A Case of Transapical Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm with a Complicated Access Route.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is an alternative treatment option for high-risk patients. While conventionally performed via a transfemoral approach, it is sometimes difficult due to poor access routes. We report the case of a 90-year-old man who was incidentally diagnosed with a descending TAA while undergoing computed tomography for esophageal cancer. The patient had undergone Y-graft replacement twice. His Y-graft leg was highly angulated; therefore, a transfemoral approach was considered difficult. Consequently, transapical TEVAR was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Transapical TEVAR can be a useful treatment option for TAAs with poor access routes in super-old patients.

Complete Recovery After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type a Aortic Dissection With Cerebral Malperfusion: A Case Report.

A 52-year-old woman presented with chest pain, shortness of breath and loss of sensation in her left limbs. Computed tomography angiography revealed an type A aortic dissection involving the brachiocephalic trunk and right common carotid artery. Endovascular therapy successfully managed the condition by reconstructing the artery and occluding the false lumen.

Clinical characteristics and early surgical outcomes of aortoesophageal fistula.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and prognosis of aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) has not been clarified. The clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of AEF were investigated. METHODS: The clinical data of patients who underwent surgical treatment for AEF from January 2020 to December 2021 that were registered in the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database (JCVSD) were analyzed. RESULTS: During the period, 123 patients (71.0 [IQR: 61.0-78.0] years old; 76.4% men) underwent surgical treatment for AEF. The prevalence of secondary AEF was 61%. Secondary AEF after aortic grafting was the most frequent (n = 40; 32.5%), followed by AEF after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n = 30; 24.4%). Operative mortality was observed in 23 patients (18.7%). TEVAR for AEF (p = 0.019), postoperative bleeding (p = 0.047), stroke (p = 0.004), renal failure (p < 0.001), newly required hemodialysis (p = 0.023), pneumonia (p = 0.003), multisystem failure (p < 0.001), and dyslipidemia (p = 0.02) were associated with risk factors of operative mortality after surgical treatment of AEF on univariable logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This first nationwide study on the surgical treatment for AEF demonstrated a higher incidence of secondary AEF than primary AEF. Both open surgical repair and TEVAR for AEF were associated with high operative mortality. TEVAR and dyslipidemia were risk factors for operative mortality. Precautions and further improved treatment strategies for AEF are still required.

Early Experience With Fenestration Modification of Castor Branched Stent-Graft for Aortic Arch Diseases.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the safety and viability of combining branched stent graft with fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in treating aortic arch lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included patients presenting with aortic arch lesions who underwent treatment with a combination of branched stent graft and fenestrated TEVAR between July 2020 and November 2022. Technical success was defined as the precise deployment of the stent graft, maintenance of branch vessel patency, and the absence of type I endoleak. The secondary outcomes examined were complications and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 21 patients (average age: 61.0±14.8 years) with aortic arch lesions from 3 tertiary care hospitals. The aortic arch lesions encompassed aortic dissection (N=8), aortic aneurysm (N=8), pseudoaneurysm (N=1), intramural hematoma (N=1), and penetrating aortic ulcer (N=3). The technical success rate achieved was 95.2% (20/21). Failure in one case was due to an intraoperative type I endoleak, which was rectified with an additional stent graft placement. The 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% (1/21). One patient suffered a stroke but responded well to medical intervention. The median hospital stay was 10.9±5.4 days. During the follow-up period, one death (4.8%) was associated with aortic complications. A type II endoleak was observed and managed with close monitoring. Two patients underwent re-interventions for retrograde type A dissection and stent migration, respectively. No occlusions were observed in the target branch arteries. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of branched stent graft with fenestrated TEVAR emerges as a viable strategy for addressing specific lesions in the aortic arch. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using branched stent grafts with fenestrated TEVAR for treating aortic arch lesions, achieving a technical success rate of 95.2%. Compared to traditional open surgery, this innovative, minimally invasive approach reduces perioperative mortality and complications, such as stroke and spinal cord ischemia. For clinicians, it offers a viable alternative for patients unfit for open repair, particularly in complex aortic arch cases. While the initial outcomes are promising, further research is needed to assess long-term durability and risks, including stent graft migration and late endoleak, ensuring the technique's safety and efficacy over time.

Safety and validity of selective cerebrospinal fluid drainage in open and endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVES: Although cerebrospinal fluid drainage has been shown to reduce the risk of ischemic spinal cord injury, serious complications have also been reported. We have been using it selectively in a pressure- and volume-regulated method and aimed to evaluate its safety, and its validity in elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair in a propensity-matched cohort. METHODS: Among the 450 patients who underwent open surgery (n = 169) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (n = 281) on the descending or thoracoabdominal aorta, 147 underwent cerebrospinal fluid drainage, which was prophylactic in 135 and therapeutic in 12. Prophylactic drainage was performed in elective open surgery under distal aortic perfusion (n = 67) or in selected patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (n = 68). RESULTS: Drainage-related complications were observed in 13 (9.6%), one of which was graded severe (0.74%). In patients undergoing prophylactic drainage, spinal cord injury was detected in 2/135 (1.5%). In patients without prophylactic drainage, 15/315 (4.8%) developed spinal cord injury. Therapeutic drainage was performed in 12 of these 15 patients, 10 of whom remained paralytic in varying degree. In the inverse probability weighted analysis of the patients undergoing elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair, the incidence of spinal cord injury was lower with prophylactic drainage (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Pressure- and volume-regulated spinal drainage rarely causes serious complications. Its prophylactic use seems beneficial in selected patients, including those undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair with high risk for spinal cord injury.

Early three-dimensional growth in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection is associated with long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Late adverse events (LAEs) are common among initially uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD); however, identifying those patients at highest risk of LAEs remains a significant challenge. Early false lumen (FL) growth has been suggested to increase risk, but confident determination of growth is often hampered by error in two-dimensional clinical measurements. Semi-automated three-dimensional (3D) mapping of aortic growth, such as by vascular deformation mapping (VDM), can potentially overcome this limitation using computed tomography angiograms (CTA). We hypothesized that FL growth in the early pre-dissection phase by VDM can accurately predict LAEs. METHODS: We performed a two-center retrospective study of patients with uTBAD, with paired CTAs in the acute (1-14 days) and subacute/early chronic (1-6 months) periods. VDM analysis was used to map 3D growth. Standard clinical CT measures (ie, aortic diameters, tear characteristics) were also collected. Multivariate analysis was conducted using a decision tree and Cox proportional hazards model. LAEs were defined as aneurysmal FL (>55 mm); rapid growth (>5 mm within 6 months); aorta-specific mortality, rupture, or re-dissection. RESULTS: A total of 107 (69% male) patients with uTBAD initially met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 7.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4.7-9.9 years). LAEs occurred in 72 patients (67%) at 2.5 years (IQR, 0.7-4.8 years) after the initial event. A multivariate decision tree model identified VDM growth (>2.1 mm) and baseline diameter (>42.7 mm) as optimal predictors of LAEs (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.94), achieving an 87% accuracy (sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 76%) after leave-one-out validation. Guideline reported high-risk features were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early growth of the FL in uTBAD was the best tested indicator for LAEs and improves upon the current gold-standard of baseline diameter in selecting patients for early prophylactic thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

An analysis of early and long-term gender-related outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate gender-related outcomes during endovascular treatment of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic diseases (TEVAR). METHODS: Multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study. All TEVARs between January 2005 and April 2023 were identified. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, and cumulative survival. Secondary outcomes were vascular access complications, and freedom from TEVAR-related reintervention. Interventions performed in male patients were matched to females on the basis of a one-to-one coarsened exact matching. RESULTS: We identified 151 males who were matched with 151 females. Mortality at 30-day was not statistically different between females and males (11.2% vs 11.2%, P = 1.0). At binary logistic regression analysis, duration of intervention (P = 0.001), and emergency TEVAR (P = 0.001) were associated with mortality at 30 days. Gender did not impact access vessel complication rate [n = 6 (4.0%) vs n = 5 (3.3%), P = 1.0]. The median of follow-up was 46 (IQR, 7-84) months with no difference between males and females [median, 50 (11-95) vs 37.5 (3.5-71.2); P = 0.153]. Estimated survival was not statistically different between females and males (Log-rank χ2 = 0.6, P = 0.442; 95% CI: 110.7-207.3). At Cox's regression analysis, gender did not impact overall survival (HR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.3, P = 0.450). Estimated freedom from TEVAR-related reinterventions was not statistically different between females and males (Log-rank χ2 = 0.4, P = 0.837; 95% CI: 187.8-219.3). CONCLUSIONS: Female gender itself was not associated with worse 30-day mortality and late survival than males with similar access vessel complication as well as TEVAR-related reintervention rate.

Assessment of the re-entry tear index as a prognostic indicator for renal perfusion improvement after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with acute and subacute Stanford type b aortic dissection with renal artery involvement.

Background: Aortic dissection is the most common acute aortic syndrome, and renal artery is the most common involved artery. The size and location of the re-entry tear directly affect the blood flow enhancement of the false lumen branch artery after surgery. In this study, the morphology and hemodynamics of the re-entry tear were comprehensively analyzed, and the location and size of the re-entry tear were quantitatively evaluated to calculate the re-entry tear index (RTI). This study aimed to assess the predictive capability of a comprehensive quantitative RTI for improvement in renal perfusion following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in cases of acute and subacute Stanford type B aortic dissection with renal artery involvement. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 137 patients diagnosed with acute or subacute type B aortic dissection with concomitant renal artery involvement who underwent TEVAR at Anzhen Hospital in Beijing from October 2017 to November 2021 were enrolled. Renal blood flow was estimated quantitatively with ultrasound. Based on the ultrasound findings of renal artery flow, the patients were classified into two groups: group A [postoperative volume flow (VolFlow) reduced compared to preoperative VolFlow] and group B (postoperative VolFlow increased compared to preoperative VolFlow). All re-entry tears present in the aortic trunk according to reconstructed computed tomography angiography (CTA) obtained preoperatively were included in the analysis. The general information of patients, whether the involved renal artery arose partially or wholly from the false lumen, the proximal diameter and length of the covered stent, the diameter of primary entry tear, the RTI, etc. were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were executed to assess the risk factors associated with increased renal arterial blood flow subsequent to TEVAR. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to ascertain the optimal cutoff value and predictive efficacy of the RTI. Results: A total of 137 patients, comprising of 32 with acute and 105 with subacute type B aortic dissection accompanied by renal artery involvement, underwent TEVAR. Among these patients, 44 (32.1%) were assigned to group A and 93 (67.9%) to group B. Renal blood flow exhibited an increase in 67.9% of the patients after TEVAR. The results of multivariate analysis indicated that the RTI is an independent risk factor for postoperative renal perfusion improvement [odds ratio =17.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.13-78.55; P=0.020]. The optimal cutoff value for RTI, determined to be 0.033, demonstrated the ability to identify renal perfusion improvement in patients without hypertension with a sensitivity of 53.7% and a specificity of 68.9%. In patients with concomitant hypertension, RTI exhibited a sensitivity of 96.6% and a specificity of 60.0%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.792 (95% CI: 0.643-0.941; P=0.021) for identifying renal perfusion improvement. Conclusions: RTI demonstrated a favorable predictive value for improving renal malperfusion following TEVAR in cases of aortic dissection with renal artery involvement.

Collagen-Based Vascular Closure Device Multicenter Italian Experience in Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Compared With Suture-Mediated Closure Vascular Device.

PURPOSE: The Manta Vascular Closure Device is a novel collagen-based vascular closure device that has been designed specifically for closure of large-bore percutaneous arterial accesses. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the immediate and 30-day outcome of Manta at the completion of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The hypothesis is that Manta is not inferior in obtaining hemostasis compared with the Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited all the percutaneous accesses for (T)EVAR performed from January 2021 to April 2023 by all the Italian Divisions of Vascular Surgery using Manta at the time of data collection (May 2023). The primary outcome is to evaluate the incidence of complications at the puncture site after Manta implantation and at 1 month, and compare this with ProGlide. We applied the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) criteria for observational studies. RESULTS: Overall, 524 consecutive femoral accesses for (T)EVAR procedures were collected: 355 in the Manta cohort and 169 in the ProGlide cohort, respectively. The size of the sheath was 17.2±2.7 Fr for Manta, 15.7±2.3 Fr for ProGlide (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, ultrasound-guided access, femoral calcifications, intraoperative, and 30-day complications. Successful arterial closure at groin puncture sites for (T)EVAR using Manta is 90.5% and 93.1% using ProGlide. Freedom for any reintervention for any complication is 95.5% for Manta and 96% for ProGlide. CONCLUSION: The 2 vascular closure devices have proved to be similar in terms of complications, without any statistically significant difference, although the median size of the sheaths for (T)EVAR was statistically significantly larger when Manta has been used, compared with ProGlide. CLINICAL IMPACT: Manta® is effective in the hemostasis of the access sites following the completion of (T)EVAR in this multicenter, retrospective, case-control study on 524 percutaneous femoral accesses. Compared to the more popular Proglide®, the average size of the introducers in the Manta® group was significantly larger than in the Proglide® group.

Physician-Modified and In Situ Fenestrated Stent Grafts in Zone 0 for Aortic Arch Pathology After Ascending Aortic Replacement.

BACKGROUND: We sought to describe our experience and outcomes of a zone 0 landing physician-modified aortic stent for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies late after open ascending aortic replacement. METHODS: This study included consecutive patients with aortic arch diseases treated with total endovascular repair using different techniques. The indication for endovascular repair was agreed on in a multidisciplinary discussion. Study end points were technical success, early and late outcomes. RESULTS: From November 2018 to May 2022, 16 consecutive patients underwent total endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies. Median time for surgery was 4.8 hours (range, 2.6-6.6 hours). All the new-onset aortic arch pathologies were successfully treated. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Two patients had endoleak. The median length of postoperative stay was 4 days (range, 3-6 days). During follow-up, 1 patient underwent reintervention for type II endoleak. There were no conversions to retrograde dissection, aortic rupture and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience of using different total endovascular techniques for selective patients with arch pathologies who may be unfit or too risky for reopen surgery revealed favorable initial results. In addition, these techniques are promising options for urgent arch pathologies without availability of custom-manufactured devices. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up. CLINICAL IMPACT: The use of physician-modified and in situ fenestrated stent grafts in zone 0 landing for aortic arch pathologies in patients with prior open ascending aortic replacement is effective in endovascular therapy. This innovation enables clinicians to offer an alternative option to high-risk patients, potentially reducing morbidity and mortality. It underscores the feasibility of tailored endovascular therapy in complex aortic diseases, where customized devices may not be available.

Comparison of the novel Ankura Plus stent and Castor stent for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection with an insufficient proximal anchoring area.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the Ankura Plus and Castor stents in Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with an insufficient proximal anchoring area. METHODS: Between January 2020 and October 2022, 54 patients with TBAD were enrolled, including 16 patients with Ankura Plus stents and 38 patients with Castor stents. Data from the two stents were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The surgical success rate for both stents was 100%, and no endoleaks or deaths occurred during hospitalization. The Ankura Plus stent group had a longer surgery time than the Castor stent group (122.6±5.1 vs. 103.7±10.0, P ＜0.001). After an average follow-up of 12 months, the patency rates of the main and branch stents were 100% in both groups. The diameter of the true lumen (TL) was significantly increased, the diameter of the false lumen (FL) was reduced, and there was no statistically significant difference in the probability of complete thrombosis of the FL (68.8% vs. 67.6%, P=0.993). There were no significant differences in the incidences of renal failure (6.3% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.814), stroke (6.3% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.520), or endoleaks (6.3% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.621) between the Ankura Plus and Castor stent groups. One patient in the Castor stent group underwent reintervention because of a type I endoleak three months after surgery. One patient in the Ankura Plus stent group had an additional covered stent placed after one month due to distal TL stenosis of the main stent. One patient in the Castor stent group died of renal failure four months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Both the Ankura Plus and Castor stents are feasible, safe, and effective in the treatment of TBAD with an insufficient proximal anchoring area. Additional long-term studies are required to evaluate the robustness and applicability of Ankura Plus stents.

Challenges in diagnosis and management of aortobronchial fistula: a case report.

Background: Aortobronchial fistulas (ABFs) are rare but potentially life-threatening conditions, often presenting with haemoptysis. They can develop following various thoracic aortic conditions or procedures. Case Presentation: A 70-year-old patient with a history of descending aorta replacement and ischaemic stroke presented with chest pain and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Imaging revealed a fistula between the aortic prosthesis and the lung, along with other cardiovascular abnormalities. Despite the indication for anticoagulant therapy, tranexamic acid was initiated due to bleeding risk. The patient showed clinical improvement with tranexamic acid treatment but experienced recurrence of bleeding after discontinuation. Endovascular treatment for the contained rupture at the proximal stent anastomosis was indicated. Discussion: Haemoptysis is the primary symptom of ABFs, often recurring until the fistula enlarges. Postoperative aortic fistulas into the airways are uncommon and can occur years after surgery. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has become the primary treatment for high-risk patients with thoracic aortic disease. Various diagnostic modalities can visualize a fistula tract, but practical visualization is rare. Untreated ABFs invariably lead to death. Conclusion: This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing ABFs, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach and regular follow-up. Patient education and prompt reporting of symptoms are essential. Early intervention upon suspicion of recurrence is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Direct visualization of postoperative aortobronchial fistula on computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative aortobronchial fistula (ABF) is a rare complication that can occur in 0.3%-5.0% of patients over an extended period of time after thoracic aortic surgery. Direct visualization of the fistula via imaging is rare. AIM: To investigate the relationship between computed tomography (CT) findings and the clinical signs/symptoms of ABF after thoracic aortic surgery. METHODS: Six patients (mean age 71 years, including 4 men and 2 women) with suspected ABF on CT (air around the graft) at our hospital were included in this retrospective study between January 2004 and September 2022. Chest CT findings included direct confirmation of ABF, peri-graft fluid, ring enhancement, dirty fat sign, atelectasis, pulmonary hemorrhage, and bronchodilation, and the clinical course were retrospectively reviewed. The proportion of each type of CT finding was calculated. RESULTS: ABF detection after surgery was found to have a mean and median of 14 and 13 years, respectively. Initial signs and symptoms were asymptomatic in 4 patients, bloody sputum was found in 1 patient, and fever was present in 1 patient. The complications of ABF included graft infection in 2 patients and graft infection with hemoptysis in 2 patients. Of the 6 patients, 3 survived, 2 died, and 1 was lost to follow-up. The locations of the ABFs were as follows: 1 in the ascending aorta; 1 in the aortic arch; 2 in the aortic arch leading to the descending aorta; and 2 in the descending aorta. ABFs were directly confirmed by CT in 4/6 (67%) patients. Peri-graft dirty fat (4/6, 67%) and peri-graft ring enhancement (3/6, 50%) were associated with graft infection, endoleaks and pseudoaneurysms were associated with hemoptysis (2/6, 33%). CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic ABF after thoracic aortic surgery can be confirmed on chest CT. CT is useful for the diagnosis of ABF and its complications.

Single-branched stent-graft with on-table fenestration for the management of zone 2 landing TEVAR with an isolated left vertebral artery: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: It is challenging to simultaneously conduct total endovascular repair and reconstruct the left subclavian artery (LSA) and isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) in patients who had an ILVA and required zone 2 anchoring. This pilot study reported the initial application experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a proximal zone 2 landing for aortic arch reconstruction in patients with ILVA. METHODS: This study was a retrospective consecutive single-center case series analysis, which involved four patients with ILVA who required zone 2 anchoring and received TEVAR combined with a single-branched stent graft and concomitant on-table fenestration between March 2021 and December 2022. RESULTS: The postoperative follow-up period was 6-27 months, and no postoperative deaths or other primary complications occurred. There were no signs of a stroke or spinal cord ischemia, as well as no chest or back pain. The postoperative computed tomography angiography showed unobstructed ILVA and LSA, no stent stenosis and displacement, and no signs of endoleak. CONCLUSION: The outcome suggested that this technique might be a feasible, safe, and alternative treatment for such patients. Further studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our findings.

Efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus medical therapy for treatment of type B aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Techniques in endovascular therapy have evolved to offer a promising alternative to medical therapy alone for Type B aortic dissections (TBADs). AIM: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare mortality and overall complications between thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and best medical therapy (BMT) in patients with TBADs. METHODS: We included randomized control trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared TEVAR and BMT for the treatment of type B aortic dissection. Multiple electronic databases were searched. RESULTS: Thirty-two cohort studies including 150,836 patients were included. TEVAR was associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate than BMT (RR = 0.79, CI = 0.63, 0.99, P = 0.04), notably in patients ≥ 65 years of age (RR = 0.78, CI = 0.64, 0.95, P = 0.01). The TEVAR group had a significantly prolonged hospital stay (MD = 3.42, CI = 1.69, 5.13, P = 0.0001) and ICU stay (MD = 3.18, CI = 1.48, 4.89, P = 0.0003) compared to the BMT. BMT was associated with increased stroke risk (RR = 1.52, CI = 1.29, 1.79, P < 0.00001). No statistically significant differences in late mortality (1, 3, and 5 years) or intervention-related factors (acute renal failure, spinal cord ischemia, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, and sepsis) were noted between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis revealed a significant association between the TEVAR group and a decreased mortality rate of TBAD compared to the medical treatment group, especially in patients aged 65 years or older. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.

In Situ Needle Fenestration during Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Successful Fenestration of Two Overlapping Thoracic Stent Grafts.

Endovascular stent grafting is becoming more common in treating complex thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. When it becomes necessary to cover the supra-aortic vessels, maintaining blood supply through the supra-aortic branches can be achieved by performing in situ needle fenestration. We present a case of a 65-year-old man with a type B aortic dissection that extended from the origin of the left subclavian artery. A stent graft was inserted into the thoracic aorta distally of the origin of the left common carotid artery. Due to the stent graft moving distally and not adequately sealing the subclavian artery, a second stent graft was placed more proximally. Both stent grafts were successfully in situ fenestrated using a needle, and a stent graft was inserted into the subclavian artery. In conclusion, during thoracic endovascular aortic repair, in situ needle fenestration can be successfully carried out on two overlapping thoracic stent grafts.

Physician Modified Endograft for Ruptured Dissecting Aortic Arch Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) in elective settings has demonstrated successful clinical outcomes. However, life-threatening conditions such as rupture are more often managed with open surgical repair due to the high complexity of arch endovascular repair, lack of available off-the-shelf devices, and limited long-term data. CASE SUMMARY: A 49-year-old female with a recent history of prior ascending aortic repair for Type A10 aortic dissection presented with chest pain and dyspnea. Chest computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed acute bilateral pulmonary emboli and a 6.2 cm post dissection aneurysm of the posterior aortic arch with the dissection extending to the right iliac artery. She was treated with thrombolysis and subsequently became hemodynamically unstable. Repeat CTA revealed a massive left hemithorax with concern for aortic arch rupture. Given significant cardiorespiratory compromise and recent open repair, she was considered unfit for redo open repair. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a physician-modified endograft (PMEG) was planned. An Alpha Zenith endograft was modified adding an internal branch for the innominate artery and a fenestration for the left common carotid artery. The left subclavian artery was occluded with a microvascular plug and coil embolization up to the level of the vertebral artery. TEVAR PMEG extension to the celiac artery was performed followed by deployment of a Zenith dissection stent to the aortic bifurcation. Completion angiogram demonstrated successful aneurysm exclusion and patency of target vessels. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of ruptured TAA with PMEGs is feasible. This approach may be an alternative for unfit patients for open repair in emergent settings.

Scoring system to predict mid-term adverse events after elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a scoring system to predict mid-term adverse events after elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective observational cohort study, 350 patients who underwent elective TEVAR for thoracic aortic disease between January 2008 and December 2021 were analyzed. The primary outcome was the first adverse event occurring within 5 years of the initial TEVAR, which included death during the initial hospitalization, perioperative neurologic complication, stent graft-induced new entry, dissection, rupture, graft infection, and reintervention related to the initial TEVAR. The scoring system was developed using the regression coefficients of the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. Its performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for competing risk analysis and internally validated by cross-validation. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients experienced at least 1 adverse event within 5 years of the initial TEVAR. The 5-year cumulative incidence of adverse events was 26% (95% confidence interval, 21%-31%). Female sex, comorbidity score, use of anticoagulants, preoperative aortic diameter at the diaphragm level, proximal oversizing ratio, aortic coverage length, and hybrid procedure were included in the scoring system. The AUC of the scoring system in the internal validation was 0.748 (standard error, 0.009). When the scoring system was validated in patients with intact thoracic aortic aneurysm only, the AUC was 0.780 (standard error, 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Although external validation is needed, our scoring system may be useful for decision making, especially in patients with an intact thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Comparative Evaluation of the Short-Term Outcome of Different Endovascular Aortic Arch Procedures.

Objectives: There are several endovascular treatment options to treat aortic arch and thoracic aortic pathologies with custom-made or surgeon-modified aortic stent grafts. This study seeks to assess endovascular treatment methods for aortic arch and thoracic aortic pathologies with no acceptable proximal landing zone for standard thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), comparing different treatment methods and evaluating technical success, intraoperative parameters and short-term outcomes. Methods: All patients undergoing elective or emergency endovascular treatment of aortic arch and thoracic aortic pathologies, with no acceptable landing zone for standard TEVAR, between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2024, at the University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany were included. An acceptable landing zone was defined as a minimum of 2 cm for sufficient sealing. All patients were not suitable for open surgery. Patients were categorized by an endovascular treatment method for a comprehensive comparison of pre-, intra- and postoperative variables. IBM SPSS29 was used for data analysis. Results: The patient cohort comprised 21 patients, predominantly males (81%), with an average age of 70.9 ± 9 years with no acceptable proximal landing zone for standard TEVAR procedure. The most treated aortic pathologies were penetrating aortic ulcers and chronic post-dissection aneurysms. Patients were sub-grouped according to the applied procedure as follows: five patients with chimney thoracic endovascular aortic repair (chTEVAR), seven patients with in situ fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (isfTEVAR), six patients with custom-made fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (cmfTEVAR) and three patients with custom-made branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (cmbTEVAR). Emergency procedures involved two patients. There were significant differences in the total procedure and fluoroscopy time, as well as in contrast agent usage among the treatment groups. cmfTEVAR had the shortest total procedure time, while chTEVAR exhibited the highest contrast agent usage. The overall mortality rate among all procedures was 9.5% (two patients) and 4.7% for elective procedures, respectively. Deaths were associated with either retrograde type A dissection or stent graft infection. Both patients were treated with chTEVAR. There was one minor and one major stroke; these patients were treated with isfTEVAR. No endoleak occurred during any procedure. The reintervention rate for chTEVAR was 20% and 0% for all other procedures during the in-hospital stay. The patients who were treated with cmfTEVAR had no complications, the shortest operating and fluoroscopy time, and less contrast agent was needed in comparison with other treatment methods. Conclusions: Complex endovascular procedures of the aortic arch with custom-made or surgeon-modified aortic stent grafts offer a safe solution, with acceptable complication rates for patients who are not suitable for open aortic arch repair. In terms of procedure-related parameters and complication rates, a custom-made fenestrated TEVAR is potentially advantageous compared to the other endovascular techniques.

Evaluating the effectiveness of immediate vs. elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between the timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) and prognosis. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients who received TEVAR for BTAI at our institution from October 2016 to September 2023 were divided into 2 categories depending on the injury severity score (ISS) (≤ 25 vs. > 25) and when the TEVAR was performed for BTAI (within 24 h vs. after 24 h), respectively. The analysis included all patients who received TEVAR treatment after being diagnosed with BTAI through whole-body CT angiography. Patients treated with open repair and non-operative management were excluded. After propensity-score matching for various factors, outcomes during hospitalization and follow-up were compared. These factors included demographics, comorbidities, concomitant injuries, cause and location of aortic injury, Glasgow coma scale score, society for vascular surgery grading, hemoglobin concentration, creatinine concentration, shock, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate at admission. The comparison was conducted using SPSS 26 software. Continuous variables were presented as either the mean ± standard deviation or median (Q1, Q3), and were compared using either the t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were expressed as n (%), and comparisons were made between the 2 groups using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided p < 0.05. RESULTS: In total, 110 patients were involved in the study, with 65 (59.1%) patients having ISS scores > 25 and 32 (29.1%) receiving immediate TEVAR. The perioperative overall mortality rate in the group with ISS > 25 was significantly higher than that in the group with ISS ≤ 25 (11 (16.9%) vs. 2 (4.4%), p < 0.001). Upon admission, the elective group exhibited a notably higher Glasgow coma scale score (median (Q1, Q3)) compared to the immediate group (15 (12, 15) vs. 13.5 (9, 15), p = 0.039), while the creatinine concentration (median (Q1, Q3)) at admission was significantly higher in the immediate group (90.5 (63.8, 144.0) vs. 71.5 (58.3, 80.8), p = 0.012). The final sample included 52 matched patients. Complications occurred significantly less frequently in the elective group compared to the immediate group (16 (50.0%) vs. 3 (10.0%), p < 0.001). Single-factor analysis of variance showed that complications in hospitalized patients were significantly associated with immediate TEVAR as the sole independent risk factor (odds ratio: 9.000, 95% confidence interval: 2.266 - 35.752, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this propensity-score matched analysis of patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI, elective TEVAR was significantly associated with a lower risk of complication rates. In this study using propensity-score matching, patients who underwent elective TEVAR for BTAI had lower complication rates than immediate TEVAR.