favorable responses to EGFR-TKIs in real-world settings. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale real-world study provides valuable insights into the treatment patterns and outcomes of NSCLC patients with EGFR20ins mutations in China. These findings contribute to the understanding of EGFR20ins treatment and provide real-world benchmark for future clinical trials and drug development.

Strong PD-L1 affect clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Background: In first/second generation EGFR-TKIs, strong PD-L1 expression contributes to primary resistance, significantly affecting patient prognosis. The relationship between PD-L1 expression levels and third-generation TKIs remains unclear.Methods: This study analyzed advanced NSCLC who received third-generation EGFR-TKIs as first-line systemic therapy from March 2019 to June 2022. The EGFR and PD-L1 status of the patients was also assessed.Results: Overall, 150 patients were included in this study. PD-L1 expression was negative (PD-L1 tumor proportion score <1%) in 89 cases, weak (1-49%) in 42 cases, and strong (≥50%) in 19 cases. mPFS for patients with negative, weak and strong PD-L1 expressions was 23.60, 26.12 and 16.60 months, respectively. The mPFS for strong PD-L1 expression was significantly shorter than that for with weak PD-L1 expression but was not associated with negativity. The same conclusions were shown in subgroup analyses of mutation types and TKI kinds. In addition, Relative to PD-L1-negative patients, resistance to TKIs may be associated with early progression for patients with strong PD-L1 expression.Conclusion: PD-L1 expression in tumor cells influenced the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Stronger PD-L1 expression in TKIs-treated patients with advanced first-line EGFR-mutated NSCLC was associated with worse PFS.

[Box: see text].

Longitudinal Analyses of Circulating Tumor DNA for the Detection of EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC Progression During Treatment: Data From FLAURA and AURA3.

INTRODUCTION: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)-sensitizing and -resistance mutations may be detected in plasma through circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Circulating tumor DNA level changes reflect alterations in tumor burden and could be a dynamic indicator of treatment effect. This analysis aimed to determine whether longitudinal EGFR-mutation ctDNA testing could detect progressive disease (PD) before radiologic detection. METHODS: This was a retrospective, exploratory ctDNA analysis in two phase 3 trials (FLAURA, NCT02296125; AURA3, NCT02151981). Patients had treatment-naïve (FLAURA) or EGFR-TKI pre-treated (AURA3) advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations and on-study PD (RECIST [Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors]), with a baseline ctDNA result and EGFR-mutation ctDNA monitoring beyond Cycle 3 Day 1. Patients received osimertinib versus comparator EGFR-TKIs (FLAURA) or chemotherapy (AURA3). Outcomes included time from ctDNA PD to RECIST PD and the first subsequent treatment (FLAURA only). RESULTS: Circulating tumor DNA PD preceded or co-occurred with RECIST-defined PD in 93 out of 146 patients (64%) in FLAURA and 82 out of 146 patients (56%) in AURA3. Median time from ctDNA PD to RECIST-defined PD (mo) was 3.4 and 2.6 in the osimertinib and comparator EGFR-TKI arms (FLAURA) and 2.8 and 1.5 in the osimertinib and chemotherapy arms (AURA3). In FLAURA, the median time from ctDNA PD to the first subsequent treatment (mo) was 6.0 and 4.7 in the osimertinib (n = 51) and comparator EGFR-TKI arms (n = 70). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy with ctDNA data and RECIST-defined PD, ctDNA PD preceded/co-occurred with RECIST-defined PD in approximately 60% of cases. Longitudinal ctDNA monitoring may detect PD before radiologic PD.

Characterization of Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC Following Emergence of the Osimertinib Resistance Mutations, L718Q or G724S: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study in France.

Purpose: The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib, is an effective first-line therapy for patients with common EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, almost all patients become resistant to treatment. In some patients, emergence of tertiary EGFR mutations is implicated as a resistance mechanism. This study describes patients with NSCLC who acquired the rare EGFR mutations, L718Q or G724S, following EGFR TKI treatment. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study undertaken in France from Feb-Nov 2021, in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with an acquired L718Q or G724S mutation. Primary objectives were description of tumor characteristics, progression, and progression under treatment. Results: Nine eligible patients were identified. Acquired resistance to initial EGFR TKI treatment was associated with T790M emergence in six patients, who then received osimertinib monotherapy. Overall, eight patients received osimertinib monotherapy treatment at some point (average treatment duration: 18.3 months). Following the emergence of L718Q or G724S, patients received chemotherapy (n = 4; two of whom subsequently received afatinib), nivolumab (n = 2), afatinib (n = 2), or immunochemotherapy (n = 1). In the four patients who received afatinib after identification of L718Q or G724S, 2 achieved a partial response, one had stable disease and one had progressive disease. Treatment duration was 1.6-31.7 months. In patients with controlled disease (n = 3), progression-free survival was 6.1-31.7 months. Two of these patients had previously received osimertinib. Conclusion: Currently, there is no consensus regarding the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC following emergence of the osimertinib resistance mutations, L718Q or G724S. Afatinib appears to be a promising treatment option in this setting.

Top 20 EGFR+ NSCLC Clinical and Translational Science Papers That Shaped the 20 Years Since the Discovery of Activating EGFR Mutations in NSCLC. An Editor-in-Chief Expert Panel Consensus Survey.

The year 2024 is the 20th anniversary of the discovery of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since then, tremendous advances have been made in the treatment of NSCLC based on this discovery. Some of these studies have led to seismic changes in the concept of oncology research and spurred treatment advances beyond NSCLC, leading to a current true era of precision oncology for all solid tumors. We now routinely molecularly profile all tumor types and even plasma samples of patients with NSCLC for multiple actionable driver mutations, independent of patient clinical characteristics nor is profiling limited to the advanced incurable stage. We are increasingly monitoring treatment responses and detecting resistance to targeted therapy by using plasma genotyping. Furthermore, we are now profiling early-stage NSCLC for appropriate adjuvant targeted treatment leading to an eventual potential "cure" in early-stage EGFR+ NSCLC which have societal implication on implementing lung cancer screening in never-smokers as most EGFR+ NSCLC patients are never-smokers. All these advances were unfathomable in 2004 when the five papers that described "discoveries" of activating EGFR mutations (del19, L858R, exon 20 insertions, and "uncommon" mutations) were published. To commemorate this 20th anniversary, we assembled a global panel of thoracic medical oncology experts to select the top 20 papers (publications or congress presentation) from the 20 years since this seminal discovery with December 31, 2023 as the cutoff date for inclusion of papers to be voted on. Papers ranked 21 to 30 were considered "honorable mention" and also annotated. Our objective is that these 30 papers with their annotations about their impact and even all the ranked papers will serve as "syllabus" for the education of future thoracic oncology trainees. Finally, we mentioned potential practice-changing clinical trials to be reported. One of them, LAURA was published online on June 2, 2024 was not included in the list of papers to be voted on but will surely be highly ranked if this consensus survery is performed again on the 25th anniversay of the discovery EGFR mutations (i.e. top 25 papers on the 25 years since the discovery of activating EGFR mutations).

Unravelling benzazepines and aminopyrimidine as multi-target therapeutic repurposing drugs for EGFR V774M mutation in neuroglioma patients.

Introduction: Neuroglioma, a classification encompassing tumors arising from glial cells, exhibits variable aggressiveness and depends on tumor grade and stage. Unraveling the EGFR gene alterations, including amplifications (unaltered), deletions, and missense mutations (altered), is emerging in glioma. However, the precise understanding of emerging EGFR mutations and their role in neuroglioma remains limited. This study aims to identify specific EGFR mutations prevalent in neuroglioma patients and investigate their potential as therapeutic targets using FDA-approved drugs for repurposing approach. Methods: Neuroglioma patient's data were analyzed to identify the various mutations and survival rates. High throughput virtual screening (HTVS) of FDA-approved (1615) drugs using molecular docking and simulation was executed to determine the potential hits. Results: Neuroglioma patient samples (n=4251) analysis reveals 19% EGFR alterations with most missense mutations at V774M in exon 19. The Kaplan-Meier plots show that the overall survival rate was higher in the unaltered group than in the altered group. Docking studies resulted the best hits based on each target's higher docking score, minimum free energy (MMGBSA), minimum kd, ki, and IC50 values. MD simulations and their trajectories show that compounds ZINC000011679756 target unaltered EGFR and ZINC000003978005 targets altered EGFR, whereas ZINC000012503187 (Conivaptan, Benzazepine) and ZINC000068153186 (Dabrafenib, aminopyrimidine) target both the EGFRs. The shortlisted compounds demonstrate favorable residual interactions with their respective targets, forming highly stable complexes. Moreover, these shortlisted compounds have drug- like properties as assessed by ADMET profiling. Conclusion: Therefore, compounds (ZINC000012503187 and ZINC000068153186) can effectively target both the unaltered/altered EGFRs as multi-target therapeutic repurposing drugs towards neuroglioma.

Activity of osimeRTInib in non-small-cell lung Cancer with UNcommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: retrospective Observational multicenter study (ARTICUNO).

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib represents the standard of care for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring classical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, constituting 80%-90% of all EGFR alterations. In the remaining cases, an assorted group of uncommon alterations of EGFR (uEGFR) can be detected, which confer variable sensitivity to previous generations of EGFR inhibitors, overall with lower therapeutic activity. Data on osimertinib in this setting are limited and strongly warranted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ARTICUNO study retrospectively evaluated data on osimertinib activity from patients with advanced NSCLC harboring uEGFR treated in 21 clinical centers between August 2017 and March 2023. Data analysis was carried out with a descriptive aim. Investigators collected response data according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. The median duration of response, progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients harboring uEGFR and treated with osimertinib were identified. Patients with 'major' uEGFR, that is, G719X, L861X, and S768I mutations (n = 51), had an overall response rate (ORR) and mPFS of 50% and 9 months, respectively. Variable outcomes were registered in cases with rarer 'minor' mutations (n = 27), with ORR and mPFS of 31% and 4 months, respectively. Among seven patients with exon 20 insertions, ORR was 14%, while the best outcome was registered among patients with compound mutations including at least one classical EGFR mutation (n = 13). Thirty patients presented brain metastases (BMs) and intracranial ORR and mPFS were 58% and 9 months, respectively. Amplification of EGFR or MET, TP53 mutations, and EGFR E709K emerged after osimertinib failure in a dataset of 18 patients with available rebiopsy. CONCLUSION: The ARTICUNO study confirms the activity of osimertinib in patients with uEGFR, especially in those with compound uncommon-common mutations, or major uEGFR, even in the presence of BMs. Alterations at the E709 residue of EGFR are associated with resistance to osimertinib.

Real-world analysis of afatinib as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer with uncommon EGFR mutations: a multicenter study in Vietnam.

Background: Afatinib is indicated for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and uncommon mutations. However, real-world studies on this topic are limited. This study aimed to evaluate afatinib as first-line therapy for locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. Patients and methods: A retrospective study included 92 patients with advanced NSCLC with uncommon and compound EGFR mutations, treated with afatinib as first-line therapy. Patients were followed up and evaluated every 3 months or when symptoms of progressive disease arose. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events. Results: The G719X EGFR mutation had the highest occurrence rate (53.3% for both monotherapy and the compound). By contrast, the compound mutation G719X-S768I was observed at a rate of 22.8%. The ORR was 75%, with 15.2% of patients achieving complete response. The overall median TTF was 13.8 months. Patients with the G719X EGFR mutation (single and compound) had a median TTF of 19.3 months, longer than that of patients with other mutations, who had a median TTF of 11.2 months. Patients with compound EGFR mutations (G719X and S768I) demonstrated a median TTF of 23.2 months compared to that of 12.3 months for other mutations. Tolerated doses of 20 or 30 mg achieved a longer median TTF of 17.1 months compared to 11.2 months with 40 mg. Median TTF differed between patients with and without brain metastasis, at 11.2 and 16.9 months, respectively. Rash (55.4%) and diarrhea (53.3%) were the most common adverse events, primarily grades 1 and 2. Other side effects occurred at a low rate. Conclusion: Afatinib is effective for locally advanced metastatic NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. Patients with G719X, compound G719X-S768I mutations, and tolerated doses of 20 or 30 mg had a longer median TTF than those with other mutations.

"ACHILLES" Heel No More? Afatinib at 40 Mg Once Daily is Superior to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in EGFR Uncommon (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) Mutations (ACHILLES/TORG1834).

Afatinib, a second-generation covalent EGFR TKI, has been approved for the treatment of the three "uncommon" EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) based on one pooled retrospective analysis of three prospective trials (LUX-Lung 2, 3 and 6). The confirmed overall response rate, as assessed by independent radiology review, was 66% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). Among the 21 responders, the proportion of patients with response duration of ≥12 months was 52% and the proportion with response durations of ≥18 months was 33%. Of note, all patients received afatinib at 40 or 50 mg once daily which is higher than the approved dose of 40 mg once daily and the usual 30 mg once daily starting dose by most thoracic oncologists. Given the approval of afatinib for "uncommon" EGFR mutations was based on the limited number of patients analyzed, the retrospective nature of the analysis, lack of randomized phase 2 or 3 trial, there remains uncertainty as to whether afatinib, chemotherapy or other next-generation EGFR TKIs is the optimal treatment. This uncertainty also hinders the development of future treatment of these "uncommon" mutations because of the uncertainty that afatinib is the optimal treatment and hence should be the standard of care control arm in future randomized trials. Finally, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 provided us with the first randomized trial result that afatinib achieved superior progression-free survival over platinum-based chemotherapy (10.6 months vs 5.7 months, HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.256-0.694; P = 0.0007). However, ACHILLES should mostly be considered as phase 2 trial given the limited number (N = 109) of patients enrolled. Furthermore, the PFS benefit seemed to be with the 40 mg daily dose (HR = 0.128; 95% CI: 0.050-0.327) and not with the 30 mg daily dose (HR = 0.704; 95% CI: 0.352-1.406). Further investigation of the 30 once daily dosing for the treatment of uncommon EGFR mutations is needed.

The Impact of Inadequate Exposure to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on the Development of Resistance in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) inevitably develop resistance through several biological mechanisms. However, little is known on the molecular mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to suboptimal EGFR-TKI doses, due to pharmacodynamics leading to inadequate drug exposure. To evaluate the effects of suboptimal EGFR-TKI exposure on resistance in NSCLC, we obtained HCC827 and PC9 cell lines resistant to suboptimal fixed and intermittent doses of gefitinib and compared them to cells exposed to higher doses of the drug. We analyzed the differences in terms of EGFR signaling activation and the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers, whole transcriptomes byRNA sequencing, and cell motility. We observed that the exposure to low doses of gefitinib more frequently induced a partial EMT associated with an induced migratory ability, and an enhanced transcription of cancer stem cell markers, particularly in the HCC827 gefitinib-resistant cells. Finally, the HCC827 gefitinib-resistant cells showed increased secretion of the EMT inducer transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1, whose inhibition was able to partially restore gefitinib sensitivity. These data provide evidence that different levels of exposure to EGFR-TKIs in tumor masses might promote different mechanisms of acquired resistance.

EGFR degraders in non-small-cell lung cancer: Breakthrough and unresolved issue.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been well validated as a therapeutic target for anticancer drug discovery. Osimertinib has become the first globally accessible third-generation EGFR inhibitor, representing one of the most advanced developments in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy. However, a tertiary Cys797 to Ser797 (C797S) point mutation has hampered osimertinib treatment in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Several classes of fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors were consequently discovered with the aim of overcoming the EGFRC797S mutation-mediated resistance. However, no clinical efficacy data of the fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors were reported to date, and EGFRC797S mutation-mediated resistance remains an "unmet clinical need." Proteolysis-targeting chimeric molecules (PROTACs) obtained from EGFR-TKIs have been developed to target drug resistance EGFR in NSCLC. Some PROTACs are from nature products. These degraders compared with EGFR inhibitors showed better efficiency in their cellular potency, inhibition, and toxicity profiles. In this review, we first introduce the structural properties of EGFR, the resistance, and mutations of EGFR, and then mainly focus on the recent advances of EGFR-targeting degraders along with its advantages and outstanding challenges.

MARIPOSA: Can Amivantamab and Lazertinib Replace Osimertinib in the Front-Line Setting?

Osimertinib is the current first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC, however, patients frequently relapse due to acquired resistance mutations. Amivantamab is a bispecific antibody against EGFR and MET alterations. Lazertinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor active against EGFR mutations including common resistance mutations. The MARIPOSA trial was designed to study if the combination of amivantamab plus lazertinib in untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients would provide improved progression-free survival. Here, we discuss the rationale for the study and the early results of MARIPOSA.