Endohepatology in clinical practice: EUS-guided portal pressure measurement combined with EUS-guided liver biopsy and variceal screening and treatment in outpatients.

Background and Objectives: EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (PPG) is a novel technique that permits a true, direct measure of portal vein pressure and hepatic vein pressure. This article details our experience and lessons learned from 20 consecutive outpatient EUS-PPG procedures performed at a single center, along with simultaneous EUS-guided liver biopsy, variceal screening, and variceal banding. Methods: Data on the first 20 patients who underwent EUS-PPG at a single center were retrospectively viewed and analyzed. The effects of various liver diseases or other patient-related factors on the clinical and technical success of EUS-PPG measurements, as well as EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB), were evaluated. During the procedure, if esophageal varices were encountered, they were assessed, and if felt to be clinically indicated, endoscopic variceal ligation was performed. Results: The 20 patients included 10 male and 10 female patients. All procedures were technically successful. In all patients, the portal vein and hepatic veins could be easily identified. One adverse event of bleeding occurred during the EUS-PPG measuring procedure. All 20 EUS-LBs were technically successful and yielded adequate samples for histological evaluations, with an average of 25 complete portal tracts per sample. Among patients with esophageal varices, 40% of patients underwent banding. The mean EUS-PPG among 5 patients with esophageal varices was 11.6 mm Hg, compared with 3.2 mm Hg among 15 patients without esophageal varices. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that EUS-PPG is a novel, safe, reproducible, and effective technique. Also, the fact that EUS-PPG, EUS-LB, variceal screening, and variceal banding could be performed in 1 session and on an outpatient basis speaks to the growing relevance and impact of the nascent field of endohepatology.

Invasive measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient before resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aim of the study: To evaluate the role of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) we describe our experience with the procedure as part of our hospital standard preoperative algorithm. We present our protocol for this situation, the HVPG measurement procedure, and the results of our cohort. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective statistical analysis of all patients who underwent planned hepatic resection for HCC with HVPG measurement between 1/2016 and 1/2023. The cohort included 35 patients (30 males, mean age 69.5 years) who underwent HVPG measurement before liver resection for HCC. Results: The success rate of measurement was 91.4%, with serious complications in 2.9% of cases. Due to the clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) 31.3% of patients were rejected for resection. Seventeen patients with excluded CSPH underwent resection with one case of a postoperative liver event, liver decompensation, representing 5.9% of them. One patient (5.9%) had a complicated postoperative course with fasciitis. None of the patients who underwent resection (88.2%) was readmitted to the hospital due to surgical complications or a liver event during 90 days of follow-up, and no death was reported. The median overall survival (OS) in the resected subgroup was 70 months (95% CI: 52-86), and in patients rejected for surgery (resection and transplantation) 35 months (95% CI: 13-48). Conclusions: HVPG measurement is the gold standard for the quantification of portal hypertension. Hepatic vein catheterization is invasive, but a safe procedure, with a clear impact on the management of resectable HCC.

Recompensation in Cirrhosis: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

The natural history of cirrhosis has usually been conceptualized in the context of progression from compensated cirrhosis to subsequent stages of decompensation. While this unidirectional concept is the most common pathophysiological trajectory, there has been an emerging understanding of a subgroup of patients which undergo recompensation. While literature mostly based on transplant waitlist registries have indicated towards such a population who experience disease regression, the overall literature about this entity remains inexplicit. An effort to generate consensus on defining recompensation has been attempted which comes with its own nuances and limitations. We summarize the available literature on this emerging yet controversial concept of recompensation in cirrhosis and delve into future implications and impact on real-life practice.

Topographic Distribution Pattern in Hepatic Amyloidosis Presenting with Portal Hypertension.

Background/aims: The liver is often involved in both primary and secondary forms of amyloidosis. Significant clinical evidence of portal hypertension is relatively uncommon and seems to be related to the reduced sinusoidal lumen and increased resistance to blood flow due to massive perisinusoidal amyloid deposits. The relationships between the pattern and extent of amyloid deposition in patients presenting with portal hypertension have not yet been clearly demonstrated. This study is focusing on the topographic distribution of amyloidosis in patients presenting with portal hypertension. Methods: The study included biopsy-proven cases of hepatic amyloidosis. The clinical, biochemical, and serological data, involvement of the extrahepatic organs, and HVPG values were recorded. Tissue sections were re-evaluated for the distribution patterns of amyloid deposits. Results: We had 41 patients with hepatic amyloidosis, of which, 32 were male. A mixed pattern (sinusoidal and vascular) was the most common (32/41; 78%). Hepatic venous pressure gradient was available in 21 cases. Portal hypertension was found in 14 patients (14/21; 67%). Cases of portal hypertension were found to have a sinusoidal pattern (3/14; 21.4%), vascular pattern (1/14; 7.1%), or a mixed sinusoidal and vascular pattern (10/14; 71.4%). Those not having portal hypertension showed hepatic artery (HA) involvement in 6/7 (85.7%) cases. A comparative analysis between portal hypertension (PTH) and non-PTH groups showed that HA amyloid deposition was dominant in the non-PTH group (6/7; 85.7%) and sinusoidal deposition in the PTH group (13/14; 92.8%). The difference was found to be significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We found that portal hypertension was noted in cases with diffuse sinusoidal deposition or mixed sinusoidal with portal vein deposition. In the non-PHT group, the deposition was mainly in HA alone.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization could improve the hepatic hemodynamics of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is widely used for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, previous studies have demonstrated that conventional TACE (cTACE) might affect hepatic hemodynamics, which both associate with liver cirrhosis and survival. Drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) improves treatment efficacy and safety, but its effects on the hepatic hemodynamics of HCC patients with cirrhosis remain unknown. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included unresectable HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE from April 2018 to September 2020, who had limited tumor burden and liver function. The hepatic hemodynamics was measured by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) using occlusion balloon catheter before and after treatment. Baseline characteristics of demography, laboratory (tumoral and liver-function) and hepatic hemodynamics were compared between patients with and without clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Laboratory examination and imaging assessments were performed 4-6 weeks; overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from DEB-TACE initiation until death or last follow-up. Results: Twenty-four eligible consecutive HCC patients were included, with a median age of 58.0 years and 54.2% in Child-Pugh A class. During a median follow-up of 9.8 months, median OS for the whole cohort of patients reached 10.0 months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analyses demonstrated that age >60 years, ascites, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 1, Child-Pugh B class, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >10, and albumin (ALB) <35 g/L were prognostic factors for decreased OS (P<0.05). Importantly, hepatic hemodynamics were significantly improved in patients after treatment with DEB-TACE (7.5 vs. 5.3 mmHg of HVPG, P<0.001), especially for those with CSPH (13.6 vs. 10.2 mmHg of HVPG, P=0.014). Conclusions: DEB-TACE can improve hepatic hemodynamics in HCC patients, especially those with CSPH. Combing these findings with its effects on tumor, DEB-TACE might be more suitable for HCC patients with cirrhosis.

Clinical significance of measuring hepatic venous pressure gradient on transjugular liver biopsy for patients with pre-cirrhotic bridging fibrosis liver disease.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that patients with pre-cirrhotic bridging fibrosis (Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Viral Hepatitis, METAVIR stage F3) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient ≥10 mmHg) experience a higher rate of clinical decompensation than patients without CSPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 128 consecutive patients with pathology proven bridging fibrosis without cirrhosis between 2012 and 2019 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients with HVPG measurement obtained during the same outpatient transjugular liver biopsy and clinical follow up of at least two years. Primary endpoint included rate of overall complication related to portal hypertension including evidence of either ascites, presence of varices on imaging or endoscopy, or evidence of hepatic encephalopathy. RESULTS: Among 128 patients with bridging fibrosis (67 females and 61 males; average age 56 years), 42 (33%) and 86 (67%) were with and without CSPH (HVPG ≥10 mmHg). Median follow-up time was 4 years. Rate of overall complication (either ascites, varices or hepatic encephalopathy) in patients with and without CSPH was 36/42 (86%) and 39/86 (45%) (p < .001) respectively. Rate of developing ascites, varices and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with and without CSPH was 21/42 (50%) vs 26/86 (30%) (p = .034), 32/42 (76%) vs 26/86 (30%) (p ≤ .001) and 18/42 (43%) vs 12/86 (14%) (p = .001) respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with pre-cirrhotic bridging fibrosis and CSPH were associated with higher rates of developing ascites, varices and hepatic encephalopathy. Measuring HVPG during transjugular liver biopsy provides additional prognostic value in anticipating clinical decompensation in patients with pre-cirrhotic bridging fibrosis.

CT-derived liver and spleen volume accurately diagnose clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background & Aims: Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is a landmark in the natural history of cirrhosis, influencing clinical decisions in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous small series suggested that splanchnic volume measurements may predict portal hypertension. We aimed to evaluate whether volumetry obtained by standard multidetector computerised tomography (MDCT) can predict CSPH in patients with HCC. Methods: We included 175 patients with HCC, referred for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) evaluation, in whom contemporary MDCT was available. Liver volume, spleen volume (SV) and liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR: volume of the segments I-III/volume of the segments IV-VIII) were calculated semi-automatically from MDCT. Other non-invasive tests (NITs) were also employed. Results: Volume parameters could be measured in almost 100% of cases with an excellent inter-observer agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.950). SV and LSVR were independently associated with CSPH (HVPG ≥10 mmHg) and did not interact with aetiology. The volume Index (VI), calculated as the product of SV and LSVR, predicted CSPH (AUC 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89). Similar results were observed in an external cohort (n = 23) (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.69-1.00). Setting a sensitivity and specificity of 98%, VI could have avoided 35.9% of HVPG measurements. The accuracy of VI was similar to that of other NITs. VI also accurately predicted HVPG greater than 12, 14, 16 and 18 mmHg (AUC 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.88], 0.84 [95% CI 0.77-0.91], 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.92] and 0.87 [95% CI 0.79-0.94], respectively). Conclusions: Quantification of liver and spleen volumes by MDCT is a simple, accurate and reliable method of CSPH estimation in patients with compensated cirrhosis and HCC. Impact and implications: An increase in portal pressure strongly impacts outcomes after surgery in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Direct measurement through hepatic vein catheterization remains the reference standard for portal pressure assessment, but its invasiveness limits its application. Therefore, we evaluated the ability of CT scan-based liver and spleen volume measurements to predict portal hypertension in patients with HCC. Our results indicate that the newly described index, based on quantification of liver and spleen volume, accurately predicts portal hypertension. These results suggest that a single imaging test may be used to diagnose and stage HCC, while providing an accurate estimation of portal hypertension, thus helping to stratify surgical risks.

Clinical Profile, Patterns of Care & adherence to Guidelines in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prospective multi-center Study.

Background and aims: Increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in India is a matter of concern and need for adequate profiling and streamlining management strategies cannot be over-emphasized. Methods: This is a prospective multi-centric observational cohort study comprising of an oncology center, one university tertiary hospital with specialized hepatology service, one public hospital with gastroenterology service, and a private liver transplant center located within a 3-km radius. The demographic and clinical parameters were recorded on a prospectively maintained database. The clinical profile, demographics, characteristics of HCC and the allocated treatment were noted and compared among the four centers. Results: In total, 672 patients were enrolled from June 2016 till January 2020. Abdominal pain (64.3%) and weight loss (47.3%) were the most common symptoms. Most common identified etiology was hepatitis B (39%). The cancer center received lesser patients with hepatitis C and those with advanced stage of HCC. The private transplant center reported the highest proportion of NASH, which was also significantly higher in those belonging to higher socioeconomic strata, and lowest proportion of alcoholic cirrhosis. Metastasis was seen in almost one-fifth (19%) cases at diagnosis. Portal vein thrombosis was evident in 40%. Adherence to treatment guidelines was seen in three-fourth cases (76%). Conclusions: Hepatitis B is the most common underlying cause for HCC, whereas other causes like NASH are on the rise. Etiologic profile may vary with selective specialization of centers catering to patients with HCC. Adherence to guideline while allocating treatment was high among all centers with highest non-adherence in BCLC A.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) predicts liver failure after transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Esophagogastric variceal bleeding is a serious complication of decompensated cirrhosis. Transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt (TIPS) is a salvage treatment with clear hemostatic results. However, various complications may occur after TIPS, including postoperative liver failure, and the prognosis is very poor once occurs. Liver failure is a common symptom of severe liver disease with a high mortality rate. This study investigated the incidence of liver failure after TIPS treatment for varicose bleeding. Methods: We analyzed the data of patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2013 and December 2018 with portal hypertension with an episode of acute gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. A total of 121 patients were referred to the regional liver unit for TIPS. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and clinical data were collected. Patients with incomplete data were excluded, and 93 patients were ultimately enrolled in the study. Primary outcomes were morbidity and hospital mortality within 4 weeks of surgery. The data were retrospectively and consecutively collected and evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors of liver failure. Results: The patients included 58 males (62.37%) and 35 females (37.63%), and the mean age was 58.43±11.85 years. The main cause was hepatitis B virus (HBV), which was found in 50.54% of patient. The overall surgical success rate was 83.87% (78/93). Of 15 treatment-failure patients, 9 (9.68%) died in hospital. Four patients died of liver failure, accounting for 44.44% of postoperative all-cause deaths. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that only hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was an independent risk factor for post-TIPS morbidity [relative risk (RR) 1.156; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.041 to 1.283; P=0.006]. In addition, HVPG was an independent risk factor for hospital mortality within 4 weeks (RR 1.133; 95% CI: 1.021 to 0.539; P=0.016). Conclusions: Post-TIPS liver failure is a serious complication in patients with cirrhosis. Pre-TIPS HVPG level may be used as a predictor of potential short-term postoperative adverse events.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin Pi∗Z allele is an independent risk factor for liver transplantation and death in patients with advanced chronic liver disease.

Background & Aims: Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency causes/predisposes individuals to advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). However, the role of the SERPINA1 Pi∗Z allele in patients who have already progressed to ACLD is unclear. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the Pi∗Z allele on the risk of liver transplantation/liver-related death in patients with ACLD, while adjusting for the severity of liver disease at inclusion. Methods: A total of 1,118 patients with ACLD who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement and genotyping for the Pi∗Z/Pi∗S allele at the Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab were included in this retrospective analysis. The outcome of interest was liver transplantation/liver-related death, while non-liver-related death and removal/suppression of the primary etiological factor were considered as competing risks. Results: Viral hepatitis was the most common etiology (44%), followed by alcohol-related (31%) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (11%). Forty-two (4%) and forty-six (4%) patients harboured the Pi∗Z and Pi∗S variants, respectively. Pi∗Z carriers had more severe portal hypertension (HVPG: 19±6 vs.15±7 mmHg; p <0.001) and hepatic dysfunction (Child-Turcotte-Pugh: 7.1±1.9 vs. 6.5±1.9 points; p = 0.050) at inclusion, compared to non-carriers. Contrarily, the Pi∗S allele was unrelated to liver disease severity. In competing risk regression analysis, harbouring the Pi∗Z allele was significantly associated with an increased probability of liver transplantation/liver-related death, even after adjusting for liver disease severity at inclusion. The detrimental impact of the common Pi∗MZ genotype (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio: ≈1.56 vs. Pi∗MM) was confirmed in a fully adjusted subgroup analysis. In contrast, Pi∗S carriers had no increased risk of events. Conclusion: Genotyping for the Pi∗Z allele identifies patients with ACLD at increased risk of adverse liver-related outcomes, thereby improving prognostication. Therapies targeting the accumulation of abnormal AAT should be evaluated as disease-modifying treatments in Pi∗Z allele carriers with ACLD. Lay summary: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is a genetic disease that affects the lung and the liver. Carrying two dysfunctional copies of the gene causes advanced liver disease. Harbouring one dysfunctional copy increases disease severity in patients with other liver illness. However, the significance of this genetic defect in patients who already suffer from advanced liver disease is unclear. Our study found that harbouring at least one dysfunctional copy of the alpha-1 antitrypsin gene increases the risk of requiring a liver transplantation or dying from a liver disease. This indicates the need for medical therapies aimed at treating the hepatic consequences of this genetic defect.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient in sinusoidal obstruction syndrome: diagnostic value and link with histological lesions.

Background & Aims: Liver sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a well-established complication of myeloablative conditioning regimens used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) >10 mmHg was described as an accurate diagnostic tool for SOS in the 1990s. However, epidemiology and presentation of SOS have dramatically changed. Moreover, elementary histological lesions influencing HVPG are unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of all patients who underwent transjugular liver biopsy with HVPG measurement for a clinical suspicion of SOS at our center. Two expert pathologists unaware of the presence or absence of SOS reviewed all liver samples and graded elementary histological lesions according to a semi-quantitative scoring defined a priori. Results: Out of the 77 included patients, the 30 patients with SOS had higher HVPG than the 47 patients without SOS (median 14 mmHg [IQR 10-18], vs. 6 mmHg [3-9], respectively p <0.001). HVPG >10 mmHg had a specificity of 78% and a positive predictive value of 66% for the diagnosis of SOS. However, almost 40% of the patients with SOS had an HVPG ≤10 mmHg. HVPG correlated with sinusoidal congestion (r = 0.57; p = 0.001) and hepatocyte necrosis (r = 0.42; p = 0.02), but not with other lesions. Conclusion: Even though HVPG is higher in patients with SOS, low HVPG values do not rule out SOS. Thus, HVPG cannot be used alone, and should be combined with transjugular liver biopsy, for the diagnosis of SOS. Lay summary: Hepatic venous pressure gradient >10 mmHg has been described as an accurate tool for the diagnosis of liver sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study shows that the sensitivity and specificity of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are insufficient, so that liver pressure measurement should be combined with a liver biopsy in this setting.

Surgical Risk Assessment in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases.

Chronic liver diseases (CLD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. The overall life span of patients with CLD has increased and so is the number of surgical procedures these patients undergo. Pathophysiological and hemodynamic changes in cirrhosis make these patients more susceptible to hypotension and hypoxia during surgery. They also have a high risk of drug induced liver injury, renal dysfunction and post-operative liver decompensation. Patients with CLD planned for elective or semi-elective surgery should undergo detailed preoperative risk assessment. Patients should be evaluated for the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension and cirrhosis. In the absence of both cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension, patients with CLD can undergo surgery with minimal or low risk. Various risk assessment tools available for patients with advanced CLD are-CTP score, MELD Score, Mayo risk score, VOCAL-Penn score. A Child class C and/or Mayo risk score >15 in general is associated with high risk of post-operative mortality and elective surgery should be deferred in these patients. In patients with Child class, A and MELD 10-15 surgery is permissible with caution (except liver resection and cardiac surgery) while in Child A and MELD <10 surgery is well tolerated. VOCAL-Penn score is a new promising tool and can be the better alternative of CTP, MELD, and Mayo risk score models but more prospective studies with large patients' population are warranted. Certain surgeries like Hepatic resection, intraabdominal, and cardiothoracic have higher risk than abdominal wall hernia repair and orthopedic surgery. Laparoscopic approaches have better outcomes and less risk of liver failure than open surgery. Minimally invasive alternatives like colonic stent placement in case of obstruction can be considered in high-risk cases. Perioperative optimization and management of ascites, HE, bleeding, liver decompensation, and nutrition should be done with multidisciplinary approach. Patients with cirrhosis undergoing high risk elective surgery can develop liver failure in post-operative period and should be evaluated and counseled for liver transplantation if not contraindicated.

Overview of Complications in Cirrhosis.

Background: Cirrhosis is the outcome of chronic liver disease of any etiology due to progressive liver injury and fibrosis. Consequently, cirrhosis leads to portal hypertension and liver dysfunction, progressing to complications like ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, sarcopenia, hepatocellular carcinoma, and coagulation disorders. End-stage liver disease leads to an impaired quality of life, loss of social and economic productivity, and reduced survival. Methods: This narrative review explains the pathophysiology of complications of cirrhosis, the diagnostic approach and innovative management, with focus on data from India. A comprehensive literature search of the published data was performed in regard with the spectrum, diagnosis, and management of cirrhosis and its complications. Results: There is a change in the epidemiology of metabolic syndrome, lifestyle diseases, alcohol consumption and the spectrum of etiological diagnosis in patients with cirrhosis. With the advent of universal vaccination and efficacious long-term viral suppression agents for chronic hepatitis B, availability of direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C, and a booming liver transplantation programme across the country, the management of complications is essential. There are several updates in the standard of care in the management of complications of cirrhosis, such as hepatorenal syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatic encephalopathy, and new therapies that address supportive and palliative care in advanced cirrhosis. Conclusion: Prevention, early diagnosis, appropriate management of complications, timely transplantation are cornerstones in the management protocol of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. India needs improved access to care, outreach of public health programmes for viral hepatitis care, health infrastructure, and disease registries for improved healthcare outcomes. Low-cost initiatives like immunization, alcohol cessation, awareness about liver diseases, viral hepatitis elimination, and patient focused decision-making algorithms are essential to manage liver disease in India.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis.

Patients with cirrhosis of the liver are at high risk of developing portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which has a complex, multifactorial cause. The condition may present with a myriad of symptoms and can occasionally cause severe complications. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of PVT. There are uncertainties regarding the effect on PVT and its treatment outcome in patients with cirrhosis. The main challenge for managing PVT in cirrhosis is analyzing the risk of hemorrhage compared to the risk of thrombus extension leading to complications. All current knowledge regarding non-tumor PVT in cirrhosis, including epidemiology, risk factors, classification, clinical presentation, diagnosis, impact on natural history, and treatment, is discussed in the present article.

Value of Liver Function Tests in Cirrhosis.

The liver comprises both parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells with varying functions. Cirrhosis is often complicated by the development of portal hypertension and its associated complications. Hence, assessment of liver in cirrhosis should include assessment of its structural, function of both hepatic and non-hepatic tissue and haemodynamic assessment of portal hypertension. There is no single test that can evaluate all functions of liver and assess prevalence and severity of portal hypertension. Commonly available tests like serum bilirubin, liver enzymes (alanine [ALT] and aspartate aminotransferase [AST], serum alkaline phosphatase [ALP], gamma glutamyl transpeptidase [GGT]), serum albumin and prothrombin time for assessment of liver functions partly assess liver functions. quantitative liver functions like indocyanine clearance tests [ICG-K], methacetin breath test [MBT] were developed to assess dynamic status of liver but has its own limitation and availability. Imaging based assessment of liver by transient elastography, MRI based 99 mTc-coupled asialoglycoprotein mebrofenin scan help the clinician to assess liver function, functional volume of liver left after surgery and portal hypertension [PH]. Hepatic venous pressure gradient still remains the gold standard for the assessment of portal hypertension but is invasive and not available in all centres. Combinations of blood parameters in form of various indices like fibrosis score of 4 [FIB-4], Lok index, scores like model for end stage liver disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte Pugh score are commonly used for assessing liver function in clinical practice.

Indications and methods for measuring portal hypertension in cirrhosis.

Background and objectives: Over the last decade our understanding of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has increased. Novel diagnostic technologies have facilitated and improved the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. With this review we aim to provide an overview of contemporary diagnostic principles of portal hypertension and indications for measuring portal pressure in cirrhosis.Methods: By review of current literature, we assessed new and old principles of measuring portal hypertension and the diagnostic values of the methods.Results: Invasive measurement of the portal pressure is still the gold standard to quantitate portal hypertension and to assess response to vasoactive treatment. The size of the portal pressure is important to assess since it contains information on the course of the disease and risk of developing hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and mortality. Reliable non-invasive Elastography techniques are emerging that adequately assess portal pressure, but the available methods are not yet sufficiently accurate.Conclusion: Although elastography techniques provide valuable information and are good monitoring tools, liver vein catheterization remains valuable in diagnosing and monitoring portal hypertension, especially in combination with a trans-jugular liver biopsy.

Hepatogenous Diabetes - A Report from Central India.

Background/Objectives: Cirrhosis of liver is associated with loss of liver function, portal hypertension, and pancreatic ß-cell dysfunction leading to hepatogenous diabetes (HD). Often HD is an underestimated and understudied problem, particularly in the Indian subcontinent, where the prevalence of both Chronic liver disease (CLD) and diabetes is high. Hence this study was planned to highlight the prevalence of HD and its association with the severity of cirrhosis. Methods: A total of 121 cirrhotic patients without a history of diabetes were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. Seventy five g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was done in all patients. Fasting serum insulin levels were done to calculate insulin resistance (IR) using homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was done to detect varices. Patients were divided into HD group and non-HD group for comparison of results. Results: HD was seen in 52 (42.98%) patients; among them, 63.4% did not show evidence of HD by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was seen in 58 (47.93%) patients. Compared with the non-HD group, the HD group had significantly higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (P = 0.038), HOMA-IR (P < 0.001), incidence of large varices (P < 0.001) and variceal bleeding (P < 0.001). A statistically significant association was noted between HD and Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis had a high prevalence of IGT, IR, and HD. The presence of HD is well associated with the severity of cirrhosis in the form of higher MELD score (>15), CTP score (>10), higher bilirubin levels, large varices, bleeding varices, and HCC. FPG levels and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) cannot be relied upon, and OGTT aids in the unmasking of HD in these patients.

Clinical parameters associated with gastric portal hypertensive polyps.

OBJECTIVES: Portal hypertensive polyps (PHPs) are incompletely characterized lesions that can be found in the distal stomach of patients with portal hypertension. We aimed to delineate clinical factors associated with the appearance of these rare polyps. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of a cohort with 513 cirrhotic patients comparing patients with and without PHP using descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression. To address the problem of missing values, in particular for HVPG and liver stiffness, we used multiple imputation of missing values. RESULTS: The prevalence of macroscopically diagnosed PHP was 3.3% (95% confidence interval 2.0 - 5.4%). In 53% of cases, the correct classification was missed on index gastroscopy. Patients with PHP were older at gastroscopy (65 years vs. 59), had higher hepatic venous pressure gradients (HVPG, 28 mmHg vs. 19 mmHg), higher transient elastography (TE) measurements (50.7 kPa vs. 21.8 kPa) and more often had previous rubber band ligations (RBL, 64.7% vs. 25.8%). The multivariable logistic regression on the outcome macroscopically diagnosed PHP estimated an odds ratio (OR) for HPVG of 1.13 (CI 0.95-1.34), increased liver stiffness of 1.03 (1.00 - 1.07) and previous RBL of 3.84 (1.24 - 11.88), respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PHPs in the stomach was higher than assumed in previous studies and misclassification was commonly observed. The appearance of these rare polyps is associated with previous RBL and may correlate with severity of PH. Thus, PHPs may be regarded as marker for relevant PH, but clinical significance of these polyps is still uncertain.

Preoperative TIPS prevents the development of postoperative acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with high CLIF-C AD score.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome associated with organ failure and high short-term mortality. Recently, the role of surgery as a precipitating event for ACLF has been characterised. However, the impact of preoperative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement on ACLF development in patients with cirrhosis undergoing surgery has not been investigated yet. METHODS: A total of 926 patients (363 with cirrhosis undergoing surgery and 563 patients with TIPS) were screened. Forty-five patients with preoperative TIPS (TIPS group) were 1:1 propensity matched to patients without preoperative TIPS (no-TIPS group). The primary endpoint was the development of ACLF within 28 and 90 days after surgery. The secondary endpoint was 1-year mortality. Results were confirmed by a differently 1:2 matched cohort (n = 176). RESULTS: Patients in the no-TIPS group had significantly higher rates of ACLF within 28 days (29 vs. 9%; p = 0.016) and 90 days (33 vs. 13%; p = 0.020) after surgery as well as significantly higher 1-year mortality (38 vs. 18%; p = 0.023) compared with those in the TIPS group. Surgery without preoperative TIPS and Chronic Liver Failure Consortium-Acute Decompensation (CLIF-C AD) score were independent predictors for 28- and 90-day ACLF development and 1-year mortality after surgery, especially in patients undergoing visceral surgery. In the no-TIPS group, a CLIF-C AD score of >45 could be identified as cut-off for patients at risk for postoperative ACLF development benefiting from TIPS. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that preoperative TIPS may result in lower rates of postoperative ACLF development especially in patients undergoing visceral surgery and with a CLIF-C AD score above 45. LAY SUMMARY: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome that is associated with high short-term mortality. Surgical procedures are a known precipitating event for ACLF. This study investigates the role of preoperative insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on postoperative mortality and ACLF development. Patients with TIPS insertion before a surgical procedure exhibit improved postoperative survival and lower rates of postoperative ACLF, especially in patients undergoing visceral surgery and with a high CLIF-C AD prognostic score. Thus, this study suggests preoperative TIPS insertion in those high-risk patients.